Quiz Question

In Lee 2022 et al., on TPLO accuracy, what was observed regarding postoperative TPA in both groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite improved technical metrics, postoperative TPA did not differ significantly between groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is There was no significant difference in postoperative TPA.
Despite improved technical metrics, postoperative TPA did not differ significantly between groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed TPLO guides significantly reduced osteotomy inclination angle in both bone models and cadaver limbs compared to jig alone (P < .001).
  • Torsional deformities were lower when the 3D-printed guide was used in bone models (P < .001), but not significantly different in cadavers.
  • Angular deformities were significantly reduced in cadavers using 3D-printed guides (P < .001).
  • Proximal jig pin angulation was more accurate with the guide in cadavers (P < .001); not significant in bone models.
  • Medial cortex damage was substantially reduced in bone models when the 3D-printed guide was used (P < .001).
  • Postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA) did not differ significantly between groups, suggesting that clinical alignment can still be achieved without the guide.
  • Clinical significance of improved metrics is uncertain, but improved precision may reduce surgical complications.
  • 3D guide design allowed direct placement of jig and bone plate, potentially improving workflow and safety.

Lee

Veterinary Surgery

6

2022

Evaluation of a customized 3D‐printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

2022-6-VS-lee-3

Article Title: Evaluation of a customized 3D‐printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Peycke 2022 et al., on CBLO in immature dogs, what was the most common **complication** from improper screw placement in CBLO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Two dogs developed valgus deformities from screws breaching the distal lateral portion of the proximal tibial physis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Valgus deformity.
Two dogs developed valgus deformities from screws breaching the distal lateral portion of the proximal tibial physis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO was effective for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs with CrCL injuries, avoiding disruption of proximal tibial growth plates.
  • Radiographic union of the osteotomy occurred in a mean of 6 weeks (range: 4–8 weeks), indicating rapid bone healing.
  • Full limb function was restored in all cases by long-term follow-up (mean 23 months), including dogs with initial complications.
  • Two dogs developed 19° valgus deformities due to screw interference with the proximal tibial physis; both were corrected surgically with return to function.
  • One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to over-rotation of the tibial plateau, but retained full function without revision.
  • CCS (countersink compression screw) caused early apophyseal closure in older dogs but had no adverse clinical effects.
  • In contrast, K-wire or plate-only fixation preserved open apophysis, suggesting implant choice may influence growth.
  • No meniscal injuries were observed, and all CrCL injuries were managed arthroscopically — 6 complete, 6 partial, 4 avulsions.

Peycke

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

2022-3-VS-peycke-2

Article Title: Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2024 et al., on CCWO outcomes, what was the **median postoperative TPA** in small dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median postoperative TPA in small dogs was 7°, exceeding the target.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 7.0°.
Median postoperative TPA in small dogs was 7°, exceeding the target.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oxley's modified CCWO did not achieve the target TPA of 5° in most cases, even with planning.
  • Mean planned TPA was 7.6°, higher than target, and consistent across dog sizes.
  • Postoperative TPAs were significantly higher in small dogs (median 7°) than in large dogs (median 4.5°).
  • Distalization >7.5 mm of the osteotomy from the patellar tendon led to increased under-correction of TPA.
  • Only dogs with preoperative TPA >35° achieved post-planning TPAs close to the 5° target.
  • Postoperative osteotomy positions were generally more distal than recommended (8.6 mm median).
  • Virtual plate fit was appropriate for all dogs at 5 mm or 7.5 mm positions, suggesting no need for excessive distalization.
  • Excessive correction leading to negative TPAs occurred in some cases, risking caudal cruciate ligament strain.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-8-VS-banks-4

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, which group had the highest meniscal repair success rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate vs 71.4% for TPLO-only.
Incorrect. The correct answer is TPLO with internal brace.
TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate vs 71.4% for TPLO-only.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

