Quiz Question

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., in Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats, what was the most challenging intraoperative step during AA-HTS in cats?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors reported toggle passage through the femoral tunnel as the most challenging step, difficult in 6 joints.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Toggle passage through the femoral tunnel.
Authors reported toggle passage through the femoral tunnel as the most challenging step, difficult in 6 joints.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 14 joints from 7 cat cadavers underwent AA-HTS successfully.
  • Median surgical time: 46.5 min (29–144), including 7 min for arthroscopy and 40 min for toggle placement.
  • Intraoperative complications in 5/14 joints: 4 related to femoral tunnel creation, 1 toggle lodging.
  • Toggle passage through femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Cartilage injury occurred in 10 joints, but all were minor (<10% of cartilage area).
  • 13 deviations from planned technique were identified (8 major, 5 minor), all involving femoral tunnel placement.
  • No neurovascular, intrapelvic, or major periarticular injuries occurred.
  • Authors conclude: AA-HTS is feasible in cats, but associated with high rates of minor iatrogenic cartilage damage, intra-op complications, and technique deviations.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-7-VS-espinel-1

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Evers 2023 et al., on needle arthroscopy for meniscal tears, what best describes the procedural morbidity of needle arthroscopy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. There was no statistically significant difference in lameness before and after needle arthroscopy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No increase in lameness.
There was no statistically significant difference in lameness before and after needle arthroscopy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Needle arthroscopy (NA) had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing medial meniscal tears in dogs with CCLR.
  • NA missed 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscal tear, both nondisplaced and stable.
  • Visibility of all meniscal horns was significantly lower with NA compared to standard arthroscopy (SA) (P < .005 for all horns).
  • Probing the caudal horn of the lateral meniscus was significantly more difficult with NA (P = .0017), though medial horn probing was similar.
  • Mean NA procedure time was 8 ± 3 minutes, significantly shorter than SA (15 ± 9 min, P = .0041).
  • No increase in lameness observed after NA, indicating minimal procedural morbidity.
  • NA was performed under sedation in most dogs, though 10/26 required additional chemical restraint or short anesthesia.
  • NA was most accurate for displaced vertical longitudinal tears, with all 14 correctly identified; one stable tear and a lateral tear were missed.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

2023-6-VS-evers-5

Article Title: Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Mazdarani 2022 et al., on CBLO and stifle biomechanics, the release of the medial meniscus (MMR) led to which of the following?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MMR led to earlier and more severe CTT than CCLx alone, highlighting the meniscus as a secondary stabilizer.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased cranial tibial translation (CTT) earlier than CCLx.
MMR led to earlier and more severe CTT than CCLx alone, highlighting the meniscus as a secondary stabilizer.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO reduced tibial plateau angle (TPA) from a mean of 28.1° to 9.7°, aligning with its goal of flattening the tibial slope.
  • CBLO eliminated cranial tibial translation (CTT) following CCL transection and meniscal release at all angles except 140° without hamstring load.
  • Hamstring loading (20% quadriceps load) significantly reduced or delayed the onset of CTT, improving stifle stability.
  • Medial meniscus was confirmed as a secondary stabilizer; its release (MMR) caused more CTT than CCLx alone.
  • PTA (patellar tendon angle) increased with joint extension; CBLO shifted the PTA curve lower and parallel to intact values, suggesting effective flexion of the joint.
  • Combined CBLO and hamstring loading resulted in the most stable joints, especially from 50° to 135° joint angles.
  • Residual CTT occurred in CBLO-only limbs at higher extension angles (e.g., 140°), but hamstring load mitigated this.
  • Stifle stability post-CBLO is multifactorial, depending on joint angle, meniscal integrity, and hamstring activation.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

2022-6-VS-mazdarani-4

Article Title: Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Peycke 2022 et al., on CBLO in immature dogs, how many dogs developed **tibial recurvatum** due to over-rotation of the TPA during CBLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to overcorrection to protect CrCL avulsion repair.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.
One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to overcorrection to protect CrCL avulsion repair.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO was effective for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs with CrCL injuries, avoiding disruption of proximal tibial growth plates.
  • Radiographic union of the osteotomy occurred in a mean of 6 weeks (range: 4–8 weeks), indicating rapid bone healing.
  • Full limb function was restored in all cases by long-term follow-up (mean 23 months), including dogs with initial complications.
  • Two dogs developed 19° valgus deformities due to screw interference with the proximal tibial physis; both were corrected surgically with return to function.
  • One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to over-rotation of the tibial plateau, but retained full function without revision.
  • CCS (countersink compression screw) caused early apophyseal closure in older dogs but had no adverse clinical effects.
  • In contrast, K-wire or plate-only fixation preserved open apophysis, suggesting implant choice may influence growth.
  • No meniscal injuries were observed, and all CrCL injuries were managed arthroscopically — 6 complete, 6 partial, 4 avulsions.

