Your Custom Quiz

In Anderson 2023 et al., on French Bulldogs with humeral condylar fractures, which fracture configuration was most common?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. LHCF was the most frequent, representing 63.6% of fractures.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lateral condylar fracture.
LHCF was the most frequent, representing 63.6% of fractures.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lateral humeral condylar fractures (LHCF) were most common, comprising 63.6% of cases.
  • Transcondylar screw (TCS) + K-wire(s) fixation had a 7.62x higher risk of major complications compared to other methods (p = .009).
  • All cases of TCS migration occurred in the TCS + K-wire group; none occurred with plate fixation.
  • Overall complication rate was 40.9%, with 29.5% being major and requiring intervention.
  • Contralateral humeral intracondylar fissures (HIF) were found in 58.1% of French Bulldogs with CT data.
  • No significant association between age and presence of HIF, but fissure length increased with age (R = 0.47, p = .048).
  • Younger, lighter dogs had higher complication and screw migration rates, possibly due to softer bone and smaller condyles.
  • TCS + plate fixation had the lowest complication rate, suggesting biomechanical superiority.

Anderson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Humeral condylar fractures and fissures in the French bulldog

2023-1-VS-anderson-1

Article Title: Humeral condylar fractures and fissures in the French bulldog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Wilson 2025 et al., on acetabular measurement accuracy, which pair of measurement methods showed the least bias in predicting final cup size?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These methods had a mean prediction bias within ±0.5 mm of final cup size.
Incorrect. The correct answer is ACVD and ALVD.
These methods had a mean prediction bias within ±0.5 mm of final cup size.

🔍 Key Findings

Study population: 73 hips from 60 dogs undergoing cementless THR.
Methods evaluated:

  • ACVD/ACOLL (acetabular circle on VD or OLL view)
  • ALVD/ALOLL (acetabular line)
  • FHCVD/FHCOLL/FHCCCHB (femoral head circle)
Findings:
  • Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver consistency were excellent for ACVD and ACOLL.
  • FHC methods consistently underestimated actual cup size by 2.4–3.6 mm.
  • AC and AL methods had low bias (±0.5 mm) and better predictive value.
  • OA severity negatively affected the accuracy of all measurements (p < .05).
  • Highest predictive accuracy was ~49% using ACVD with rounding down protocol.

Wilson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Evaluation of three acetabular measurement methods for total hip replacement in dogs

2025-1-VS-wilson-5

Article Title: Evaluation of three acetabular measurement methods for total hip replacement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, which enterotomy method showed significantly lower intraluminal pressure resistance?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. SSE had significantly lower leak pressures and failed in 12/20 constructs, making it less secure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Skin staple enterotomy (SSE).
SSE had significantly lower leak pressures and failed in 12/20 constructs, making it less secure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-1

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In İnal 2025 et al., on feline high-rise trauma, what was the survival rate across all included cats?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 354 out of 373 cats survived, giving a 94.9% survival rate
Incorrect. The correct answer is 94.9%.
354 out of 373 cats survived, giving a 94.9% survival rate

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 373 cats with high-rise syndrome (HRS) from 2017–2020.
ATTS was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001); each point increase decreased survival odds (OR = 0.46).
AUC for ATTS ROC curve: 0.857 (95% CI: 0.788–0.926).
Floor height, lesion type, and ground surface were not significantly associated with survival.
Odds of injury were 7.98× higher when landing on hard vs. soft surface (p < 0.001).
16.96× increased injury risk from the fourth vs. third floor (p = 0.008).
Cats with ATTS ≥7 had 62% mortality; median ATTS increased with floor height (r = 0.244, p < 0.001).
Thoracic and vertebral trauma were most common causes of death.
Only 32% of cats had the “classic” HRS triad (pneumothorax, epistaxis, hard palate fracture).

Inal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

2025-1-VC-inal-3

Article Title: Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, which factor was significantly associated with incisional dehiscence?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lack of postoperative antibiotics was significantly associated with higher dehiscence rates (p = .023).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Postoperative antibiotic use.
Lack of postoperative antibiotics was significantly associated with higher dehiscence rates (p = .023).

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in non-infected incisional dehiscence rates among groups using PDS vs. Monocryl for subcutaneous and skin closure.
  • Overall dehiscence rate: 9.48% (22/232 dogs).
  • Postoperative antibiotic use and signs of inflammation were significantly associated with dehiscence (p = .023 and p < .001, respectively).
  • Dogs not receiving postoperative antibiotics had a higher dehiscence rate (14.74%) than those that did (5.84%).
  • Most dehiscence cases were superficial (85.7%), and the average length of dehiscence was 1.71 cm.
  • No statistically significant impact of weight, BCS, incision length, procedure type, surgeon experience, closure direction, or barrier use on dehiscence rate.

Caiazzo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

2025-3-VS-caiazzo-2

Article Title: Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kwok 2023 et al., on BFX lateral bolt THR in dogs,what was the reported mean subsidence of the femoral stem at 1 month?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean subsidence was 1.22 ± 0.16 mm at 1 month.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.22 mm.
Mean subsidence was 1.22 ± 0.16 mm at 1 month.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 97.4% of dogs returned to normal function after total hip replacement using the BFX lateral bolt.
  • Mean femoral stem subsidence was 1.22 mm, with most occurring in the first month and minimal thereafter.
  • Postoperative complication rate was 13.6%, with 9.2% major and 4.4% minor complications.
  • Femoral fractures (3.6%) and coxofemoral luxations (3.6%) were the most common major complications.
  • Increased age and higher stem size were risk factors for postoperative femoral fractures; CFI >2.0 was also associated.
  • Medial calcar fractures were avoided, and fractures occurred distal to stem ingrowth zone, simplifying repairs.
  • Three cases underwent prophylactic plating, all with excellent outcomes and no complications.
  • Explant rate was 2.6% (5/195), with most failures involving acetabular cup rather than femoral stem.

