Your Custom Quiz

In Carvajal 2025 et al., on femoral stem breakage, what was the most common site of stem failure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All failures occurred at the proximolateral shoulder, consistent with high stress concentration and fatigue location.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Proximolateral shoulder.
All failures occurred at the proximolateral shoulder, consistent with high stress concentration and fatigue location.

🔍 Key Findings

Incidence of BFX lateral bolt stem breakage: 2.95% (13 dogs, 14 stems)

Implant factors:

  • 13/14 were BFX lateral bolt stems (sizes #5–7)
  • +9 necks used in 5/11 of 17 mm heads
  • 10/14 stems undersized based on radiographs
  • 10/13 dogs exceeded weight limits for implanted stem size

Malalignment:

  • 10/14 had varus alignment (median 3.9°)
  • 8/14 had insufficient proximodistal seating

Breakage site: Proximolateral shoulder in all cases

Revision outcomes:

  • 11 revised (7 CFX, 3 larger BFX, 1 collared)
  • 9/10 revised dogs regained full function
  • Complications: 1 rebreakage, 1 periprosthetic fracture, 1 fixation failure

Histopathology:

  • Electron microscopy showed fatigue striations and incomplete bead fusion

Conclusion: Avoid small BFX lateral bolt stems if undersized or if long necks required; use weight guidelines to prevent fatigue failure.

Carvajal

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

2025-3-VS-carvajal-4

Article Title: Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Poggi 2025 et al., on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cats, what was the reported median postoperative hospitalization duration?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The median hospitalization time following surgery was 3 days (range 2–4 days).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3 days.
The median hospitalization time following surgery was 3 days (range 2–4 days).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was successfully performed in all 22 cats without conversion to open surgery.
  • Complication rate was low: 3 cats had postoperative complications (1 seroma, 1 vomiting, 1 EHBDO and death).
  • Median operating time was 41 minutes; median hospitalization was 3 days.
  • No cases required conversion to open laparotomy, even in cats as small as 2.5 kg.
  • Common devices used: Hemoclips or Hem-o-lok for cystic duct ligation; Ligasure, harmonic scalpel, or j-hook for dissection.
  • Most common indications: cholelithiasis (9/22) and cholecystitis (10/22), with one biliary mucocele and one adenoma.
  • Histopathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases; concurrent liver or intestinal biopsies were performed in some cats.
  • Postoperative AUS and bloodwork were routine and important for detecting early signs of EHBDO.

Poggi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

2025-5-VS-poggi-5

Article Title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Stoneburner 2024 et al., on MIS survey results, which factor was most strongly associated with increased MIS proficiency?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Those trained in MIS during residency had significantly greater perceived proficiency (p < .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Residency training in MIS.
Those trained in MIS during residency had significantly greater perceived proficiency (p < .001).

🔍 Key Findings

  • The survey included 111 practicing surgeons and 28 residents from ACVS, ECVS, and ANZCVS. 98.2% had performed soft tissue minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
  • In the past year, surgeons reported a median caseload of 90% basic laparoscopy, 0% advanced laparoscopy, and 10% thoracoscopy; for residents: 100% basic laparoscopy, 0% advanced, 0% thoracoscopy.
  • Laparoscopic ovariectomy and OHE were the most commonly performed MIS procedures, with most respondents proficient in basic laparoscopy, but few performing advanced laparoscopy or thoracoscopy.
  • Top barriers to MIS adoption were: lack of consistent caseload, lack of training, difficult learning curve, equipment limitations, and cost.
  • 76.6% of surgeons and 92.9% of residents received MIS training during residency. Those trained had completed residency median 6 years ago, compared to 22 years ago for those without MIS training (p < .001). Perceived adequate training correlated with higher proficiency.
  • MIS was recognized as having a steep learning curve, but patient benefits (mean score 4.0/5) were the top motivation — less pain, faster recovery, improved visualization.
  • The authors conclude basic laparoscopy is widely adopted, but advanced and thoracoscopic MIS remain underutilized. Training and access are key to future growth.
  • Expanded training and improved access to equipment are necessary to promote broader integration of MIS into veterinary soft-tissue surgery.

Stoneburner

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal surgery: A 2020 survey of small animal surgical diplomates and residents

2024-5-VS-stoneburner-3

Article Title: Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal surgery: A 2020 survey of small animal surgical diplomates and residents

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Folk 2025 et al., on vessel sealing device reuse, what was the most common level of biologic debris observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Scant debris was the most frequent finding (14 of 16 devices), despite cleaning and EtO sterilization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Scant.
Scant debris was the most frequent finding (14 of 16 devices), despite cleaning and EtO sterilization.

