Your Custom Quiz

In Danielski 2025 et al., on PUO complication reduction, which statement best describes the **healing outcome**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Radiographic healing was confirmed in 92/93 limbs, with only one delayed case.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 98.9% of limbs achieved healing by 6 weeks.
Radiographic healing was confirmed in 92/93 limbs, with only one delayed case.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined intramedullary (IM) pin and rhBMP-2 use resulted in a low complication rate (7.4%) after proximal ulnar osteotomy (PUO).
  • Major complications occurred in 5.3% of cases (4 infections, 1 pin breakage with ulnar tilt requiring revision).
  • Minor complications occurred in 2.1% of cases (seroma, delayed union).
  • No cases of non-union were observed; 98.9% of limbs achieved radiographic healing by 6 weeks.
  • IM pin breakage was noted in 11.8% of limbs but did not affect healing outcomes.
  • Chondrodystrophic breeds made up 64.8% of the cohort and tolerated the procedure well.
  • Compared to prior studies, complication rates were substantially reduced with this technique (prior major: 13.9%; this study: 5.3%).
  • The use of rhBMP-2 likely enhanced early bone healing and provided biologic support, particularly important in breeds at higher risk of complications.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Impact of intramedullary pinning and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 on postoperative complications after proximal ulnar osteotomy in dogs

2025-6-VS-danielski-3

Article Title: Impact of intramedullary pinning and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 on postoperative complications after proximal ulnar osteotomy in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Trefny 2025 et al., on plate length and stiffness, what plate–bone ratio was required before significant stiffness and strain differences became apparent?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Biomechanical differences only became significant at the 80% plate–bone ratio (12-hole plate).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 80%.
Biomechanical differences only became significant at the 80% plate–bone ratio (12-hole plate).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 12-hole LCPs (80% plate–bone ratio) showed significantly higher construct stiffness than 6-, 8-, or 10-hole plates in both compression and tension bending.
  • Strain on the plate was significantly lower in 12-hole vs 6-hole plates at all regions of interest (ROIs), especially around the fracture gap.
  • No incremental increases in stiffness or decreases in strain were observed between 6-, 8-, and 10-hole plates—only when comparing to 12-hole plates.
  • Bone model strain adjacent to the plate end was significantly lower for 10- and 12-hole plates vs 6-hole plates under both loading conditions.
  • The threshold effect suggests biomechanical benefits only emerge beyond a plate–bone ratio of ~80%.
  • Working length increased from 9.4 mm (6-hole) to 13 mm (others), potentially influencing strain/stiffness differences.
  • Four-point bending was used, as it replicates the most biomechanically relevant force on plated long bones.
  • Clinical implication: Longer plates may reduce plate strain and peri-implant bone strain, potentially lowering risk of fatigue failure or stress risers.

Trefny

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2025

Effect of Plate Length on Construct Stiffness and Strain in a Synthetic Short-Fragment Fracture Gap Model Stabilized with a 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate

2025-2-VCOT-trefny-5

Article Title: Effect of Plate Length on Construct Stiffness and Strain in a Synthetic Short-Fragment Fracture Gap Model Stabilized with a 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Ellis 2024 et al., which region showed significantly higher mean HU in Guide Dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Guide Dogs had significantly higher mean HU in the humeral trochlea (mean difference 146.49 HU, p < 0.01):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Humeral trochlea.
Guide Dogs had significantly higher mean HU in the humeral trochlea (mean difference 146.49 HU, p < 0.01):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 86 elbows assessed: 32 Guide Dogs, 11 Border Collies
  • Guide Dogs showed significantly higher HU values in:
    • MCP: min (p = 0.022), mean (p < 0.01), max (p < 0.01)
    • Humeral trochlea: mean (p < 0.01), max (p < 0.01)
  • Results imply breed-associated HU variation, not necessarily pathologic sclerosis
  • Relevance: Important to avoid false positives for elbow dysplasia during CT-based breeding screens
  • Good interobserver agreement for mean HU values (ICC ~0.82–0.90)

Ellis

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Comparison of Hounsfield Units within the Humeral Trochlea and Medial Coronoid Process in a Population of Labrador X Golden Retriever Guide Dogs and Border Collies

2024-3-VCOT-ellis-2

Article Title: Comparison of Hounsfield Units within the Humeral Trochlea and Medial Coronoid Process in a Population of Labrador X Golden Retriever Guide Dogs and Border Collies

