Your Custom Quiz

In Schroeder 2022 et al., on fascial anatomy mapping, what is a key challenge of using cutaneous trunci as a deep margin?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The cutaneous trunci has thin, fragile fascia and may be inadequate for deep margins in many cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C. It is striated muscle with fragile fascia.
The cutaneous trunci has thin, fragile fascia and may be inadequate for deep margins in many cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascial planes in dogs were consistently classifiable into four surgical types:
  • Type I (discrete sheets), Type II (tightly adhered to thin muscle), Type III (tightly adhered to thick muscle), and Type IV (periosteum-associated).
  • Two junction types were identified: Type A (easily elevated) and Type B (higher risk of disruption).
  • Disruption-prone areas include the scapular spine (type IV fascia) and lateral thorax near the 13th rib, where rib resection may be needed to preserve margins.
  • The latissimus dorsi transition zones and fascial areas near the thoracic inlet and scapulohumeral joint were prone to fascial thinning or disruption.
  • Partial muscle resections or periosteal elevations may be required in areas with fragile fascia to maintain oncologic margins.
  • Dorsal spinous processes (T6–L6) showed type IV fascia; however, osteotomy may be needed in some dogs for clear margins.
  • Blended fascial transitions (e.g., rectus abdominis: type II cranially, type I caudally) necessitate intraoperative judgment on resection depth.
  • Cutaneous trunci may suffice as a deep margin for small, low-grade tumors in well-muscled dogs, but not reliably for high-grade or larger masses.

Schroeder

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

2022-1-VS-schroeder-4

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Israel 2023 et al., on povidone-iodine lavage, which component best describes the composition and method of PrePIL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PrePIL involved a 0.35% povidone-iodine solution applied for 3 minutes using a low-pressure lavage.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.35% PI solution applied for 3 minutes.
PrePIL involved a 0.35% povidone-iodine solution applied for 3 minutes using a low-pressure lavage.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No infections (0/102) occurred in cases where preclosure povidone-iodine lavage (PrePIL) was used, compared to 21/2111 (0.99%) with saline lavage.
  • Break-even cost for PrePIL was calculated at $49.74, while the actual cost was only $2.07, confirming strong cost-effectiveness.
  • No adverse reactions or healing complications were reported in the 102 PrePIL cases.
  • The PrePIL protocol used 0.35% povidone-iodine for 3 minutes before closure, followed by sterile saline lavage.
  • Majority of THRs (97%) used cementless fixation (BFX) in PrePIL group; only 3 cases used CFX components.
  • Surgeries followed consistent perioperative antibiotic protocols, making PrePIL the only major protocol variable.
  • Antibiotics were not added to lavage, aligning with WHO and CDC guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship.
  • The infection reduction with PrePIL supports routine use in total hip replacement to reduce periprosthetic joint infections.

Israel

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Preclosure povidone‐iodine lavage in total hip replacement surgery: Infection outcomes and cost–benefit analysis

2023-1-VS-israel-3

Article Title: Preclosure povidone‐iodine lavage in total hip replacement surgery: Infection outcomes and cost–benefit analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, what functional outcome was observed in most dogs at long-term follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 11 of 14 dogs had full or acceptable function at long-term follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Acceptable or full function in majority.
11 of 14 dogs had full or acceptable function at long-term follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Retrospective case series of 15 dogs (19 tarsi) with talar OCD.
  • Technique: Modified arthroscopic approach with both scope and instrument portals on the same side as the lesion.
  • Outcomes:
    • Good to excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes in 11/14 dogs.
    • Statistically significant improvement in CBPI (p < .05) and VAS scores (p < .05).
    • Minor postoperative complications (synovial cysts) in 4/13 tarsi, all resolved spontaneously.
    • No major intraoperative complications; 1/19 required mini-arthrotomy due to fragment size.
  • Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): Progression noted in 10/14 cases, despite good functional outcomes.
  • Fragment Characteristics: Multiple osteochondral fragments were present in most cases, with 17/19 lesions on the medial talar ridge.
  • Technical Advantage: Lower conversion rate to arthrotomy (1/19) compared to previous studies (Gielen et al. and Miller & Beale).

Cruciani

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

2025-1-VS-cruciani-2

Article Title: A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Peng 2025 et al., on topical amikacin gel, what maximum topical dose per kg was administered?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The highest dose applied to any dog was 24.9 mg/kg, nearing the systemic recommended maximum【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】
Incorrect. The correct answer is 24.9 mg/kg.
The highest dose applied to any dog was 24.9 mg/kg, nearing the systemic recommended maximum【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Determine if topical 45 mg/mL amikacin in CMC gel leads to systemic absorption in dogs with wounds.

