Quiz Question

In Gant 2025 et al., on skin prep and SSI, which two combinations were compared for their impact on SSI?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These two combinations were the basis of comparison in the retrospective and prospective parts of the study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2% chlorhexidine & 70% isopropyl alcohol vs 0.7% iodophor & 74% isopropyl alcohol.
These two combinations were the basis of comparison in the retrospective and prospective parts of the study.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No statistically significant difference in overall SSI rates: 9.2% (chlorhexidine) vs. 7.38% (iodophor) (p = .25).
  • Significant drape lift occurred in 13.2% of cases; those with lift had 2.72× increased risk of SSI (p = .026).
  • Increased body weight was a statistically significant risk factor for SSI (p = .008): each 1 kg increased SSI risk by 3%.
  • Use of glutaraldehyde was associated with a 2.38× increased risk of SSI (p = .055, approaching significance).
  • No difference in SSI rates based on surgeon training level or surgical classification (clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated).

Gant

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Influence of skin preparation on surgical site infection and lift of adhesive surgical drapes

2025-3-VS-gant-2

Article Title: Influence of skin preparation on surgical site infection and lift of adhesive surgical drapes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Viljoen 2022 et al., on surgical hand prep protocols, which of the following statements is TRUE about CHX and BAC hand preparations?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no significant difference in CFU counts between CHX and BAC washes, although CHX showed lower counts than pHN.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They had no difference in CFU reduction compared to each other.
The study found no significant difference in CFU counts between CHX and BAC washes, although CHX showed lower counts than pHN.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Pre-ABHR hand preparation lowered CFUs at 120 minutes post-gloving compared to ABHR alone (P = .001)
  • pH-neutral soap followed by ABHR outperformed ABHR alone despite being nonmedicated (P = .001)
  • CHX and BAC prewashes showed better immediate CFU reduction post-preparation than pHN (P = .012)
  • No significant difference in total log10 CFU reduction across all four groups over the full surgical period (P = .362)
  • Glove perforation in the thumb was a significant contamination factor (P = .036)
  • All dogs recovered without surgical site infections, though SSI incidence was not a primary outcome
  • Neutralizer validation lacking, so CHX results interpreted cautiously
  • Study supports a 1-minute hand wash with pH-neutral soap prior to ABHR as effective and safe

Viljoen

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of 4 surgical hand‐preparation procedures prior to application of an alcohol-based hand rub in veterinary students

2022-3-VS-viljoen-2

Article Title: Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of 4 surgical hand‐preparation procedures prior to application of an alcohol-based hand rub in veterinary students

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Canever 2022 et al., on labial flap vascular anatomy, which tissue layer was most critical to include to ensure arterial perfusion of the flap?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The musculomucosal layer housed the key vascular network needed for flap survival.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Musculomucosal layer including orbicularis oris.
The musculomucosal layer housed the key vascular network needed for flap survival.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Superior and inferior labial arteries in cats perfuse robust angiosomes, which support musculomucosal axial pattern flaps.
  • Cadaver angiography confirmed vascular anatomy, with consistent patterns between sides and among specimens.
  • The vascular supply is located primarily in the musculomucosal layer, not the skin, critical for flap viability.
  • Flap harvest requires inclusion of the orbicularis oris (± buccinator) muscle to ensure vascular integrity and flap survival.
  • Two clinical cases demonstrated successful use of superior and inferior labial musculomucosal flaps for palatal reconstruction with complete flap survival and resolution of clinical signs.
  • Intraoperative transillumination aided vessel localization, facilitating surgical planning and flap design.
  • No cases of distal flap necrosis or dehiscence occurred, although mild donor site morbidity (lip retraction, mucosal denuding) was noted.
  • These flaps offer a valuable option when local tissues are compromised, especially after failed previous repairs or radiation therapy.