Kwok

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Clinical outcomes of canine total hip replacement utilizing a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem: 195 consecutive cases (2013–2019)

2023-1-VS-kwok-4

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of canine total hip replacement utilizing a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem: 195 consecutive cases (2013–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Deprey 2022 et al., on gap fracture implants, which material was the NAS-ILN made of?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The NAS-ILN was made from titanium alloy (Ti6Al-4V ELI), offering favorable biomechanics and biocompatibility.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Titanium alloy.
The NAS-ILN was made from titanium alloy (Ti6Al-4V ELI), offering favorable biomechanics and biocompatibility.

🔍 Key Findings

  • NAS-ILN had significantly greater stiffness in both axial compression and 4-point bending compared to LCP constructs.
  • Ultimate load to failure was significantly higher for NAS-ILN in compression (804 N vs 328 N) and bending (25.7 Nm vs 16.3 Nm).
  • Torsional stiffness and angular deformation were similar, but NAS-ILN resisted higher torque to failure than LCP (22.5 Nm vs 19.1 Nm).
  • No slack was observed with the NAS-ILN construct, unlike older nail designs.
  • Failure modes differed: LCPs failed via plate bending; NAS-ILNs failed at the implant or bone near screw holes.
  • Titanium alloy and curved design of NAS-ILN provides better anatomic fit and more uniform stress distribution.
  • A third, perpendicular locking hole in NAS-ILN may enhance torsional stability but was not utilized in this study.
  • The curved, angle-stable design of NAS-ILN is a novel advancement in veterinary orthopedics.

Deprey

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

2022-8-VS-deprey-4

Article Title: Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Larose 2024 et al., on laparoscopic liver biopsies in dogs, what biopsy surface area was associated with a 98% probability of obtaining ≥11 portal triads?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Figure 1 modeled surface area vs. triad count; ≥40 mm² yielded 98% probability of sufficient portal triads.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 40 mm².
Figure 1 modeled surface area vs. triad count; ≥40 mm² yielded 98% probability of sufficient portal triads.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Histologic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm biopsies was 90%, with a Gwet's AC1 of 0.81 (p < .0001).
  • 5 mm biopsies yielded significantly more portal triads and lobules than 3 mm samples (p = .0003 and p < .0001).
  • Crush artifacts were significantly higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), though fragmentation scores were similar (p = .935).
  • Both forceps produced adequate samples for histopathology, copper quantification, and bacterial culture.
  • No hemorrhage requiring intervention occurred, and both sizes were deemed safe and minimally invasive.
  • Surface area ≥40 mm² strongly predicted ≥11 portal triads, a desirable threshold for reliable histopathology.
  • Use of 3 mm instruments was easier in small dogs (<12 kg), but more challenging in larger dogs due to shaft length.
  • Clinical diagnoses were unaffected by forceps size, even in the one discordant histologic pair.

Larose

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

2024-4-VS-larose1-2

Article Title: Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Petchell 2025 et al., on CORA-based CCWO, what was the key advantage of the CCWOCORA method in achieving postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPAPOST)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CCWOCORA achieved a precise TPAPOST of 5.00° in all cases due to preoperative geometric planning.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It allowed for exact prediction and achievement of TPAPOST.
CCWOCORA achieved a precise TPAPOST of 5.00° in all cases due to preoperative geometric planning.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy (CCWOCORA) consistently achieved the target postoperative TPA of 5° across all tibial morphologies.
  • CCWOCORA produced significantly less variability in postoperative TPA compared to other methods (TPA range: 5.00–5.00°; p < .001).
  • Mechanical axis advancement (MAA) was precisely controlled at 3° in CCWOCORA, leading to greater surgical predictability.
  • Other techniques (e.g., CCWOTPA, CCWOTPA–5, CCWOISO) showed greater variance in TPA, MAA, and tibial length.
  • In small-breed dogs, increasing the MAA from 3° to 5° did not affect TPA outcomes, but increased proximal bone stock, improving feasibility.
  • Wedge angles and tibial length changes varied by method, but CCWOCORA maintained length better than TPA-based methods.
  • The technique allows preoperative planning of both desired MAA and TPA, enhancing predictability and customization.
  • CORA methodology enables precise geometric correction and alignment of mechanical axes, reducing reliance on trial-and-error alignment.

Petchell

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

2025-7-VS-petchell-1

Article Title: An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Burton 2025 et al., on antebrachial conformation, which group comparison showed a significant difference in both PRUDA and UCORA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PRUDA differed significantly between Group 1 and both Group 2 & 3; UCORA differed between Group 1 and Group 3.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Group 1 vs both Group 2 and 3.
PRUDA differed significantly between Group 1 and both Group 2 & 3; UCORA differed between Group 1 and Group 3.

🔍 Key Findings

  • PRUDA (proximal radio-ulnar divergence angle) and UCORA (ulnar center of rotation of angulation) were significantly greater in Cocker Spaniels with HIF vs those without.
  • PRUDA (p < .001): Group 1 (HIF) vs Group 2 & 3.
  • UCORA (p = .036): Group 1 vs Group 3.
  • Other angles (MPRA, LDRA, PCRA, DCRA, torsion) showed no significant differences.
  • Increased PRUDA and UCORA may lead to divergent load vectors across the humeral condyle, potentially predisposing to stress fracture (HIF).
  • Measurement techniques using CT-based 3D reconstructions were reliable (intraobserver ICC > 0.84).

Burton

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Antebrachial conformation in Cocker Spaniels with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

2025-4-VS-burton-4

Article Title: Antebrachial conformation in Cocker Spaniels with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.