Your Custom Quiz

In Sadowitz 2023 et al., on screw angle & speed, which factor most strongly contributed to increased TCF risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found angle deviation from the pilot hole was the strongest predictor of TCF formation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Off-axis insertion angle.
The study found angle deviation from the pilot hole was the strongest predictor of TCF formation.

2023-8-VS-sadowitz-3

Article Title:

Journal:

In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, what percentage of fractures achieved near-anatomic reduction postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 13/15 fractures achieved near-anatomic reduction; the rest were acceptable.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 87%.
13/15 fractures achieved near-anatomic reduction; the rest were acceptable.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The study was a prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed, patient-specific reduction system for aligning diaphyseal tibial fractures stabilized using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in fifteen client-owned dogs.
  • Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and fabrication were feasible within a clinically relevant timeframe, with a mean of 50.7 hours. Surgical efficiency improved with experience.
  • Pin-guide placement was accurate, with median translational discrepancies of 2.7 mm (proximal) and 2.9 mm (distal), and angular discrepancies highest in the axial plane.
  • The proximal guide was easier to apply (median Likert score: 8) than the distal guide (median: 6).
  • The 3D-printed system enabled near-anatomic reduction in 87% of cases and acceptable reduction in the remaining 13%; no unacceptable reductions occurred.
  • Postoperative alignment and tibial length were well-restored, with all dogs within 5° or 5 mm of contralateral measurements.
  • Temporary circular fixation was occasionally used to assist reduction and improve alignment.
  • Precontoured plates fit easily, with a median Likert score of 9; total surgical time was shorter than conventional MIPO at the institution.
  • The study lacked a control group but builds on prior cadaveric feasibility work.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model

2024-6-VS-scheuermann1-2

Article Title: Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Swieton 2025 et al., on portocaval shunts, what proportion of dogs achieved a good to excellent long-term clinical outcome?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 81% of dogs had good to excellent long-term outcomes after surgical treatment, despite shunt persistence in some.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 81%.
81% of dogs had good to excellent long-term outcomes after surgical treatment, despite shunt persistence in some.

🔍 Key Findings

Study population: 21 dogs with portocaval extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (EHPSS)
Surgical approach: 67% (14/21) underwent ameroid constrictor placement
Perioperative complications: 4 dogs (19%), including seizures (n = 2), vomiting, and abdominal effusion
Perioperative mortality: 1 dog (5%)
Postoperative clinical outcome:

  • Good to excellent outcome: 81% (17/21)
  • Median follow-up: 6 months (range 3–43)

Persistence of shunting (CT or US): 56% (9/16 evaluated)
Dogs with persistent shunting: 67% still had good to excellent clinical outcome
Congenital portocaval shunts may have more favorable outcomes than previously reported

Swieton

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Outcome of 21 dogs treated for the portocaval subtype of extrahepatic portosystemic shunt

2025-2-VS-swieton-1

Article Title: Outcome of 21 dogs treated for the portocaval subtype of extrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Ellis 2024 et al., which region showed significantly higher mean HU in Guide Dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Guide Dogs had significantly higher mean HU in the humeral trochlea (mean difference 146.49 HU, p < 0.01):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Humeral trochlea.
Guide Dogs had significantly higher mean HU in the humeral trochlea (mean difference 146.49 HU, p < 0.01):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 86 elbows assessed: 32 Guide Dogs, 11 Border Collies
  • Guide Dogs showed significantly higher HU values in:
    • MCP: min (p = 0.022), mean (p < 0.01), max (p < 0.01)
    • Humeral trochlea: mean (p < 0.01), max (p < 0.01)
  • Results imply breed-associated HU variation, not necessarily pathologic sclerosis
  • Relevance: Important to avoid false positives for elbow dysplasia during CT-based breeding screens
  • Good interobserver agreement for mean HU values (ICC ~0.82–0.90)

