Your Custom Quiz

In Gutbrod 2024 et al., on feline tibial stabilization, how did the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin construct perform compared to others?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group 1 had significantly inferior yield point and failure load versus groups 2 and 3.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lowest stiffness and axial force.
Group 1 had significantly inferior yield point and failure load versus groups 2 and 3.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 2.4 mm LCP with a 1.6 mm IM pin had the highest axial stiffness and yield strength among the tested constructs.
  • Axial stiffness was significantly higher in the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm IM pin group compared to 2.7 mm LCP alone (p = .013).
  • No significant difference in torsional stiffness was found among groups.
  • 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin had the lowest stiffness and failure load, underperforming both other constructs.
  • All constructs failed via valgus bending, consistent with clinical observations in feline tibial fractures.
  • A 1.6 mm pin (~50% canal fill) resulted in superior construct performance vs. 1.0 mm (~30% fill).
  • Group 2 (2.4 LCP + 1.6 mm pin) outperformed the 2.7 mm LCP alone in stiffness, despite using a smaller plate.
  • Plate–rod constructs may better preserve periosteal blood supply and support minimally invasive stabilization strategies.

Gutbrod

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

2024-4-VS-gutbrod-4

Article Title: Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Paul 2024 et al., on postoperative analgesia with BLIS vs fentanyl in amputation, what was the median time to eating postoperatively in the BLIS group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs in the BLIS group began eating earlier (median 6 h) compared to the control group.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6 hours.
Dogs in the BLIS group began eating earlier (median 6 h) compared to the control group.

🔍 Key Findings

  • BLIS (bupivacaine liposome injectable solution) provided equivalent analgesia to fentanyl CRI based on CMPS-SF scores at all time points except 6h, where BLIS was superior
  • Fewer adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation) were noted in the BLIS group
  • BLIS dogs ate sooner postoperatively (median 6h vs 9h in control)
  • Sedation occurred in 2/20 dogs in BLIS group vs 10/20 in fentanyl group
  • Vomiting occurred in 0/20 BLIS dogs vs 4/20 in fentanyl group
  • Rescue analgesia rates were similar (5 BLIS vs 4 fentanyl group), confirming noninferiority
  • Owner-reported VAS scores were lower for BLIS on day 1 a.m. and p.m. despite variability
  • Results suggest BLIS could reduce opioid reliance post-amputation

Paul

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Comparison of bupivacaine liposome injectable solution and fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing limb amputation

2024-6-VS-paul-3

Article Title: Comparison of bupivacaine liposome injectable solution and fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing limb amputation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Marchionatti 2022 et al., on antiseptic efficacy comparison, what was the finding of the meta-analysis regarding SSI incidence with chlorhexidine vs povidone-iodine protocols?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Meta-analysis showed no statistical difference in postoperative SSI between protocols (RR 0.90; P = 0.82):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is There was no significant difference in SSI incidence between protocols.
Meta-analysis showed no statistical difference in postoperative SSI between protocols (RR 0.90; P = 0.82):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings

  • Chlorhexidine-based asepsis protocols were comparable to povidone-iodine for reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates in veterinary surgery.
  • No significant difference in skin bacterial colonization was observed between the two antiseptics, at both immediate and delayed timepoints.
  • Chlorhexidine-alcohol protocols showed a non-significant trend toward improved bacterial reduction in some studies, though inconsistent across all studies.
  • Use of neutralizing agents was inconsistent, which may have led to overestimation of antiseptic efficacy in several studies.
  • Formulations and concentrations varied widely (e.g., chlorhexidine 0.5–4%, povidone-iodine 0.7–1%), contributing to heterogeneity and limiting definitive conclusions.
  • Only a minority of studies reported using CDC criteria for SSI diagnosis, affecting the reliability of infection outcomes.
  • Risk of bias was high or unclear in multiple domains across all included studies, limiting overall confidence in conclusions.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed no statistically significant superiority of either protocol for SSI prevention or skin bacterial reduction.