2024-5-VS-rocheleau-3

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Schmutterer 2024 et al., what was the observed peak pressure in the lateral meniscus at 125° flexion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lateral meniscus peak pressure was 1.2 MPa at 125°, higher than at 145° (1.0 MPa), p = 0.049
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.2 MPa.
Lateral meniscus peak pressure was 1.2 MPa at 125°, higher than at 145° (1.0 MPa), p = 0.049

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Biomechanical study on 14 hindlimbs from Retrievers (cadaveric)
  • Three stifle flexion angles tested: 125°, 135°, and 145°
  • Contact Force Ratio (CFR) was significantly higher at 125° and 135° than at 145° (p < 0.001)
  • Center of force shifted caudally with increasing flexion — especially in medial meniscus
  • Lateral meniscus peak pressure was significantly higher at 125° than 145° (p = 0.049)
  • Mean pressures on lateral meniscus decreased with extension, while medial meniscus pressure remained constant
  • Relevance: Helps interpret meniscal load in early cruciate disease and in surgical modeling

Schmutterer

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Evaluation of Meniscal Load and Load Distribution in the Sound Canine Stifle at Different Angles of Flexion

2024-3-VCOT-schmutterer-3

Article Title: Evaluation of Meniscal Load and Load Distribution in the Sound Canine Stifle at Different Angles of Flexion

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2023 et al., on TECA-LBO in brachycephalic dogs, which neurologic sign was most significantly more common in extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) preoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Facial nerve paresis occurred in 28.4% of EBBs compared to only 5.3% in other breeds (p = .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Facial nerve paresis.
Facial nerve paresis occurred in 28.4% of EBBs compared to only 5.3% in other breeds (p = .001).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) presented more acutely and at younger ages, most often with neurological signs compared to other breeds.
  • Preoperative signs such as facial nerve paresis, vestibular syndrome, and Horner’s syndrome were significantly more common in EBBs.
  • EBBs showed more severe imaging findings, including higher rates of otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%).
  • Intraoperative complications were more frequent in EBBs (11.1% vs. 5.3%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .078).
  • Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly between EBBs and other breeds (23.5% vs. 29.3%).
  • Surgical time was significantly longer in EBBs (median 115 vs. 95 minutes; p = .011).
  • MRI or combined CT/MRI were more frequently used in EBBs, likely due to the higher prevalence of neurological signs.
  • Despite anatomical challenges, complication rates in EBBs were comparable, supporting TECA-LBO safety in these breeds.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

2023-5-VS-banks-1

Article Title: Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Almeida 2025 et al., on TPLO and partial CCL rupture, where was the greatest increase in ligament thickness observed postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The largest increase in PLT was recorded at the midpoint of the patellar ligament.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Midpoint.
The largest increase in PLT was recorded at the midpoint of the patellar ligament.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Transecting the CCL remnant during TPLO did not reduce patellar ligament thickening (PLT) at any measured point (proximal, mid, distal).
  • Transection also failed to reduce postoperative patellar ligament shortening (PLL) at 6 weeks.
  • Both groups (transected vs non-transected) showed significant thickening and shortening, with greatest PLT increase at the midpoint.
  • Increased PLT was positively correlated with tibial plateau rotation (p = 0.02) and postoperative TPA (p = 0.04).
  • No correlation between TT-O (tibial tuberosity width index) and PLT, suggesting narrow osteotomies did not influence PLT in this population.
  • Partial CCL rupture was not significantly protective; dogs with partial tears still developed ligament thickening.
  • Post-TPLO mid-patellar ligament thickening may relate to Gelpi retractor placement and osteotomy mechanics rather than CCL status.
  • Authors do not recommend CCL transection during TPLO to prevent desmitis, citing possible increased instability and degeneration.