Ellis

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Comparison of Hounsfield Units within the Humeral Trochlea and Medial Coronoid Process in a Population of Labrador X Golden Retriever Guide Dogs and Border Collies

2024-3-VCOT-ellis-2

Article Title: Comparison of Hounsfield Units within the Humeral Trochlea and Medial Coronoid Process in a Population of Labrador X Golden Retriever Guide Dogs and Border Collies

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, what was the Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement trend in the scaffold area over time?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. HU values rose over time, indicating progressive tissue ingrowth (though not full bone regeneration).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased from 20.4 to ~98.
HU values rose over time, indicating progressive tissue ingrowth (though not full bone regeneration).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Patient-specific 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffold enabled successful zygomatic arch reconstruction in a dog.
  • Complete surgical resection of a zygomatic parosteal osteosarcoma was achieved, with a 0.3 mm histologically clean margin.
  • Post-op imaging showed progressive tissue ingrowth into the scaffold, with Hounsfield Units increasing from 20.4 to 97.8 over 10 months.
  • No complications (e.g., infection, displacement) or tumor recurrence were noted at 16-month follow-up.
  • Use of a patient-specific osteotomy guide improved anatomical fit and facilitated precise excision and implant placement.
  • Facial symmetry and orbital stability were maintained throughout follow-up.
  • The scaffold remained structurally stable despite limited bone regeneration, suggesting connective tissue filled the defect.
  • Topical mitomycin C was applied intraoperatively for possible anti-neoplastic effect, but efficacy remains unclear.

Kang

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Zygomatic arch reconstruction with a patient-specific polycaprolactone beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold after parosteal osteosarcoma resection in a dog

2022-8-VS-kang-4

Article Title: Zygomatic arch reconstruction with a patient-specific polycaprolactone beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold after parosteal osteosarcoma resection in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Carvajal 2025 et al., on femoral stem breakage, what implant feature was shared by the majority of failed stems?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 13 of 14 failed implants were BFX lateral bolt stems, highlighting a common feature among breakages.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Use of BFX lateral bolt stem.
13 of 14 failed implants were BFX lateral bolt stems, highlighting a common feature among breakages.

🔍 Key Findings

Incidence of BFX lateral bolt stem breakage: 2.95% (13 dogs, 14 stems)

Implant factors:

  • 13/14 were BFX lateral bolt stems (sizes #5–7)
  • +9 necks used in 5/11 of 17 mm heads
  • 10/14 stems undersized based on radiographs
  • 10/13 dogs exceeded weight limits for implanted stem size

Malalignment:

  • 10/14 had varus alignment (median 3.9°)
  • 8/14 had insufficient proximodistal seating

Breakage site: Proximolateral shoulder in all cases

Revision outcomes:

  • 11 revised (7 CFX, 3 larger BFX, 1 collared)
  • 9/10 revised dogs regained full function
  • Complications: 1 rebreakage, 1 periprosthetic fracture, 1 fixation failure

Histopathology:

  • Electron microscopy showed fatigue striations and incomplete bead fusion

Conclusion: Avoid small BFX lateral bolt stems if undersized or if long necks required; use weight guidelines to prevent fatigue failure.

Carvajal

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

2025-3-VS-carvajal-2

Article Title: Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Danielski 2022 et al., on PAUL complications, which factor was significantly associated with increased risk of post-operative complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Heavier dogs had a 7% increased risk of complications per kg.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Body weight.
Heavier dogs had a 7% increased risk of complications per kg.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Major complications occurred in 25.6% of limbs treated with PAUL, including non-union, implant failure, and infection requiring revision surgery.
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with a higher risk of complications (7% increased risk per additional kg; p = .04).
  • Post-operative radiographic assessment was unreliable in predicting complications; inter-observer agreement was poor (kappa ≤ 0.12).
  • Expert evaluation of implant or reduction errors had low predictive value (k < 0.2) for postoperative complications.
  • Common major complications included non-union (6 limbs), screw breakage, and surgical site infections.
  • Implant removal was required in 11.5% of limbs, mostly due to non-union or infection.
  • Being a Labrador appeared protective on univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis after adjusting for weight.
  • Radiographs showing suboptimal plate placement or osteotomy reduction did not reliably correlate with actual complication occurrence.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs

2022-1-VS-danielski-1

Article Title: Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Burton 2025 et al., on antebrachial conformation, what statistical result supported intraobserver reliability of PRUDA and UCORA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. ICC values were 0.84–0.91, confirming excellent intraobserver agreement for PRUDA and UCORA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.80.
ICC values were 0.84–0.91, confirming excellent intraobserver agreement for PRUDA and UCORA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • PRUDA (proximal radio-ulnar divergence angle) and UCORA (ulnar center of rotation of angulation) were significantly greater in Cocker Spaniels with HIF vs those without.
  • PRUDA (p < .001): Group 1 (HIF) vs Group 2 & 3.
  • UCORA (p = .036): Group 1 vs Group 3.
  • Other angles (MPRA, LDRA, PCRA, DCRA, torsion) showed no significant differences.
  • Increased PRUDA and UCORA may lead to divergent load vectors across the humeral condyle, potentially predisposing to stress fracture (HIF).
  • Measurement techniques using CT-based 3D reconstructions were reliable (intraobserver ICC > 0.84).

Burton

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Antebrachial conformation in Cocker Spaniels with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

2025-4-VS-burton-3

Article Title: Antebrachial conformation in Cocker Spaniels with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Gomes 2025 et al., on subdural shunting for TL-AD, what was the significant long-term outcome of SDS placement compared to durotomy alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 85.7% of dogs with SDS improved long-term vs. 41.7% with durotomy alone (p = 0.04).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significantly improved long-term neurological recovery.
85.7% of dogs with SDS improved long-term vs. 41.7% with durotomy alone (p = 0.04).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified subdural shunt (SDS) placement was adapted from prior techniques using a hemilaminectomy approach and no suturing of the dura or shunt.
  • Dogs receiving SDS had significantly better long-term outcomes (85.7% improved) compared to those with durotomy alone (41.7%).
  • Recurrence rate was lower in the SDS group (14.3%) than control (41.7%), though not statistically significant.
  • Most recurrences occurred in Pugs (5/7), suggesting a breed predisposition.
  • Shunt size was limited to 25% of spinal cord diameter, typically 3–3.5 Fr.
  • CSF flow through the shunt was confirmed intraoperatively, supporting the role of SDS in maintaining flow and possibly preventing recurrence.
  • Immediate postoperative outcomes were not different between groups (≈42% deteriorated), but long-term recovery was better with SDS.
  • Steroid use pre-surgery did not correlate with improved outcome; fewer SDS dogs received steroids pre-op.

Gomes

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

2025-5-VS-gomes-2

Article Title: Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Price 2024 et al., on left-sided TD ligation in dogs, what anatomical advantage was associated with the left fourth intercostal approach?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This region had fewer branches than traditional sites, reducing collateral risk.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fewer thoracic duct branches.
This region had fewer branches than traditional sites, reducing collateral risk.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Left fourth intercostal thoracotomy allowed successful thoracic duct (TD) ligation in 9/10 canine cadavers.
  • 10/13 clinical cases had a single TD branch at the left fourth intercostal space, indicating lower anatomical complexity.
  • All TD branches at this site were lateral to the esophagus, simplifying surgical access.
  • Unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy was successfully performed via the same incision in 10/10 cadavers.
  • Fewer TD branches at the fourth intercostal space than traditional caudal sites may reduce the risk of missed collaterals.
  • In contrast, traditional caudal TD ligation sites had up to 5 branches, requiring broader dissection.
  • No cadaver had right-sided TD branches, reducing surgical complexity at the studied location.
  • Contrast-confirmed ligation was effective in 90% (9/10) cadavers on CT imaging.

Price

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

2024-3-VS-price-3

Article Title: Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.