Dogs enrolled: 11 client-owned dogs, with 31 applications of the gel.

Serum findings:

  • Only 5 of 153 samples were above the 2.5 µg/mL quantification limit
  • All values remained <5 µg/mL, the presumed toxicity threshold
  • No correlation was found between dose-related parameters (mg, mg/kg, mg/cm²) and serum amikacin levels

Peak concentrations were observed at ~2 hours post-application, declining rapidly thereafter

No nephrotoxicity observed, and most values were below detection

Conclusion: Topical amikacin gel appears safe at doses up to 24.9 mg/kg, with minimal systemic absorption

Peng

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

2025-3-VS-peng2-4

Article Title: Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kwok 2023 et al., on BFX lateral bolt THR in dogs, what percentage returned to normal function?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 97.4% of dogs returned to normal function per owner and clinical follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 97.4%.
97.4% of dogs returned to normal function per owner and clinical follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 97.4% of dogs returned to normal function after total hip replacement using the BFX lateral bolt.
  • Mean femoral stem subsidence was 1.22 mm, with most occurring in the first month and minimal thereafter.
  • Postoperative complication rate was 13.6%, with 9.2% major and 4.4% minor complications.
  • Femoral fractures (3.6%) and coxofemoral luxations (3.6%) were the most common major complications.
  • Increased age and higher stem size were risk factors for postoperative femoral fractures; CFI >2.0 was also associated.
  • Medial calcar fractures were avoided, and fractures occurred distal to stem ingrowth zone, simplifying repairs.
  • Three cases underwent prophylactic plating, all with excellent outcomes and no complications.
  • Explant rate was 2.6% (5/195), with most failures involving acetabular cup rather than femoral stem.

Kwok

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Clinical outcomes of canine total hip replacement utilizing a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem: 195 consecutive cases (2013–2019)

2023-1-VS-kwok-1

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of canine total hip replacement utilizing a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem: 195 consecutive cases (2013–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Adams 2024 et al., on canine tibial plateau fractures, what was the long-term functional outcome for the two cases that completed LOAD questionnaires?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both cases that completed LOAD surveys had excellent scores of 5/52, indicating minimal long-term dysfunction.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Excellent function, LOAD 5.
Both cases that completed LOAD surveys had excellent scores of 5/52, indicating minimal long-term dysfunction.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Tibial plateau fractures (TPF) are rare in dogs, but can be surgically stabilized with good outcomes even in complex trauma cases.
  • Lateral TPFs (Unger type 41-B1) were approached via caudolateral arthrotomy, with elevation of the lateral meniscus for visualization and use of lag screws and K-wires for fixation.
  • Medial TPF (Unger type 41-B2) was addressed via medial parapatellar approach using K-wires and a figure-of-eight tension band.
  • One minor complication occurred: implant yield at 2 weeks in a case with a concurrent fibular fracture, resulting in a 0.8 mm step defect.
  • No major complications were recorded, and all dogs achieved clinical union with full function by 8–10 weeks.
  • Long-term owner-reported outcomes (LOAD scores) were excellent (5/52), indicating minimal osteoarthritis or chronic pain.
  • Concurrent fibular fractures may increase risk of implant failure and should influence implant selection (e.g., considering buttress plating).
  • Arthroscopic-assisted techniques may be applicable in select cases, but open reduction was preferred due to fragment displacement or concurrent injuries.

Adams

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Prospective evaluation of the surgical stabilization and outcome of canine tibial plateau fractures in three cases

2024-6-VS-adams-4

Article Title: Prospective evaluation of the surgical stabilization and outcome of canine tibial plateau fractures in three cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cheon 2025 et al., on guide accuracy in DFO, how did correction accuracy compare between uniplanar and biplanar deformities?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no significant difference between uniplanar and biplanar correction outcomes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference found.
The study found no significant difference between uniplanar and biplanar correction outcomes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Both patient-specific and universal guides yielded correction errors <2°, with no statistically significant difference in accuracy.
  • Universal guide corrected aLDFA up to 24° and AA up to 20°, addressing multiplanar deformities effectively.
  • Patient-specific guides allowed for preoperative simulation, providing more stable pin placement and potentially aiding less-experienced surgeons.
  • Universal guide eliminated the need for CT-based customization, reducing time and cost.
  • Cadaver and bone model trials showed consistent accuracy, validating both methods in vitro and ex vivo.
  • No significant differences in outcome when correcting uniplanar (aLDFA) vs biplanar (aLDFA + AA) deformities.
  • Universal guide's fixed size presented limitations in small dogs, potentially requiring multiple size options.
  • Universal guide showed potential for standard use, offering repeatable outcomes with minimal prep despite needing precise intraoperative placement.

