Your Custom Quiz

In Clayton 2026 et al., on feline bandage complications, which complication was reported most frequently?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The most common complication recorded was soiled or wet bandages (34.6%), followed by skin irritation and bandage slippage.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Soiled or wet bandages.
The most common complication recorded was soiled or wet bandages (34.6%), followed by skin irritation and bandage slippage.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bandage-associated complications occurred in 68.4% of cats (104/152) following clean orthopaedic procedures, highlighting the high risk of postoperative coaptation complications in feline patients.
  • Most complications were mild (64.4%), while 32.7% were moderate and 2.9% severe, indicating that although common, severe outcomes are relatively rare.
  • Use of a splint significantly increased complication severity, with splinted cats 3.42× more likely to develop moderate or severe complications (p = 0.012).
  • Complication incidence was not significantly influenced by bandage duration, limb involved, injury location, or professional role of the bandage applier.
  • The most common complications were soiled/wet bandages (34.6%), skin irritation (31.7%), bandage slippage (30.8%), pressure sores (29.8%), chewing (20.2%), and toe swelling (19.2%).
  • Distal pelvic limb injuries (tarsus and distal) showed the highest proportion of complications (81.5%), suggesting distal limb bandaging in cats carries greater risk.
  • Bandages were most commonly applied after osteosynthesis procedures, but procedure type was not associated with complication occurrence (p = 0.720).
  • Findings support cautious use of postoperative bandaging in cats, particularly splinted bandages, and emphasize vigilant monitoring and careful case selection.

Clayton

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2026

Incidence of Bandage-Associated Complications in Cats following Clean Orthopaedic Procedures: A Retrospective Study of 152 Cases

2026-2-vcot-clayton-3

Article Title: Incidence of Bandage-Associated Complications in Cats following Clean Orthopaedic Procedures: A Retrospective Study of 152 Cases

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Levine 2025 et al., on thoracoscopic pericardiectomy, which approach produced the largest pericardial resection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PDR achieved significantly larger pericardial fragment sizes (mean difference = 23.21 cm², p = .004).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Paraxiphoid in dorsal recumbency (PDR).
PDR achieved significantly larger pericardial fragment sizes (mean difference = 23.21 cm², p = .004).

🔍 Key Findings

Study design: Randomized cadaveric comparison (n=20 dogs; ILR vs PDR)

Approaches:

  • ILR = Intercostal in Left Lateral Recumbency (no OLV required)
  • PDR = Paraxiphoid in Dorsal Recumbency (traditional)

Outcomes:

  • Pericardiectomy time was shorter for ILR (p = .045)
  • Pericardial fragment size was significantly larger in PDR group (p = .004; 23.21 cm² difference)
  • Visibility and cardiac exposure were superior in PDR group

Feasibility:

  • ILR approach was consistently successful in achieving partial pericardiectomy
  • Bilateral ventilation was adequate; no need for OLV

Clinical relevance:

  • ILR may improve efficiency when paired with TDL
  • PDR remains preferable for cases requiring maximal pericardial resection

Levine

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Intercostal thoracoscopic pericardiectomy in left lateral recumbency: A cadaveric study of feasibility, efficiency, and extent of pericardial resection

2025-1-VS-levine-1

Article Title: Intercostal thoracoscopic pericardiectomy in left lateral recumbency: A cadaveric study of feasibility, efficiency, and extent of pericardial resection

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Burton 2023 et al., on CHAPS plate design, how many CHAPS plate sizes were developed to accommodate different dog sizes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Four plate sizes (TP1–TP4) were designed to cover a broad range of dog body weights from 5–50 kg.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 4.
Four plate sizes (TP1–TP4) were designed to cover a broad range of dog body weights from 5–50 kg.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The Canine Humeral Anatomic Plating System (CHAPS) was designed using CT-based 3D modeling of 100 canine humeri from 5–50 kg.
  • Four plate sizes (TP1–TP4) were developed to accommodate a wide range of canine body sizes.
  • Plate contour fit was evaluated across 48 cadaveric limbs and showed a 97.5% median surface match, demonstrating excellent topographic conformity.
  • Screw hole placement avoided 95–100% of critical anatomical structures including the supratrochlear foramen and nutrient foramen.
  • The plates were designed for use with locking screws, improving biomechanical stability for humeral diaphyseal fractures.
  • CHAPS plates showed consistent alignment with humeral curvature in both craniocaudal and mediolateral planes.
  • CT data revealed marked breed and size variation, but the multi-size design achieved broad anatomical applicability.
  • The system provides an anatomic solution with potentially fewer intraoperative contouring needs and reduced iatrogenic risk.

