Your Custom Quiz

In Nash 2024 et al., on GER frequency, what was the upper reference limit for distal GER events per hour?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. An upper reference limit of 2.4 distal GER events per hour was established based on 35 healthy dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.4.
An upper reference limit of 2.4 distal GER events per hour was established based on 35 healthy dogs.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 35 nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing orthopedic procedures (TPLO)
  • Study design: Prospective observational using transnasal Digitrapper dual-sensor pH probe after short TIVA
  • Upper reference limits:
    • Distal GER events per hour: 2.4
    • Proximal GER events per hour: 0.4
    • Cumulative distal acid exposure: 2.3%
    • Cumulative proximal acid exposure: 0%
  • Median values (normal):
    • Distal GER events per hour: 0.3
    • Proximal GER events per hour: 0
  • Proximal GER observed in 12/31 dogs
  • No regurgitation observed in any dog
  • No major adverse events with probe use
  • Clinical implication: These parameters provide a reference for assessing excessive GER in future canine surgical cases

Nash

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs; a reference

2024-1-VS-nash-1

Article Title: Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs; a reference

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Brockman 2025 et al., on canine mitral valve repair outcomes, what was the most common cause of death in dogs that did not survive?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Among 25 non-survivors, the most frequent cause of death was inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Failure to wean from CPB.
Among 25 non-survivors, the most frequent cause of death was inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Overall survival to discharge: 107 of 132 dogs (81%)
  • Quartile improvement: Survival increased steadily from 67% in Q1 to 91% in Q4
    • Q1: 22/33 survived
    • Q2: 27/33
    • Q3: 28/33
    • Q4: 30/33
  • Statistical significance: Higher operative rank significantly associated with improved survival (p < .05)
  • Median cross clamp time (XCT): 73 min (range 40–165), but increased again in Q4
  • Fatalities (n=25) were often due to:
    • Failure to wean from CPB
    • Intracranial vascular events (stroke)
    • Intrathoracic hemorrhage
  • Breed representation: CKCS (23.5%), Chihuahua (22%), Crossbreeds (21%)
  • Stages of MMVD: Stage C (67%), Stage D (27%), Stage B2 (6%)
  • Emphasis on deliberate multidisciplinary teamwork for outcome improvement
  • Highlights importance of technical and non-technical team skills, procedural standardization, and consistent personnel

Brockman

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Improvement in short‐term outcome over time, in a single center embarking on a canine mitral valve repair program using a structured multidisciplinary approach

2025-4-VS-brockman-4

Article Title: Improvement in short‐term outcome over time, in a single center embarking on a canine mitral valve repair program using a structured multidisciplinary approach

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Ferreira 2025 et al., on tibial torsion measurement, how did the traditional method compare in interobserver agreement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The traditional method had moderate interobserver agreement (ICC = 0.52).
Incorrect. The correct answer is ICC = 0.52.
The traditional method had moderate interobserver agreement (ICC = 0.52).

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Validate a new 3D CT-based method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with MPL, comparing it to a traditional method.

Sample: 40 tibiae from client-owned dogs with MPL (primarily small-breed).

Repeatability (intraobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.99 → excellent agreement

Reproducibility (interobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.83 → high agreement
  • Traditional method: ICC = 0.52 → moderate agreement

Torsion angle measurements:

  • New method avg: 16.00° ± 8.77
  • Traditional method avg: 8.76° ± 4.92

Conclusion: The new method is more repeatable, reproducible, and provides higher torsion values than the traditional Aper method, especially reliable for small-breed dogs.

Ferreira

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

2025-3-VS-ferreira-4

Article Title: Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Thompson 2024 et al., on cyanoacrylate enterotomy sealants, which group had the lowest maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The CE group had the lowest MIP (mean 22.7 mmHg), significantly lower than suture-based groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cyanoacrylate only.
The CE group had the lowest MIP (mean 22.7 mmHg), significantly lower than suture-based groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Highest initial leak pressure (ILP) observed in the handsewn + cyanoacrylate (HS + CE) group: 83.3 ± 4.6 mmHg (p < .001 vs. others).
  • Lowest ILP: cyanoacrylate-only group (CE): 18.6 ± 3.5 mmHg.
  • No significant MIP difference between handsewn (HSE) and HS + CE groups (p = .19); CE had significantly lower MIP (22.7 mmHg).
  • Leak location:
    • HSE: 60% from suture holes
    • CE: 100% from incisional line
    • HS + CE: 60% from incisional line, 40% from suture holes
  • Authors conclude cyanoacrylate augmentation significantly increases ILP and could reduce enterotomy leakage risk.

Thompson

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Effects of cyanoacrylate on leakage pressures of cooled canine cadaveric jejunal enterotomies

2024-2-VS-thompson-4

Article Title: Effects of cyanoacrylate on leakage pressures of cooled canine cadaveric jejunal enterotomies

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was the average red blood cell mass (rbcM) recovery percentage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Swab washing recovered an average of 84.74% of rbcM.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 84.7%.
Swab washing recovered an average of 84.74% of rbcM.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-2

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hawker 2024 et al., on checklist attitudes, what was a leading barrier cited for noncompletion of SSCs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Forgetfulness (39.6%) was the most frequently cited reason for SSC noncompletion.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Forgetfulness.
Forgetfulness (39.6%) was the most frequently cited reason for SSC noncompletion.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 67.9% of respondents reported using SSCs, with most indicating frequent use (64% used in every surgery).
  • 78.7% agreed SSCs reduce complications, and 89.6% believed SSCs improve communication.
  • Respondents not using SSCs were more likely to view them as a waste of time (p < .001).
  • Forgetfulness (39.6%) and time constraints (36.5%) were leading reasons for checklist noncompletion.
  • Only 23.3% had SSC training during surgical residency, with newer diplomates more likely to have had exposure (p < .001).
  • Key strategies to improve uptake included: staff feedback modifications (67.9%), formal designation of initiator (48.6%), and training (52.2%).
  • Surgeons and OR staff were most commonly identified as noncompliant team members.
  • SSC use was more frequent in small animal practices, and mandating SSCs by management was favored but not always effective alone.