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Boullenger 2025 et al., on traumatic patellar luxation, what was the total proportion of cases experiencing severe complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Three of 14 animals (21.4%) had severe complications including FPS or capsular suture failure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 21.4%.
Three of 14 animals (21.4%) had severe complications including FPS or capsular suture failure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Patients: 16 (11 dogs, 5 cats); 6.1% of canine and 23.8% of feline PL cases were traumatic.
  • Most common luxation direction: Medial (81.3%).
  • Surgery: All had capsular imbrication; 75% had fabello-patellar suture (FPS).
  • Short-term results (13/16 cases):
    • 77% had no lameness by 2 months.
    • 85% had no PL recurrence.
    • 3 severe complications: capsulorrhaphy tear, FPS fabellar tear, septic arthritis.
  • Long-term results (13/16 cases):
    • 85% lameness-free.
    • 77% full function; 23% acceptable.
    • 0 reluxations reported by owners.

Boullenger

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Clinical Presentation, Surgical Treatment, and Outcome of Traumatic Patellar Luxation in 11 Dogs and 5 Cats: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study between 2011 and 2022

2025-1-VC-boullenger-4

Article Title: Clinical Presentation, Surgical Treatment, and Outcome of Traumatic Patellar Luxation in 11 Dogs and 5 Cats: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study between 2011 and 2022

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Renaud 2025 et al., on biliary peritonitis surgery, what total bilirubin threshold was associated with a 50% mortality rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Total bilirubin > 60.5 µmol/L was associated with 50% mortality among dogs with biliary peritonitis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 60.5 µmol/L.
Total bilirubin > 60.5 µmol/L was associated with 50% mortality among dogs with biliary peritonitis.

🔍 Key Findings

Mortality rate: 36% (12/33)
Cholecystectomy performed: 94% of dogs (31/33)
New significant prognostic factors for survival:

  • Hyperbilirubinemia (p = .049) — threshold = 60.5 μmol/L
  • Use of vasopressors (p = .002)
  • Renal dysfunction postoperatively (p = .008)
  • Number of postoperative complications (p = .005)

Multivariate model: Total bilirubin and number of complications best predicted survival
Septic vs nonseptic effusion: No significant difference in survival
Diagnostic imaging: Ultrasound sensitivity for extrahepatic biliary rupture = 38%
Most cultured pathogen: E. coli (80% of septic cases)

Renaud

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Clinical findings and prognostic factors for immediate survival in 33 dogs undergoing surgery for biliary peritonitis

2025-2-VS-renaud-2

Article Title: Clinical findings and prognostic factors for immediate survival in 33 dogs undergoing surgery for biliary peritonitis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Banks 2023 et al., on TECA-LBO in brachycephalic dogs, what was the most common intraoperative complication observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Severe hemorrhage was the most common intraoperative complication, seen in 76.2% of those with intra-op events.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Severe hemorrhage.
Severe hemorrhage was the most common intraoperative complication, seen in 76.2% of those with intra-op events.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) presented more acutely and at younger ages, most often with neurological signs compared to other breeds.
  • Preoperative signs such as facial nerve paresis, vestibular syndrome, and Horner’s syndrome were significantly more common in EBBs.
  • EBBs showed more severe imaging findings, including higher rates of otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%).
  • Intraoperative complications were more frequent in EBBs (11.1% vs. 5.3%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .078).
  • Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly between EBBs and other breeds (23.5% vs. 29.3%).
  • Surgical time was significantly longer in EBBs (median 115 vs. 95 minutes; p = .011).
  • MRI or combined CT/MRI were more frequently used in EBBs, likely due to the higher prevalence of neurological signs.
  • Despite anatomical challenges, complication rates in EBBs were comparable, supporting TECA-LBO safety in these breeds.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

2023-5-VS-banks-2

Article Title: Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Adair 2023 et al., on PCCLm vs. open cystotomy, what was the most common reason for converting PCCLm to OC?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most PCCLm to OC conversions (4/5) were due to difficulty retrieving numerous stones.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Too numerous stones to retrieve with cystoscope.
Most PCCLm to OC conversions (4/5) were due to difficulty retrieving numerous stones.

🔍 Key Findings

  • PCCLm resulted in significantly fewer postoperative lower urinary tract signs compared to OC (13.0% vs 60.9%, p <.001).
  • Incomplete urolith removal was not significantly different between PCCLm and OC (11.4% vs 20%, p = .112).
  • PCCLm had significantly shorter anesthesia times than OC when no concurrent procedures were performed (97.5 vs 120 min, p < .001).
  • Surgical site infection/inflammation (SSII) rates were low and not significantly different between groups (4.5% PCCLm vs 1.8% OC).
  • Dogs undergoing PCCLm were more frequently discharged same-day (84.7% vs 0% in OC), reflecting faster recovery.
  • PCCLm had higher intraoperative complication rates (22.1% vs 3.4%), mostly due to incision extension or conversions.
  • Time to additional surgery for urolith recurrence was longer in PCCLm dogs (24 vs 11.5 months, p = .004).
  • Calcium oxalate uroliths were more prevalent in PCCLm cases, while OC had more struvite or mixed types.

