Your Custom Quiz

In Kwok 2023 et al., on BFX lateral bolt THR in dogs, what percentage returned to normal function?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 97.4% of dogs returned to normal function per owner and clinical follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 97.4%.
97.4% of dogs returned to normal function per owner and clinical follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 97.4% of dogs returned to normal function after total hip replacement using the BFX lateral bolt.
  • Mean femoral stem subsidence was 1.22 mm, with most occurring in the first month and minimal thereafter.
  • Postoperative complication rate was 13.6%, with 9.2% major and 4.4% minor complications.
  • Femoral fractures (3.6%) and coxofemoral luxations (3.6%) were the most common major complications.
  • Increased age and higher stem size were risk factors for postoperative femoral fractures; CFI >2.0 was also associated.
  • Medial calcar fractures were avoided, and fractures occurred distal to stem ingrowth zone, simplifying repairs.
  • Three cases underwent prophylactic plating, all with excellent outcomes and no complications.
  • Explant rate was 2.6% (5/195), with most failures involving acetabular cup rather than femoral stem.

Kwok

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Clinical outcomes of canine total hip replacement utilizing a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem: 195 consecutive cases (2013–2019)

2023-1-VS-kwok-1

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of canine total hip replacement utilizing a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem: 195 consecutive cases (2013–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Payne 2024 et al., on HIF propagation pattern, which finding was significantly associated with higher %HIF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Higher %HIF was significantly associated with increased clinical lameness or elbow abnormalities (p = 0.004).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Abnormalities on clinical examination.
Higher %HIF was significantly associated with increased clinical lameness or elbow abnormalities (p = 0.004).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • HIF typically originates 57° caudal to the supratrochlear foramen and propagates cranially in a segmental pattern.
  • %HIF correlated significantly with both fissure depth and length:
    • %DHIF increased linearly (r = 0.989, p < 0.001)
    • %LHIF followed a sigmoidal relationship with %HIF (p < 0.001)
  • Higher %HIF was significantly associated with:
    • Clinical lameness (p = 0.004)
    • Distal shift in the fissure center (CHIF)
  • Implant complications in 5/17 elbows treated with transcondylar screws
  • Isthmus diameter increased with weight (p = 0.002), relevant for screw sizing

Payne

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Computed Tomography Topographical Analysis of Incomplete Humeral Intracondylar Fissures in English Springer Spaniel Dogs

2024-2-VCOT-payne-4

Article Title: Computed Tomography Topographical Analysis of Incomplete Humeral Intracondylar Fissures in English Springer Spaniel Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, which of the following statements best describes Algorithm 1?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Algorithm 1 had the highest sensitivity (87.1%) and negative predictive value (97%), making it suitable for ruling out SSIs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It was best used to rule out SSIs.
Algorithm 1 had the highest sensitivity (87.1%) and negative predictive value (97%), making it suitable for ruling out SSIs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Algorithm 3 had the highest overall accuracy (95.5%) in diagnosing SSIs from client questionnaires.
  • Active surveillance identified 19.4% more SSIs compared to passive surveillance alone.
  • SSI rate was 8.22% across 754 surgeries; 33.9% of SSIs required revision surgery.
  • Client-based responses were 37.9% more frequent than those from referring veterinarians.
  • Deep/implant SSIs could be missed if not associated with visible wound healing problems.
  • Two late SSIs (after 90 days) occurred, both linked to implant surgeries.
  • Algorithm 1 was the most sensitive (87.1%) but less specific; useful for screening.
  • Algorithm 2 had the highest specificity (97.9%); useful as a “rule-in” diagnostic method.

Glenn

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

2024-8-VS-glenn-3

Article Title: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, what was the mean total radial lengthening achieved after distraction osteogenesis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean lengthening was 22.6 mm, representing ~11% increase compared to the contralateral radius.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 22.6 mm.
Mean lengthening was 22.6 mm, representing ~11% increase compared to the contralateral radius.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CESF with distraction osteogenesis restored elbow congruity and normalized aLDRA in skeletally immature dogs with PCDRP.
  • Radial head subluxation was eliminated in all dogs, and elbow incongruity reduced significantly (from 6.1 mm to 0.3 mm, p <.01).
  • Mean radial lengthening of 22.6 mm (∼11% of normal length) was achieved, but only 80% of recorded distraction translated to length gain.
  • Major complications occurred in 2/12 dogs: one with permanent carpal contracture, one with radial fracture at wire tract.
  • Minor complications (e.g., carpal pain, restricted extension, synostosis, pin tract issues) were noted in 10/12 dogs but generally resolved.
  • Owner surveys (8/12 dogs) reported good to excellent long-term function, even up to 6 years post-op.
  • Radial valgus deformities were moderate (mean 15°) and less severe than deformities from ulnar physeal closure.
  • Surgical strategy included staged distraction, with radial or combined radius/ulna distraction guided by fluoroscopy and adjusted per case.

