Your Custom Quiz

In Gleason 2023 et al., on ala vestibuloplasty in cats, which of the following complications was reported after ala vestibuloplasty?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only minor complications were reported: mild epistaxis and hypersalivation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Mild epistaxis.
Only minor complications were reported: mild epistaxis and hypersalivation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ala vestibuloplasty significantly reduced normalized pulmonary transit time (nPTT) (mean 5.43 → 3.89 sec; p <.001), suggesting improved cardiopulmonary function.
  • Clinical respiratory signs improved, including reduced snoring, sneezing, nasal discharge, and open-mouth breathing (all p <.01).
  • Activity tolerance increased, with less dyspnea during activity and longer time to onset of dyspnea (p <.005).
  • Paradoxical sternal motion resolved in all affected cats after surgery.
  • Hiatal hernias resolved in 75% of affected cats on follow-up CT.
  • No serious complications occurred, with only mild, self-limiting epistaxis and hypersalivation in a few cases.
  • Aberrant turbinates were detected on CT in all cats, though only 1 showed obstructive CATs endoscopically.
  • Total clinical severity scores improved significantly postoperatively (median reduction of 30 points; p <.001).

Gleason

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Ala vestibuloplasty improves cardiopulmonary and activity‐related parameters in brachycephalic cats

2023-4-VS-gleason-4

Article Title: Ala vestibuloplasty improves cardiopulmonary and activity‐related parameters in brachycephalic cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kurogochi 2025 et al., on cardioplegia in mitral repair, what was the main finding regarding serum cardiac troponin I levels 12 hours post-op?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. There was no significant difference in cTnI levels at 12h post-op (p = 0.478).
Incorrect. The correct answer is They were comparable between both groups.
There was no significant difference in cTnI levels at 12h post-op (p = 0.478).

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in cardiac troponin I levels 12h post-op between mDN and St. Thomas cardioplegia groups (p = 0.478)
  • Sinus rhythm returned faster in the mDN group after aortic cross-clamp removal (median 60s vs 362s, p = 0.027)
  • Lower serum potassium at cross-clamp removal in the mDN group (median 4.5 mEq/L vs 5.4, p = 0.005)
  • Fewer doses needed in the mDN group (median 2.5 vs 4.0, p = 0.040)
  • Higher total crystalloid volume used in mDN group (23.6 vs 12.6 mL/kg, p < 0.001)
  • No difference in survival (700-day survival 90% in both groups, p = 0.958)
  • No difference in hospitalization duration (median 6 days for both, p = 0.789)
  • Echocardiographic remodeling similar between groups at 24h post-op

Kurogochi

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Saline‐based modified del Nido cardioplegia versus multidose St. Thomas cardioplegia in canine mitral valve repair: A randomized controlled trial

2025-7-VS-kurogochi-2

Article Title: Saline‐based modified del Nido cardioplegia versus multidose St. Thomas cardioplegia in canine mitral valve repair: A randomized controlled trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Peycke 2022 et al., on CBLO in immature dogs, how many dogs developed **tibial recurvatum** due to over-rotation of the TPA during CBLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to overcorrection to protect CrCL avulsion repair.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.
One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to overcorrection to protect CrCL avulsion repair.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO was effective for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs with CrCL injuries, avoiding disruption of proximal tibial growth plates.
  • Radiographic union of the osteotomy occurred in a mean of 6 weeks (range: 4–8 weeks), indicating rapid bone healing.
  • Full limb function was restored in all cases by long-term follow-up (mean 23 months), including dogs with initial complications.
  • Two dogs developed 19° valgus deformities due to screw interference with the proximal tibial physis; both were corrected surgically with return to function.
  • One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to over-rotation of the tibial plateau, but retained full function without revision.
  • CCS (countersink compression screw) caused early apophyseal closure in older dogs but had no adverse clinical effects.
  • In contrast, K-wire or plate-only fixation preserved open apophysis, suggesting implant choice may influence growth.
  • No meniscal injuries were observed, and all CrCL injuries were managed arthroscopically — 6 complete, 6 partial, 4 avulsions.

Peycke

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

2022-3-VS-peycke-5

Article Title: Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Meltzer 2022 et al., on femoral implant selection, what was the most common major complication reported?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Luxation was the most common complication, occurring in 8 of 135 THRs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Coxofemoral luxation.
Luxation was the most common complication, occurring in 8 of 135 THRs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Hybrid implants were used in older, heavier dogs with lower canal flare index (CFI) compared to cementless types.
  • CFI <1.8 was associated with higher risk of femoral fracture or stem subsidence with cementless implants.
  • Total complication rate was 14%, with catastrophic complications in only 1.5%—lower than reported in other studies.
  • No significant difference in complication rates across implant types (BFX, BFX-C, hybrid).
  • Femur fractures were rare (2.9%), lower than in prior studies, and successfully managed with cerclage/plate fixation.
  • Coxofemoral luxation was the most common complication (8 cases); all occurred within 62 days post-op, mostly resolved with revision.
  • Collared BFX stems did not significantly reduce complications, though they may limit stem subsidence.
  • An implant selection algorithm was proposed, using age ≥7 years, weight ≥45 kg, and CFI <1.8 to guide cemented vs. cementless stem use.