Canever

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Evaluation of the superior and inferior labial musculomucosal flaps in cats: An angiographic study and case series

2022-4-VS-canever-3

Article Title: Evaluation of the superior and inferior labial musculomucosal flaps in cats: An angiographic study and case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, what fixation technique was used to secure the plate to the tendon?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A figure-of-8 suture pattern with 0-Prolene was used to anchor the plate to the tendon.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Figure-of-8 pattern with Prolene.
A figure-of-8 suture pattern with 0-Prolene was used to anchor the plate to the tendon.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bone-to-tendon plate fixation allowed successful stabilization of a highly comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog with fragments too small for traditional fixation.
  • The plate was sutured to the common calcaneal tendon using a figure-of-8 pattern, bypassing the need for screw fixation into small proximal fragments.
  • Radiographic union was achieved by 17 weeks, though considered delayed, with the dog returning to normal function by 36 weeks post-op.
  • A second surgery was required to replace the tendon-anchored plate with a calcaneus-only plate due to skin ulceration and implant prominence.
  • Implant-associated infection was suspected; cultures confirmed Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, managed with doxycycline and clindamycin.
  • Use of human placental matrix (hPM) and both autogenous and allogenic bone grafts supported healing, though their specific contribution remains uncertain.
  • Postoperative complications included delayed union and skin ulceration, emphasizing challenges of implant design and soft tissue management.
  • This is the first report of using a bone-to-tendon plate for a calcaneus fracture in dogs and demonstrates its potential in cases where traditional methods are not viable.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Use of a bone‐to‐tendon plate to stabilize a comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog

2022-5-VS-evers-4

Article Title: Use of a bone‐to‐tendon plate to stabilize a comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Ritson 2025 et al., on feline hilar lobectomy sealants, what was the **design benefit** of the double-shank (DS) titanium clip?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The DS clip's dual shanks prevent clip scissoring and improve tissue grip.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Compression with reduced scissoring risk.
The DS clip's dual shanks prevent clip scissoring and improve tissue grip.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No leakage occurred using pretied ligature loops (PLL) or double-shank (DS) titanium clips up to 40 cm H₂O airway pressure.
  • 1/10 stapled lobes leaked at supraphysiologic pressure (40 cm H₂O), but this was not statistically significant (p = .33).
  • All techniques sealed effectively under physiologic and supraphysiologic pressures in cadaveric feline lungs.
  • PLL and DS clips required less working space than staplers, making them more practical for small thoracic cavities.
  • DS titanium clips offer enhanced security due to dual shanks and tissue-gripping design, reducing clip slippage.
  • Leak testing was cyclic and submerged, simulating physiologic ventilation and allowing robust evaluation.
  • Stapling failure occurred along the staple line, highlighting risks of air leakage due to staple misalignment or poor hilar access.
  • PLL and DS clips may be cost-effective and efficient alternatives for open or minimally invasive feline lung lobectomy.

Ritson

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Ex vivo comparative evaluation of feline hilar lung lobectomy using linear stapler, pretied ligature loop, and double-shank titanium clips

2025-7-VS-ritson-3

Article Title: Ex vivo comparative evaluation of feline hilar lung lobectomy using linear stapler, pretied ligature loop, and double-shank titanium clips

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Chik 2024 et al., on cholangioscopy feasibility, what was the most distal biliary region consistently visualized using the 3.8 mm disposable flexible endoscope?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In all eight cadavers, visualization was achievable up to the junction of the hepatic ducts, common bile duct, and cystic duct.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Confluence of hepatic ducts and cystic duct.
In all eight cadavers, visualization was achievable up to the junction of the hepatic ducts, common bile duct, and cystic duct.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Open transcholecystic cholangioscopy was feasible using a 3.8 mm disposable flexible endoscope in all 8 canine cadavers.
  • Visualization was consistently achieved up to the junction of the hepatic ducts, common bile duct, and cystic duct.
  • Advancement past the junction was limited by the endoscope diameter (3.8 mm) and anatomical flexure.
  • The 1.9 mm flexible ureteroscope could visualize the entire biliary tree, including the major duodenal papilla, in a large dog (43.8 kg).
  • Endoscopic tools (e.g., 3 Fr grasping forceps) could be passed through the working channel only after removing the irrigation line.
  • Standard biopsy forceps were incompatible with the disposable endoscope's 1.2 mm working channel.
  • Cadaver study showed no rupture, but clinical extrapolation is limited due to lack of diseased tissue.
  • Disposable endoscope setup cost (~$6,100) was significantly lower than traditional endoscopy systems (~$75,000–100,000), improving accessibility.

