Your Custom Quiz

In Allaith 2023 et al., on THR outcomes, which implant types were associated with increased complications following femoral head and neck excision?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Multivariable analysis showed significantly increased complications using BFX and Helica implants for revision after femoral head and neck excision.
Incorrect. The correct answer is BioMedtrix BFX and Helica.
Multivariable analysis showed significantly increased complications using BFX and Helica implants for revision after femoral head and neck excision.

🔍 Key Findings

From Allaith et al., 2023 – Outcomes from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry

  • 2375 total hip replacements were analyzed across 1852 dogs, making this the largest multiuser canine THR dataset to date.
  • Most common indications for THR were hip dysplasia (51%) and osteoarthritis (34%).
  • Implants used included Kyon (46%), BioMedtrix CFX (22%), Hybrid (11%), BFX (9%), and Helica (4.5%).
  • Veterinary-reported complication rate was 8.5%, while owner-reported was 23%, with moderate agreement (k=0.44).
  • Most common complications: Luxation, femoral fracture, and aseptic loosening.
  • BioMedtrix BFX and Helica implants had a higher risk of complications when used after femoral head and neck excision (P = .031).
  • Postoperative LOAD scores significantly improved vs preoperative (21 → 11; P < .0001), supporting improved mobility.
  • Owner satisfaction was high, with 88% rating outcome as very good or good.

Allaith

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Outcomes and complications reported from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry over a 10-year period

2023-2-VS-allaith-2

Article Title: Outcomes and complications reported from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry over a 10-year period

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Duffy 2022 et al., on barbed suture oversew, how did **control jejunal segments** (no surgery) compare to oversewn FEESA constructs in terms of leakage pressure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Controls showed significantly higher resistance to leakage than all FEESA constructs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6.6x higher ILP and 5.1x higher MLP.
Controls showed significantly higher resistance to leakage than all FEESA constructs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oversewing the transverse staple line using barbed suture showed no difference in initial (ILP) or maximum leakage pressure (MLP) compared to monofilament suture (p = .439 and .644).
  • Barbed suture repairs were ~18% faster (25 seconds faster; p < .001) than monofilament suture.
  • No difference was found between unidirectional and bidirectional barbed sutures in leakage resistance or repair time (p = .697).
  • Mean ILP and MLP were significantly higher in control jejunal segments (6.6x and 5.1x greater respectively; p < .001).
  • Leakage consistently occurred at the crotch of the FEESA in all oversew groups (>80%), not the staple line.
  • All oversewn techniques leaked at supraphysiologic pressures, indicating clinical safety against in vivo leakage.
  • No leakage was observed from barbed suture holes, addressing concerns of tissue trauma due to barb design.
  • The study supports barbed suture as a viable alternative to conventional monofilament suture for FEESA oversew in dogs.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

2022-5-VS-duffy-5

Article Title: Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sullivan 2025 et al., on TTT stabilization methods, why should findings be interpreted cautiously for clinical translation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study tested acute failure in cadavers, not cyclic loading or clinical healing.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cadaveric, single-load model used.
The study tested acute failure in cadavers, not cyclic loading or clinical healing.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spacer pin fixation showed no difference in failure force or stiffness compared to tension band wire (TBW) or 2-pin techniques.
  • All constructs failed under loads >1000 N, exceeding estimated peak quadriceps force in dogs during walking (~240 N).
  • Patellar ligament failure was the most common mode of failure across all groups (5–8 samples per group).
  • Distal tibial crest fractures were seen only in 2-pin and spacer pin groups, not in TBW group, suggesting TBW may protect against crest failure.
  • No failures occurred at pin tracts, possibly due to pin placement within patellar ligament footprint.
  • Spacer pin technique avoids placing pins through the tuberosity, potentially reducing risks of soft tissue complications like tendinopathy or irritation.
  • Use of partial osteotomy with robust distal crest may substitute for TBW without compromising initial mechanical strength.
  • Further in vivo or cyclic loading studies are required, as this cadaveric study tested only acute tensile failure.

