Quiz Question

In Barnes 2024 et al., on knot performance, what advantage does the DF knot provide in confined surgical spaces?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The DF knot allows sliding placement like the forwarder knot, aiding use in deep/limited access fields.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It can be pre-tied and slid into place.
The DF knot allows sliding placement like the forwarder knot, aiding use in deep/limited access fields.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Double forwarder (DF) knots had significantly higher knot holding capacity (KHC) than square (SQ) and surgeon’s (SU) knots when tied with <6 throws.
  • In 3 USP polyglactin 910, DF knots with 4–5 throws were not significantly stronger than SU knots with 6–8 throws (p > .43).
  • DF knots never unraveled, while SQ and SU knots with 4–5 throws showed substantial unraveling.
  • KHC did not increase in DF knots when throws increased from 3 to 5.
  • Knot volume and weight were significantly higher in DF knots than SQ/SU knots at the same throw count (p < .003).
  • DF knots allow sliding placement, potentially useful in minimally invasive or deep cavity procedures.

Barnes

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Evaluation of the in vitro performance of the double forwarder knot, compared to square and surgeon's knots using large gauge suture

2024-2-VS-barnes-5

Article Title: Evaluation of the in vitro performance of the double forwarder knot, compared to square and surgeon's knots using large gauge suture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Monnet 2023 et al., on barbed vs conventional suture in vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA), despite reduced suturing time, what is a clinical limitation of using unidirectional barbed suture for VUA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite shorter suturing time, UBS had lower leakage pressure (some as low as 5 mmHg), necessitating catheter use post-op.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Leakage pressure remains low.
Despite shorter suturing time, UBS had lower leakage pressure (some as low as 5 mmHg), necessitating catheter use post-op.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Leakage pressure was not significantly different between unidirectional barbed suture (UBS) and conventional (C) suture groups (p = .236).
  • UBS group had a 28% lower median leakage pressure than the C group (8.6 mmHg vs. 11.7 mmHg), suggesting higher biological risk of leakage.
  • UBS significantly reduced suturing time (median 12.7 vs. 17.3 minutes; p < .0002).
  • Fewer suture bites were needed in the UBS group (median 14 vs. 19; p = .012).
  • No suture breakage or urethral narrowing occurred in either group.
  • Leakage site distribution (ventral vs lateral) was similar between groups; no dorsal leaks noted.
  • Leakage occurred as low as 5 mmHg in UBS group, indicating potential for postoperative extravasation.
  • UBS may aid intracorporeal suturing in minimally invasive prostatectomy, but catheterization remains necessary postoperatively.

Monnet

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of conventional versus unidirectional barbed suture on leakage pressures in canine vesicourethral anastomosis: An ex-vivo study

2023-5-VS-monnet-5

Article Title: Influence of conventional versus unidirectional barbed suture on leakage pressures in canine vesicourethral anastomosis: An ex-vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Poggi 2025 et al., on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cats, which instrument was most frequently used for gallbladder dissection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ligasure was used in 14 of 22 cats, making it the most common device for gallbladder dissection.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ligasure.
Ligasure was used in 14 of 22 cats, making it the most common device for gallbladder dissection.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was successfully performed in all 22 cats without conversion to open surgery.
  • Complication rate was low: 3 cats had postoperative complications (1 seroma, 1 vomiting, 1 EHBDO and death).
  • Median operating time was 41 minutes; median hospitalization was 3 days.
  • No cases required conversion to open laparotomy, even in cats as small as 2.5 kg.
  • Common devices used: Hemoclips or Hem-o-lok for cystic duct ligation; Ligasure, harmonic scalpel, or j-hook for dissection.
  • Most common indications: cholelithiasis (9/22) and cholecystitis (10/22), with one biliary mucocele and one adenoma.
  • Histopathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases; concurrent liver or intestinal biopsies were performed in some cats.
  • Postoperative AUS and bloodwork were routine and important for detecting early signs of EHBDO.