Cheon

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-cheon-5

Article Title: Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Jones 2024 et al., on surgical technique mortality, which factor besides surgical technique was independently associated with increased mortality?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Stage II or III laryngeal collapse had an OR of 4.6 for mortality (p = .002).
Incorrect. The correct answer is High-grade laryngeal collapse.
Stage II or III laryngeal collapse had an OR of 4.6 for mortality (p = .002).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study compared 606 dogs (English Bulldogs, French Bulldogs, Pugs) undergoing partial staphylectomy via CO₂ laser, bipolar vessel sealing device (BVSD), or conventional incision.
  • Mortality rate: 4.0% (24/606).
  • BVSD was associated with significantly increased perioperative mortality compared to other methods (OR = 6.0, 95% CI: 1.3–28.4, p = .023).
  • High-grade laryngeal collapse (stage II or III) independently increased mortality risk (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.8–11.8, p = .002).
  • No difference in mortality between CO₂ laser and conventional incision techniques.
  • CO₂ laser and conventional techniques had similar complication rates.

Jones

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Comparison of mortality of brachycephalic dogs undergoing partial staphylectomy using conventional incisional, carbon dioxide laser, or bipolar vessel sealing device

2024-1-VS-jones-3

Article Title: Comparison of mortality of brachycephalic dogs undergoing partial staphylectomy using conventional incisional, carbon dioxide laser, or bipolar vessel sealing device

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Rodiño Tilve 2022 et al., on feline THR outcomes, which implant feature was associated with all luxation complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All luxations occurred in implants using femoral neck +0 mm, though not all such implants luxated.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Femoral neck extension +0 mm.
All luxations occurred in implants using femoral neck +0 mm, though not all such implants luxated.

🔍 Key Findings

From “Long-term follow up of 44 cats undergoing total hip replacement” by Rodiño Tilve et al.

  • Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) was the most common surgical indication (61%, 34/56 hips), primarily affecting young neutered male cats.
  • All THRs used cemented micro/nano BioMedtrix implants; most common femoral stem was size #3, and most common acetabular cup was 12 mm.
  • Postoperative complication rate was 19.6% (11/56) with 9 major complications (luxation most common), and no intraoperative complications reported.
  • All luxations occurred in hips implanted with femoral neck +0 mm length implants.
  • Second luxations were more common when revision used same implant size; use of larger implants reduced reluxation rates.
  • FMPI-sf score improved significantly from median 2.111 pre-op to 0.111 post-op (P < .001), indicating reduced pain and improved function.
  • Very high owner satisfaction: 91% (30/33) reported outcome as "very good."
  • No significant associations found between complications and variables like weight, sex, implant size, or surgical indication.

Rodiño Tilve

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Long‐term follow up of 44 cats undergoing total hip replacement: Cases from a feline hip registry (2010–2020)

2022-5-VS-rodino-3

Article Title: Long‐term follow up of 44 cats undergoing total hip replacement: Cases from a feline hip registry (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Latifi 2022 et al., on forelimb fascial mapping, which fascial type was most frequently observed in the antebrachium of dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Type I fascia predominated in the antebrachium, although it thinned distally and became less reliable.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Type I fascia (discrete fascial sheet).
Type I fascia predominated in the antebrachium, although it thinned distally and became less reliable.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia was present over most of the canine forelimb, but key areas like the elbow, carpus, and manus lacked robust fascial planes for wide resection.
  • Type I fascia (discrete sheet) was primarily found in the antebrachium, with type IV (periosteal) fascia located at the olecranon, scapular spine, and accessory carpal bone.
  • Distal antebrachial fascia was thin and adherent, often blending with carpal structures and lacking reliable surgical planes.
  • Partial tenectomy or joint capsule resection was often required for wide excision in the distal limb, especially over the triceps tendon and carpus.
  • Nerve transections (e.g., superficial radial or ulnar branches) were commonly needed to maintain fascial margins, though often with minimal functional loss due to overlapping innervation.
  • Digital and metacarpal pads lacked clear deep fascial borders, making digit amputation necessary for oncologic margins in distal tumors.
  • Dissections revealed fascial junctions as either Type A (easily separable) or Type B (risk of disruption), guiding resection plane selection.
  • Findings provide a surgical map to guide preoperative planning for superficial tumor excision on the forelimb.

Latifi

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

2022-1-VS-latifi-1

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.