Marchionatti

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022-5-VS-marchionatti-1

Article Title: Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Song 2024 et al., on CT vs cystoscopy for ectopic ureters in dogs, what proportion of dogs were misclassified for CLA candidacy based on CT findings alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 26% of cases were misclassified for CLA based on CT, underlining its limitations for treatment planning.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 26%.
26% of cases were misclassified for CLA based on CT, underlining its limitations for treatment planning.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT correctly identified ectopic ureters in 91% of dogs, but missed 50% of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
  • Sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, while specificity was 71%, indicating moderate diagnostic performance.
  • Sensitivity for extramural ectopic ureters was only 29%, despite a high specificity of 97%.
  • CT was inaccurate in predicting ureteral orifice location, with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 76% depending on the site.
  • 26% of dogs were misclassified for cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA) eligibility based on CT findings alone.
  • Overall CT accuracy for CLA candidacy was 74%, but a significant minority would have been inappropriately treated.
  • Multivariate analysis found no predictive factors (e.g., colon distension, body weight) for when CT would be incorrect.
  • Authors recommend confirmatory cystoscopy to verify CT findings prior to treatment planning.

Song

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

2024-3-VS-song-4

Article Title: Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Berger 2023 et al., on elbow COR estimation, how did the COR in FMCP elbows compare to normal elbows?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CT-based analysis showed that the COR in FMCP elbows shifted caudally compared to normal.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It was more caudal.
CT-based analysis showed that the COR in FMCP elbows shifted caudally compared to normal.

🔍 Key Findings

  • COR of elbows with FMCP was significantly more caudal compared to normal elbows, based on CT-derived geometry.
  • In normal elbows, 74% of medial and 93% of lateral axes exited cranial and distal to the epicondyles.
  • In FMCP elbows, 81% of medial and 70% of lateral axes exited caudal and distal to the epicondyles.
  • Different landmark combinations produced slightly different COR approximations, especially between humeral vs. radius/ulna-based axes.
  • The medial-lateral axis using trochlea and capitulum centers provided the most consistent COR approximation.
  • COR estimations based on diseased elbows may not match normal joint geometry, impacting implant alignment accuracy.
  • External epicondylar landmarks may be useful intraoperatively to estimate COR location, but variability limits precision.
  • Drill diameter size may buffer small COR differences, but impact in advanced disease or bilateral cases remains unclear.

Berger

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

2023-1-VS-berger-2

Article Title: The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kershaw 2025 et al., on PSG vs AD, how many joint penetrations occurred in the PSG group during cadaveric screw placement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 7 PSG placements avoided joint penetration, compared to 3/7 joint penetrations in the AD group.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.
All 7 PSG placements avoided joint penetration, compared to 3/7 joint penetrations in the AD group.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed patient-specific guides (PSGs) significantly improved accuracy of drill hole entry (p < 0.001) and exit (p = 0.044) compared to commercial aiming devices (AD).
  • Zero joint penetrations occurred with PSGs, whereas 3 of 7 AD-guided screws were predicted to penetrate the joint (p = 0.19).
  • Variance in exit point and drill angle was significantly lower in PSG group, suggesting more consistent results.
  • One PSG case failed due to improper guide seating, but this was corrected with improved soft tissue clearance.
  • PSGs enabled safer trajectories despite use by novice surgeons, emphasizing their value in less experienced hands.
  • Drill holes placed with ADs deviated more cranially and distally, increasing the risk of articular violation.
  • Use of PSGs allowed for tighter clustering of drill trajectories, especially in the cranial–caudal axis.
  • Subjective feedback favored PSGs for ease of use and ergonomic design, despite requiring slightly larger incisions.

Kershaw

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

2025-5-VCOT-kershaw-2

Article Title: Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Sandoval 2024 et al., on lung lobectomy technique outcomes, what was the survival to discharge rate across all cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A total of 82 out of 87 cases survived to discharge, reflecting a high short-term survival rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 94.3%.
A total of 82 out of 87 cases survived to discharge, reflecting a high short-term survival rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Intra- and postoperative complications occurred only in stapled lobectomies, but the difference was not statistically significant (intra: p = .069, post: p = .112).
  • Intraoperative hemorrhage was the most common complication (11.8%), followed by air leakage (2%).
  • All self-ligating loop (SLL) lobectomies had zero complications (n=18), though the sample was small.
  • Postoperative complications included 4 catastrophic events (cardiopulmonary arrest), all in stapled cases.
  • Lung lobectomy technique was not associated with duration of chest tube use, hospitalization, or survival (p > .05).
  • 94.3% of patients survived to discharge (82/87).
  • SLLs are lower-cost and may be more feasible for thoracoscopic/minimally invasive approaches due to smaller port size (5mm vs. 12mm for staplers).
  • A future superiority study would need ≥103 lobectomies per group to assess differences in complication rates.

