Your Custom Quiz

In Walker 2025 et al., on ventral slot guides, what was observed regarding surgical time between freehand and guided slots?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgical time was similar between groups (p = .071).
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference in time.
Surgical time was similar between groups (p = .071).

🔍 Key Findings

Design: Ex vivo cadaver study (n=8 dogs, 24 sites)
Comparison: Freehand vs. 3D-printed drill guide-assisted ventral slot (GAVS vs FHVS)
Findings:

  • GAVS produced slots not significantly different from planned dimensions (p = .722–.875)
  • FHVS produced significantly shorter slots than intended (p < .01)
  • No difference in surgical time (p = .071)
  • Shape ratio and slot divergence from midline were similar between groups (p > .4)
  • Use of guide significantly reduced variability in slot position (63% → 29%), shape (65% → 24%), and divergence (54% → 50%)

Conclusion: 3D-printed guides improved accuracy and consistency of ventral slot creation by novice surgeons; supports future evaluation in live dogs and small breeds

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

2025-3-VS-walker-4

Article Title: Evaluation of a patient‐specific 3D‐printed guide for ventral slot surgery in dogs: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Williams 2024 et al., on adrenaline use in maxillary nerve blocks, what adverse cardiovascular effects were observed due to adrenaline?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No dogs developed tachycardia, arrhythmia, tachypnea, or hypertension.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant adverse effects.
No dogs developed tachycardia, arrhythmia, tachypnea, or hypertension.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The addition of adrenaline (0.00198%) to bilateral maxillary nerve blocks significantly reduced intraoperative hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy (median reduction: 77.1%).
  • Normalized hemorrhage (g/kg) and total hemorrhage (g) were significantly lower in the adrenaline group (p = .021 and p = .013, respectively).
  • Surgeon-assessed hemorrhage scores were also significantly lower in the adrenaline group (median 2 vs. 3; p = .029), indicating improved surgical visibility.
  • No adverse effects (e.g. tachycardia, arrhythmia, or hypertension) were observed with adrenaline administration.
  • A standardized intraoral approach to the maxillary nerve block was used with 0.5 mL per side regardless of dog size.
  • Breed effect observed: English Bulldogs had higher normalized hemorrhage, possibly due to anatomical variation or underdosing relative to size.
  • Adrenaline may also prolong local anesthetic action and reduce blood aspiration risks, though this was not directly measured.
  • The study supports the routine inclusion of adrenaline in maxillary nerve blocks for staphylectomy in BOAS patients to improve surgical field and reduce bleeding.

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-8-VS-williams-4

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Parlier 2024 et al., on insufflation effects on portal pressure in dogs, what clinical recommendation did the authors make regarding insufflation pressure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors recommended using the minimum insufflation pressure necessary to visualize the abdomen.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Use lowest pressure to allow visualization.
Authors recommended using the minimum insufflation pressure necessary to visualize the abdomen.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal pressure increased proportionally with insufflation pressure: 38% at 6 mmHg, 95% at 10 mmHg, and 175% at 14 mmHg.
  • Exponential model: average increase of 7.45% per mmHg of insufflation pressure (CI: 4.7–10.2%).
  • No systemic hemodynamic adverse effects were observed; MAP remained >60 mmHg throughout.
  • Portal hypertension threshold (15 mmHg) predicted at ~6.4 mmHg insufflation pressure.
  • No statistical impact from patient weight, pressure-to-weight ratio, or order of insufflation rounds.
  • Measurement technique was feasible and safe, with only minor challenges (e.g., catheter kinking).
  • The study supports use of the lowest insufflation pressure needed for visualization to avoid portal hypertension.
  • Baseline portal pressures returned after desufflation, supporting comparison pre- and post-attenuation.

