Your Custom Quiz

In Drudi 2022 et al., on CAL vs TAL outcomes, what clinical difference was reported between the two groups at 15-day follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both groups had improved clinical signs with no differences at day 15.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No clinical difference was observed.
Both groups had improved clinical signs with no differences at day 15.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cricoarytenoid lateralization (CAL) resulted in a significantly greater increase in rima glottidis area at both immediate (205%) and 15-day (199%) time points compared to thyroarytenoid lateralization (TAL) (152% and 127%, respectively).
  • TAL group showed a significant reduction in rima glottidis area between immediate and 15-day postoperative measurements (P < .05), while CAL group had no significant reduction over time.
  • No dogs in either group showed postoperative complications, including aspiration pneumonia, at the 15-day follow-up.
  • All dogs showed improved clinical signs, including decreased stridor and increased exercise tolerance by day 15.
  • CAL produced more stable postoperative glottic area, potentially due to preserved anatomical tension, whereas TAL might experience tension loss due to thyroid cartilage repositioning.
  • Both procedures were technically effective and performed under the same protocol by a single board-certified surgeon.
  • Endoscopic image analysis was used to quantify rima glottidis area, demonstrating a reliable objective method for surgical outcome assessment.
  • Clinical outcome did not differ between groups, despite CAL showing a larger rima glottidis area.

Drudi

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Comparison of immediate and short‐term outcomes of cricoarytenoid and thyroarytenoid lateralization in dogs with idiopathic laryngeal paralysis

2022-3-VS-drudi-4

Article Title: Comparison of immediate and short‐term outcomes of cricoarytenoid and thyroarytenoid lateralization in dogs with idiopathic laryngeal paralysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Caldeira 2025 et al., on femoral neck fixation, what was the main mechanical advantage of using three cannulated screws over two?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group 3 (three screws) had significantly higher yield load (586 N) compared to Group 2 (303 N)
Incorrect. The correct answer is Higher yield load.
Group 3 (three screws) had significantly higher yield load (586 N) compared to Group 2 (303 N)

🔍 Key Findings

Design: In vitro study on cadaveric femurs (n=21) with basilar femoral neck fractures stabilized using 2 vs 3 titanium cannulated screws.

Stiffness: Control > 3-screw > 2-screw (674 > 120 > 90 N/mm).

Yield Load: 3-screw (586 N) > 2-screw (303 N); both < intact femur (2692 N).

Displacement: No difference across groups.

Complication: 3-screw technique more demanding; higher risk of cortical perforation, especially with narrow femoral necks.

Failure Mode: Dislodgement of femoral head + screw shaft bending.

Conclusion: 3 screws = stronger construct than 2 screws. Clinical implications need further study.

Caldeira

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

In Vitro Biomechanical Study of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation with Two or Three Cannulated Screws in Dogs

2025-1-VC-Caldeira-1

Article Title: In Vitro Biomechanical Study of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation with Two or Three Cannulated Screws in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Alvarez 2022 et al., on rehabilitation modalities, which therapy showed consistent positive outcomes in two Level II studies with low risk of bias?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CCT was the only modality supported by two Level II, low RoB studies showing pain relief, improved ROM, and reduced swelling.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cold compression therapy.
CCT was the only modality supported by two Level II, low RoB studies showing pain relief, improved ROM, and reduced swelling.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Exercise-based rehabilitation showed benefits in 6 of 7 studies, including increased peak vertical force (PVF) and reduced lameness, though most had high risk of bias (RoB).
  • Cold compression therapy (CCT) had 2 high-quality (Level II, low RoB) studies showing improvements in pain scores, range of motion, and swelling, supporting its clinical use.
  • Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was supported by 2 Level II studies; only one had low RoB, showing short-term benefits in patellar ligament thickness and PVF, but no long-term benefit on bone healing.
  • Photobiomodulation (PBM) had mixed results across 3 Level II studies (all low RoB); only 1 showed positive impact on PVF, limiting its recommendation.
  • Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) showed no significant impact on gait analysis or bone healing in a Level II, low RoB study.
  • Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) improved lameness and thigh circumference in one Level III study, but had high-moderate RoB and involved experimentally-induced CCL rupture, limiting clinical relevance.
  • No modality beyond exercise and CCT had consistent or strong evidence for efficacy in post-TPLO or extracapsular repair rehabilitation.
  • The absence of standardized protocols, small sample sizes, and inconsistent outcome measures limited the generalizability of findings.