Almeida

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

2025-4-VCOT-almeida-2

Article Title: Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection during TPLO on Patellar Desmitis in Dogs with Partial Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Knudsen 2024 et al., on CTA diagnosis, what was the approximate percentage of menisci correctly classified in second readings?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Second readings yielded ~90% correct classification rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 90%.
Second readings yielded ~90% correct classification rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Multidetector CTA had high sensitivity (up to 100%) and specificity (up to 96%) for detecting medial meniscal tears in dogs.
  • Observer experience significantly influenced diagnostic accuracy, with more experienced observers showing higher agreement and better performance.
  • Training effect was evident, as less experienced observers improved between first and second readings.
  • Positive likelihood ratios ≥4.6 and negative likelihood ratios ≤0.08 were observed, suggesting CTA is clinically useful for confirming or ruling out meniscal injury.
  • CTA allowed identification of full and partial thickness lesions, with good visualization in sagittal, transverse, and frontal reconstructions.
  • Approximately 90% of menisci were correctly classified in second readings.
  • No adverse reactions were noted from the contrast injection; sedation was used instead of general anesthesia.
  • CTA was less invasive and potentially more cost-effective compared to arthroscopy, especially in settings without MRI access.

Knudsen

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

2024-8-VS-knudsen-3

Article Title: Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Moreira 2024 et al., on predictive equations for TPA correction, which CCWO technique produced the **greatest** tibial shortening at high wedge angles?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Slocum and Devine CCWO had up to 40.9% mTL reduction, the highest among all.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Slocum and Devine.
Slocum and Devine CCWO had up to 40.9% mTL reduction, the highest among all.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A linear relationship was observed between wedge angle and tibial plateau angle (TPA) correction across all four CCWO techniques.
  • All techniques produced predictable TPA corrections using linear regression-derived equations, allowing wedge angle extrapolation to achieve a target postoperative TPA of 5°.
  • TLA shift (tibial long axis) increased with wedge angle and influenced final TPA; greatest in Frederick & Cross method.
  • Tibial shortening (mTL%) varied by technique, being most severe (up to 40.9%) in traditional Slocum & Devine CCWO and least in newer techniques (7.5–12%).
  • The Oxley mCCWO technique showed lower TLA shift compared to the Frederick & Cross and Christ techniques, though similar to Slocum & Devine; tibial shortening was more pronounced than other modified techniques at wedge angles ≤40°.
  • Techniques varied in craniocaudal translation and wedge apex positioning, influencing planning accuracy and mechanical axis alignment.
  • The corrective wedge angle equations reliably predicted TPA within 4–6° across varied tibial conformations.
  • The study supports equation-based planning over static TPA–5° subtraction to reduce risk of under- or over-correction.

Moreira

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

2024-8-VS-moreira-2

Article Title: Predicting tibial plateau angles following four different types of cranial closing wedge ostectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Brincin 2023 et al., on radiographic follow-up post-MPL surgery, what was the likelihood of dogs on NSAIDs at recheck requiring a change in management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs receiving NSAIDs had 6× higher odds of having their postoperative plan modified.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6× higher.
Dogs receiving NSAIDs had 6× higher odds of having their postoperative plan modified.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Routine follow-up radiographs after MPL surgery influenced management in only 3% of asymptomatic cases.
  • Isolated radiographic abnormalities were rare (3.3%) and even less likely to alter treatment unless accompanied by clinical concerns.
  • Dogs with both radiographic changes and clinical/owner concerns had 32× higher odds of a management change (OR 32.16, P < .001).
  • Lameness, NSAID use, or prior unplanned visits significantly increased the odds of altered post-op plans.
  • Owner-reported concerns alone led to a change in only 1.6% of cases without corroborating clinical findings.
  • Radiographic follow-up was deemed unnecessary in dogs without owner concerns or abnormal physical findings.
  • Hands-on clinical exam remains critical, though video-based rechecks may aid triage in uncomplicated cases.
  • The study supports selective radiographic follow-up, reducing unnecessary imaging, stress, and clinician workload.

Brincin

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-brincin-4

Article Title: The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Stifle Joint
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.