Your Custom Quiz

In Marturello 2023 et al., on 3D-printed humeral models, what clinical application is most **justified by this study’s findings**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. High accuracy in the humeral condyle suggests 3D-printed models are ideal for planning articular fracture repairs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Preoperative fracture reduction of humeral condyle.
High accuracy in the humeral condyle suggests 3D-printed models are ideal for planning articular fracture repairs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed models using desktop printers (FDM, LFS) showed submillimetric accuracy, comparable to or better than industrial-grade PJP printers.
  • Bone size had a greater effect on print accuracy than printer type, especially in proximal humerus regions.
  • The humeral condyle region showed the greatest model accuracy, with mean differences under 0.5 mm, regardless of printer.
  • Models tended to be slightly smaller than cadaveric bones, potentially due to systematic underestimation during printing.
  • FDM printer provided the highest accuracy at the humeral condyle in medium-sized bones (+0.09 mm).
  • LFS printer produced prints faster and more reliably than FDM, although both had comparable dimensional accuracy.
  • Statistically significant differences existed, but all were submillimetric and unlikely to impact surgical outcomes.
  • Desktop printers are suitable for surgical planning, including plate pre-contouring and patient-specific instrumentation.

Marturello

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Accuracy of anatomic 3‐dimensionally printed canine humeral models

2023-1-VS-marturello-5

Article Title: Accuracy of anatomic 3‐dimensionally printed canine humeral models

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Meltzer 2022 et al., on femoral implant selection, what was the role of canal flare index (CFI) in femoral component selection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CFI <1.8 was linked to increased risk of fracture and stem subsidence in cementless implants.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lower CFI was associated with femoral fractures and guided cemented stem selection.
CFI <1.8 was linked to increased risk of fracture and stem subsidence in cementless implants.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Hybrid implants were used in older, heavier dogs with lower canal flare index (CFI) compared to cementless types.
  • CFI <1.8 was associated with higher risk of femoral fracture or stem subsidence with cementless implants.
  • Total complication rate was 14%, with catastrophic complications in only 1.5%—lower than reported in other studies.
  • No significant difference in complication rates across implant types (BFX, BFX-C, hybrid).
  • Femur fractures were rare (2.9%), lower than in prior studies, and successfully managed with cerclage/plate fixation.
  • Coxofemoral luxation was the most common complication (8 cases); all occurred within 62 days post-op, mostly resolved with revision.
  • Collared BFX stems did not significantly reduce complications, though they may limit stem subsidence.
  • An implant selection algorithm was proposed, using age ≥7 years, weight ≥45 kg, and CFI <1.8 to guide cemented vs. cementless stem use.

Meltzer

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Case factors for selection of femoral component type in canine hip arthroplasty using a modular system

2022-2-VS-meltzer-4

Article Title: Case factors for selection of femoral component type in canine hip arthroplasty using a modular system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2024 et al., on leak testing in cooled feline intestine, what was the finding regarding initial leak pressure (ILP) between fresh and cooled enterotomy constructs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both ILP and MIP did not differ between cooled and fresh enterotomy groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Initial leak pressure did not differ significantly between groups.
Both ILP and MIP did not differ between cooled and fresh enterotomy groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No difference in initial leak pressure (ILP) or maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) between cooled (17–29 h) and fresh enterotomy constructs.
  • Wall thickness of duodenum and jejunum did not differ between fresh and cooled samples.
  • Leak locations (suture holes vs clamp sites) were similar between groups; not statistically different.
  • Volume of infusion did not influence ILP or MIP outcomes.
  • Mean ILP values: Control = 600 mmHg (maxed), Fresh = 200 mmHg, Cooled = 131 mmHg; CE vs FE difference was not significant.
  • Intraluminal diameter was largest in the ileum, followed by jejunum and duodenum.
  • Cadaveric intestine cooled ≤29h may be reliably used in ex vivo feline leak pressure studies.
  • First report of gross small intestinal lengths by region in cats—useful for resection planning.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

2024-5-VS-miller-1

Article Title: Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McKay 2023 et al., on patellar tendon augmentation, what was the most common mode of failure in the suprapatellar TBW group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Wire unraveling was the most frequent failure in the suprapatellar group (67%).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Wire unraveling.
Wire unraveling was the most frequent failure in the suprapatellar group (67%).

