Quiz Question

In Bresciani 2022 et al., on modified urethrostomy outcomes, what was the reported outcome for voluntary urination post-surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Urination resumed within 24 hours in all 8 cats without need for prolonged catheterization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All cats urinated voluntarily within 24 hours.
Urination resumed within 24 hours in all 8 cats without need for prolonged catheterization.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified prepubic urethrostomy (mPPU) was effective for managing proximal urethral obstructions in male cats.
  • All 8 cats regained voluntary urination within 24 hours postoperatively.
  • Early urinary incontinence and peristomal dermatitis occurred in all cats but were self-limiting.
  • Two cats (25%) required surgical revision due to stomal obstruction from weight gain and abdominal fat.
  • No intraoperative complications were reported in any of the 8 cats.
  • Follow-up (13–84 months) showed sustained urinary continence and owner satisfaction in all cases.
  • The rectus abdominis muscle tunnel likely increased outflow resistance, minimizing persistent incontinence.
  • Recurrent hematuria and dysuria occurred in 3 cats but were managed conservatively.

Bresciani

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Modified prepubic urethrostomy with body wall tunneling: Description of technique and long-term outcome in eight male cats

2022-2-VS-bresciani-3

Article Title: Modified prepubic urethrostomy with body wall tunneling: Description of technique and long-term outcome in eight male cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Duffy 2022 et al., on crotch suture techniques, why are two simple interrupted sutures (TCS) or SCCS considered superior to a single suture (SICS)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TCS and SCCS better distribute tension at the crotch, reducing leakage risk.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They improve tension distribution at the crotch.
TCS and SCCS better distribute tension at the crotch, reducing leakage risk.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Augmenting FEESA with two simple interrupted crotch sutures (TCS) or simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS) significantly increased initial leakage pressure (ILP) compared to no suture or a single suture (NCS, SICS).
  • SCCS had the highest ILP (47.6 mm Hg), followed by TCS (37.8 mm Hg), SICS (33.0 mm Hg), and NCS (27.1 mm Hg).
  • All crotch suture types increased maximal leakage pressure (MLP) compared to no crotch suture.
  • Leakage from the crotch occurred most commonly in NCS (67%) and SICS (50%), but only 8% with TCS and 0% with SCCS.
  • SCCS was the only technique where leakage never occurred at the crotch site.
  • SCCS had the highest MLP (100.6 mm Hg), supporting its use in clinical settings with high-risk patients.
  • Intraluminal pressures during leakage in NCS constructs were sometimes below normal physiologic pressures, emphasizing risk of leakage without crotch suture.
  • The transverse staple line never leaked in any group, indicating the crotch is the primary weak point.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

2022-4-VS-duffy-5

Article Title: Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was a noted potential **benefit** of cell salvage over allogeneic transfusion in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cell salvage removes leukocytes, potentially reducing transfusion reactions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Removal of leukocytes, reducing cytokine-mediated effects.
Cell salvage removes leukocytes, potentially reducing transfusion reactions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-5

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wood 2024 et al., on knot security and locking throws, how did the failure mode differ between locking and non-locking constructs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Non-locking knots failed by slipping, while locking versions broke the suture material.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Locking failed by breakage, non-locking by slippage.
Non-locking knots failed by slipping, while locking versions broke the suture material.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding a single locking throw significantly increased holding security for specific knots, including the surgeon's throw (p = .0001) and square throw (p = .0002).
  • For the Miller's throw (p = .166) and strangle throw (p = .808), no significant improvement was observed with a locking throw.
  • After locking throw addition, all five knots leaked at similar pressures (p = .5233), and these pressures exceeded physiologic arterial pressures.
  • Surgeon's throw without a locking throw had the lowest leak pressure (62.5 ± 46.2 mm Hg), below physiologic arterial values.
  • The square throw without locking also leaked below physiologic pressures (148.7 ± 109.4 mm Hg), though it outperformed the surgeon's throw.
  • Miller’s and strangle throws performed significantly better than square or surgeon’s throws without locking, achieving leak pressures >200 mm Hg.
  • All knots used 2-0 polyglyconate monofilament (Maxon); no comparisons across suture types or sizes were performed.
  • Authors concluded that correct tensioning and locking throw addition are key to safe vascular ligation. Miller’s, strangle, or slip knots are preferred for challenging surgical fields.

Wood

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

2024-4-VS-wood-2

Article Title: Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Ibrahim 2022 et al., on scrotal arterial supply, which artery was identified as the **dominant** source of scrotal perfusion in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The dorsal scrotal arteries, arising from the ventral perineal arteries, provided the most consistent and extensive perfusion in all cadavers.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Dorsal scrotal artery from ventral perineal.
The dorsal scrotal arteries, arising from the ventral perineal arteries, provided the most consistent and extensive perfusion in all cadavers.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dorsal scrotal arteries, branching from the ventral perineal arteries, are the dominant arterial supply to the scrotum in dogs.
  • The ventral scrotal arteries, arising from the external pudendal arteries, perfused only the cranial scrotal border and were inconsistently present or absent in some dogs.
  • A scrotal flap based on the dorsal scrotal arteries showed strong perfusion and may be a viable axial pattern flap.
  • Perfusion was consistent across fresh and frozen cadavers, showing no difference due to preservation method.
  • Poor flap survival (27%) occurred when based on cranial supply alone (i.e., ventral scrotal arteries), confirming importance of preserving caudal supply.
  • There are anastomoses between dorsal and ventral scrotal arteries, offering collateral flow but insufficient alone for complete perfusion.
  • Scrotal flaps based on the caudal pedicle may be applicable for reconstruction of proximal medial/lateral thigh wounds.
  • Proposed flap requires careful preservation of ventral perineal arteries, ideally designed 2.5–3 cm lateral to midline in large dogs.