Sullivan

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-sullivan-5

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Muroi 2025 et al., on refracture risk, what screw-to-bone diameter ratio (SBDR) is suggested as a **threshold** for increased refracture risk in growing dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. An SBDR over 0.4 may weaken bone, especially when screws become relatively large due to growth.
Incorrect. The correct answer is >0.4.
An SBDR over 0.4 may weaken bone, especially when screws become relatively large due to growth.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Refracture occurred in 5.5% of limbs, with higher incidence in the plate removal group (12.5%) vs. non-removal (3.5%).
  • In the non-plate removal group, refractures occurred at the most distal screw site, linked to greater screw position change during growth (OR 1.79, p=0.04).
  • Screw-to-bone diameter ratio (SBDR) >0.4 was a significant risk factor for refracture in the plate retention group.
  • In the plate removal group, refractures occurred at the original fracture site, associated with lower pixel value ratio (bone mineral density) and reduced radial thickness.
  • Implant-induced osteoporosis (IIO) beneath the plate likely contributed to refracture risk after plate removal.
  • Younger age at fracture (<6 months) was associated with higher refracture risk due to ongoing radial growth and shifting screw position.
  • No significant association was found between refracture and plate type (locking vs conventional), fixation method, or ulnar union.
  • Recommendations include careful SBDR sizing, motion restriction, and cautious plate removal decisions in growing dogs.

Muroi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2025

A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors Associated with Refracture after Repair of Radial–Ulnar Fractures in Small-Breed Dogs

2025-2-VCOT-muroi-2

Article Title: A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors Associated with Refracture after Repair of Radial–Ulnar Fractures in Small-Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Schuenemann 2025 et al., on biceps tenodesis, what was a key CT finding during follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CT follow-up showed progressive bone fill at the anchor site with no signs of lysis or failure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Drill hole filled with new bone.
CT follow-up showed progressive bone fill at the anchor site with no signs of lysis or failure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Case series of 6 shoulders in 5 working/sporting dogs. Conditions treated: 3 partial biceps ruptures, 3 luxations with fraying.
  • All treated with biceps tenodesis using a bioabsorbable anchor (Weldix 2.3 mm).
  • All dogs returned to function (some to high-level sports); lameness resolved within 1–5 weeks.
  • No implant-related complications with anchor-only cases. One dog had seroma and later infection but recovered.
  • Tendon clamp (used in 2 cases) caused irritation in one dog → resolved after removal.
  • CT follow-up confirmed integrity; drill holes filled with bone.
  • Median LOAD score: 12; higher in older dogs or with concurrent conditions.
  • Authors suggest tenodesis offers more stability and faster return to function than tenotomy in working dogs.
  • Larger, controlled studies are recommended.

Schuenemann

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Biceps tenodesis with a bioabsorbable bone anchor using BoneWelding technology: Results in six clinical cases (5 dogs)

2025-4-VS-schuenemann-4

Article Title: Biceps tenodesis with a bioabsorbable bone anchor using BoneWelding technology: Results in six clinical cases (5 dogs)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In O'Marra 2026 et al., on perioperative septic peritonitis, which of the following is a recommended strategy to mitigate intra-abdominal hypertension in at-risk veterinary patients?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. IAH can compromise healing and perfusion. Recommended strategies include decompression techniques, sedation, and open abdomen management.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Open abdomen management.
IAH can compromise healing and perfusion. Recommended strategies include decompression techniques, sedation, and open abdomen management.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Early enteral nutrition (<24–48 hrs) is associated with improved survival and reduced hospitalization in dogs with septic peritonitis.
  • Appropriate empirical antimicrobials improve survival in cats, but data are mixed in dogs.
  • Recurrent septic peritonitis (RecSP) has poor survival (0%–43.9%); most common cause is gastrointestinal dehiscence.
  • Intraoperative hypotension and preoperative hypoalbuminemia may increase dehiscence risk, though findings are inconsistent.
  • Lidocaine CRI during surgery improves survival over opioids alone in dogs.
  • Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is not recommended due to risks of coagulopathy and kidney injury; albumin use is controversial.
  • Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is under-recognized but contributes to mortality; IAP monitoring should be considered.
  • Diagnostic tests (effusion lactate, glucose, cytology) are unreliable for detecting RecSP; clinical judgment and ultrasound are advised.

