Forzisi et al: Temporary Transarticular Immobilization of the Stifle Joint Using a Locking Plate
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 2026

Temporary Transarticular Immobilization of the Stifle Joint Using a Locking Plate

🔍 Key Findings

  • Temporary transarticular locking plates successfully immobilized the stifle joint for protection of primary repairs (e.g., ligament reconstruction or articular fracture fixation) in dogs and cats.
  • 15 stifle joints in 13 patients met inclusion criteria (9 dogs, 4 cats) treated for injuries such as patellar fracture, patellar ligament rupture, stifle luxation, and femoral condylar fractures.
  • The plate was contoured along the medial distal femur and proximal tibia, immobilizing the joint at 135–145° extension with at least three screws in each bone segment.
  • Implant removal occurred at a median of 58 days (range 27–96), aligning with the planned ~6-week immobilization period intended to protect repair while limiting cartilage damage.
  • No intraoperative complications were reported, and all animals were able to ambulate comfortably postoperatively.
  • One major complication (plate breakage at 19 days) required early removal and temporary orthotic support.
  • Four minor complications involved plate breakage occurring after the recommended removal time, often related to delayed follow-up appointments.
  • Respecting the planned 6-week implant removal is important to prevent implant failure, and dedicated anatomically designed plates may further improve technique reliability.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Forzisi et al: Temporary Transarticular Immobilization of the Stifle Joint Using a Locking Plate
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • Temporary transarticular locking plates successfully immobilized the stifle joint for protection of primary repairs (e.g., ligament reconstruction or articular fracture fixation) in dogs and cats.
  • 15 stifle joints in 13 patients met inclusion criteria (9 dogs, 4 cats) treated for injuries such as patellar fracture, patellar ligament rupture, stifle luxation, and femoral condylar fractures.
  • The plate was contoured along the medial distal femur and proximal tibia, immobilizing the joint at 135–145° extension with at least three screws in each bone segment.
  • Implant removal occurred at a median of 58 days (range 27–96), aligning with the planned ~6-week immobilization period intended to protect repair while limiting cartilage damage.
  • No intraoperative complications were reported, and all animals were able to ambulate comfortably postoperatively.
  • One major complication (plate breakage at 19 days) required early removal and temporary orthotic support.
  • Four minor complications involved plate breakage occurring after the recommended removal time, often related to delayed follow-up appointments.
  • Respecting the planned 6-week implant removal is important to prevent implant failure, and dedicated anatomically designed plates may further improve technique reliability.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Forzisi 2026 et al., on stifle locking plate immobilization, what was the primary rationale for limiting immobilization to approximately 6–8 weeks?

A. Prevent muscle atrophy
B. Reduce surgical costs
C. Allow bone plate integration
D. Avoid articular cartilage degeneration from prolonged immobilization
E. Prevent screw loosening

Answer: Avoid articular cartilage degeneration from prolonged immobilization

Explanation: Prolonged immobilization can lead to cartilage deterioration; limiting immobilization to about 6–8 weeks reduces these deleterious effects.
In Forzisi 2026 et al., on stifle locking plate immobilization, what was the typical planned time for implant removal after surgery?

A. 2 weeks postoperatively
B. 4 weeks postoperatively
C. 6 weeks postoperatively
D. 12 weeks postoperatively
E. Implants were permanent and not removed

Answer: 6 weeks postoperatively

Explanation: The authors planned implant removal at approximately 6 weeks to allow healing while minimizing cartilage degeneration associated with prolonged immobilization.
In Forzisi 2026 et al., on stifle locking plate immobilization, where was the plate typically positioned for transarticular immobilization?

A. Craniolateral femur to tibial crest
B. Lateral femoral condyle to fibular head
C. Medial distal femur to proximal tibia
D. Caudal femur to calcaneus
E. Patella to tibial tuberosity

Answer: Medial distal femur to proximal tibia

Explanation: The technique involved contouring a locking plate along the medial aspect of the distal femur and proximal tibia to immobilize the joint.
In Forzisi 2026 et al., on stifle locking plate immobilization, what joint angle was targeted when contouring the locking plate for temporary stifle immobilization?

A. 90–100° stifle flexion
B. 110–120° stifle flexion
C. 135–145° stifle extension
D. 150–160° hyperextension
E. Full physiologic range of motion allowed

Answer: 135–145° stifle extension

Explanation: The locking plate was contoured to maintain the stifle in approximately 135–145° extension to protect primary repairs while maintaining functional alignment.
In Forzisi 2026 et al., on stifle locking plate immobilization, which complication was most commonly reported in this case series?

A. Surgical site infection
B. Implant loosening due to screw pullout
C. Plate breakage
D. Patellar luxation recurrence
E. Tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture

Answer: Plate breakage

Explanation: Plate breakage occurred in several cases, often when implant removal occurred later than the planned 6-week period.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Something off with this article?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.
Thanks for flagging this!
We’ll review your note as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Anything to add to this article?
Know a finding or detail we missed? Share it below.
Thanks for the suggestion!
We’ll review it as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.