Parlier

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

2024-4-VS-parlier-5

Article Title: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In You 2025 et al., on barbed sutures for lung lobectomy, what was the main advantage of barbed sutures compared to traditional sutures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Barbed sutures significantly reduced bronchial ligation time vs traditional sutures (10.7 vs 14.1 minutes, p < .01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced ligation time.
Barbed sutures significantly reduced bronchial ligation time vs traditional sutures (10.7 vs 14.1 minutes, p < .01).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Barbed sutures showed comparable leakage pressure to traditional sutures and stapling devices (p = .36).
  • No bronchial leaks occurred at physiological pressure (<20 cmH₂O) in any group.
  • Leakage at supraphysiologic pressure (20–80 cmH₂O) occurred in 90% of stapler, 80% of traditional, and 60% of barbed suture closures.
  • Barbed sutures reduced ligation time significantly compared to traditional sutures (10.7 vs. 14.1 minutes, p < .01).
  • Staplers remained fastest, with mean ligation time of 2.4 minutes.
  • No knot failure or suture breakage was observed in barbed or traditional suture groups.
  • Leakage in barbed sutures occurred mostly at the loop effector zone, but remained within acceptable limits.
  • Barbed sutures may offer an effective alternative when staplers are unavailable, impractical, or cost-prohibitive.

You

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of a knotless barbed suture for canine total lung lobectomy: An ex vivo study

2025-7-VS-you-2

Article Title: Evaluation of a knotless barbed suture for canine total lung lobectomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In González Montaño 2023 et al., on traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP), what was the TPP-related mortality in the study cohort?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No patient died due to TPP; one cat was euthanized due to unrelated trauma.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0%.
No patient died due to TPP; one cat was euthanized due to unrelated trauma.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP) were diagnosed in 11 patients (9 dogs, 2 cats) using CT after blunt trauma.
  • TPPs were identified on radiographs in 64% of cases that were CT-confirmed, highlighting the superior sensitivity of CT.
  • Most cases (7/10) were managed conservatively, with complete recovery and no TPP-related mortality.
  • Thoracic surgery (lung lobectomy) was performed in 3 dogs, due to persistent pneumothorax or large TPP with perceived risk of complications.
  • All pneumothorax cases were managed with thoracostomy tubes, and chest drains were used in 73% of cases.
  • Pneumothorax was present in 100% of patients, often bilateral, and pulmonary contusions were reported in 73%.
  • One cat was euthanized due to unrelated maxillofacial trauma; no deaths were attributed to TPP itself.
  • Long-term follow-up (median 768 days) revealed only 1 case with possible TPP-related pneumonia; others had no complications.

González Montaño

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

2023-4-VS-gonzalezmontano-5

Article Title: Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was the main advantage of swab washing during intraoperative blood salvage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Swab washing is useful when blood accumulates on swabs rather than in cavities, e.g., in soft tissue surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It served as an adjunct when direct suction was limited.
Swab washing is useful when blood accumulates on swabs rather than in cavities, e.g., in soft tissue surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-4

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Violini 2024 et al., on 3D-guided spinal stabilization in brachycephalic dogs, which of the following best describes the utility of 3D-printed drill guides?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3D-PSGs enabled accurate pedicle screw placement in small deformed vertebrae of brachycephalic dogs:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Enabled screw placement in deformed vertebrae.
3D-PSGs enabled accurate pedicle screw placement in small deformed vertebrae of brachycephalic dogs:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spinal stabilization with 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides (3D-PSGs) was safe, with no immediate perioperative complications reported.
  • 84% of pedicle screws were optimally placed, and only 0.5% breached the spinal canal, reflecting high placement accuracy.
  • 80% of dogs experienced no neurologic deterioration postoperatively, indicating reliable short-term safety.
  • 3D-PSGs were accurate and reproducible, even across multiple institutions and surgeons.
  • Mid-term outcomes were favorable: all dogs were ambulatory, and 90% had static or improved neurologic signs.
  • 7 of 10 mid-term follow-ups showed abnormal gait, though owners rated lifestyle ≥3/5, suggesting acceptable function.
  • 3D-printed guides enabled precise pedicle screw placement in deformed vertebrae, expanding options in small breeds.
  • One dog suffered a T4 spinous process fracture due to overextension of PMMA cement, emphasizing the need for cement placement caution.

Violini

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

2024-4-VS-violini-5

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Jenkins 2022 et al., on medial epicondylar fissure fracture, what was the most significant risk factor for developing MEFF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Larger screw size relative to condylar height (>41%) significantly increased MEFF risk (P = .004, OR 1.52).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Using screws with a size-to-condylar height ratio >41%.
Larger screw size relative to condylar height (>41%) significantly increased MEFF risk (P = .004, OR 1.52).