Adair

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

2023-7-VS-adair-2

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sullivan 2025 et al., on TTT stabilization methods, what theoretical advantage does the spacer pin technique offer?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Avoiding tuberosity pins may reduce risk of soft tissue irritation or fracture.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Avoids placing pins through tuberosity.
Avoiding tuberosity pins may reduce risk of soft tissue irritation or fracture.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spacer pin fixation showed no difference in failure force or stiffness compared to tension band wire (TBW) or 2-pin techniques.
  • All constructs failed under loads >1000 N, exceeding estimated peak quadriceps force in dogs during walking (~240 N).
  • Patellar ligament failure was the most common mode of failure across all groups (5–8 samples per group).
  • Distal tibial crest fractures were seen only in 2-pin and spacer pin groups, not in TBW group, suggesting TBW may protect against crest failure.
  • No failures occurred at pin tracts, possibly due to pin placement within patellar ligament footprint.
  • Spacer pin technique avoids placing pins through the tuberosity, potentially reducing risks of soft tissue complications like tendinopathy or irritation.
  • Use of partial osteotomy with robust distal crest may substitute for TBW without compromising initial mechanical strength.
  • Further in vivo or cyclic loading studies are required, as this cadaveric study tested only acute tensile failure.

Sullivan

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-sullivan-4

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Gutbrod 2024 et al., on feline tibial stabilization, which construct demonstrated the highest axial stiffness?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group 2 (2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm pin) showed the greatest stiffness and yield point under axial loading.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm pin.
Group 2 (2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm pin) showed the greatest stiffness and yield point under axial loading.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 2.4 mm LCP with a 1.6 mm IM pin had the highest axial stiffness and yield strength among the tested constructs.
  • Axial stiffness was significantly higher in the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm IM pin group compared to 2.7 mm LCP alone (p = .013).
  • No significant difference in torsional stiffness was found among groups.
  • 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin had the lowest stiffness and failure load, underperforming both other constructs.
  • All constructs failed via valgus bending, consistent with clinical observations in feline tibial fractures.
  • A 1.6 mm pin (~50% canal fill) resulted in superior construct performance vs. 1.0 mm (~30% fill).
  • Group 2 (2.4 LCP + 1.6 mm pin) outperformed the 2.7 mm LCP alone in stiffness, despite using a smaller plate.
  • Plate–rod constructs may better preserve periosteal blood supply and support minimally invasive stabilization strategies.

Gutbrod

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

2024-4-VS-gutbrod-1

Article Title: Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Gomes 2025 et al., on subdural shunting for TL-AD, which modification was part of the surgical technique for SDS placement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The modified technique used a hemilaminectomy, longitudinal dural incision, and avoided suturing either the dura or the shunt tube.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Hemilaminectomy with longitudinal durotomy and no suturing of shunt or dura.
The modified technique used a hemilaminectomy, longitudinal dural incision, and avoided suturing either the dura or the shunt tube.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified subdural shunt (SDS) placement was adapted from prior techniques using a hemilaminectomy approach and no suturing of the dura or shunt.
  • Dogs receiving SDS had significantly better long-term outcomes (85.7% improved) compared to those with durotomy alone (41.7%).
  • Recurrence rate was lower in the SDS group (14.3%) than control (41.7%), though not statistically significant.
  • Most recurrences occurred in Pugs (5/7), suggesting a breed predisposition.
  • Shunt size was limited to 25% of spinal cord diameter, typically 3–3.5 Fr.
  • CSF flow through the shunt was confirmed intraoperatively, supporting the role of SDS in maintaining flow and possibly preventing recurrence.
  • Immediate postoperative outcomes were not different between groups (≈42% deteriorated), but long-term recovery was better with SDS.
  • Steroid use pre-surgery did not correlate with improved outcome; fewer SDS dogs received steroids pre-op.

Gomes

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

2025-5-VS-gomes-1

Article Title: Post‐surgical outcome and recurrence rates in thoracolumbar arachnoid diverticula undergoing durotomy alone or alongside a modified technique of subdural shunt-placement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.