Your Custom Quiz

In Billas 2022 et al., on SSI risk after limb amputation, what was concluded regarding use of electrosurgery for muscle transection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Monopolar electrosurgery was not associated with increased SSI risk (*P* > .05).
Incorrect. The correct answer is It had no association with SSI.
Monopolar electrosurgery was not associated with increased SSI risk (*P* > .05).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 12.5% overall incidence of SSI after limb amputation, and 10.9% for clean procedures.
  • Bipolar vessel sealing device use for muscle transection significantly increased SSI risk (OR 2.5; P = .023).
  • Monopolar electrosurgery and sharp transection were not associated with increased SSI risk.
  • Non-clean wound classification increased SSI odds (OR 8.2; P = .003).
  • Amputation for infection (OR 5.7) or trauma (OR 4.5) significantly increased SSI risk compared to neoplasia.
  • Preoperative infections at distant sites did not significantly increase SSI risk.
  • Neither surgery/anesthesia duration, hypothermia, hypotension, nor skin closure method significantly affected SSI risk.
  • Study supports avoiding bipolar sealing devices for muscle transection in limb amputations to reduce SSI risk.

Billas

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation

2022-3-VS-billas-5

Article Title: Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection following canine limb amputation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Quitzan 2022 et al., on staple line configuration, which FEESA variation did *not* significantly increase ILP compared to 2V/2T?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3V/2T did not show a statistically significant increase in ILP vs. 2V/2T, unlike 2V/3T and 3V/3T.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3V/2T.
3V/2T did not show a statistically significant increase in ILP vs. 2V/2T, unlike 2V/3T and 3V/3T.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All FEESA configurations leaked at lower pressures than intact segments, confirming reduced integrity vs. native tissue.
  • FEESA with 3-row transverse staples (3V/3T or 2V/3T) had significantly higher leak pressures than 2-row configurations.
  • 3V/3T configuration had the highest ILP (69.88 ± 21.23 mmHg) among all groups, significantly greater than 2V/2T and 3V/2T (P < .001).
  • Leakage consistently occurred at the transverse staple line (not vertical), regardless of configuration.
  • No significant difference in maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) between FEESA groups.
  • All FEESA constructs withstood intraluminal pressures >25 mmHg, exceeding normal physiological jejunal pressure in dogs.
  • No leaks occurred from the vertical staple line, highlighting it as a more robust closure site.
  • Third staple row in transverse line may be a viable alternative to suture oversew, pending further clinical evaluation.

Quitzan

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study

2022-5-VS-quitzan-4

Article Title: Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hawker 2025 et al., on locking head inserts, where was peak strain localized during testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Strain was consistently highest over the Combi-hole spanning the simulated fracture gap.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Over the fracture defect.
Strain was consistently highest over the Combi-hole spanning the simulated fracture gap.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding Locking Head Inserts (LHI) to a 3.5-mm LCP had no effect on plate strain, stiffness, or deformation in an open fracture gap model.
  • Peak strain consistently occurred at the Combi-hole over the fracture gap, with values up to ~1837 µε.
  • No significant difference in strain was found across configurations with 0, 3, or 9 LHI (p = 0.847).
  • Construct stiffness and compressive displacement also remained unchanged regardless of LHI count (p = 0.311 and 0.069 respectively).
  • Study contradicted the hypothesis that LHI would reduce strain and increase stiffness under biologic loading.
  • Combi-hole design may limit the efficacy of LHI, as LHI only fill the locking portion, not the compression side where strain peaks.
  • Implant fatigue risk remains highest over unfilled screw holes, especially over fracture sites—confirming previous failure patterns.
  • Surgeons should consider alternative methods to reduce strain when facing high implant load scenarios.

Hawker

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

The Effect of Locking Head Inserts on the Biomechanical Properties of a 3.5-mm Broad Locking Compression Plate When Used in an Open Fracture-Gap Model

2025-4-VCOT-hawker-2

Article Title: The Effect of Locking Head Inserts on the Biomechanical Properties of a 3.5-mm Broad Locking Compression Plate When Used in an Open Fracture-Gap Model