Chik

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Feasibility of open cholangioscopy with disposable flexible endoscopes

2024-7-VS-chik-1

Article Title: Feasibility of open cholangioscopy with disposable flexible endoscopes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was a noted potential **benefit** of cell salvage over allogeneic transfusion in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cell salvage removes leukocytes, potentially reducing transfusion reactions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Removal of leukocytes, reducing cytokine-mediated effects.
Cell salvage removes leukocytes, potentially reducing transfusion reactions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-5

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wood 2024 et al., on knot security and locking throws, which knot had the poorest performance, especially without a locking throw?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Forwarder knot showed the lowest holding pressures, especially when unlocked.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Forwarder knot.
Forwarder knot showed the lowest holding pressures, especially when unlocked.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding a single locking throw significantly increased holding security for specific knots, including the surgeon's throw (p = .0001) and square throw (p = .0002).
  • For the Miller's throw (p = .166) and strangle throw (p = .808), no significant improvement was observed with a locking throw.
  • After locking throw addition, all five knots leaked at similar pressures (p = .5233), and these pressures exceeded physiologic arterial pressures.
  • Surgeon's throw without a locking throw had the lowest leak pressure (62.5 ± 46.2 mm Hg), below physiologic arterial values.
  • The square throw without locking also leaked below physiologic pressures (148.7 ± 109.4 mm Hg), though it outperformed the surgeon's throw.
  • Miller’s and strangle throws performed significantly better than square or surgeon’s throws without locking, achieving leak pressures >200 mm Hg.
  • All knots used 2-0 polyglyconate monofilament (Maxon); no comparisons across suture types or sizes were performed.
  • Authors concluded that correct tensioning and locking throw addition are key to safe vascular ligation. Miller’s, strangle, or slip knots are preferred for challenging surgical fields.

Wood

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

2024-4-VS-wood-5

Article Title: Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Duffy 2022 et al., on barbed suture oversew, which repair method demonstrated the **shortest completion time** during oversew of the transverse staple line?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Barbed suture repairs were ~18% faster than monofilament; unidirectional suture had the shortest average time.
Incorrect. The correct answer is FEESA with unidirectional barbed suture oversew.
Barbed suture repairs were ~18% faster than monofilament; unidirectional suture had the shortest average time.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oversewing the transverse staple line using barbed suture showed no difference in initial (ILP) or maximum leakage pressure (MLP) compared to monofilament suture (p = .439 and .644).
  • Barbed suture repairs were ~18% faster (25 seconds faster; p < .001) than monofilament suture.
  • No difference was found between unidirectional and bidirectional barbed sutures in leakage resistance or repair time (p = .697).
  • Mean ILP and MLP were significantly higher in control jejunal segments (6.6x and 5.1x greater respectively; p < .001).
  • Leakage consistently occurred at the crotch of the FEESA in all oversew groups (>80%), not the staple line.
  • All oversewn techniques leaked at supraphysiologic pressures, indicating clinical safety against in vivo leakage.
  • No leakage was observed from barbed suture holes, addressing concerns of tissue trauma due to barb design.
  • The study supports barbed suture as a viable alternative to conventional monofilament suture for FEESA oversew in dogs.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

2022-5-VS-duffy-1

Article Title: Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what was the main reason for using a fascia lata autograft in Case 1?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Primary repair was not possible due to a 24 mm tendon gap; fascia lata was used as a bridging graft.
Incorrect. The correct answer is To bridge a complete tendon rupture.
Primary repair was not possible due to a 24 mm tendon gap; fascia lata was used as a bridging graft.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia lata autograft reconstruction of the FCU tendon successfully treated carpal hyperextension in both dogs.
  • Primary repair was not possible in one dog due to complete rupture; a fascia lata graft bridged the tendon gap.
  • In the second case, elongated tendon was corrected and reinforced with fascia lata to prevent recurrence.
  • Type I external skeletal fixation was used for 6 weeks to support tendon healing in both dogs.
  • Postoperative gait and range of motion returned to normal, with no recurrence at 36-month follow-up.
  • Ultrasonography aided diagnosis, revealing thinning and echogenic changes in the FCU tendon.
  • Histologic findings showed mild, nonspecific muscle changes, suggesting injury rather than a systemic disease.
  • No complications occurred, and fascia lata showed potential for biological integration and remodeling into tendon-like structure.

Tani

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon with a fascia lata autograft in two dogs with carpal hyperextension

2022-8-VS-tani-1

Article Title: Reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon with a fascia lata autograft in two dogs with carpal hyperextension

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Suture & Soft Tissue Techniques
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.