De Moya et al: Closed reduction and fluoroscopic‐guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2023

🔍 Key Findings

  • FGPP (fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning) resulted in successful healing in 10/13 fractures, with good limb function.
  • Complications occurred in 5 of 11 cases, including intra-articular implants, malunion, implant failure/nonunion, and implant migration.
  • Cases with delayed surgery (>15 days) or radiographic remodeling were more likely to experience major complications.
  • Most fractures (10/13) were classified as Salter-Harris type I with mild displacement.
  • Median surgical time was 60 minutes, and no conversions to open surgery were needed.
  • Postoperative femoral neck resorption was minimal, suggesting possible benefits of the minimally invasive approach for preserving vascular supply.
  • One intra-articular pin led to progressive joint disease and required femoral head ostectomy.
  • FGPP appears best suited for acute, minimally displaced fractures in young dogs (<8 months) with planned elective explant to avoid growth disturbance.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

De Moya et al: Closed reduction and fluoroscopic‐guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2023

🔍 Key Findings

  • FGPP (fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning) resulted in successful healing in 10/13 fractures, with good limb function.
  • Complications occurred in 5 of 11 cases, including intra-articular implants, malunion, implant failure/nonunion, and implant migration.
  • Cases with delayed surgery (>15 days) or radiographic remodeling were more likely to experience major complications.
  • Most fractures (10/13) were classified as Salter-Harris type I with mild displacement.
  • Median surgical time was 60 minutes, and no conversions to open surgery were needed.
  • Postoperative femoral neck resorption was minimal, suggesting possible benefits of the minimally invasive approach for preserving vascular supply.
  • One intra-articular pin led to progressive joint disease and required femoral head ostectomy.
  • FGPP appears best suited for acute, minimally displaced fractures in young dogs (<8 months) with planned elective explant to avoid growth disturbance.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In De Moya 2023 et al., on femoral pinning outcomes, which finding was associated with reduced success of FGPP?

A. Use of large Kirschner wires
B. Leaving pins short
C. Moderate to severe fracture displacement
D. Proximal metaphyseal entry
E. Traction applied during reduction

Answer: Moderate to severe fracture displacement

Explanation: Fractures with mild displacement had better outcomes and higher success with closed reduction.
In De Moya 2023 et al., on femoral physeal/neck fracture repair, which factor was most associated with the development of complications following FGPP?

A. Use of >3 Kirschner wires
B. Post-op NSAID administration
C. Fracture chronicity >15 days
D. Intraoperative fluoroscopy time >20 min
E. Body weight over 25 kg

Answer: Fracture chronicity >15 days

Explanation: Cases with >15 days between injury and surgery showed remodeling and had a higher complication rate.
In De Moya 2023 et al., on femoral pinning outcomes, what was a reported benefit of FGPP over open techniques?

A. Increased accuracy of reduction
B. Reduced surgical time
C. Decreased radiation exposure
D. Reduced surgical trauma and morbidity
E. Improved visualization of joint anatomy

Answer: Reduced surgical trauma and morbidity

Explanation: FGPP is a minimally invasive technique with lower tissue trauma than open repair.
In De Moya 2023 et al., on femoral pinning outcomes, what rationale was given for elective pin removal in young dogs?

A. Prevent Kirschner wire migration
B. Limit degenerative joint disease
C. Allow femoral neck reshaping
D. Prevent premature physeal closure
E. Prevent intra-articular placement

Answer: Prevent premature physeal closure

Explanation: Pin removal was advised in dogs <8 months to reduce the risk of iatrogenic closure.
In De Moya 2023 et al., on femoral physeal/neck fracture repair, which surgical advantage is most associated with FGPP over ORIF?

A. Allows treatment of chronic remodeling
B. Requires no imaging guidance
C. Limits surgical trauma and preserves vascular supply
D. Eliminates need for postoperative analgesia
E. Allows shorter anesthesia in all cases

Answer: Limits surgical trauma and preserves vascular supply

Explanation: FGPP is a minimally invasive technique that may reduce trauma and preserve femoral neck blood flow.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.