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Lu 2025 et al., on SOP constructs, which mechanical axis showed greater bending stiffness regardless of tee usage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Craniocaudal bending showed 37–44% higher stiffness due to the node's geometry in that axis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Craniocaudal.
Craniocaudal bending showed 37–44% higher stiffness due to the node's geometry in that axis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bending tees significantly increased mediolateral bending stiffness, but not craniocaudal stiffness, in plate-bone constructs.
  • Mean mediolateral stiffness was 43.2 N/mm with tees vs. 41.1 N/mm without (p = 0.0042), though the absolute difference was small.
  • No significant differences were found in craniocaudal bending stiffness between constructs with or without tees (p = 0.89).
  • Plastic deformation occurred in all constructs; no screw pull-out or implant breakage was observed.
  • SOP nodes may resist compressive but not tensile deformation, suggesting variable mechanical contributions depending on loading direction.
  • Craniocaudal bending had greater stiffness than mediolateral due to higher area moment of inertia along the node diameter.
  • Clinical relevance of added stiffness from tees remains unclear, warranting further in vivo and cyclic testing.
  • This was the first study to directly test SOP constructs with/without tees over a fracture gap in multiple planes.

Lu

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2025

Comparison of Bending Stiffness between String of Pearls Plate-Bone Substitute Constructs with and without Bending Tees in a Fracture Gap Model

2025-2-VCOT-lu-5

Article Title: Comparison of Bending Stiffness between String of Pearls Plate-Bone Substitute Constructs with and without Bending Tees in a Fracture Gap Model

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Banks 2024 et al., on CCWO planning accuracy, what was the **mean planned tibial plateau angle (TPA)** using Oxley’s modified method?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean planned TPA across all groups was 7.6°, exceeding the 5° target.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 7.6°.
Mean planned TPA across all groups was 7.6°, exceeding the 5° target.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oxley's modified CCWO did not achieve the target TPA of 5° in most cases, even with planning.
  • Mean planned TPA was 7.6°, higher than target, and consistent across dog sizes.
  • Postoperative TPAs were significantly higher in small dogs (median 7°) than in large dogs (median 4.5°).
  • Distalization >7.5 mm of the osteotomy from the patellar tendon led to increased under-correction of TPA.
  • Only dogs with preoperative TPA >35° achieved post-planning TPAs close to the 5° target.
  • Postoperative osteotomy positions were generally more distal than recommended (8.6 mm median).
  • Virtual plate fit was appropriate for all dogs at 5 mm or 7.5 mm positions, suggesting no need for excessive distalization.
  • Excessive correction leading to negative TPAs occurred in some cases, risking caudal cruciate ligament strain.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-8-VS-banks-1

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Williams 2024 et al., on adrenaline use in maxillary nerve blocks, what was the standard volume of local anesthetic injected per side during the block?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A fixed dose of 0.5 mL was used per side regardless of bodyweight.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.5 mL per side.
A fixed dose of 0.5 mL was used per side regardless of bodyweight.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The addition of adrenaline (0.00198%) to bilateral maxillary nerve blocks significantly reduced intraoperative hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy (median reduction: 77.1%).
  • Normalized hemorrhage (g/kg) and total hemorrhage (g) were significantly lower in the adrenaline group (p = .021 and p = .013, respectively).
  • Surgeon-assessed hemorrhage scores were also significantly lower in the adrenaline group (median 2 vs. 3; p = .029), indicating improved surgical visibility.
  • No adverse effects (e.g. tachycardia, arrhythmia, or hypertension) were observed with adrenaline administration.
  • A standardized intraoral approach to the maxillary nerve block was used with 0.5 mL per side regardless of dog size.
  • Breed effect observed: English Bulldogs had higher normalized hemorrhage, possibly due to anatomical variation or underdosing relative to size.
  • Adrenaline may also prolong local anesthetic action and reduce blood aspiration risks, though this was not directly measured.
  • The study supports the routine inclusion of adrenaline in maxillary nerve blocks for staphylectomy in BOAS patients to improve surgical field and reduce bleeding.

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-8-VS-williams-2

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Katz 2022 et al., on meniscal flounce sign, what was the diagnostic accuracy of the sign for indicating an intact or torn meniscus during stifle arthroscopy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The flounce sign showed 94.6% diagnostic accuracy in identifying meniscal status.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 94.6%.
The flounce sign showed 94.6% diagnostic accuracy in identifying meniscal status.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A positive meniscal flounce sign was associated with normal menisci in 95.5% of cases, demonstrating strong predictive value.
  • Absence of the meniscal flounce sign was associated with meniscal tears in 92.7% of cases.
  • Overall diagnostic accuracy of the flounce sign was 94.6%, with 96.6% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity.
  • Most tears in flounce-negative stifles were bucket-handle tears (73.8%), while radial tears were present in some flounce-positive stifles.
  • Radial tears did not consistently eliminate the flounce sign, suggesting they may not disrupt meniscal fiber tension sufficiently.
  • All procedures were arthroscopically performed, with probing and visualization of the medial meniscus' caudal pole.
  • Flounce sign should complement, not replace, probing—especially as some tear types (e.g., radial) may not abolish the sign.
  • Limb positioning and joint distraction may affect flounce visibility, introducing minor observer variability.