Poggi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

2025-5-VS-poggi-4

Article Title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, what was the most common location of leakage for skin staple enterotomy (SSE)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Center of closure.
All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-2

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, what did the authors conclude about skin staple enterotomy (SSE) for use in live cats?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors do not recommend SSE due to low leak pressure and high failure rates.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Not recommended.
Authors do not recommend SSE due to low leak pressure and high failure rates.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-5

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Fink 2025 et al., on Roux-en-Y outcomes, which anastomosis type was preferred when the common bile duct was severely dilated?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Choledochojejunostomy was favored due to favorable size match with the intestinal lumen when the CBD was dilated.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Choledochojejunostomy.
Choledochojejunostomy was favored due to favorable size match with the intestinal lumen when the CBD was dilated.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Roux-en-Y procedures were successfully completed in all 11 cases (6 dogs, 5 cats), despite case complexity and disease severity.
  • Median survival post-discharge was longer in cats (365 days) vs. dogs (82 days), with better outcomes in non-neoplastic vs. neoplastic disease (192 vs. 5 days).
  • Complication rate was high, with septic peritonitis, dehiscence, and cardiac arrest as leading causes of postoperative death; mortality rate = 36%.
  • Dehiscence rate was 8.6% (2 of 23 anastomoses), considered lower than typical rates for GI anastomoses in high-risk patients.
  • Feeding tubes (gastrostomy/jejunostomy) were used in all cases, enabling early nutritional support and stomach decompression.
  • Postoperative nausea and vomiting were common but mostly self-limiting; managed with metoclopramide, cisapride, and antiemetics.
  • Choledochojejunostomy was preferred when common bile duct was dilated, offering a favorable size match and potentially reducing bile leakage.
  • Roux-en-Y reduced typical Billroth II complications (e.g., bile reflux, afferent loop syndrome, dumping syndrome), with none observed in discharged patients.

Fink

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Roux‐en‐Y procedure to reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract in six dogs and five cats: A descriptive case series

2025-5-VS-fink-2

Article Title: Roux‐en‐Y procedure to reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract in six dogs and five cats: A descriptive case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Jones 2024 et al., on surgical technique mortality, what was found when comparing CO₂ laser and conventional incisional techniques?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mortality rates were statistically equivalent between CO₂ laser and conventional techniques (p = .890).
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference in mortality.
Mortality rates were statistically equivalent between CO₂ laser and conventional techniques (p = .890).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study compared 606 dogs (English Bulldogs, French Bulldogs, Pugs) undergoing partial staphylectomy via CO₂ laser, bipolar vessel sealing device (BVSD), or conventional incision.
  • Mortality rate: 4.0% (24/606).
  • BVSD was associated with significantly increased perioperative mortality compared to other methods (OR = 6.0, 95% CI: 1.3–28.4, p = .023).
  • High-grade laryngeal collapse (stage II or III) independently increased mortality risk (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.8–11.8, p = .002).
  • No difference in mortality between CO₂ laser and conventional incision techniques.
  • CO₂ laser and conventional techniques had similar complication rates.

Jones

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Comparison of mortality of brachycephalic dogs undergoing partial staphylectomy using conventional incisional, carbon dioxide laser, or bipolar vessel sealing device

2024-1-VS-jones-4

Article Title: Comparison of mortality of brachycephalic dogs undergoing partial staphylectomy using conventional incisional, carbon dioxide laser, or bipolar vessel sealing device

