Quiz Question

In Kikuchi 2025 et al., on arthroscopic MMI in toy breeds, what arthroscopic finding was associated with **severe** meniscal injury?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Severe MMI was defined as requiring partial meniscectomy, often due to bucket-handle or flap tears.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Bucket-handle tear.
Severe MMI was defined as requiring partial meniscectomy, often due to bucket-handle or flap tears.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Medial meniscus injury (MMI) occurred in 36.3% of stifles with CrCLR in toy breed dogs (<5 kg)
  • Complete CrCLR was significantly associated with MMI (15.3% of complete vs. 3.4% of partial)
  • Severe lameness (grade 3) increased the likelihood of MMI compared to mild lameness (grade 1)
  • Higher body weight, even within the toy breed range, was positively associated with MMI
  • Yorkshire Terriers had the highest MMI incidence (55.6%), but this was not a significant independent factor due to multicollinearity
  • Arthroscopy identified more meniscal damage (including small radial tears and bucket-handle lesions) than gross examination might detect
  • MMI was classified as mild (radial tear) or severe (bucket-handle or flap) with implications for partial meniscectomy
  • Arthroscopy was used in all cases, underscoring its utility in small-breed stifle assessment

Kikuchi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

2025-5-VCOT-kikuchi-3

Article Title: Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Mazdarani 2022 et al., on CBLO and stifle biomechanics, which statement best describes the **patellar ligament angle (PTA)** after CBLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CBLO resulted in a parallel but lower PTA curve, indicating effective flexion induced by the osteotomy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PTA was consistently lower than intact, mimicking flexion.
CBLO resulted in a parallel but lower PTA curve, indicating effective flexion induced by the osteotomy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO reduced tibial plateau angle (TPA) from a mean of 28.1° to 9.7°, aligning with its goal of flattening the tibial slope.
  • CBLO eliminated cranial tibial translation (CTT) following CCL transection and meniscal release at all angles except 140° without hamstring load.
  • Hamstring loading (20% quadriceps load) significantly reduced or delayed the onset of CTT, improving stifle stability.
  • Medial meniscus was confirmed as a secondary stabilizer; its release (MMR) caused more CTT than CCLx alone.
  • PTA (patellar tendon angle) increased with joint extension; CBLO shifted the PTA curve lower and parallel to intact values, suggesting effective flexion of the joint.
  • Combined CBLO and hamstring loading resulted in the most stable joints, especially from 50° to 135° joint angles.
  • Residual CTT occurred in CBLO-only limbs at higher extension angles (e.g., 140°), but hamstring load mitigated this.
  • Stifle stability post-CBLO is multifactorial, depending on joint angle, meniscal integrity, and hamstring activation.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

2022-6-VS-mazdarani-5

Article Title: Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kikuchi 2025 et al., on arthroscopic MMI in toy breeds, what was the overall incidence of medial meniscus injury (MMI) in dogs with CrCLR?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MMI was detected arthroscopically in 36.3% of stifles with CrCLR in toy breed dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 36.3%.
MMI was detected arthroscopically in 36.3% of stifles with CrCLR in toy breed dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Medial meniscus injury (MMI) occurred in 36.3% of stifles with CrCLR in toy breed dogs (<5 kg)
  • Complete CrCLR was significantly associated with MMI (15.3% of complete vs. 3.4% of partial)
  • Severe lameness (grade 3) increased the likelihood of MMI compared to mild lameness (grade 1)
  • Higher body weight, even within the toy breed range, was positively associated with MMI
  • Yorkshire Terriers had the highest MMI incidence (55.6%), but this was not a significant independent factor due to multicollinearity
  • Arthroscopy identified more meniscal damage (including small radial tears and bucket-handle lesions) than gross examination might detect
  • MMI was classified as mild (radial tear) or severe (bucket-handle or flap) with implications for partial meniscectomy
  • Arthroscopy was used in all cases, underscoring its utility in small-breed stifle assessment

