Kang et al: Feasibility of Integrating Locking Plate System into Additively Manufactured Implants: A Mechanical Comparison of Three-Dimensional-Printed and Machined Locking Hole Threads
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 2026

Feasibility of Integrating Locking Plate System into Additively Manufactured Implants: A Mechanical Comparison of Three-Dimensional-Printed and Machined Locking Hole Threads

🔍 Key Findings

  • Directly 3D-printed locking plate holes can achieve mechanical performance comparable to machined plates when printed at optimal orientation (0°).
  • All 3D-printed plates failed at 2.0 Nm insertion torque due to thread deformation, while machined ARIX plates tolerated this torque without failure.
  • Build orientation significantly affected mechanical strength, with push-out strength ranking: ARIX > 3D-0° > 3D-45° > 3D-90°.
  • Insertion torque was a major determinant of push-out strength, with 1.1 Nm (manufacturer-recommended torque) producing the highest strength.
  • Low torque combined with screw angulation (15°) resulted in the lowest push-out strength, demonstrating reduced screw–plate engagement.
  • Screw angulation alone did not significantly reduce strength when torque was adequate, likely due to the ARIX double-lead thread design allowing engagement up to 15°.
  • Additive manufacturing produced threads with lower hardness compared with machined threads, explaining deformation at excessive torque.
  • Integrated 3D-printed locking systems may enable patient-specific implants without post-machining, potentially improving implant conformity and surgical efficiency.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Kang et al: Feasibility of Integrating Locking Plate System into Additively Manufactured Implants: A Mechanical Comparison of Three-Dimensional-Printed and Machined Locking Hole Threads
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • Directly 3D-printed locking plate holes can achieve mechanical performance comparable to machined plates when printed at optimal orientation (0°).
  • All 3D-printed plates failed at 2.0 Nm insertion torque due to thread deformation, while machined ARIX plates tolerated this torque without failure.
  • Build orientation significantly affected mechanical strength, with push-out strength ranking: ARIX > 3D-0° > 3D-45° > 3D-90°.
  • Insertion torque was a major determinant of push-out strength, with 1.1 Nm (manufacturer-recommended torque) producing the highest strength.
  • Low torque combined with screw angulation (15°) resulted in the lowest push-out strength, demonstrating reduced screw–plate engagement.
  • Screw angulation alone did not significantly reduce strength when torque was adequate, likely due to the ARIX double-lead thread design allowing engagement up to 15°.
  • Additive manufacturing produced threads with lower hardness compared with machined threads, explaining deformation at excessive torque.
  • Integrated 3D-printed locking systems may enable patient-specific implants without post-machining, potentially improving implant conformity and surgical efficiency.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Kang 2026 et al., on 3D-printed locking plates, what occurred when insertion torque reached 2.0 Nm in the 3D-printed specimens?

A. Threads plastically deformed and locking failed
B. Screws fractured at the head–shaft junction
C. The plate fractured through the hole
D. The screw backed out without thread damage
E. The screw head stripped without plate damage

Answer: Threads plastically deformed and locking failed

Explanation: All 3D-printed specimens failed at 2.0 Nm due to deformation of internal threads, indicating lower hardness compared with machined plates.
In Kang 2026 et al., on 3D-printed locking plates, which factor was identified as the most critical determinant of mechanical performance of the printed locking holes?

A. Screw angulation
B. Build orientation
C. Screw diameter
D. Plate thickness
E. Number of screws used

Answer: Build orientation

Explanation: The study concluded that build orientation had the strongest effect on push-out strength, with 0° orientation providing optimal mechanical properties.
In Kang 2026 et al., on 3D-printed locking plates, which insertion torque produced the greatest push-out strength across constructs?

A. 0.6 Nm
B. 1.1 Nm
C. 1.5 Nm
D. 2.0 Nm
E. Torque had no influence on strength

Answer: 1.1 Nm

Explanation: The manufacturer-recommended torque of 1.1 Nm generated the highest push-out strength without causing thread damage.
In Kang 2026 et al., on 3D-printed locking plates, which combination produced the lowest push-out strength?

A. 1.1 Nm torque with 0° screw angle
B. 1.1 Nm torque with 15° screw angle
C. 0.6 Nm torque with 0° screw angle
D. 0.6 Nm torque with 15° screw angle
E. 2.0 Nm torque with 0° screw angle

Answer: 0.6 Nm torque with 15° screw angle

Explanation: Low torque combined with screw angulation significantly reduced screw–plate engagement and resulted in the weakest push-out strength.
In Kang 2026 et al., on 3D-printed locking plates, which build orientation produced push-out strength comparable to the machined ARIX plate system?

A. 0-degree build orientation
B. 45-degree build orientation
C. 90-degree build orientation
D. Any orientation provided torque exceeds 2 Nm
E. Orientation had no measurable effect on push-out strength

Answer: 0-degree build orientation

Explanation: The study showed that specimens printed at 0° orientation had push-out strength comparable to ARIX plates, while 45° and 90° orientations showed reduced strength.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Something off with this article?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.
Thanks for flagging this!
We’ll review your note as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Anything to add to this article?
Know a finding or detail we missed? Share it below.
Thanks for the suggestion!
We’ll review it as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.