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kurogochi 2025 et al., on cardioplegia in mitral repair, what was the effect of mDN solution on sinus rhythm recovery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Faster sinus rhythm recovery in the mDN group (60s vs 362s, p = 0.027) suggests electrical stabilization benefits.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It resulted in significantly faster sinus rhythm recovery.
Faster sinus rhythm recovery in the mDN group (60s vs 362s, p = 0.027) suggests electrical stabilization benefits.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in cardiac troponin I levels 12h post-op between mDN and St. Thomas cardioplegia groups (p = 0.478)
  • Sinus rhythm returned faster in the mDN group after aortic cross-clamp removal (median 60s vs 362s, p = 0.027)
  • Lower serum potassium at cross-clamp removal in the mDN group (median 4.5 mEq/L vs 5.4, p = 0.005)
  • Fewer doses needed in the mDN group (median 2.5 vs 4.0, p = 0.040)
  • Higher total crystalloid volume used in mDN group (23.6 vs 12.6 mL/kg, p < 0.001)
  • No difference in survival (700-day survival 90% in both groups, p = 0.958)
  • No difference in hospitalization duration (median 6 days for both, p = 0.789)
  • Echocardiographic remodeling similar between groups at 24h post-op

Kurogochi

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Saline‐based modified del Nido cardioplegia versus multidose St. Thomas cardioplegia in canine mitral valve repair: A randomized controlled trial

2025-7-VS-kurogochi-1

Article Title: Saline‐based modified del Nido cardioplegia versus multidose St. Thomas cardioplegia in canine mitral valve repair: A randomized controlled trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Schroeder 2022 et al., on fascial anatomy mapping, which region is most prone to fascial disruption during resection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The scapular spine has Type IV fascia, which is thin and adherent to bone, making it prone to disruption.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C. Over the scapular spine.
The scapular spine has Type IV fascia, which is thin and adherent to bone, making it prone to disruption.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascial planes in dogs were consistently classifiable into four surgical types:
  • Type I (discrete sheets), Type II (tightly adhered to thin muscle), Type III (tightly adhered to thick muscle), and Type IV (periosteum-associated).
  • Two junction types were identified: Type A (easily elevated) and Type B (higher risk of disruption).
  • Disruption-prone areas include the scapular spine (type IV fascia) and lateral thorax near the 13th rib, where rib resection may be needed to preserve margins.
  • The latissimus dorsi transition zones and fascial areas near the thoracic inlet and scapulohumeral joint were prone to fascial thinning or disruption.
  • Partial muscle resections or periosteal elevations may be required in areas with fragile fascia to maintain oncologic margins.
  • Dorsal spinous processes (T6–L6) showed type IV fascia; however, osteotomy may be needed in some dogs for clear margins.
  • Blended fascial transitions (e.g., rectus abdominis: type II cranially, type I caudally) necessitate intraoperative judgment on resection depth.
  • Cutaneous trunci may suffice as a deep margin for small, low-grade tumors in well-muscled dogs, but not reliably for high-grade or larger masses.

Schroeder

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

2022-1-VS-schroeder-2

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Dekerle 2022 et al., on ectopic ureter correction, **what factor was significantly associated with recurrence of incontinence** after neoureterostomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All recurrence cases after neoureterostomy had persistent ureteral remnants.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ureteral remnant distal to ligation.
All recurrence cases after neoureterostomy had persistent ureteral remnants.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cystoscopic-guided laser ablation (CLA) was associated with significantly fewer minor complications (13%) than neoureterostomy (100%) (P < .01)
  • CLA resulted in significantly fewer recurrences of incontinence compared to neoureterostomy (0/7 vs 5/12; P < .05)
  • 80% of dogs achieved continence within 1 month postoperatively, with a median continence score of 10
  • Long-term continence was achieved in 88% of dogs, with or without adjunctive treatment, over a median of 66 months
  • Major complications occurred in only 8% of dogs, and all were successfully managed with surgical revision
  • Persistent ureteral remnants were seen only in neoureterostomy dogs, potentially contributing to incontinence recurrence
  • All dogs with incontinence recurrence responded to medical treatment, while only 1/5 with persistent incontinence after surgery did
  • CLA is recommended over open surgery for iEU correction, due to lower complication and recurrence rates

Dekerle

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Outcomes of 25 female dogs treated for ectopic ureters by open surgery or cystoscopic-guided laser ablation

2022-4-VS-dekerle-4

Article Title: Outcomes of 25 female dogs treated for ectopic ureters by open surgery or cystoscopic-guided laser ablation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Suture & Soft Tissue Techniques
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.