Quiz Question

In Mazdarani 2022 et al., on CBLO and stifle biomechanics, when did cranial tibial translation (CTT) occur after CBLO **without** hamstring loading?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CBLO eliminated CTT at all angles **except 140°** in the absence of hamstring load.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Only at 140°.
CBLO eliminated CTT at all angles **except 140°** in the absence of hamstring load.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO reduced tibial plateau angle (TPA) from a mean of 28.1° to 9.7°, aligning with its goal of flattening the tibial slope.
  • CBLO eliminated cranial tibial translation (CTT) following CCL transection and meniscal release at all angles except 140° without hamstring load.
  • Hamstring loading (20% quadriceps load) significantly reduced or delayed the onset of CTT, improving stifle stability.
  • Medial meniscus was confirmed as a secondary stabilizer; its release (MMR) caused more CTT than CCLx alone.
  • PTA (patellar tendon angle) increased with joint extension; CBLO shifted the PTA curve lower and parallel to intact values, suggesting effective flexion of the joint.
  • Combined CBLO and hamstring loading resulted in the most stable joints, especially from 50° to 135° joint angles.
  • Residual CTT occurred in CBLO-only limbs at higher extension angles (e.g., 140°), but hamstring load mitigated this.
  • Stifle stability post-CBLO is multifactorial, depending on joint angle, meniscal integrity, and hamstring activation.

Mazdarani

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

2022-6-VS-mazdarani-2

Article Title: Effect of center of rotation of angulation‐based leveling osteotomy on ex vivo stifle joint stability following cranial cruciate ligament transection and medial meniscal release with and without a hamstring load

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Haine 2022 et al., on outcomes in canine limb tumors, which lateral surgical margin width significantly reduced R1 margin rates?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6–10 mm.
Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fewer R1 margins (tumor on ink) were achieved in mast cell tumors (MCTs) when using 6–10 mm lateral margins versus 0–5 mm (7% vs. 55%; _P_ = .049).
  • For soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), no benefit was seen in margin completeness between 0–5 mm vs. 6–10 mm lateral margins (41% vs. 43% R1).
  • Overall R1 rates were 26% for MCTs and 42% for STSs following PNE.
  • R scheme (“tumor on ink” = R1) had better interobserver agreement (83%) compared to ≤1 mm margin criteria (68% agreement).
  • Complication rate was moderate (26%), but no surgeries required revision.
  • Local recurrence/metastasis occurred in 14% of dogs, with 60% of those having R1 margins.
  • Adjunctive therapy was considered clinically indicated in 46% of 0–5 mm margin cases vs. 24% of 6–10 mm cases.
  • Histologic grade and tumor size were not predictive of margin completeness.

Haine

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

2022-7-VS-haine-2

Article Title: Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2024 et al., what patient factor was associated with higher preoperative and postoperative TPAs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Small dogs had significantly higher pre- and postoperative TPAs than large dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Small body size.
Small dogs had significantly higher pre- and postoperative TPAs than large dogs.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study Design: Retrospective study of 100 radiographs using in silico and clinical data
  • Mean preoperative TPA: 28.6°, higher in small dogs than large (p = .02)
  • Mean planned TPA (in silico): 7.6°, not achieving 5° target (p < .01)
  • Median postoperative TPA: 5.5° overall; higher in small dogs (7°) vs large (4.5°) (p = .06)
  • Postoperative ostectomy position: More distal than recommended; average = 8.6 mm
  • Increased distalizationgreater under-correction of TPA (p = .01)
  • Most accurate correction occurred when ostectomy was ≤7.5 mm from patellar tendon
  • Wedge angle categories (TPA-Pre minus 5–2°) were used based on pre-op TPA

