Mancusi et al: Comparison between Two Zurich Cementless Total Hip Replacement Cup Impactor Types in the Accuracy of Cup Positioning: An In Vitro Study
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 2026

Comparison between Two Zurich Cementless Total Hip Replacement Cup Impactor Types in the Accuracy of Cup Positioning: An In Vitro Study

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cup positioning accuracy for the angle of lateral opening (ALO) was significantly influenced by impactor design for beginner surgeons.
  • The prototype impactor reduced ALO mean error for the beginner surgeon (1.8°) compared with the standard impactor (3.9°).
  • Senior surgeons achieved similar ALO accuracy regardless of impactor type, suggesting experience mitigates instrument limitations.
  • Beginner surgeons using the standard impactor tended to place cups with excessive ALO (~48.9°), deviating from the ideal 45°.
  • Cup retroversion accuracy was not significantly affected by the impactor type, indicating it depends more on surgeon experience and anatomical landmark recognition.
  • Typical acceptable retroversion range for Zurich THR cups is approximately 15–25°, matched to the patient’s acetabular anatomy.
  • Prototype impactor design improvements included ergonomic handle, wider hammering surface, shorter aiming bar, and cup-size–specific holders, improving instrument stability and alignment.
  • Improved instrument ergonomics may facilitate safer learning curves for surgeons performing canine total hip replacement.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Mancusi et al: Comparison between Two Zurich Cementless Total Hip Replacement Cup Impactor Types in the Accuracy of Cup Positioning: An In Vitro Study
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cup positioning accuracy for the angle of lateral opening (ALO) was significantly influenced by impactor design for beginner surgeons.
  • The prototype impactor reduced ALO mean error for the beginner surgeon (1.8°) compared with the standard impactor (3.9°).
  • Senior surgeons achieved similar ALO accuracy regardless of impactor type, suggesting experience mitigates instrument limitations.
  • Beginner surgeons using the standard impactor tended to place cups with excessive ALO (~48.9°), deviating from the ideal 45°.
  • Cup retroversion accuracy was not significantly affected by the impactor type, indicating it depends more on surgeon experience and anatomical landmark recognition.
  • Typical acceptable retroversion range for Zurich THR cups is approximately 15–25°, matched to the patient’s acetabular anatomy.
  • Prototype impactor design improvements included ergonomic handle, wider hammering surface, shorter aiming bar, and cup-size–specific holders, improving instrument stability and alignment.
  • Improved instrument ergonomics may facilitate safer learning curves for surgeons performing canine total hip replacement.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Mancusi 2026 et al., on cup impactor accuracy, which outcome was significantly improved for beginner surgeons when using the prototype cup impactor compared with the standard impactor?

A. Femoral stem alignment
B. Cup retroversion accuracy
C. Angle of lateral opening accuracy
D. Pelvic positioning stability
E. Implant press-fit strength

Answer: Angle of lateral opening accuracy

Explanation: The prototype impactor significantly reduced the ALO positioning error for the beginner surgeon compared with the standard impactor.
In Mancusi 2026 et al., on cup impactor accuracy, which design feature was introduced in the prototype impactor to improve handling and cup positioning accuracy?

A. Longer aiming bar without handle
B. Narrower hammering surface
C. Single universal cup holder
D. Ergonomic handle with cup-size–specific holders
E. Integrated fluoroscopy alignment guide

Answer: Ergonomic handle with cup-size–specific holders

Explanation: The prototype impactor introduced ergonomic handling, a wider hammering surface, and cup holders matched to each cup size to improve positioning control.
In Mancusi 2026 et al., on cup impactor accuracy, what was the approximate mean ALO achieved by the beginner surgeon using the standard impactor?

A. 35 degrees
B. 40 degrees
C. 43 degrees
D. 48.9 degrees
E. 55 degrees

Answer: 48.9 degrees

Explanation: The beginner surgeon using the standard impactor had a mean ALO of about 48.9°, exceeding the ideal 45° target.
In Mancusi 2026 et al., on cup impactor accuracy, which parameter was found to be primarily influenced by surgeon experience rather than the type of impactor used?

A. Cup retroversion angle
B. Angle of lateral opening
C. Cup press-fit stability
D. Femoral canal preparation depth
E. Pelvic positioning

Answer: Cup retroversion angle

Explanation: The study concluded that retroversion accuracy depends mainly on recognition of anatomical landmarks and surgeon experience.
In Mancusi 2026 et al., on cup impactor accuracy, what is the ideal angle of lateral opening (ALO) recommended for Zurich cementless total hip replacement cups in dogs?

A. 30 degrees
B. 35 degrees
C. 45 degrees
D. 60 degrees
E. 75 degrees

Answer: 45 degrees

Explanation: The literature and this study identify approximately 45° as the ideal ALO to minimize luxation risk after canine THR.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Something off with this article?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.
Thanks for flagging this!
We’ll review your note as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Anything to add to this article?
Know a finding or detail we missed? Share it below.
Thanks for the suggestion!
We’ll review it as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.