Katz

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

The significance of the meniscal flounce sign in canine stifle arthroscopy

2022-2-VS-katz-1

Article Title: The significance of the meniscal flounce sign in canine stifle arthroscopy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Rocheleau 2023 et al., on shoulder stabilization, what was the overall targeting accuracy of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) during shoulder stabilization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Use of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) resulted in an overall targeting accuracy of 88%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 88%.
Use of the intra-articular aiming device (IAD) resulted in an overall targeting accuracy of 88%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopically assisted stabilization with an IAD was feasible in cadaveric canine shoulders using both bone anchor and suture-toggle techniques.
  • Suture-toggle repair was successfully performed in all specimens, while bone anchors could not be deployed in 3/10 shoulders, indicating lower feasibility.
  • Median surgical time was shorter for the suture-toggle group (25.5 min) compared to the anchor group (37.3 min).
  • Postoperative abduction angles returned to baseline in the anchor group, while the suture-toggle group had slightly reduced angles, suggesting possible overtightening.
  • Violation of the articular surface occurred in 2 anchor specimens and 1 suture-toggle specimen, but none were considered likely to be clinically significant.
  • Overall targeting accuracy using the IAD was 88%, supporting its utility in guiding tunnel/anchor placement.
  • CT measurements showed acceptable bone stock and insertion angles, but anchor insertion angles were lower than optimal for mechanical pullout strength.
  • Suture-toggle technique was considered simpler and more consistent, with fewer complications and faster execution than anchor placement.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

2023-4-VS-rocheleau-2

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of arthroscopically assisted shoulder stabilization in dogs using an intra-articular aiming device

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Guevara 2024 et al., on implant placement accuracy, which vertebra had the lowest odds of acceptable pin placement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. T10 had the lowest OR for success (0.10), likely due to anatomical and guide design complexity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is T10.
T10 had the lowest OR for success (0.10), likely due to anatomical and guide design complexity.

🔍 Key Findings:

  • Sample: 24 canine cadavers, 477 total pins across 240 vertebrae.
  • Technique Comparison: 3D printed guides (3DPG) vs freehand (FH).
  • Acceptable Placement Rates: 3DPG = 87.5%, FH = 69.8% (p < .0001).
  • Odds Ratio for FH: 0.28 (95% CI 0.16–0.47), significantly less likely to yield acceptable placement.
  • Worst Accuracy Locations: T10 (OR 0.10), T11 (OR 0.35).
  • Surgeon Impact: Surgeon 2 outperformed others (OR 9.61, p = .001).
  • Modified Zdichavsky Classification used to score implant accuracy (Grades I–IIIb).
  • Primary Benefit of 3DPG: Increased safety and precision, regardless of surgeon experience.

Guevara

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Ex vivo comparison of pin placement with patient-specific drill guides or freehand technique in canine cadaveric spines

2024-2-VS-guevara-3

Article Title: Ex vivo comparison of pin placement with patient-specific drill guides or freehand technique in canine cadaveric spines

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Galliano 2022 et al., on vascular access ports, what was the reported functionality rate of ports placed in the femoral/external iliac vein (fSVAP)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 4 dogs with fSVAP had fully functional ports during follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100%.
All 4 dogs with fSVAP had fully functional ports during follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • SVAPs placed in axillary (aSVAP) or femoral/external iliac veins (fSVAP) during limb amputation remained functional in 92.3% and 100% of cases, respectively.
  • Complication rates were lower in aSVAP (23.1%) and fSVAP (0%) compared to jSVAP (47.4%), although not statistically significant (P = .12).
  • No catastrophic complications occurred with aSVAP or fSVAP; 2 deaths occurred with jSVAP due to port-related issues.
  • Infection-related port removal was needed in 1 aSVAP (7.7%) and 2 jSVAPs (10.5%) — no removals were required in fSVAPs.
  • Tip placement of the catheter (e.g., right atrium vs. vena cava) did not correlate with complications (P = .66).
  • Shorter surgical time likely with aSVAP/fSVAP as they use the same surgical field as the limb amputation.
  • Survival time median was similar across groups (jSVAP: 177 days, aSVAP: 125 days, fSVAP: 122 days).
  • SVAP implantation during limb amputation offers a practical and safe alternative to separate jugular placement.

Galliano

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

2022-7-VS-galliano-1

Article Title: Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.