Kikuchi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

2025-5-VCOT-kikuchi-1

Article Title: Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Almeida 2025 et al., on TPLO and partial CCL rupture, what effect did CCL remnant transection have on postoperative patellar ligament thickness?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Transection of the CCL remnant did not reduce PLT at any measured location.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference vs control.
Transection of the CCL remnant did not reduce PLT at any measured location.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Transecting the CCL remnant during TPLO did not reduce patellar ligament thickening (PLT) at any measured point (proximal, mid, distal).
  • Transection also failed to reduce postoperative patellar ligament shortening (PLL) at 6 weeks.
  • Both groups (transected vs non-transected) showed significant thickening and shortening, with greatest PLT increase at the midpoint.
  • Increased PLT was positively correlated with tibial plateau rotation (p = 0.02) and postoperative TPA (p = 0.04).
  • No correlation between TT-O (tibial tuberosity width index) and PLT, suggesting narrow osteotomies did not influence PLT in this population.
  • Partial CCL rupture was not significantly protective; dogs with partial tears still developed ligament thickening.
  • Post-TPLO mid-patellar ligament thickening may relate to Gelpi retractor placement and osteotomy mechanics rather than CCL status.
  • Authors do not recommend CCL transection during TPLO to prevent desmitis, citing possible increased instability and degeneration.

Almeida

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

2025-4-VCOT-almeida-1

Article Title: Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wang 2025 et al., on TPLO osteotomy alignment, what was the primary benefit of using intraoperative fluoroscopy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement led to a median postoperative TPA of 3°, with a narrow range of 0–4.5°, indicating high precision.
Incorrect. The correct answer is More accurate postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA).
Fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement led to a median postoperative TPA of 3°, with a narrow range of 0–4.5°, indicating high precision.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement achieved a median postoperative TPA of (range: 0–4.5°), showing excellent accuracy.
  • The D1 measurement (from patellar ligament insertion to osteotomy exit) was more reproducible and accurate intraoperatively than D2.
  • Median R1 value (D1-based) matched the intended 21 mm radius with only 0.5 mm deviation, while R2 deviated by 2.5 mm.
  • Real-time fluoroscopy allowed dynamic limb positioning and reduced osteotomy placement variability.
  • Intraoperative fluoroscopy reduced reliance on preoperative planning, especially in cases with difficult anatomy or positioning.
  • Radiation exposure was minimal (avg. 3 images per case) and within safe limits using standard protection protocols.
  • Study standardized to 21 mm blades and excluded dogs with developmental orthopedic conditions to reduce confounders.
  • Targeting a lower postoperative TPA (3°) may reduce meniscal load and cranio-caudal instability, though long-term outcomes require further study.

Wang

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Accuracy of fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement in TPLO: Postoperative tibial plateau angle and preoperative planning evaluation

2025-7-VS-wang-1

Article Title: Accuracy of fluoroscopy-guided osteotomy placement in TPLO: Postoperative tibial plateau angle and preoperative planning evaluation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Fracka 2025 et al., on cementless knee replacement, what peak vertical force was measured on the operated limb at 6 weeks?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Force plate analysis showed 70% bodyweight peak vertical force in the operated limb by 6 weeks post-op【57†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】
Incorrect. The correct answer is 70% bodyweight.
Force plate analysis showed 70% bodyweight peak vertical force in the operated limb by 6 weeks post-op【57†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】

🔍 Key Findings

Subject: 7-year-old Labrador underwent cementless total knee replacement (TKR) due to severe stifle OA.

Clinical function:

  • Improved ROM from 90° pre-op to 120° post-op.
  • Weight-bearing increased from toe-touching to 70% bodyweight by 6 weeks post-op.
  • No visible lameness by 14 weeks.

Implant performance:

  • No complications at any follow-up points.
  • No osteolysis, loosening, or metallosis at 6-year necropsy.

Wear evaluation:

  • Mild UHMWPE insert wear, localized to caudal edges.

Histologic findings:

  • Robust osseointegration at implant-bone interface.
  • Fibrous tissue only in areas lacking porous coating.

Conclusion:

  • Cementless TKR demonstrated excellent 6-year survival and functional outcomes.
  • Support for considering early surgical intervention in severe stifle OA.

Fracka

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Long‐term clinical outcomes and retrieval analysis of a cementless total knee replacement in a dog