🔍 Key Findings

40 dogs underwent splenectomy using 16 bipolar vessel sealing devices (VSDs)
Devices were reused up to 4 times after handwashing and ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization
Biologic debris was found in 100% of devices, specifically under the transection blade, even after a single use

  • Mostly scant (14/16) or mild (2/16) debris

No devices or debris yielded positive aerobic culture after EtO sterilization
EtO sterilization proved microbiologically effective despite visible residue
Perioperative failure rate: 1 device (malfunctioned during first activation)

Folk

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Incidence of residual biologic debris and contamination of reused bipolar vessel sealing devices after ethylene oxide sterilization following splenectomy

2025-3-VS-folk-4

Article Title: Incidence of residual biologic debris and contamination of reused bipolar vessel sealing devices after ethylene oxide sterilization following splenectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Devriendt 2022 et al., on EHPSS blood testing, which **two tests** had the highest sensitivity for detecting shunt closure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. SHA (96.9%) and MEGX T15 (96.2%) were the most sensitive single tests for detecting EHPSS closure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is SHA and MEGX at 15 minutes.
SHA (96.9%) and MEGX T15 (96.2%) were the most sensitive single tests for detecting EHPSS closure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fasting ammonia (FA) was the most specific test (100%) for confirming EHPSS closure postoperatively.
  • Serum hyaluronic acid (SHA) and MEGX at 15 minutes post-lidocaine were the most sensitive tests (96.9% and 96.2%, respectively).
  • SHA combined with MEGX T15, or with FA or postprandial serum bile acids (SBA), provided 100% sensitivity with good specificity (72.4–82.8%).
  • SHA levels remained elevated in all dogs with persistent shunting, even when other tests were normal.
  • Paired SBA had moderate sensitivity (90%) and variable specificity (89%).
  • The L/MEGX test at 30 min was less useful than at 15 min for assessing closure.
  • Traditional SBA testing showed reduced utility postoperatively; normal values did not rule out persistent shunting.
  • Blood tests improved when combined, but imaging remains essential to definitively confirm EHPSS closure.

Devriendt

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment

2022-7-VS-devriendt-2

Article Title: Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Welsh 2023 et al., on TTAF fixation methods, which failure mode was **most common** in both groups during mechanical testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 82% of failures were due to pin bending and pullout in both fixation groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pin bending and pullout.
82% of failures were due to pin bending and pullout in both fixation groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Two-pin fixation had significantly greater strength (639 N) than single-pin fixation (426 N) in TTAF models (p = .003).
  • Stiffness was also higher with two-pin constructs (72 N/mm vs 57 N/mm); statistically significant (p = .029).
  • Both fixation types withstood loads greater than quadriceps force in dogs at a walk (240 N), indicating clinical viability.
  • Failure was most commonly due to pin bending or pullout (82%), with fewer cases of ligament tearing or epiphyseal fracture.
  • K-wire insertion angle (KWIA) did not significantly differ between fixation types (p = .13).
  • Single larger pins delivered ~68% of the strength and ~83% of the stiffness of two smaller vertically aligned pins.
  • Clinical implication: Two vertically aligned pins are biomechanically superior for TTAF fixation in canine models.
  • Study used mature cadavers, which may underestimate loads and stiffness compared to immature clinical cases.

Welsh

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

2023-5-VS-welsh-2

Article Title: Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fitzpatrick 2024 et al., on ESF for pelvic fractures in cats, what was the typical postoperative hospitalization time?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cats were hospitalized for 2–5 days after ESF surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2–5 days.
Cats were hospitalized for 2–5 days after ESF surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • External skeletal fixation (ESF) was successfully applied to a variety of pelvic fracture types in cats, including sacroiliac luxations and ilial body fractures.
  • All fractures achieved radiographic union within 9 weeks, even in comminuted or complex configurations.
  • No intraoperative or long-term complications were reported during the study period.
  • Implant loosening was observed radiographically in 13% of cases, with 8% of pins found to be loose at frame removal.
  • ESF enabled indirect fracture reduction using components as handles, with a limited open approach minimizing soft tissue disruption.
  • No iatrogenic neurological deficits were observed, supporting safe pin placement near neurovascular structures, although some cats presented with pre-existing neurologic signs.
  • No cases required revision surgery, and all cats underwent stabilization solely with ESF as per study inclusion criteria.
  • Postoperative hospitalization ranged from 2 to 5 days, though no comparison to other fixation types was evaluated.

