Your Custom Quiz

In García 2025 et al., on TIAS shunt confirmation, what confirmed complete shunt occlusion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Microbubbles appear in the right atrium when EHPSS is patent. Their absence after temporary occlusion confirms full attenuation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No microbubbles seen in right atrium.
Microbubbles appear in the right atrium when EHPSS is patent. Their absence after temporary occlusion confirms full attenuation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 40 dogs with congenital EHPSS were surgically treated using intraoperative transsplenic injection of agitated saline (TIAS) to assess full temporary occlusion.
  • TIAS was successful in 38/40 dogs; the remaining 2 had additional shunting vessels not originally seen and required further identification/ligation.
  • No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred.
  • TIAS allowed real-time confirmation of attenuation success using ultrasound-visible microbubbles.
  • Median postoperative bile acids were 5 μmol/L (preprandial) and 25 μmol/L (postprandial).
  • Long-term outcomes: 29/39 dogs had excellent, 10/39 had good outcomes; 3 dogs died unrelated to EHPSS.
  • Technique is presented as a safe, quick, low-cost, accessible intraoperative assessment alternative to IOMP or SP.

Garcia

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Use of intraoperative transsplenic injection of agitated saline to confirm temporary full attenuation of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs

2025-2-VS-garcia-1

Article Title: Use of intraoperative transsplenic injection of agitated saline to confirm temporary full attenuation of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mihara 2024 et al., on mitral valve repair in dogs, what was the postoperative change in the LA:Ao ratio?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The LA:Ao ratio significantly dropped post-op, indicating reduced volume overload.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Decreased from 2.2 to 1.2.
The LA:Ao ratio significantly dropped post-op, indicating reduced volume overload.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mitral valve plasty (MVP) in dogs with MMVD significantly reduced regurgitant volume and fraction, and normalized LA:Ao ratio, indicating reversal of volume overload.
  • MVP altered mitral valve geometry, with reduced annular dimensions and increased coaptation length, enhancing valve competence.
  • Postoperative LA:Ao ratio dropped from 2.2 to 1.2, consistent with improved left atrial pressure and size.
  • Forward stroke volume index and cardiac index increased at 3 months, reflecting improved hemodynamic function despite reduced fractional shortening.
  • Three dogs (3.9%) died postoperatively, highlighting a 96.1% survival rate within 3 months.
  • The repair technique involved artificial chordal replacement and annuloplasty; no cleft closure or leaflet suturing was used.
  • Color Doppler echocardiography confirmed substantial reduction in mitral regurgitation postoperatively in most dogs.

Mihara

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

2024-3-VS-mihara-1

Article Title: Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lin 2025 et al., on surgical approaches to the radius, which benefit did CLA offer over CMA regarding ulna fracture fixation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CLA permitted ulna fixation via same skin incision, unlike CMA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CLA allowed shared incision for ulna.
CLA permitted ulna fixation via same skin incision, unlike CMA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Craniolateral approach (CLA) exposed significantly more radial surface area than craniomedial approach (CMA) (19.4 cm² vs. 13.8 cm²; p = 0.01).
  • Proximal width of exposure was greater in CLA, especially at 12.5% length (P2 level, p = 0.016), aiding plate placement.
  • No significant difference in exposed bone length between approaches.
  • CLA avoided major neurovascular structures, making dissection cleaner and safer proximally.
  • CMA consistently encountered median nerve/artery/vein, complicating proximal exposure.
  • CLA allowed better access to proximal radius for locking plate application, which may benefit MIPO techniques.
  • CLA also enables ulna fixation via the same incision, whereas CMA requires a separate skin incision.
  • Anatomical tilt of the proximal cranial surface favored CLA, requiring less plate contouring than CMA for proper fit.

Lin

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Does the Craniolateral Approach Provide Better Exposure to the Radius than the Craniomedial Approach for Internal Fracture Fixation in Dogs?

2025-3-VCOT-lin-4

Article Title: Does the Craniolateral Approach Provide Better Exposure to the Radius than the Craniomedial Approach for Internal Fracture Fixation in Dogs?