🔍 Key Findings

  • MEFF occurred in 11.4% (10/88 elbows) following medial-to-lateral transcondylar screw placement in dogs with HIF.
  • Screw size to condylar height ratio >41% significantly increased MEFF risk (P = .004, OR 1.52).
  • MEFF was not recognized intraoperatively in 60% of cases and was only seen on follow-up or retrospective imaging review.
  • Screw loosening was the most common complication (11.2%), observed both with and without MEFF.
  • MEFF tended to increase the risk of screw loosening (P = .06), but was not statistically significant.
  • Most MEFFs did not require treatment and healed radiographically by 14–17 weeks in monitored cases.
  • Shaft screws were used in all MEFF cases, but shaft vs cortical design was not significantly associated with MEFF.
  • The clinical impact of MEFF was minor in most cases, although long-term significance is unknown.

Jenkins

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Medial epicondylar fissure fracture as a complication of transcondylar screw placement for the treatment of humeral intracondylar fissure

2022-4-VS-jenkins-1

Article Title: Medial epicondylar fissure fracture as a complication of transcondylar screw placement for the treatment of humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Adams 2022 et al., on C-section survival rates, what relationship was found between C-section litter size and neonatal survival?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Larger C-section litter size was positively associated with neonatal survival (OR 1.57, p = .004), while total litter size was not predictive.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Larger C-section litters had higher survival.
Larger C-section litter size was positively associated with neonatal survival (OR 1.57, p = .004), while total litter size was not predictive.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Neonatal survival to discharge was 93.1% overall, with no significant difference between brachycephalic (94.8%) and nonbrachycephalic (91.8%) breeds.
  • Elective C-section significantly improved neonatal survival (99.2%) compared to emergency C-section (87.1%) (p < .001).
  • Larger C-section litter size was positively associated with survival (p = .004; OR 1.57), whereas total litter size had no effect.
  • Maternal heart rate and stage of labor were associated with neonatal mortality in univariable analysis, but not multivariable.
  • Brachycephalism alone was not a risk factor for neonatal mortality (p = .221) in multivariable analysis.
  • Emergency C-section was the strongest predictor of neonatal mortality (OR 4.75), regardless of breed.
  • Multidisciplinary team approach likely contributed to high survival rates, emphasizing importance of coordinated care.
  • Historical factors such as primiparity and maternal age were not associated with mortality in this cohort.

Adams

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Risk factors for neonatal mortality prior to hospital discharge in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing cesarean section

2022-7-VS-adams-5

Article Title: Risk factors for neonatal mortality prior to hospital discharge in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing cesarean section

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Smith 2024 et al., on ergonomics and preferences in veterinary laparoscopy, which surgeon-related factor was significantly associated with more reported difficulty using instruments?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Smaller glove size was associated with increased difficulty, especially for staplers.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Glove size <6.5.
Smaller glove size was associated with increased difficulty, especially for staplers.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgeons with smaller glove sizes experienced more difficulty using laparoscopic instruments, especially endoscopic staplers, cup biopsy forceps, and vessel sealing devices.
  • Endoscopic stapler was rated the most difficult instrument, with a median difficulty score of 4/10 and 25% usage difficulty.
  • Female surgeons reported significantly more difficulty with several instruments due to smaller glove size.
  • Reusable instruments were preferred over disposable ones for all tasks.
  • Pistol grips were preferred for grasping/retracting and fine dissection, while axial grips were preferred for suturing/knot tying.
  • Articulating handles were consistently associated with increased reported difficulty, especially with scissors and cup biopsy forceps.
  • Left-handed surgeons had more difficulty operating endoscopic staplers, suggesting limited design inclusivity.
  • Surgeons in academic settings reported more difficulty with laparoscopic maneuvers than those in private practice.

Smith

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Variables affecting surgeons’ use of, and preferences for, instrumentation in veterinary laparoscopy

2024-3-VS-smith-3

Article Title: Variables affecting surgeons’ use of, and preferences for, instrumentation in veterinary laparoscopy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.