Trommelmans et al: Effect of Double Pelvic Osteotomy on Dorsal Acetabular Rim Angle Using Computed Tomography in 27 Dogs
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1, 2026

Effect of Double Pelvic Osteotomy on Dorsal Acetabular Rim Angle Using Computed Tomography in 27 Dogs

🔍 Key Findings

  • Double pelvic osteotomy (DPO) significantly decreases dorsal acetabular rim angle (DARA), confirming improved acetabular ventroversion and femoral head coverage in dysplastic hips.
  • The achieved acetabular ventroversion is consistently less than the plate’s predetermined angle, indicating predictable loss of rotation during DPO.
  • Median reduction in DARA was 23.4°, 16.7°, and 15° with 30°, 25°, and 20° plates respectively, demonstrating that larger plates produce greater rotation but still less than intended.
  • Actual ventroversion achieved was ~5–8° less than the plate angle, with median losses of 6.6°, 8.3°, and 5° for 30°, 25°, and 20° plates.
  • Postoperative DARA decreased from ~16–18° preoperatively to approximately −4°, aligning with recommended postoperative acetabular slope targets.
  • Postoperative DARA remained stable on short-term (~48 days) and long-term (~386 days) CT follow-up, suggesting minimal remodeling after DPO.
  • Most acetabular rotation (~88%) occurs at the pelvic symphysis rather than through iliac torsion, explaining partial loss of rotation relative to plate angle.
  • CT-measured DARA provides a reliable surgical planning metric and may improve implant angle selection for DPO procedures.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Trommelmans et al: Effect of Double Pelvic Osteotomy on Dorsal Acetabular Rim Angle Using Computed Tomography in 27 Dogs
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • Double pelvic osteotomy (DPO) significantly decreases dorsal acetabular rim angle (DARA), confirming improved acetabular ventroversion and femoral head coverage in dysplastic hips.
  • The achieved acetabular ventroversion is consistently less than the plate’s predetermined angle, indicating predictable loss of rotation during DPO.
  • Median reduction in DARA was 23.4°, 16.7°, and 15° with 30°, 25°, and 20° plates respectively, demonstrating that larger plates produce greater rotation but still less than intended.
  • Actual ventroversion achieved was ~5–8° less than the plate angle, with median losses of 6.6°, 8.3°, and 5° for 30°, 25°, and 20° plates.
  • Postoperative DARA decreased from ~16–18° preoperatively to approximately −4°, aligning with recommended postoperative acetabular slope targets.
  • Postoperative DARA remained stable on short-term (~48 days) and long-term (~386 days) CT follow-up, suggesting minimal remodeling after DPO.
  • Most acetabular rotation (~88%) occurs at the pelvic symphysis rather than through iliac torsion, explaining partial loss of rotation relative to plate angle.
  • CT-measured DARA provides a reliable surgical planning metric and may improve implant angle selection for DPO procedures.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Trommelmans 2026 et al., on DPO DARA change, what was the median reduction in dorsal acetabular rim angle (DARA) achieved using a 30-degree double pelvic osteotomy plate?

A. Approximately 10 degrees
B. Approximately 15 degrees
C. Approximately 23 degrees
D. Approximately 30 degrees
E. Approximately 35 degrees

Answer: Approximately 23 degrees

Explanation: The study reported a median DARA reduction of 23.4° when a 30° DPO plate was used, indicating rotation less than the plate angle but greater than smaller plates.
In Trommelmans 2026 et al., on DPO DARA change, where does most acetabular rotation occur during double pelvic osteotomy?

A. Within the femoral head
B. At the sacroiliac joint
C. At the pelvic symphysis
D. Within the acetabular cartilage
E. Within the femoral neck

Answer: At the pelvic symphysis

Explanation: The study suggests that approximately 88% of acetabular rotation occurs at the pelvic symphysis rather than via iliac torsion.
In Trommelmans 2026 et al., on DPO DARA change, what was the approximate median postoperative DARA following double pelvic osteotomy?

A. Approximately +15 degrees
B. Approximately +10 degrees
C. Approximately 0 to −5 degrees
D. Approximately −15 degrees
E. Approximately +20 degrees

Answer: Approximately 0 to −5 degrees

Explanation: Postoperative DARA values were approximately −4 degrees, which aligns with recommended targets of 0 to −5 degrees for improved hip stability.
In Trommelmans 2026 et al., on DPO DARA change, which imaging modality was used to measure dorsal acetabular rim angle (DARA)?

A. Standard pelvic radiography
B. Fluoroscopy
C. Computed tomography
D. Ultrasonography
E. MRI

Answer: Computed tomography

Explanation: The study used CT imaging with multiplanar reconstruction to measure the dorsal acetabular rim angle for accurate assessment of acetabular ventroversion.
In Trommelmans 2026 et al., on DPO DARA change, how did the achieved acetabular ventroversion compare with the predetermined plate angle?

A. It was identical to the plate angle
B. It exceeded the plate angle
C. It was consistently less than the plate angle
D. It varied randomly with no pattern
E. It depended only on patient weight

Answer: It was consistently less than the plate angle

Explanation: The study demonstrated that actual acetabular ventroversion was consistently lower than the plate angle, with a loss of rotation of approximately 5–8 degrees.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Something off with this article?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.
Thanks for flagging this!
We’ll review your note as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Anything to add to this article?
Know a finding or detail we missed? Share it below.
Thanks for the suggestion!
We’ll review it as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.