Hawker

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

2024-5-VS-hawker-2

Article Title: Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Wilson 2025 et al., on acetabular measurement accuracy, what factor significantly reduced measurement accuracy across all methods?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Higher OA severity was associated with greater prediction error (p < .05).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Osteoarthritis severity.
Higher OA severity was associated with greater prediction error (p < .05).

🔍 Key Findings

Study population: 73 hips from 60 dogs undergoing cementless THR.
Methods evaluated:

  • ACVD/ACOLL (acetabular circle on VD or OLL view)
  • ALVD/ALOLL (acetabular line)
  • FHCVD/FHCOLL/FHCCCHB (femoral head circle)
Findings:
  • Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver consistency were excellent for ACVD and ACOLL.
  • FHC methods consistently underestimated actual cup size by 2.4–3.6 mm.
  • AC and AL methods had low bias (±0.5 mm) and better predictive value.
  • OA severity negatively affected the accuracy of all measurements (p < .05).
  • Highest predictive accuracy was ~49% using ACVD with rounding down protocol.

Wilson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Evaluation of three acetabular measurement methods for total hip replacement in dogs

2025-1-VS-wilson-3

Article Title: Evaluation of three acetabular measurement methods for total hip replacement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Israel 2022 et al., on cerclage wire in THR, which of the following statements about cerclage wire outcomes is CORRECT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No wire-related complications or failures occurred in the study's 184 THRs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No complications were reported from cerclage wire use.
No wire-related complications or failures occurred in the study's 184 THRs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No proximal femoral fractures occurred in any of the 184 hips with cerclage wire placement
  • Cerclage wire was well tolerated, with no failures or complications related to the wire
  • Application of a single cerclage wire took <10 minutes, was cost-effective, and required minimal instrumentation
  • 3 postoperative complications (1 fissure, 2 fractures) occurred distal to the cerclage site, near the stem tip, requiring plate/screw fixation
  • All dogs returned to normal activity, and all owners were satisfied with the outcome
  • Cerclage placement location is critical—must be proximal to the lesser trochanter and close to the calcar to resist hoop strain
  • Biomechanical evidence supports that cerclage wires improve resistance to hoop strain and subsidence of cementless stems
  • Press-fit cementless stems may settle, but when supported by cerclage, this does not result in fractures even in undersized implants

Israel

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

2022-2-VS-israel-3

Article Title: Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sisk 2024 et al., which IMN design improvement addresses rotational slack?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Angle-stable designs reduce mediolateral “slack” and enhance torsional stability:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Angle-stable interlocking threads.
Angle-stable designs reduce mediolateral “slack” and enhance torsional stability:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • IMN provides relative stability, resists bending/torsion due to central axis alignment
  • Larger diameter nails = exponentially greater stiffness (∝ D⁴)
  • Trade-off: Larger interlocking holes weaken fatigue strength of the nail
  • Reaming increases contact/stability but has pros/cons:
    • Improves outcomes in closed fractures
    • May reduce endosteal blood flow in thin-walled bones (e.g., cats)
  • Design advances:
    • Angle-stable IMN reduce rotational slack
    • Expandable nails simplify insertion but may compromise removal or compressive load resistance
    • Precontoured nails match bone curvature but lack consistent clinical superiority
  • Material debates continue (e.g., titanium vs. stainless steel vs. magnesium)

Sisk

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

2024-6-VCOT-sisk-4

Article Title: Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Otero Balda 2025 et al., on Short-term outcomes after feline cPSS surgery, what proportion of cats with postattenuation seizures (PAS) survived to 30 days?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only half of the cats that developed PAS survived 30 days, compared to 78% overall.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 50%.
Only half of the cats that developed PAS survived 30 days, compared to 78% overall.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 78% of cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after congenital portosystemic shunt (cPSS) surgery survived to 30 days.
  • Postattenuation seizures (PAS) were associated with significantly decreased 30-day survival (50% vs. 78%; OR: 0.015, p = .005).
  • Treatment of PANS with propofol was a negative prognostic factor (OR: 0.112, p = .0008).
  • Generalized PAS accounted for most seizure cases and were more frequently fatal than focal or unknown-type seizures.
  • Pretreatment with levetiracetam (LEV1 protocol) showed a trend toward improved survival (100% vs. 60.6% in untreated cats), though not statistically significant (p = .06).
  • Shunt morphology, method of attenuation, and study period (early vs. late) were not significantly associated with 30-day survival.
  • Electrolyte, glucose, and ammonia abnormalities were not strongly linked to survival outcomes in this study.
  • Majority of PAS-related deaths were due to uncontrolled generalized seizures or euthanasia because of severity.

Otero Balda

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

2025-5-VS-otero-3

Article Title: Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.