O'Marra

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

2026-1-VS-omarra-5

Article Title: Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Enright 2022 et al., on adrenalectomy outcomes, which of the following best describes the association between alpha-blocker use and intraoperative hypertension?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs receiving alpha-blockers had significantly higher systolic BP intraoperatively (median 170 mmHg vs. 142 mmHg; P = .01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Alpha-blocker therapy was associated with higher intraoperative systolic BP.
Dogs receiving alpha-blockers had significantly higher systolic BP intraoperatively (median 170 mmHg vs. 142 mmHg; P = .01).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 83% of dogs survived to discharge after adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.
  • Median survival time post-discharge was 1169 days (3.2 years).
  • Preoperative alpha-blocker therapy (e.g., phenoxybenzamine) was not associated with improved survival.
  • Dogs receiving alpha-blockers had higher intraoperative systolic BP, with median values 170 mmHg vs. 142 mmHg in non-treated dogs (P = .01).
  • Intraoperative arrhythmias occurred in 30% of cases, with no difference between dogs receiving alpha-blockers and those not.
  • Histologic vascular invasion occurred in ~70% of tumors.
  • Tumor recurrence was suspected in 3 dogs, and metastasis in 8 dogs, though not histologically confirmed in most cases.
  • Postoperative complications included refractory hypotension, acute kidney injury, and hypertension persisting >48 hours in 10 dogs.

Enright

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

2022-3-VS-enright-3

Article Title: Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Ferreira 2025 et al., on heated pneumoperitoneum in dogs, what best describes the clinical outcome of all patients in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 15 dogs recovered uneventfully and were discharged on the day of surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All animals recovered and were discharged same day.
All 15 dogs recovered uneventfully and were discharged on the day of surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Heated CO₂ insufflation reduced perioperative hypothermia during laparoscopic ovariectomy compared to nonheated CO₂.
  • Final body temperature was significantly higher in the heated group (36.03°C) than in the nonheated group (34.93°C).
  • Temperature reduction correlated with surgical duration only in the nonheated group (p < .05).
  • Heated CO₂ delayed temperature drop, occurring after 20 minutes vs. 5 minutes in nonheated cases.
  • No significant differences between groups in anesthetic, surgical, or insufflation times.
  • All dogs recovered uneventfully and were discharged the same day.
  • Heated CO₂ may offer greater benefit in longer procedures or in small-sized dogs prone to hypothermia.
  • No adverse effects were attributed to heated gas use in this clinical trial.

Ferreira

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Effect of heated pneumoperitoneum on body temperature in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy—A randomized controlled trial

2025-5-VS-ferreira-5

Article Title: Effect of heated pneumoperitoneum on body temperature in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy—A randomized controlled trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Anderson 2025 et al., on liver hemostatic agents, what was observed regarding sponge dislodgement during abdominal lavage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 5 of 23 PC sponges dislodged during lavage and required replacement due to bleeding; no AG sponges dislodged (p = .042).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Dislodgement occurred in 5/23 cases.
5 of 23 PC sponges dislodged during lavage and required replacement due to bleeding; no AG sponges dislodged (p = .042).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial of 45 dogs undergoing liver biopsy or lobectomy.
  • Groups:
    • Adhesive gelatin sponge (AG) group (n=22)
    • Plain collagen sponge (PC) group (n=23)
  • Main Results:
    • At 5 minutes post-application, 10/20 PC dogs were still bleeding vs. 2/20 AG dogs (p = 0.0138).
    • AG had significantly better adhesion scores (median 2 vs. 1, p < 0.001).
    • Sponge dislodgement: 5/23 in PC group, 0/22 in AG group (p = 0.042).
    • Time to 50% hemostasis: AG = 2 min, PC = 4 min 49 sec.
  • Complications: No adverse events related to either sponge.
  • Conclusion: Adhesive gelatin sponges offered superior intraoperative adhesion and hemostatic control during canine liver surgery compared to collagen sponges.

Anderson

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

A randomized comparison of an adhesive gelatin sponge and a plain collagen sponge for hemostatic control during canine liver surgery

2025-2-VS-anderson1-3

Article Title: A randomized comparison of an adhesive gelatin sponge and a plain collagen sponge for hemostatic control during canine liver surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Anderson 2024 et al., how was the caudal malpositioning of the TPLO plate hypothesized to contribute to nerve injury?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Drilling caudally positioned plates risks striking the fibular nerve directly:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Directed drill trajectory toward fibular nerve.
Drilling caudally positioned plates risks striking the fibular nerve directly:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 3 dogs developed permanent fibular nerve dysfunction following TPLO
  • Common findings:
    • Drill hole or screw in caudal tibial cortex just distal to osteotomy
    • Caudal malpositioning of TPLO plate (esp. right limb of case 3)
    • Post-op signs: cranial tibial atrophy, knuckling, exaggerated gait, no hock flexion
  • One case had confirmed deep/superficial fibular neuropathy via electrodiagnostics
  • Recommended prevention: avoid overly caudal drill paths; careful gait assessment at follow-up is key

Anderson

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

2024-3-VCOT-anderson-4

Article Title: Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.