2023-8-VS-mckay-2

Article Title:

Journal:

In McLean 2024 et al., what was the mean postoperative TPA in dogs **without** rock-back?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The mean follow-up TPA in non-rock-back dogs was 6.8°:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6.8°.
The mean follow-up TPA in non-rock-back dogs was 6.8°:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 95 TPLO procedures reviewed retrospectively with follow-up radiographs
  • Rock-back defined as increase in tibial plateau angle (TPA) ≥2° from immediate post-op to recheck
  • 21% of stifles (20/95) experienced rock-back
  • Mean ΔTPA among rock-back cases = 3.2° ± 2.6°
  • No implant failures or tibial tuberosity fractures were reported in these cases
  • Plate inclination and exit cut angle (ECA) were not associated with increased risk of rock-back (p = 0.4 and 0.2)
  • Authors hypothesize that compression across osteotomy in vivo may mitigate torsional effects from ECA, unlike in gap-model studies
  • Emphasizes that rock-back is relatively common, even with well-placed implants

Mclean

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Effect of Plate Inclination and Osteotomy Positioning on Rock-back following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy in Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-mclean-4

Article Title: Effect of Plate Inclination and Osteotomy Positioning on Rock-back following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Leu 2026 et al., on cadaver training outcomes, what was a key limitation of the OSATS GRS identified in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Subjectivity in categories like tissue handling limits reliability and interobserver agreement.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It includes subjective scoring categories.
Subjectivity in categories like tissue handling limits reliability and interobserver agreement.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Structured cadaveric training significantly improved surgical technical skills with expert OSATS scores increasing from 17/35 to 23/35 (p = .001)
  • Self-assessment scores also improved significantly from 17/35 to 25/35 (p = .018), indicating perceived skill progression
  • Inter-assessor agreement was variable (κ = 0.04–0.65), with only moderate–substantial agreement between two of three experts
  • Agreement between self-assessment and expert assessment was poor (κ ≈ 0), highlighting inaccurate self-perception
  • Residents demonstrated better self-assessment accuracy than interns, suggesting experience improves insight into performance
  • Training program included multimodal structure (supervised sessions, self-directed practice, and one-on-one feedback), totaling ~45.8 hours over 3 months
  • OSATS GRS effectively detected skill improvement but has limitations in reliability, particularly due to subjective categories and lack of procedural specificity
  • Structured cadaver training is feasible and beneficial for residency programs, supporting integration into surgical curricula

Leu

Veterinary Surgery

3

2026

Structured assessment of a cadaveric orthopedic surgical training program of small animal surgeons in training: A prospective observational pilot study

2026-3-vs-leu-4

Article Title: Structured assessment of a cadaveric orthopedic surgical training program of small animal surgeons in training: A prospective observational pilot study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, which feature helped protect the pancreatic duct during lasering?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The catheter served as a protective shield over the ductal orifice during the laser procedure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Catheter positioned over pancreatic duct.
The catheter served as a protective shield over the ductal orifice during the laser procedure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Endoscopic-assisted retrograde catheterization (EARC) and laser sphincterotomy were successful in 18/18 cadavers, demonstrating technical feasibility.
  • Intramural common bile duct (ICBD) length ranged from 10 to 21 mm (mean 15.8 mm), with no correlation to body weight (r = 0.06, p = .79).
  • Transition from ICBD to extramural duct was accurately identified endoscopically in 88% (16/18); transition was heralded by separation of the submucosal layer.
  • Partial lateral perforations occurred in 2/18 dogs, only during early learning phase; no leakage was found on open dissection.
  • Laser sphincterotomy preserved the pancreatic duct orifice, aided by protective catheter positioning.
  • Compared to open duodenotomy, this technique allows for a smaller incision and less manipulation of the pancreas, which may reduce morbidity.
  • No adverse events such as intra-abdominal saline egress or full-thickness perforation occurred, and the technique allowed safe access up to 10 mm from the MDP.
  • Cadaveric limitations included absence of biliary pathology and inability to evaluate live complications, but the technique shows promise for future live animal trials.