Ibrahim

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Arterial supply to the scrotum: A cadaveric angiographic study

2022-4-VS-ibrahim-1

Article Title: Arterial supply to the scrotum: A cadaveric angiographic study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was the main advantage of swab washing during intraoperative blood salvage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Swab washing is useful when blood accumulates on swabs rather than in cavities, e.g., in soft tissue surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It served as an adjunct when direct suction was limited.
Swab washing is useful when blood accumulates on swabs rather than in cavities, e.g., in soft tissue surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-4

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banse 2022 et al., on skill retention methods, what was the observed benefit of spaced instruction (SI) over massed instruction (MI) in veterinary students?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Students in the SI group performed better on the first learned skill than those in the MI group immediately post-training.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Improved performance on the first skill learned.
Students in the SI group performed better on the first learned skill than those in the MI group immediately post-training.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spaced instruction (SI) improved immediate performance on the first learned skill compared to massed instruction (MI) in both LSU and LMU cohorts.
  • Cognitive load was higher in MI students at LMU, particularly in physical demand, effort, and frustration, while LSU showed no significant cognitive load differences.
  • Skill performance differences disappeared after 2 weeks of supervised practice, regardless of instructional format.
  • Time to complete skills improved over time, but this did not always correlate with improved checklist or global rating scores.
  • Intrinsic cognitive load increased when teaching more complex or related surgical tasks in the same session.
  • Initial skill complexity and prior exposure may influence effectiveness of spaced vs massed instruction.
  • Supervised practice sessions are critical to eliminate initial skill disparities between instructional methods.
  • Massed instruction may still be acceptable if followed by scheduled practice opportunities.

Banse

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Teaching veterinary surgical skills: Comparison of massed versus spaced instruction

2022-7-VS-banse-1

Article Title: Teaching veterinary surgical skills: Comparison of massed versus spaced instruction

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Davies 2024 et al., on lymphaticovenous anastomosis, what is the proposed advantage of creating a TD to AV anastomosis over traditional TD ligation and cisterna chyli ablation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TD to AV connection reduces stimulus for collateral formation and may prevent leakage.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Direct lymphatic drainage to central veins.
TD to AV connection reduces stimulus for collateral formation and may prevent leakage.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (TD to AV) was successfully performed in all 8 feline cadavers using a microvascular anastomotic coupler (MAC).
  • Anastomotic patency was confirmed intraoperatively and postoperatively in 7/8 cats via contrast lymphography or retrograde venography.
  • Dissection and anastomosis took a median of 120 minutes, with minimal technical complications.
  • A 1.5 mm MAC was used in 6 cats, and a 2.0 mm in 2 cats; TD diameter ranged 1.0–1.5 mm, AV up to 2.25 mm.
  • Challenges included vessel twisting and luminal patency issues, resolved intraoperatively with minor adjustments (e.g., repeat pinning, tacking suture).
  • MAC use eliminated need for hand-suturing, lowering skill demands but requiring precise alignment.
  • Technique provides direct lymphatic-to-venous drainage, potentially reducing the stimulus for collateral vessel formation.
  • May serve as a future treatment option for feline idiopathic chylothorax, warranting further in vivo studies.

Davies

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis of the caudal thoracic duct to the azygous vein: A feline cadaver study

2024-7-VS-davies-5

Article Title: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis of the caudal thoracic duct to the azygous vein: A feline cadaver study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wood 2024 et al., on knot security and locking throws, what was the effect of a single locking throw on holding strength?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Adding a single locking throw increased the holding strength for all five knots tested.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased in all knots.
Adding a single locking throw increased the holding strength for all five knots tested.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding a single locking throw significantly increased holding security for specific knots, including the surgeon's throw (p = .0001) and square throw (p = .0002).
  • For the Miller's throw (p = .166) and strangle throw (p = .808), no significant improvement was observed with a locking throw.
  • After locking throw addition, all five knots leaked at similar pressures (p = .5233), and these pressures exceeded physiologic arterial pressures.
  • Surgeon's throw without a locking throw had the lowest leak pressure (62.5 ± 46.2 mm Hg), below physiologic arterial values.
  • The square throw without locking also leaked below physiologic pressures (148.7 ± 109.4 mm Hg), though it outperformed the surgeon's throw.
  • Miller’s and strangle throws performed significantly better than square or surgeon’s throws without locking, achieving leak pressures >200 mm Hg.
  • All knots used 2-0 polyglyconate monofilament (Maxon); no comparisons across suture types or sizes were performed.
  • Authors concluded that correct tensioning and locking throw addition are key to safe vascular ligation. Miller’s, strangle, or slip knots are preferred for challenging surgical fields.

Wood

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

2024-4-VS-wood-3

Article Title: Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Logothetou 2024 et al., on SPF complications, which flap type had the lowest complication rate on univariable analysis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Advancement flaps were associated with a significantly lower complication rate on univariable analysis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Advancement flap.
Advancement flaps were associated with a significantly lower complication rate on univariable analysis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Complication rate for subdermal plexus flaps (SPFs) in dogs was 53.6%.
  • Skin staples had a numerically higher complication rate (72.2%) than sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant due to small sample size.
  • Most common complication was wound dehiscence (35%), followed by seroma (14%) and wound discharge (14%).
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with higher complication risk (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).
  • Advancement flaps were associated with a lower incidence of complications on univariable analysis (p < .001).
  • Head region flap closures had fewer complications, while proximal pelvic limb closures had the highest complication rate.
  • Age was a risk factor—each additional year increased odds of complications (OR = 1.019; p = .004).
  • Closure technique did not significantly influence complication severity, though staple use was numerically worse.

Logothetou

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

2024-3-VS-logothetou-4

Article Title: Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Suture & Soft Tissue Techniques
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.