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-1-VS-banks-4

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Peycke 2022 et al., on CBLO in immature dogs, what was the most common **complication** from improper screw placement in CBLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Two dogs developed valgus deformities from screws breaching the distal lateral portion of the proximal tibial physis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Valgus deformity.
Two dogs developed valgus deformities from screws breaching the distal lateral portion of the proximal tibial physis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO was effective for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs with CrCL injuries, avoiding disruption of proximal tibial growth plates.
  • Radiographic union of the osteotomy occurred in a mean of 6 weeks (range: 4–8 weeks), indicating rapid bone healing.
  • Full limb function was restored in all cases by long-term follow-up (mean 23 months), including dogs with initial complications.
  • Two dogs developed 19° valgus deformities due to screw interference with the proximal tibial physis; both were corrected surgically with return to function.
  • One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to over-rotation of the tibial plateau, but retained full function without revision.
  • CCS (countersink compression screw) caused early apophyseal closure in older dogs but had no adverse clinical effects.
  • In contrast, K-wire or plate-only fixation preserved open apophysis, suggesting implant choice may influence growth.
  • No meniscal injuries were observed, and all CrCL injuries were managed arthroscopically — 6 complete, 6 partial, 4 avulsions.

Peycke

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

2022-3-VS-peycke-2

Article Title: Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cortina 2023 et al., on modified TTT outcomes for MPL in dogs, how did the complication rate of the m-TTT compare to historical methods?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The overall complication rate (19.6%) was lower than historical reports (up to 48%), with major complications at only 4.3%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Markedly lower overall complications.
The overall complication rate (19.6%) was lower than historical reports (up to 48%), with major complications at only 4.3%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • m-TTT yielded a low overall major complication rate (4.3%) and minor complication rate of 15%, consistent with or better than previous techniques.
  • Patellar reluxation occurred in only 4.3% of stifles, with high-grade reluxation seen in just 0.6% of cases—lower than the 12.4–21% range reported for other techniques.
  • Implant migration rate was 3.7%, lower than previously reported for smooth pin fixation (7.7–24.6%).
  • Use of a tension band with single Steinmann and Kirschner wire reduced stress risers and fixation failure, supporting better stability.
  • Tibial tuberosity fracture occurred in only 1.3% of cases, lower than the 1–6% seen in other reports.
  • All long-term major complications (1.3%) were related to pin migration, but were easily resolved.
  • Radiographic follow-up confirmed complete bone healing in all examined cases, even up to 9 years postoperatively.
  • Owner satisfaction was 100%, and 95% rated quality of life as good to excellent based on CBPI surveys.

Cortina

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Outcomes and complications of a modified tibial tuberosity transposition technique in the treatment of medial patellar luxation in dogs

2023-5-VS-cortina-4

Article Title: Outcomes and complications of a modified tibial tuberosity transposition technique in the treatment of medial patellar luxation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Evers 2023 et al., on medial meniscal tear detection, which aspect of the procedure was significantly more difficult using NA compared to SA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The caudal horn of the lateral meniscus was significantly harder to probe with NA (*P* = .0017).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Meniscal probing of the lateral horn.
The caudal horn of the lateral meniscus was significantly harder to probe with NA (*P* = .0017).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Needle arthroscopy (NA) had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing medial meniscal tears in dogs with CCLR.
  • NA missed 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscal tear, both nondisplaced and stable.
  • Visibility of all meniscal horns was significantly lower with NA compared to standard arthroscopy (SA) (P < .005 for all horns).
  • Probing the caudal horn of the lateral meniscus was significantly more difficult with NA (P = .0017), though medial horn probing was similar.
  • Mean NA procedure time was 8 ± 3 minutes, significantly shorter than SA (15 ± 9 min, P = .0041).
  • No increase in lameness observed after NA, indicating minimal procedural morbidity.
  • NA was performed under sedation in most dogs, though 10/26 required additional chemical restraint or short anesthesia.
  • NA was most accurate for displaced vertical longitudinal tears, with all 14 correctly identified; one stable tear and a lateral tear were missed.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