2025-3-VS-fracka-2

Article Title: Long‐term clinical outcomes and retrieval analysis of a cementless total knee replacement in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Husi 2023 et al., on TPLO vs TPLO-IB biomechanics, which test revealed significantly greater cranial tibial translation after TPLO compared to intact stifles?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cranial tibial translation was ~6× higher in TPLO stifles vs intact during both eTPT and iTPT, but not during TCT.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both eTPT and iTPT.
Cranial tibial translation was ~6× higher in TPLO stifles vs intact during both eTPT and iTPT, but not during TCT.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO alone failed to neutralize rotational instability under tibial pivot compression (TPT), despite a negative TCT.
  • TPLO combined with lateral augmentation (TPLO-IB) restored both craniocaudal and rotational stability to near-intact levels.
  • Cranial tibial translation was 6× greater after TPLO vs intact stifles when tested with TPT (p < .001).
  • No significant difference in cranial tibial translation or internal rotation between intact stifles and TPLO-IB group during TCT, eTPT, or iTPT.
  • TPLO-IB did not overconstrain the stifle, avoiding excessive external rotation.
  • External tibial rotation (eTPT) was more sensitive than TCT in detecting persistent instability after TPLO.
  • Excellent intraobserver reliability for both eTPT and iTPT (ICC > 0.9).
  • Study supports intraoperative use of TPT to identify cases needing additional rotational stabilization.

Husi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

2023-5-VS-husi-2

Article Title: Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Knudsen 2024 et al., on CTA diagnosis, what was the approximate percentage of menisci correctly classified in second readings?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Second readings yielded ~90% correct classification rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 90%.
Second readings yielded ~90% correct classification rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Multidetector CTA had high sensitivity (up to 100%) and specificity (up to 96%) for detecting medial meniscal tears in dogs.
  • Observer experience significantly influenced diagnostic accuracy, with more experienced observers showing higher agreement and better performance.
  • Training effect was evident, as less experienced observers improved between first and second readings.
  • Positive likelihood ratios ≥4.6 and negative likelihood ratios ≤0.08 were observed, suggesting CTA is clinically useful for confirming or ruling out meniscal injury.
  • CTA allowed identification of full and partial thickness lesions, with good visualization in sagittal, transverse, and frontal reconstructions.
  • Approximately 90% of menisci were correctly classified in second readings.
  • No adverse reactions were noted from the contrast injection; sedation was used instead of general anesthesia.
  • CTA was less invasive and potentially more cost-effective compared to arthroscopy, especially in settings without MRI access.

Knudsen

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

2024-8-VS-knudsen-3

Article Title: Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Brincin 2023 et al., on radiographic follow-up post-MPL surgery, what was the likelihood of dogs on NSAIDs at recheck requiring a change in management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs receiving NSAIDs had 6× higher odds of having their postoperative plan modified.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6× higher.
Dogs receiving NSAIDs had 6× higher odds of having their postoperative plan modified.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Routine follow-up radiographs after MPL surgery influenced management in only 3% of asymptomatic cases.
  • Isolated radiographic abnormalities were rare (3.3%) and even less likely to alter treatment unless accompanied by clinical concerns.
  • Dogs with both radiographic changes and clinical/owner concerns had 32× higher odds of a management change (OR 32.16, P < .001).
  • Lameness, NSAID use, or prior unplanned visits significantly increased the odds of altered post-op plans.
  • Owner-reported concerns alone led to a change in only 1.6% of cases without corroborating clinical findings.
  • Radiographic follow-up was deemed unnecessary in dogs without owner concerns or abnormal physical findings.
  • Hands-on clinical exam remains critical, though video-based rechecks may aid triage in uncomplicated cases.
  • The study supports selective radiographic follow-up, reducing unnecessary imaging, stress, and clinician workload.

Brincin

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-brincin-4

Article Title: The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Husi 2023 et al., on TPLO vs TPLO-IB biomechanics, how did the TPLO-IB construct affect rotational stability compared to TPLO alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TPLO-IB reduced internal tibial rotation to levels similar to intact stifles without inducing external overconstraint.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Restored rotational motion to pre-CCLD levels.
TPLO-IB reduced internal tibial rotation to levels similar to intact stifles without inducing external overconstraint.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO alone failed to neutralize rotational instability under tibial pivot compression (TPT), despite a negative TCT.
  • TPLO combined with lateral augmentation (TPLO-IB) restored both craniocaudal and rotational stability to near-intact levels.
  • Cranial tibial translation was 6× greater after TPLO vs intact stifles when tested with TPT (p < .001).
  • No significant difference in cranial tibial translation or internal rotation between intact stifles and TPLO-IB group during TCT, eTPT, or iTPT.
  • TPLO-IB did not overconstrain the stifle, avoiding excessive external rotation.
  • External tibial rotation (eTPT) was more sensitive than TCT in detecting persistent instability after TPLO.
  • Excellent intraobserver reliability for both eTPT and iTPT (ICC > 0.9).
  • Study supports intraoperative use of TPT to identify cases needing additional rotational stabilization.

Husi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

2023-5-VS-husi-3

Article Title: Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Stifle Joint
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.