Peycke

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

2022-3-VS-peycke-5

Article Title: Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Isono 2025 et al., on tibial malalignment in MPL, which statistical trend was observed in toy poodles with grade 3 MPL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Toy poodles with grade 3 MPL had higher PTMTA than normals, indicating breed-specific severity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significantly higher PTMTA compared to normals.
Toy poodles with grade 3 MPL had higher PTMTA than normals, indicating breed-specific severity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal Tibia Metatarsal Angle (PTMTA) was significantly increased in dogs with grade 3 and 4 MPL, making it a useful marker for severity.
  • PTMTA strongly correlated with Tibial Torsion Angle (TTA) (r = 0.733) and Crural Rotation Angle (CRA) (r = 0.643), integrating multiple morphological deformities.
  • Grade 4 MPL cases showed significant internal tibial torsion, increased mMPTA, and decreased MDTT/PTW—indicating both rotation and medial displacement.
  • DTMTA was significantly more negative in grade 4, indicating a consistent pattern of internal foot rotation with disease severity.
  • PTMTA can be visually assessed during palpation, offering preoperative utility without CT.
  • Among toy poodles, PTMTA showed significant differences even between grades 3 and normal, suggesting breed-specific severity patterns.
  • Corrective osteotomy may need to address tibial as well as femoral deformities in severe MPL cases with high PTMTA.
  • Younger dogs with grade 4 MPL had more severe deformities, possibly due to early onset or developmental progression.

Isono

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-4-VCOT-isono-4

Article Title: Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Johnson 2022 et al., on PET implant outcomes, what percentage of implants remained fully intact and functional at 6 months postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 2 out of 10 implants were found fully intact and functional at 6 months, representing a 10% success rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 10%.
Only 2 out of 10 implants were found fully intact and functional at 6 months, representing a 10% success rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Only 2 of 10 PET implants were fully intact and functional at 6 months post-op.
  • Owner-reported function (LOAD scores) improved by 51.7% (p = .008) over 6 months.
  • Gait asymmetry improved by 86% (p = .002) postoperatively.
  • Implant failure occurred in the midbody of the PET device, suggesting fatigue as a failure mechanism.
  • One dog (10%) developed implant infection, necessitating implant removal.
  • Implant fixation method (screws + washers + interference screw) was mechanically adequate and technically simple.
  • Partially intact implants (4/10) still showed improved clinical outcomes, despite structural compromise.
  • Midbody tearing and lack of long-term integrity prohibit continued use of this PET implant in CCL repair.

Johnson

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Outcome of cranial cruciate ligament replacement with an enhanced polyethylene terephthalate implant in the dog: A pilot clinical trial

2022-8-VS-johnson-1

Article Title: Outcome of cranial cruciate ligament replacement with an enhanced polyethylene terephthalate implant in the dog: A pilot clinical trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2024 et al., on CCWO outcomes, what was the **median postoperative TPA** in small dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median postoperative TPA in small dogs was 7°, exceeding the target.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 7.0°.
Median postoperative TPA in small dogs was 7°, exceeding the target.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oxley's modified CCWO did not achieve the target TPA of 5° in most cases, even with planning.
  • Mean planned TPA was 7.6°, higher than target, and consistent across dog sizes.
  • Postoperative TPAs were significantly higher in small dogs (median 7°) than in large dogs (median 4.5°).
  • Distalization >7.5 mm of the osteotomy from the patellar tendon led to increased under-correction of TPA.
  • Only dogs with preoperative TPA >35° achieved post-planning TPAs close to the 5° target.
  • Postoperative osteotomy positions were generally more distal than recommended (8.6 mm median).
  • Virtual plate fit was appropriate for all dogs at 5 mm or 7.5 mm positions, suggesting no need for excessive distalization.
  • Excessive correction leading to negative TPAs occurred in some cases, risking caudal cruciate ligament strain.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-8-VS-banks-4

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Lemmon 2025 et al., on synovitis severity scoring, what clinical implication was proposed based on the findings?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Higher synovitis scores were tied to worse cartilage lesions, supporting early treatment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis.
Higher synovitis scores were tied to worse cartilage lesions, supporting early treatment.

🔍 Key Findings

Synovitis was present in 100% of canine stifles with CCL disease (n = 163).

The most frequent severity score was 3/5 (55.2%), followed by 4/5 (24.5%).

Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with:

  • Higher median cartilage scores (p = .042, OR = 2.1 per unit increase)
  • Longer duration of clinical signs (p < .001, OR = 1.27 per month)

Bodyweight (p = .083) and sex (p = .17) were not statistically significant in multivariable analysis.

Bucket handle meniscal tears were not associated with synovitis severity.

Clinical implication: Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis and slow OA progression.

Lemmon

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

2025-3-VS-lemmon-5

Article Title: Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, which metric showed no significant difference between treatment and placebo groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CMPS-SF pain scores.
CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-1

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Longo 2023 et al., on CT trochlear measurements, what FTGA threshold was proposed for recommending trochleoplasty in small breed dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FTGA >134° was associated with MPL in small breeds, suggesting shallowness that may warrant trochleoplasty.
Incorrect. The correct answer is >134°.
FTGA >134° was associated with MPL in small breeds, suggesting shallowness that may warrant trochleoplasty.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dogs with MPL had significantly shallower femoral trochlear grooves compared to controls, based on CT-measured femoral trochlear groove angle (FTGA).
  • FTGA >134° in small breeds (SB) and >128° in medium/large breeds (MLB) were associated with MPL and can serve as surgical thresholds for considering trochleoplasty.
  • FTA and FTRIA measurements were less reliable, showing lower sensitivity/specificity than FTGA.
  • Inter-rater reliability for FTGA was excellent (ICC > 0.9), supporting its use in clinical decision-making.
  • FTGA differed significantly between SB and MLB dogs, suggesting anatomical variation influences MPL predisposition.
  • Dogs with MPL but with FTGA below threshold may not benefit from trochleoplasty, supporting individualized surgical planning.
  • CT provides more precise and reproducible evaluation of trochlear morphology than radiography or ultrasound.
  • The study introduces a CT protocol using P25 and P50 reference points for consistent FTGA measurement.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-longo-2

Article Title: Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Stifle Joint
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.