Miyagi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Endoscopic‐assisted laser sphincterotomy of the intramural common bile duct: A cadaveric pilot study

2025-5-VS-miyagi-3

Article Title: Endoscopic‐assisted laser sphincterotomy of the intramural common bile duct: A cadaveric pilot study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Leu 2026 et al., on cadaver training outcomes, which group demonstrated more accurate self-assessment compared to expert evaluation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Residents had higher agreement with expert scores, reflecting improved self-perception with experience.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Residents.
Residents had higher agreement with expert scores, reflecting improved self-perception with experience.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Structured cadaveric training significantly improved surgical technical skills with expert OSATS scores increasing from 17/35 to 23/35 (p = .001)
  • Self-assessment scores also improved significantly from 17/35 to 25/35 (p = .018), indicating perceived skill progression
  • Inter-assessor agreement was variable (κ = 0.04–0.65), with only moderate–substantial agreement between two of three experts
  • Agreement between self-assessment and expert assessment was poor (κ ≈ 0), highlighting inaccurate self-perception
  • Residents demonstrated better self-assessment accuracy than interns, suggesting experience improves insight into performance
  • Training program included multimodal structure (supervised sessions, self-directed practice, and one-on-one feedback), totaling ~45.8 hours over 3 months
  • OSATS GRS effectively detected skill improvement but has limitations in reliability, particularly due to subjective categories and lack of procedural specificity
  • Structured cadaver training is feasible and beneficial for residency programs, supporting integration into surgical curricula

Leu

Veterinary Surgery

3

2026

Structured assessment of a cadaveric orthopedic surgical training program of small animal surgeons in training: A prospective observational pilot study

2026-3-vs-leu-5

Article Title: Structured assessment of a cadaveric orthopedic surgical training program of small animal surgeons in training: A prospective observational pilot study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sadowitz 2023 et al., on screw angle & speed, what clinical recommendation is supported to reduce TCF risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors recommend slow, coaxial screw insertion to minimize the risk of transcortical fractures.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Insert screws slowly and coaxially to the pilot hole.
The authors recommend slow, coaxial screw insertion to minimize the risk of transcortical fractures.

2023-8-VS-sadowitz-5

Article Title:

Journal:

In Niida 2024 et al., on surgical residents and TPLO time, how much longer did residents take compared to faculty surgeons (FS)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Resident surgeries took 1.54x the time of FS cases (153 vs 99 min).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 54% longer.
Resident surgeries took 1.54x the time of FS cases (153 vs 99 min).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Resident involvement significantly increased TPLO surgery duration compared to cases performed by faculty surgeons (FS)-only. Residents required 54% more surgery time (GLSM, 153 min) than FS-only cases (GLSM, 99 min), representing a 1.54-fold increase.
  • The study did not report on short-term complication rates. No conclusions can be drawn from this source regarding complications between resident and faculty groups.
  • Bone plate contouring was not evaluated. The source does not provide data regarding contouring frequency or its comparison between groups.
  • Surgery duration significantly decreased after the first year of residency, but remained stable between second- and third-year residents. This was largely due to shorter tibial osteotomy durations, while arthroscopy times remained unchanged across residency years.
  • Meniscal treatment was performed in 80% of cases, and it was associated with increased surgical duration, but the study did not compare the frequency of medial meniscal release between resident and faculty cases.
  • The study did not evaluate osteotomy healing or revision surgery. Cases requiring immediate reoperation were excluded.
  • Bone union outcomes were not assessed at 8 weeks or any other time point.
  • The study concludes that resident participation significantly prolongs surgical time, but no data are provided regarding the effect on short-term clinical outcomes.

Niida

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

The impact of surgery resident training on the duration of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and outcomes in dogs

2024-5-VS-niida-1

Article Title: The impact of surgery resident training on the duration of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and outcomes in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.