Alvarez

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

2022-2-VS-alvarez-2

Article Title: Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Low 2025 et al., on machine-learning prediction, which of the following breeds was associated with a significantly *reduced* risk of postoperative complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Labradors had a significantly lower risk of complications compared to other breeds.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Labrador Retriever.
Labradors had a significantly lower risk of complications compared to other breeds.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Postoperative complications occurred in 20% of stifles, including 7.5% minor, 10.3% surgical, and 3.4% medical complications.
  • The PROSPECT machine-learning model achieved high predictive accuracy: 92.3% for surgical complications, 91.9% for minor, and 94.3% for medical.
  • Top predictive features included surgical technique, implant type, patient age, and surgeon identity.
  • Surgeon-specific variables influenced predictions, indicating operator experience and technique matter.
  • Engineered interaction features (e.g., breed × implant) were more predictive than raw clinical data alone.
  • Rottweiler, intact male status, and higher bodyweight were associated with increased complication risk; Labradors had decreased risk.
  • Model calibration was strong, especially for high and low probability predictions; midrange predictions were less reliable.
  • The model supports individualized, probabilistic risk assessment, which could inform client counseling and tailored postoperative care.

PROSPECT = Predicting Risk Of Surgical compli­cations aftEr CCWO and TPLO

Low

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Machine‐learning prediction of postoperative complications after high tibial osteotomy for canine cranial cruciate ligament disease

2025-7-VS-low-2

Article Title: Machine‐learning prediction of postoperative complications after high tibial osteotomy for canine cranial cruciate ligament disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Papacella-Beugger 2024 et al., what tool was essential for achieving low screw deviation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The neuronavigation system allowed the surgeon to drill with on-screen guidance via tracked tools:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Real-time feedback with tracked instruments.
The neuronavigation system allowed the surgeon to drill with on-screen guidance via tracked tools:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Cadaveric study using 3 miniature breed dogs (6 hemipelves) to assess spinal neuronavigation accuracy for lumbar plate fixation
  • 20 screws placed using CBCT-based navigation with real-time tracking
  • 85% (17/20) of screws were safely and accurately placed
  • Median deviation of screw entry points from plan: 1.8 mm
  • All 3 misplaced screws occurred in a single cadaver, attributed to inexperienced drill handling
  • Custom 3D-printed lightweight tracking array was necessary due to small spinous processes in miniature dogs
  • No iatrogenic canal perforations or vertebral damage in any specimen
  • Concludes neuronavigation offers precise, safe placement of spinal implants in small dogs, with minimal anatomic disruption

Papacella

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Spinal Neuronavigation for Lumbar Plate Fixation in Miniature Breed Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-papacella-beugger-4

Article Title: Spinal Neuronavigation for Lumbar Plate Fixation in Miniature Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Lederer 2025 et al., on MIPO vs ORPS, which outcome measure significantly differed between groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Time to clinical union was significantly longer in MIPO (85 days) vs ORPS (57 days), p = .010.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Time to clinical union.
Time to clinical union was significantly longer in MIPO (85 days) vs ORPS (57 days), p = .010.