2023-6-VS-evers-2

Article Title: Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kikuchi 2025 et al., on arthroscopic MMI in toy breeds, which variable was **not** part of the final regression model predicting MMI?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The final model included body weight, lameness score, and CrCL status. Breed and age were excluded in multivariate analysis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Age.
The final model included body weight, lameness score, and CrCL status. Breed and age were excluded in multivariate analysis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Medial meniscus injury (MMI) occurred in 36.3% of stifles with CrCLR in toy breed dogs (<5 kg)
  • Complete CrCLR was significantly associated with MMI (15.3% of complete vs. 3.4% of partial)
  • Severe lameness (grade 3) increased the likelihood of MMI compared to mild lameness (grade 1)
  • Higher body weight, even within the toy breed range, was positively associated with MMI
  • Yorkshire Terriers had the highest MMI incidence (55.6%), but this was not a significant independent factor due to multicollinearity
  • Arthroscopy identified more meniscal damage (including small radial tears and bucket-handle lesions) than gross examination might detect
  • MMI was classified as mild (radial tear) or severe (bucket-handle or flap) with implications for partial meniscectomy
  • Arthroscopy was used in all cases, underscoring its utility in small-breed stifle assessment

Kikuchi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

2025-5-VCOT-kikuchi-4

Article Title: Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Story 2024 et al., on surgical correction of excessive tibial plateau angle (eTPA), which two techniques demonstrated the most accurate achievement of their target TPA values?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Groups A and D had the least variation from their target TPAs, with mean correction accuracy near 1.0.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CBLO + CCWO and PTNWO.
Groups A and D had the least variation from their target TPAs, with mean correction accuracy near 1.0.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All four techniques achieved TPA <14°, meeting the threshold for acceptable surgical correction in eTPA cases.
  • Group A (CBLO + CCWO) and Group D (PTNWO) showed highest accuracy in achieving target TPA values.
  • Group B (TPLO + CCWO) resulted in significant tibial shortening compared to other techniques.
  • Group A caused the greatest cranial mechanical axis shift, while Group B caused the least.
  • Group C (mCCWO) resulted in consistent under-correction of TPA, despite aiming for 0°.
  • Modified or neutral wedge osteotomies (Groups C and D) had minimal effect on tibial length, making them suitable when preservation is important.
  • All techniques involved mechanical axis shifts, highlighting the importance of preoperative planning to minimize morphologic disruption.
  • Supplemental fixation was standard for all procedures to reduce risks such as tibial tuberosity fracture and plateau leveling loss.

Story

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

2024-8-VS-story-3

Article Title: Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Moreira 2024 et al., on predictive equations for TPA correction, which of the following is true regarding the Oxley mCCWO technique?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The Oxley mCCWO did not require caudal translation for cortical alignment, unlike others.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It achieved cranial cortical alignment without requiring caudal translation.
The Oxley mCCWO did not require caudal translation for cortical alignment, unlike others.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A linear relationship was observed between wedge angle and tibial plateau angle (TPA) correction across all four CCWO techniques.
  • All techniques produced predictable TPA corrections using linear regression-derived equations, allowing wedge angle extrapolation to achieve a target postoperative TPA of 5°.
  • TLA shift (tibial long axis) increased with wedge angle and influenced final TPA; greatest in Frederick & Cross method.
  • Tibial shortening (mTL%) varied by technique, being most severe (up to 40.9%) in traditional Slocum & Devine CCWO and least in newer techniques (7.5–12%).
  • The Oxley mCCWO technique showed lower TLA shift compared to the Frederick & Cross and Christ techniques, though similar to Slocum & Devine; tibial shortening was more pronounced than other modified techniques at wedge angles ≤40°.
  • Techniques varied in craniocaudal translation and wedge apex positioning, influencing planning accuracy and mechanical axis alignment.
  • The corrective wedge angle equations reliably predicted TPA within 4–6° across varied tibial conformations.
  • The study supports equation-based planning over static TPA–5° subtraction to reduce risk of under- or over-correction.

Moreira

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

2024-8-VS-moreira-5

Article Title: Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, which metric showed no significant difference between treatment and placebo groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CMPS-SF pain scores.
CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-1

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Stifle Joint
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.