Sandoval

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

2024-7-VS-sandoval-4

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Song 2024 et al., on CT vs cystoscopy for ectopic ureters in dogs, what was the sensitivity of CT for intramural ectopic ureters?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CT sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, showing moderate detection ability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 65%.
CT sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, showing moderate detection ability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT correctly identified ectopic ureters in 91% of dogs, but missed 50% of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
  • Sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, while specificity was 71%, indicating moderate diagnostic performance.
  • Sensitivity for extramural ectopic ureters was only 29%, despite a high specificity of 97%.
  • CT was inaccurate in predicting ureteral orifice location, with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 76% depending on the site.
  • 26% of dogs were misclassified for cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA) eligibility based on CT findings alone.
  • Overall CT accuracy for CLA candidacy was 74%, but a significant minority would have been inappropriately treated.
  • Multivariate analysis found no predictive factors (e.g., colon distension, body weight) for when CT would be incorrect.
  • Authors recommend confirmatory cystoscopy to verify CT findings prior to treatment planning.

Song

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

2024-3-VS-song-2

Article Title: Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Korchek 2025 et al., on fracture gap risk, what was the incidence of implant failure among cases with a fracture gap?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Among the 37 cases with a fracture gap, 10 experienced implant failure, corresponding to a 27% failure rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 27%.
Among the 37 cases with a fracture gap, 10 experienced implant failure, corresponding to a 27% failure rate.

🔍 Key Findings

80 toy breed dogs with surgically repaired transverse radius/ulna fractures were analyzed.
Fracture gap in the caudal cortex was present in 46% of cases.
Implant failure rate:

  • 27% in cases with fracture gap
  • 2% in cases without fracture gap

Fracture gap significantly associated with implant failure:

  • OR = 23.0, 95% CI: 2.7–197.9, p = 0.004

Absence of external coaptation also associated with increased implant failure risk:

  • OR = 10.1, 95% CI: 1.1–89.6, p = 0.04

Prolonged external coaptation (>1 week) linked to non-implant complications (skin wounds, osteopenia, osteomyelitis):

  • OR = 5.4, p = 0.04

Plate thickness, type, open screw holes, and working length were not statistically significant predictors of implant failure after multivariable analysis.

Korchek

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Association of fracture gap with implant failure in radius and ulna fractures in toy breed dogs—A multicenter retrospective cohort study

2025-2-VS-korchek-5

Article Title: Association of fracture gap with implant failure in radius and ulna fractures in toy breed dogs—A multicenter retrospective cohort study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Ciammaichella 2025 et al., on lymphadenectomy complications, which lymphadenectomy site had the highest rate of postoperative complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ilio-sacral lymphadenectomy had a 41% postoperative complication rate, the highest among the groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ilio-sacral.
Ilio-sacral lymphadenectomy had a 41% postoperative complication rate, the highest among the groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ilio-sacral lymphadenectomy had the highest complication rates: intraoperative (7%) and postoperative (41%)
  • Axillary lymphadenectomy showed the lowest complication rates: intraoperative (1%) and postoperative (16%)
  • Enlarged or metastatic lymph nodes were significantly associated with intraoperative complications (p = .030)
  • Postoperative complications were mostly minor (Grade 1) and self-limiting (seromas, edema)
  • Medial retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy had intermediate complication rates: postoperative complications in 26%
  • No significant predictors retained significance in multivariate analysis
  • Use of methylene blue was associated with fewer complications, although not statistically significant
  • Complication rates did not result in mortality, and all were manageable; MST was 374 days

Ciammaichella

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Complications of medial retropharyngeal, axillary, and ilio-sacral lymphadenectomy in 127 dogs with malignant tumors

2025-7-VS-ciammaichella-1

Article Title: Complications of medial retropharyngeal, axillary, and ilio-sacral lymphadenectomy in 127 dogs with malignant tumors

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.