Fitzpatrick

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

External skeletal fixation for the treatment of pelvic fractures in cats

2024-7-VS-fitzpatrick-4

Article Title: External skeletal fixation for the treatment of pelvic fractures in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Galliano 2022 et al., on vascular access ports, what was the most frequent minor complication observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Temporary loss of patency occurred in 5 cases and was the most common minor complication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Temporary loss of catheter patency.
Temporary loss of patency occurred in 5 cases and was the most common minor complication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • SVAPs placed in axillary (aSVAP) or femoral/external iliac veins (fSVAP) during limb amputation remained functional in 92.3% and 100% of cases, respectively.
  • Complication rates were lower in aSVAP (23.1%) and fSVAP (0%) compared to jSVAP (47.4%), although not statistically significant (P = .12).
  • No catastrophic complications occurred with aSVAP or fSVAP; 2 deaths occurred with jSVAP due to port-related issues.
  • Infection-related port removal was needed in 1 aSVAP (7.7%) and 2 jSVAPs (10.5%) — no removals were required in fSVAPs.
  • Tip placement of the catheter (e.g., right atrium vs. vena cava) did not correlate with complications (P = .66).
  • Shorter surgical time likely with aSVAP/fSVAP as they use the same surgical field as the limb amputation.
  • Survival time median was similar across groups (jSVAP: 177 days, aSVAP: 125 days, fSVAP: 122 days).
  • SVAP implantation during limb amputation offers a practical and safe alternative to separate jugular placement.

Galliano

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

2022-7-VS-galliano-3

Article Title: Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Duffy 2022 et al., on crotch suture techniques, which technique resulted in the highest **initial leakage pressure** during FEESA in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. SCCS produced the highest ILP at 47.6 mm Hg, significantly higher than all other techniques.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS).
SCCS produced the highest ILP at 47.6 mm Hg, significantly higher than all other techniques.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Augmenting FEESA with two simple interrupted crotch sutures (TCS) or simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS) significantly increased initial leakage pressure (ILP) compared to no suture or a single suture (NCS, SICS).
  • SCCS had the highest ILP (47.6 mm Hg), followed by TCS (37.8 mm Hg), SICS (33.0 mm Hg), and NCS (27.1 mm Hg).
  • All crotch suture types increased maximal leakage pressure (MLP) compared to no crotch suture.
  • Leakage from the crotch occurred most commonly in NCS (67%) and SICS (50%), but only 8% with TCS and 0% with SCCS.
  • SCCS was the only technique where leakage never occurred at the crotch site.
  • SCCS had the highest MLP (100.6 mm Hg), supporting its use in clinical settings with high-risk patients.
  • Intraluminal pressures during leakage in NCS constructs were sometimes below normal physiologic pressures, emphasizing risk of leakage without crotch suture.
  • The transverse staple line never leaked in any group, indicating the crotch is the primary weak point.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

2022-4-VS-duffy-1

Article Title: Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Frapwell 2026 et al., on humeral condyle morphology, how did vertical condylar height differ in HIF-affected dogs compared to controls?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lengths a and b (vertical height) were significantly greater in HIF-affected elbows, indicating elongation of the condyle.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased medial and lateral heights.
Lengths a and b (vertical height) were significantly greater in HIF-affected elbows, indicating elongation of the condyle.

🔍 Key Findings

  • HIF-affected dogs had significantly greater angle A and B, indicating increased axial articular angulation of the medial and lateral humeral condyle (p < .001).
  • Vertical condylar height (lengths a and b) was significantly greater in HIF-affected dogs compared to controls (p = .007 and p < .001 respectively).
  • Angle G (dorsal plane medial condyle angle) was also significantly greater in HIF-affected dogs, suggesting altered medial humeral morphology (p < .001).
  • The angle between axial surfaces (A–B angle) was significantly more acute in HIF dogs (107.4° vs. 114.2°, p < .001), suggesting potential for increased shear force.
  • Springer Spaniels with HIF showed significantly greater angulation and vertical height than unaffected Springer controls (p < .001 to .007 across variables).
  • Morphological differences persisted across non-spaniel breeds, reinforcing that altered condylar geometry is not breed-restricted.
  • Authors propose that greater condylar angulation contributes to shear stress, orthogonal to the fissure, possibly contributing to HIF pathogenesis.
  • These morphologic alterations could inform future screening or preventive strategies, and may explain variable surgical outcomes and implant failure.

Frapwell

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Analysis of humeral condylar morphology in dogs with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

2026-1-VS-frapwell-3

Article Title: Analysis of humeral condylar morphology in dogs with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.