Burton

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Design and topographic evaluation of a canine humeral anatomic plating system (CHAPS)

2023-3-vs-burton-2

Article Title: Design and topographic evaluation of a canine humeral anatomic plating system (CHAPS)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Becker 2026 et al., on lumbar spine PLC biomechanics, what explanation was given for the preservation of rotational stability despite PLCs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Rotational stability was attributed to the integrity of facet joints and dorsal structures, which were not affected by PLCs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Facet joints and lamina remained intact.
Rotational stability was attributed to the integrity of facet joints and dorsal structures, which were not affected by PLCs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Each PLC significantly increased passive range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal and dorsal planes (p < .05).
  • No significant change was observed in rotational ROM after either PLC.
  • First PLC increased sagittal ROM by 2.4° (23% increase); second PLC added 1.0° (8% increase).
  • Dorsal ROM increased by 2.3° after first PLC and 1.5° after second PLC.
  • Second PLC did not cause greater destabilization than the first — both contributed similarly to ROM increase.
  • Failure testing showed that spinal segments with two PLCs failed at 13 Nm, while native spines withstood up to 25 Nm, suggesting reduced load-bearing capacity but not clinically significant under normal conditions.
  • Rotational stability was preserved, possibly due to intact facet joints and lamina, which play a larger role in rotation.
  • Study supports the clinical feasibility of two consecutive PLCs, but cautions against excessive bone removal due to potential for spinal instability.

Becker

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Influence of two consecutive partial lateral corpectomies on passive motion of the canine lumbar spine

2026-1-VS-becker-5

Article Title: Influence of two consecutive partial lateral corpectomies on passive motion of the canine lumbar spine

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lemmon 2025 et al., on synovitis severity scoring, what was the most common synovitis severity score observed during arthroscopy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Score 3/5 was the most frequently observed severity grade, present in 55.2% of joints.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3/5.
Score 3/5 was the most frequently observed severity grade, present in 55.2% of joints.

🔍 Key Findings

Synovitis was present in 100% of canine stifles with CCL disease (n = 163).

The most frequent severity score was 3/5 (55.2%), followed by 4/5 (24.5%).

Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with:

  • Higher median cartilage scores (p = .042, OR = 2.1 per unit increase)
  • Longer duration of clinical signs (p < .001, OR = 1.27 per month)

Bodyweight (p = .083) and sex (p = .17) were not statistically significant in multivariable analysis.

Bucket handle meniscal tears were not associated with synovitis severity.

Clinical implication: Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis and slow OA progression.

Lemmon

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

2025-3-VS-lemmon-1

Article Title: Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Barrett 2023 et al., on complication grading systems, what percentage of complications were graded as **Grade 3** using the aCD system?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Grade 3 complications (requiring surgery or anesthesia) were the most frequently assigned using the aCD system.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 60–63%.
Grade 3 complications (requiring surgery or anesthesia) were the most frequently assigned using the aCD system.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cook system had good reliability across all cases (ICC = 0.848), even when complications, sequelae, and failure-to-cure were included.
  • aCD system had excellent reliability when excluding sequelae/failure-to-cure cases (ICC = 0.975) but only moderate reliability when including them (ICC = 0.620).
  • Majority of complications (60–63%) were graded as Grade 3 in the aCD system, corresponding to surgical or anesthetic intervention.
  • Cook system classified most cases (78–81%) as major complications.
  • Assessors had difficulty distinguishing sequelae from Grade 1 complications, and failure-to-cure from Grades 1–2, reducing aCD reliability.
  • The aCD system offers more resolution (5 grades vs. 3) and less subjectivity through objective definitions.
  • Novel terminology (e.g., sequelae, failure to cure) in the aCD system may hinder its uptake without proper training.
  • Reclassifying expected events (e.g., swelling, bruising) as sequelae could significantly reduce reported complication rates in other studies.

Barrett

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Comparison of two postoperative complication grading systems after treatment of stifle and shoulder instability in 68 dogs

2023-1-VS-barrett-4

Article Title: Comparison of two postoperative complication grading systems after treatment of stifle and shoulder instability in 68 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Philips 2025 et al., on radiographic IAIP detection, what was the reported sensitivity and specificity of radiography?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Radiography showed high sensitivity (97.2%) but moderate specificity (67.6%) in this study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 97.2% sensitivity, 67.6% specificity.
Radiography showed high sensitivity (97.2%) but moderate specificity (67.6%) in this study.