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, what conclusion was drawn about %BW distribution to the operated limb?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No difference in %BWdist was found at any time point between LB and placebo dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It did not differ significantly between groups.
No difference in %BWdist was found at any time point between LB and placebo dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-3

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., on hip toggle stabilization, what was the most challenging step reported during the procedure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This was rated mildly difficult in 6 joints and was the step most frequently noted as challenging.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Toggle passage through femoral tunnel.
This was rated mildly difficult in 6 joints and was the step most frequently noted as challenging.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization (AA-HTS) was successfully completed in all 14 feline cadaver joints.
  • Femoral and acetabular tunnel creation was feasible in all cases, though femoral tunnel placement had a higher rate of deviations.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 5/14 joints, mostly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.
  • Minor articular cartilage injury (<10% total cartilage area) occurred in 10/14 joints, but no injury to neurovascular or intrapelvic structures.
  • Thirteen surgical technique deviations (8 major, 5 minor) were identified in 7 joints, all involving the femoral tunnel.
  • Toggle passage through the femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, being mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Postoperative CT and gross dissection confirmed all toggles and buttons were in correct position, without damage to major surrounding structures.
  • No deviations, complications, or cartilage injuries occurred in the last 4 joints, suggesting a learning curve effect.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-6-VS-espinel-2

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Guevara 2024 et al., on implant placement accuracy, which surgeon had significantly higher odds of success?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgeon 2, who also designed the guides, had the highest odds (OR = 9.61, p = .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Surgeon 2.
Surgeon 2, who also designed the guides, had the highest odds (OR = 9.61, p = .001).

🔍 Key Findings:

  • Sample: 24 canine cadavers, 477 total pins across 240 vertebrae.
  • Technique Comparison: 3D printed guides (3DPG) vs freehand (FH).
  • Acceptable Placement Rates: 3DPG = 87.5%, FH = 69.8% (p < .0001).
  • Odds Ratio for FH: 0.28 (95% CI 0.16–0.47), significantly less likely to yield acceptable placement.
  • Worst Accuracy Locations: T10 (OR 0.10), T11 (OR 0.35).
  • Surgeon Impact: Surgeon 2 outperformed others (OR 9.61, p = .001).
  • Modified Zdichavsky Classification used to score implant accuracy (Grades I–IIIb).
  • Primary Benefit of 3DPG: Increased safety and precision, regardless of surgeon experience.

Guevara

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Ex vivo comparison of pin placement with patient-specific drill guides or freehand technique in canine cadaveric spines

2024-2-VS-guevara-5

Article Title: Ex vivo comparison of pin placement with patient-specific drill guides or freehand technique in canine cadaveric spines

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Karydas 2025 et al., on follow-up radiography, what is the recommended role of follow-up imaging in the absence of clinical signs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Routine radiographs were not justified without owner concerns or clinical abnormalities.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Not recommended unless clinical signs present.
Routine radiographs were not justified without owner concerns or clinical abnormalities.

🔍 Key Findings

139 immature dogs with humeral condylar fractures (HCF) reviewed retrospectively.
Postoperative plan changed in 17% (23/139) of cases.
Key risk factors for plan change:

  • Owner concerns (OR: 7.6)
  • Analgesic use at follow-up (OR: 7.9)
  • Lameness (OR: 5.9)
  • Abnormal clinical exam (OR: 44.8)
  • Radiographic abnormalities (OR: 51.9)

No plan changes were based solely on radiographs when clinical signs were absent.
Supracondylar K-wire migration noted in 3.5% of dogs without affecting the clinical plan.
Authors conclude that routine follow-up radiographs offer limited value without concurrent clinical indicators.

Karydas

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Impact of postoperative radiography on the management of humeral condylar fractures in immature dogs