De Moya

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

2025-6-VS-demoya-4

Article Title: Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cheon 2025 et al., on guide accuracy in DFO, which of the following was a limitation of the universal guide?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The universal guide struggled with fit in small dogs due to its one-size design.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Single-size design may not suit all dogs.
The universal guide struggled with fit in small dogs due to its one-size design.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Both patient-specific and universal guides yielded correction errors <2°, with no statistically significant difference in accuracy.
  • Universal guide corrected aLDFA up to 24° and AA up to 20°, addressing multiplanar deformities effectively.
  • Patient-specific guides allowed for preoperative simulation, providing more stable pin placement and potentially aiding less-experienced surgeons.
  • Universal guide eliminated the need for CT-based customization, reducing time and cost.
  • Cadaver and bone model trials showed consistent accuracy, validating both methods in vitro and ex vivo.
  • No significant differences in outcome when correcting uniplanar (aLDFA) vs biplanar (aLDFA + AA) deformities.
  • Universal guide's fixed size presented limitations in small dogs, potentially requiring multiple size options.
  • Universal guide showed potential for standard use, offering repeatable outcomes with minimal prep despite needing precise intraoperative placement.

Cheon

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-cheon-4

Article Title: Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Brockman 2025 et al., on canine mitral valve repair outcomes, which of the following best explains the improvement in short-term outcomes over time?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors emphasize team structure, standardization, and deliberate practice as key contributors to outcome improvement.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Structured multidisciplinary team and procedural consistency.
The authors emphasize team structure, standardization, and deliberate practice as key contributors to outcome improvement.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Overall survival to discharge: 107 of 132 dogs (81%)
  • Quartile improvement: Survival increased steadily from 67% in Q1 to 91% in Q4
    • Q1: 22/33 survived
    • Q2: 27/33
    • Q3: 28/33
    • Q4: 30/33
  • Statistical significance: Higher operative rank significantly associated with improved survival (p < .05)
  • Median cross clamp time (XCT): 73 min (range 40–165), but increased again in Q4
  • Fatalities (n=25) were often due to:
    • Failure to wean from CPB
    • Intracranial vascular events (stroke)
    • Intrathoracic hemorrhage
  • Breed representation: CKCS (23.5%), Chihuahua (22%), Crossbreeds (21%)
  • Stages of MMVD: Stage C (67%), Stage D (27%), Stage B2 (6%)
  • Emphasis on deliberate multidisciplinary teamwork for outcome improvement
  • Highlights importance of technical and non-technical team skills, procedural standardization, and consistent personnel

Brockman

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Improvement in short‐term outcome over time, in a single center embarking on a canine mitral valve repair program using a structured multidisciplinary approach

2025-4-VS-brockman-5

Article Title: Improvement in short‐term outcome over time, in a single center embarking on a canine mitral valve repair program using a structured multidisciplinary approach

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Dickerson 2023 et al., on surgical outcomes in hepatic abscessation, what proportion of dogs developed intraoperative hypotension?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Intraoperative hypotension occurred in 32 of 36 dogs (89%).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 89%.
Intraoperative hypotension occurred in 32 of 36 dogs (89%).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liver lobectomy was the most common treatment (27/36 dogs), with multiple lobes removed in ~1/3 of cases.
  • Septic peritonitis was present in 21/23 sampled dogs, making it a frequent complication.
  • Perioperative complications occurred in 21/36 dogs, including aspiration pneumonia, pancreatitis, and acute kidney injury.
  • Intraoperative hypotension was common (32/36), often requiring vasopressors or colloids.
  • Mortality prior to discharge was 21% (8/38), with deaths related to sepsis, aspiration pneumonia, and multi-organ dysfunction.
  • Median survival time was 638 days in dogs surviving to discharge.
  • No recurrence of hepatic abscessation was observed in the surviving population.
  • E. coli and Clostridium spp. were the most commonly cultured organisms, often as single-agent infections.