Meltzer

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Case factors for selection of femoral component type in canine hip arthroplasty using a modular system

2022-2-VS-meltzer-3

Article Title: Case factors for selection of femoral component type in canine hip arthroplasty using a modular system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hanlon 2022 et al., on short screw sacroiliac fixation, what was the difference in mechanical performance between short lag and short positional screws?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No statistical difference in mechanical performance (stiffness, peak, or yield load) was found between SLS and SPS.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No mechanical difference was observed.
No statistical difference in mechanical performance (stiffness, peak, or yield load) was found between SLS and SPS.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Two short screws (SLS or SPS) provided >2× peak load, yield load, and stiffness vs a single long screw (LLS) for SI joint stabilization.
  • No mechanical advantage was seen between the two short screw types (lag vs positional).
  • All short screws terminated lateral to the spinal canal, avoiding spinal impingement.
  • Ventral sacral foraminal impingement occurred in 3 short-screw cases (1 SPS, 2 SLS), all involving the caudal screw.
  • LLS group showed more abaxial displacement at osteotomy sites, suggesting inferior stabilization for concurrent pelvic fractures.
  • Short screw constructs had longer total screw length (48 mm) than LLS (40 mm), contributing to increased stiffness.
  • Positioning of caudal screw in a cranial/craniodorsal trajectory may help avoid nerve foraminal injury.
  • No significant difference in displacement at peak load among groups; stiffness and load capacity were the primary benefits.

Hanlon

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Mechanical evaluation of canine sacroiliac joint stabilization using two short screws

2022-7-VS-hanlon-2

Article Title: Mechanical evaluation of canine sacroiliac joint stabilization using two short screws

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In İnal 2025 et al., on supracutaneous locking plates, what was one key advantage of SLPs over external skeletal fixation in bilateral fractures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The SLP design prevented interference in bilateral applications, unlike bulky external fixators.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced bulk, no entanglement.
The SLP design prevented interference in bilateral applications, unlike bulky external fixators.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Supracutaneous locking plates (SLPs) were successfully used to manage 33 diaphyseal fractures (radial–ulnar and tibial) in 30 cats and dogs.
  • Median fracture healing time was 50.5 days (range: 27–88), with most patients regaining limb use within days postoperatively.
  • CT-based metrics (callus area, HU, and 3D bone volume) increased significantly during healing (p < 0.05), validating CT as a quantitative tool for assessing healing.
  • Complications were minimal: minor in 15/33 (e.g., screw tract discharge, edema), and major in 3/33 (e.g., implant failure, delayed union, nonunion).
  • Minimally invasive osteosynthesis required longer surgery times than closed reduction (p < 0.05), but both techniques were viable.
  • SLPs enabled successful bilateral fracture management without inter-plate interference due to their compact design.
  • Screw orientation challenges were noted in cats, especially with cranial application to the radius due to narrow anatomy.
  • Polyaxial locking screws were used safely and did not dislodge, allowing for angular insertion (≤10°) to avoid neurovascular structures.

İnal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Minimally Invasive Radial–Ulnar and Tibial Fracture Management with Supracutaneous Locking Plates in Dogs and Cats

2025-5-VCOT-inal-5

Article Title: Minimally Invasive Radial–Ulnar and Tibial Fracture Management with Supracutaneous Locking Plates in Dogs and Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Banks 2024 et al., what ostectomy position was associated with the most accurate postoperative TPA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Accuracy in achieving target TPA was best when the ostectomy was placed ≤7.5 mm from patellar tendon origin.
Incorrect. The correct answer is ≤7.5 mm from patellar tendon origin.
Accuracy in achieving target TPA was best when the ostectomy was placed ≤7.5 mm from patellar tendon origin.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study Design: Retrospective study of 100 radiographs using in silico and clinical data
  • Mean preoperative TPA: 28.6°, higher in small dogs than large (p = .02)
  • Mean planned TPA (in silico): 7.6°, not achieving 5° target (p < .01)
  • Median postoperative TPA: 5.5° overall; higher in small dogs (7°) vs large (4.5°) (p = .06)
  • Postoperative ostectomy position: More distal than recommended; average = 8.6 mm
  • Increased distalizationgreater under-correction of TPA (p = .01)
  • Most accurate correction occurred when ostectomy was ≤7.5 mm from patellar tendon
  • Wedge angle categories (TPA-Pre minus 5–2°) were used based on pre-op TPA