2025-2-VS-karydas-5

Article Title: Impact of postoperative radiography on the management of humeral condylar fractures in immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Wylie 2025 et al., on femoral implant accuracy, what is true regarding the simplified pivot shift grading system introduced in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The simplified system uses 2 grades: grade 1 = glide, grade 2 = clunk, aiding intraoperative assessment of rotational instability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It differentiates between “glide” and “clunk” types of instability.
The simplified system uses 2 grades: grade 1 = glide, grade 2 = clunk, aiding intraoperative assessment of rotational instability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Accurate femoral isometric placement was achieved in 63% of cases, significantly more with SwiveLock (78.6%) than FASTak (38.9%).
  • Inaccurate placement was associated with increased internal tibial rotation at follow-up (p = .009), suggesting potential implant failure.
  • Pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles postoperatively, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
  • SwiveLock implants had a faster learning curve and higher placement accuracy than FASTak.
  • Higher patient weight was linked to more accurate implant placement (p = .012), likely due to easier anatomical landmark identification.
  • No correlation found between implant type or positioning accuracy and final pivot shift grade at 6 weeks.
  • Minor and major complications were low and not significantly different between implant types.
  • A simplified 2-grade pivot shift system was proposed for clinical use (Grade 1: glide, Grade 2: clunk), aiding intraoperative decision-making.

Wylie

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

2025-7-VS-wylie-5

Article Title: Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mullins 2023 et al., on thoracolumbar pin placement, which technique had zero intraoperative technique deviations?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3DPGs had no intraoperative technique deviations, whereas 6 deviations occurred using the FHP technique.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3D-printed drill guides (3DPG).
3DPGs had no intraoperative technique deviations, whereas 6 deviations occurred using the FHP technique.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Both free-hand probing (FHP) and 3D-printed guides (3DPG) enabled accurate spinal pin placement, with 87.5% vs 96.4% of pins graded as optimal (Grade I).
  • 3DPGs had fewer intraoperative deviations (0/56 pins) compared to 6/56 with the FHP technique.
  • No pins using either method fully breached the medial vertebral canal (Grade IIb) — a critical safety outcome.
  • Pins placed using 3DPGs required less time overall (mean 2.6 min) than FHP (mean 4.5 min).
  • FHP required specific experience and has a learning curve, whereas 3DPG use requires CAD software and 3D printing access.
  • FHP had more lateral canal violations (Grade IIIa: 4/56 vs 0/56 for 3DPG), suggesting slightly less precision.
  • Both techniques were safe, and all deviations were recognized and corrected intraoperatively.
  • 3DPGs may offer practical advantages in clinical settings lacking surgical expertise, while FHP allows immediate intervention without 3D printing delay.

Mullins

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Accuracy of pin placement in the canine thoracolumbar spine using a free-hand probing technique versus 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides: An ex-vivo study

2023-5-VS-mullins-1

Article Title: Accuracy of pin placement in the canine thoracolumbar spine using a free-hand probing technique versus 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides: An ex-vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Stoneburner 2024 et al., on MIS survey results, which factor was most strongly associated with increased MIS proficiency?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Those trained in MIS during residency had significantly greater perceived proficiency (p < .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Residency training in MIS.
Those trained in MIS during residency had significantly greater perceived proficiency (p < .001).

🔍 Key Findings

  • The survey included 111 practicing surgeons and 28 residents from ACVS, ECVS, and ANZCVS. 98.2% had performed soft tissue minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
  • In the past year, surgeons reported a median caseload of 90% basic laparoscopy, 0% advanced laparoscopy, and 10% thoracoscopy; for residents: 100% basic laparoscopy, 0% advanced, 0% thoracoscopy.
  • Laparoscopic ovariectomy and OHE were the most commonly performed MIS procedures, with most respondents proficient in basic laparoscopy, but few performing advanced laparoscopy or thoracoscopy.
  • Top barriers to MIS adoption were: lack of consistent caseload, lack of training, difficult learning curve, equipment limitations, and cost.
  • 76.6% of surgeons and 92.9% of residents received MIS training during residency. Those trained had completed residency median 6 years ago, compared to 22 years ago for those without MIS training (p < .001). Perceived adequate training correlated with higher proficiency.
  • MIS was recognized as having a steep learning curve, but patient benefits (mean score 4.0/5) were the top motivation — less pain, faster recovery, improved visualization.
  • The authors conclude basic laparoscopy is widely adopted, but advanced and thoracoscopic MIS remain underutilized. Training and access are key to future growth.
  • Expanded training and improved access to equipment are necessary to promote broader integration of MIS into veterinary soft-tissue surgery.

Stoneburner

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal surgery: A 2020 survey of small animal surgical diplomates and residents

2024-5-VS-stoneburner-3

Article Title: Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal surgery: A 2020 survey of small animal surgical diplomates and residents

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.