🔍 Key Findings

Overall accuracy of radiography to detect IAIP: 77.9%

Sensitivity: 97.2%
Specificity: 67.6%

False positive rate: 32.4% of non-penetrating implants were misclassified as penetrating

Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle had higher misclassification (23.8%) than medial (8.3%)

Most accurate detection: Implants placed 2 mm into the joint (97.2% correct classification)

Least agreement: For implants placed at 0 mm (subchondral level), especially lateral (AC1 = 0.48)

No palpable abnormalities (e.g., crepitus) observed during ROM for any group

No significant difference in detection by specialty field or reviewer qualification

Suggests radiographic misclassification risk and supports considering CT/fluoroscopy in equivocal cases

Philips

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Detection of intra‐articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study

2025-3-VS-philips-3

Article Title: Detection of intra‐articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mazdarani 2025 et al., on simulated muscle loading, what was the clinical significance of using hip mobility in limb press models?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hip mobility improved the physiologic realism of simulated quadriceps forces.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It allowed force ratios closer to in vivo values.
Hip mobility improved the physiologic realism of simulated quadriceps forces.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Simulated quadriceps and gastrocnemius forces increased proportionally with axial load in all three femoral fixation models.
  • Model 2 (rigid fixation) resulted in subphysiologic quadriceps forces and abnormally high gastrocnemius forces, reducing model fidelity.
  • Models 1 and 3 (with hip mobility) produced more physiologic quadriceps and force ratios, especially under 30–40% bodyweight loads.
  • Force ratios were significantly lower in rigid fixation (Model 2) compared to hip-mobile models (p = .007), suggesting model design affects simulated muscle coordination.
  • Joint angles (stifle and hock) remained within acceptable limits, though slight flexion occurred with increasing load.
  • Relative foot position differed by ~3.9 mm between models 2 and 3, with model 2 showing a more caudal position.
  • Model 3 preserved benefits of hip mobility while allowing radiographic documentation, making it a preferred setup for future studies.
  • The study suggests that models used in feline stifle stabilization research may underestimate physiologic forces, especially with rigid fixation designs.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

2025-5-VS-mazdarani-5

Article Title: Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Bondonny 2024 et al., what was the mid-term functional outcome rate after using the modified IM pin technique?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mid-term full functional outcome was achieved in 96.9% of cats (32/33 fractures):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 96.9%.
Mid-term full functional outcome was achieved in 96.9% of cats (32/33 fractures):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Retrospective study of 33 fractures in 31 cats with Salter–Harris I or II distal femoral fractures
  • Used 1 intramedullary Steinmann pin + 1 laterally placed antirotational pin
  • 96.9% achieved full functional outcome at mid-term follow-up
  • No implant migration or removal required
  • Minor complications: 2 seromas; Major: 3 (patellar luxation [2], osteomyelitis [1])
  • Growth plate remained open in 27.3% of cases at 6–8 weeks post-op

Bondonny

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Use of a Modified Intramedullary Pinning Technique for Distal Femoral Physeal Salter–Harris Type I and II Fracture Management

2024-2-VCOT-bondonny-1

Article Title: Use of a Modified Intramedullary Pinning Technique for Distal Femoral Physeal Salter–Harris Type I and II Fracture Management

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Viskjer 2026 et al., on SDFT luxation surgery, which breed represented the majority of affected dogs in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Eight of the nine dogs included in the study were Shetland Sheepdogs, supporting previous reports of breed predisposition.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Shetland Sheepdog.
Eight of the nine dogs included in the study were Shetland Sheepdogs, supporting previous reports of breed predisposition.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified block recession calcaneoplasty restored full clinical function in all dogs (11 limbs in 9 dogs) at long-term follow-up.
  • Objective gait function improved significantly, with symmetry index improving from 0.20 ± 0.13 preoperatively to 0.05 ± 0.03 at long-term follow-up (p = .03).
  • No routine postoperative tarsal immobilization was used, yet stable tendon positioning and excellent outcomes were achieved in most cases.
  • Overall complication rate was 45%, including 18% major complications requiring revision surgery and 27% minor complications.
  • Only one reluxation occurred, secondary to fracture of an overly narrow medial calcaneal wall; successful revision prevented further recurrence.
  • CT confirmed persistent deepening of the calcaneal groove and uneventful healing with variable osseous remodeling at long-term follow-up.
  • Ultrasonography demonstrated normalization of tendon fiber architecture at long-term evaluation despite heterogeneous appearance in many tendons at 6 weeks.
  • Most dogs were Shetland Sheepdogs (8/9), supporting breed predisposition, and all luxations were lateral.

Viskjer

Veterinary Surgery

4

2026

Surgical management of luxation of the superficial digital flexor muscle tendon (SDFT) using a modified block recession calcaneoplasty without subsequent tarsal joint immobilization

2026-4-vs-viskjer-5

Article Title: Surgical management of luxation of the superficial digital flexor muscle tendon (SDFT) using a modified block recession calcaneoplasty without subsequent tarsal joint immobilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.