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-1-VS-banks-5

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lampart 2023 et al., on manual laxity testing, what was the interobserver agreement for cranial tibial translation (CTT) across all manual laxity tests?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CTT had an ICC > 0.9 across all tests, indicating excellent interobserver reliability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Excellent.
CTT had an ICC > 0.9 across all tests, indicating excellent interobserver reliability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cranial drawer (CD), tibial compression (TCT), and tibial pivot compression test (TPCT) showed 100% sensitivity and specificity in differentiating intact from CCL-deficient stifles in this ex vivo model.
  • TPCT elicited the highest cranial tibial translation (CTT) and internal tibial rotation, though differences in rotation did not reach statistical significance.
  • Inter- and intraobserver agreement for CTT was excellent across all tests (ICC >0.9).
  • Rotation and force application had greater variability, particularly with less experienced observers and during CD.
  • Forces applied during CD were significantly higher in intact limbs and correlated with observer experience.
  • Subjective CTT estimates strongly correlated with objective kinematic measurements (r = 0.895), with a median absolute error of 1.31 mm.
  • TPCT may be particularly useful for assessing rotational instability, mimicking the pivot-shift test used in human ACL exams.
  • Study supports development of a grading system for manual laxity testing, especially in acute CCLR cases.

Lampart

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Evaluation of the accuracy and intra‐ and interobserver reliability of three manual laxity tests for canine cranial cruciate ligament rupture—An ex vivo kinetic and kinematic study

2023-5-VS-lampart-2

Article Title: Evaluation of the accuracy and intra‐ and interobserver reliability of three manual laxity tests for canine cranial cruciate ligament rupture—An ex vivo kinetic and kinematic study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Marchionatti 2022 et al., on antiseptic efficacy comparison, what methodological limitation was common across studies?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most studies lacked detail in randomization and blinding methods, leading to unclear risk of bias in multiple domains:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Unclear risk of bias due to insufficient reporting.
Most studies lacked detail in randomization and blinding methods, leading to unclear risk of bias in multiple domains:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings

  • Chlorhexidine-based asepsis protocols were comparable to povidone-iodine for reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates in veterinary surgery.
  • No significant difference in skin bacterial colonization was observed between the two antiseptics, at both immediate and delayed timepoints.
  • Chlorhexidine-alcohol protocols showed a non-significant trend toward improved bacterial reduction in some studies, though inconsistent across all studies.
  • Use of neutralizing agents was inconsistent, which may have led to overestimation of antiseptic efficacy in several studies.
  • Formulations and concentrations varied widely (e.g., chlorhexidine 0.5–4%, povidone-iodine 0.7–1%), contributing to heterogeneity and limiting definitive conclusions.
  • Only a minority of studies reported using CDC criteria for SSI diagnosis, affecting the reliability of infection outcomes.
  • Risk of bias was high or unclear in multiple domains across all included studies, limiting overall confidence in conclusions.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed no statistically significant superiority of either protocol for SSI prevention or skin bacterial reduction.

Marchionatti

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022-5-VS-marchionatti-3

Article Title: Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Danielski 2024 et al., on PUO effect on HIF, what was the mean preoperative Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the fissure ROI on CT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The preoperative HU for the fissure region of interest was reported as 640.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 640.
The preoperative HU for the fissure region of interest was reported as 640.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Sample: 51 elbows from 35 spaniel dogs
  • Healing Rate: Subjective healing (complete or partial) in 80.3% of elbows; complete in 54.9%
  • Objective HU analysis: Mean HU increased from 640 (pre-op) to 835 (follow-up) (p = .001)
  • Age Effect: Dogs <14 months showed the greatest HU increase (+384 HU) and had wider fissures with less sclerosis
  • Complications:
    • Major: 5 dogs (6 limbs); 4 related to fissure healing (7.8%), 2 related to PUO healing (3.9%)
    • Minor: 3 cases (5.8%) due to IM pin migration
  • Sclerosis: Older dogs had more humeral condyle sclerosis, possibly limiting healing
  • PUO Effectiveness: Confirmed cranio-proximal displacement of anconeal process; aimed to relieve humero-anconeal incongruity
  • Control Comparison: Avoids complications associated with transcondylar screw (infection, breakage)

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Influence of oblique proximal ulnar osteotomy on humeral intracondylar fissures in 35 spaniel breed dogs

2024-2-VS-danielski-4

Article Title: Influence of oblique proximal ulnar osteotomy on humeral intracondylar fissures in 35 spaniel breed dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.