Dickerson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Outcome in 38 dogs surgically treated for hepatic abscessation

2023-1-VS-dickerson-5

Article Title: Outcome in 38 dogs surgically treated for hepatic abscessation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Winston 2023 et al., on LES-AS surgery outcomes, which of the following best describes the surgical approach used for the myotomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors performed a standard ventral midline celiotomy with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ventral midline celiotomy with Dor fundoplication.
The authors performed a standard ventral midline celiotomy with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication improved vomiting/regurgitation scores by 180%, QoL by 100%, and owner-perceived body weight by 63% (P < .05).
  • 6 of 9 dogs with postoperative VFSS showed objective improvement in gastric filling scores; others remained stable.
  • Oral sildenafil was discontinued postoperatively in all dogs, indicating surgical success comparable to medical management.
  • 12 of 13 dogs survived to discharge; one dog was euthanized due to aspiration pneumonia postoperatively.
  • 50% of dogs experienced gastrostomy tube complications, higher than reported in previous literature.
  • Most complications were gastrostomy-tube related, with some requiring surgical correction (e.g., tube migration, leakage).
  • Feeding strategies (Bailey chair, elevated bowls) and food consistency (gruel/liquid) remained essential postoperatively to control regurgitation.
  • 9 of 11 owners would opt for the surgery again; those who wouldn’t cited risk or lack of efficacy.

Winston

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

2023-2-VS-winston-2

Article Title: Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Picavet 2026 et al., on sesamoid displacement radiography, what was the reported prevalence of popliteal sesamoid displacement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease on preoperative 90° flexion radiographs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found popliteal sesamoid displacement in 14.4% of dogs with CCLD on preoperative radiographs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 14.4%.
The study found popliteal sesamoid displacement in 14.4% of dogs with CCLD on preoperative radiographs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Popliteal sesamoid displacement (PSD) was identified in 14.4% of dogs with CCLD on preoperative 90° flexion radiographs, indicating it is an uncommon but notable radiographic finding.
  • Dogs with PSD had significantly greater cranial tibial subluxation (CTS) preoperatively compared with dogs without PSD.
  • Popliteal sesamoid reduction occurred in 100% of cases after TPLO, suggesting that proper TPLO mechanics restore normal sesamoid position.
  • Postoperative CTS persisted in all dogs that had preoperative CTS (50.3%), although the magnitude of subluxation was significantly reduced after TPLO.
  • Osteotomy positioning (centered vs distally centered) did not significantly influence postoperative CTS, indicating residual translation is not strongly affected by osteotomy placement.
  • Postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA) showed a weak negative correlation with residual CTS, suggesting lower TPAs may slightly reduce postoperative tibial translation.
  • PSD appears to be associated with more pronounced stifle instability prior to surgery, serving as a radiographic indicator of more severe CCLD biomechanics.
  • Radiographic evaluation of popliteal sesamoid reduction may provide an additional objective indicator of residual cranio-caudal instability following TPLO.

Picavet

Veterinary Surgery

2

2026

Radiographic assessment of popliteal sesamoid position and cranial tibial subluxation in canine stifle joints undergoing TPLO: A retrospective study of 163 dogs

2026-2-vs-picavet-1

Article Title: Radiographic assessment of popliteal sesamoid position and cranial tibial subluxation in canine stifle joints undergoing TPLO: A retrospective study of 163 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Petchell 2025 et al., on CORA-based CCWO, which parameter was defined preoperatively to enable CORA-based planning?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MAA was preset at 3° or 5° depending on breed size, which allowed precise calculation of the CORA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Desired mechanical axis advancement (MAA).
MAA was preset at 3° or 5° depending on breed size, which allowed precise calculation of the CORA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy (CCWOCORA) consistently achieved the target postoperative TPA of 5° across all tibial morphologies.
  • CCWOCORA produced significantly less variability in postoperative TPA compared to other methods (TPA range: 5.00–5.00°; p < .001).
  • Mechanical axis advancement (MAA) was precisely controlled at 3° in CCWOCORA, leading to greater surgical predictability.
  • Other techniques (e.g., CCWOTPA, CCWOTPA–5, CCWOISO) showed greater variance in TPA, MAA, and tibial length.
  • In small-breed dogs, increasing the MAA from 3° to 5° did not affect TPA outcomes, but increased proximal bone stock, improving feasibility.
  • Wedge angles and tibial length changes varied by method, but CCWOCORA maintained length better than TPA-based methods.
  • The technique allows preoperative planning of both desired MAA and TPA, enhancing predictability and customization.
  • CORA methodology enables precise geometric correction and alignment of mechanical axes, reducing reliance on trial-and-error alignment.

Petchell

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

2025-7-VS-petchell-2

Article Title: An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.