🔍 Key Findings

Study size: 105 dogs (73 ORPS; 32 MIPO)

MIPO vs ORPS differences:

  • Surgical time: MIPO median 130 min vs ORPS 85 min (p < .001)
  • Explant rate: MIPO 25% vs ORPS 4.1% (p = .003)
  • Time to clinical union: MIPO 85 days vs ORPS 57 days (p = .010)
  • Frontal alignment deviation: MIPO 3.5° vs ORPS 2.0° (p = .047)
  • Comminution more frequent in MIPO (41% vs 16%; p = .012)

Significant predictors for MIPO use: More proximal fracture margin (p = .004), surgeon identity (p < .001)

No significant difference: Sagittal alignment, radial length, union rate, or complication rate by surgeon

Implant preference: Fixin plates used in 84% of MIPO; locking plates more common in ORPS

Lederer

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

2025-4-VS-lederer-1

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Condon 2024 et al., what percentage of fractures were classified as lateral humeral condylar fractures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lateral fractures made up 69.8% of the 136 elbows in the study:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 70%.
Lateral fractures made up 69.8% of the 136 elbows in the study:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Lateral humeral condylar fractures = 69.8% of cases; medial = 16.2%; Y/T = 14.0%
  • Falls/stairs were the inciting trauma in 45.6% of cases; significantly younger dogs were more likely to fracture after major trauma (p = 0.01)
  • Complication rate = 22% (10 major, 20 minor); implant migration and seroma most common
  • Fixation method had no significant impact on complication rates (p = 0.87)
  • Epicondylar comminution was significantly associated with complications (p = 0.02, OR = 3.27)
  • Contralateral intracondylar fissure found in 9.8%, none progressed to fracture during study
  • Wide inter-center variation in complication rate (5–62%, p = 0.002)

Condon

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Humeral Condylar Fractures in French Bulldogs—Inciting Cause and Factors Influencing Complications of Internal Fixation in 136 Dogs

2024-2-VCOT-condon-2

Article Title: Humeral Condylar Fractures in French Bulldogs—Inciting Cause and Factors Influencing Complications of Internal Fixation in 136 Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Trefny 2025 et al., on locking plate biomechanics, why may in vitro stiffness benefits of transcortical contact not translate in vivo?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Transcortical contact in vivo may cause unsustainable strain and bone resorption.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Causes high interfragmentary strain.
Transcortical contact in vivo may cause unsustainable strain and bone resorption.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Short working length constructs had significantly higher stiffness and lower strain than long constructs in compression bending (p = 0.0172).
  • In tension bending, short constructs also had higher precontact stiffness and lower strain, but this reversed after transcortical contact (~150 N).
  • Transcortical contact increased stiffness only in long constructs, producing a bilinear load-displacement curve.
  • Postcontact stiffness was higher in long constructs, but this may not reflect clinical benefit due to risks of high interfragmentary strain.
  • Short working length reduced strain at multiple ROIs under both loading conditions, including over fracture gap (Tables 1–3).
  • Increased working length promoted stress concentration and deformation, especially in compression bending.
  • In vitro benefits of long constructs (via contact stability) may not translate to healing, as repetitive loading could increase plate strain and bone resorption.
  • Plate strain was effectively mapped using 3D digital image correlation, confirming regional strain differences between configurations.

Trefny

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Effect of Plate Screw Configuration on Construct Stiffness and Plate Strain in a Synthetic Short Fragment Small Gap Fracture Model Stabilized with a 12-Hole 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate

2025-3-VCOT-trefny-4

Article Title: Effect of Plate Screw Configuration on Construct Stiffness and Plate Strain in a Synthetic Short Fragment Small Gap Fracture Model Stabilized with a 12-Hole 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Sadowitz 2023 et al., on screw angle & speed, which technique produced a lower TCF rate despite off-axis screw insertion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hand insertion of off-axis screws resulted in only 3.75% TCF rate, suggesting lower speed allows redirection and reduces fracture.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Manual insertion at 10° angle.
Hand insertion of off-axis screws resulted in only 3.75% TCF rate, suggesting lower speed allows redirection and reduces fracture.

2023-8-VS-sadowitz-4

Article Title:

Journal:

In Bounds 2023 et al., on feline hip arthroscopy, what was the most common location of iatrogenic cartilage injury during arthroscopy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most cartilage lesions occurred at the cannula insertion site, in the middle femoral head.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Middle femoral head.
Most cartilage lesions occurred at the cannula insertion site, in the middle femoral head.

2023-8-VS-bounds-2

Article Title:

Journal:

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.