Quiz Question

In Fracka 2024 et al., on perioperative risk factors, what was the most common breed affected in this study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 63% of the cases were French Bulldogs; 80% were Bulldogs overall.
Incorrect. The correct answer is French Bulldog.
63% of the cases were French Bulldogs; 80% were Bulldogs overall.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Staphylectomy was linked to higher risk of complicated recovery than folded flap palatoplasty (OR = 59.29, p = .0002).
  • Laryngeal collapse > Grade 2 was strongly associated with poor recovery (OR = 97.13, p < .0001).
  • Longer general anesthesia duration increased the risk of complications (OR = 1.01 per min, p = .0051).
  • Increasing age significantly raised the odds of perioperative complication (OR = 1.04 per month, p = .0113).
  • History of aspiration pneumonia was only found in dogs with complications, though not in final model due to instability.
  • Complicated recovery included >12 h O₂ therapy, tracheostomy, or death.
  • FFP may reduce pharyngeal-laryngeal edema, possibly improving immediate outcomes.
  • Bulldogs comprised 80% of population, with French Bulldogs most common (63%).

Fracka

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Risk factors for complicated perioperative recovery in dogs undergoing staphylectomy or folded flap palatoplasty: Seventy-six cases (2018–2022)

2024-4-VS-fracka-4

Article Title: Risk factors for complicated perioperative recovery in dogs undergoing staphylectomy or folded flap palatoplasty: Seventy-six cases (2018–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Thibault 2023 et al., on DPO for THR luxation, what major limitation of DPO was discussed compared to TPO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. DPO reduced ALO less effectively than TPO due to plate design and patient skeletal maturity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Limited reduction in ALO.
DPO reduced ALO less effectively than TPO due to plate design and patient skeletal maturity.

2023-8-VS-thibault-5

Article Title:

Journal:

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Glenn 2024 et al., on overall diagnostic performance, which algorithm had the highest accuracy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Algorithm 3 had the highest overall accuracy (95.5%), balancing sensitivity and specificity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Algorithm 3.
Algorithm 3 had the highest overall accuracy (95.5%), balancing sensitivity and specificity.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 754 soft tissue or orthopedic procedures in dogs and cats
  • SSI Rate: 62/754 (8.2%)
  • Algorithms Evaluated:
    • Algorithm 1: Highest sensitivity (87.1%) → best for "rule-out"
    • Algorithm 2: Highest specificity (97.9%) → best for "rule-in"
    • Algorithm 3: Highest overall accuracy (95.5%)
  • Active vs. Passive Surveillance:
    • Active surveillance detected 12 additional SSIs (19.4%) missed by passive
    • Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24%
  • Timing: Most SSIs occurred within 30 days; late infections (after 90 days) were rare and implant-related
  • Conclusion: Client questionnaires are a valid and scalable tool for SSI detection; active surveillance improves outcomes

Glenn

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

2024-1-VS-glenn-4

Article Title: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lu 2025 et al., on SOP constructs, what was concluded about the **clinical significance** of the increased mediolateral stiffness with bending tees?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The absolute difference in stiffness was small (2.08 N/mm), so the clinical impact remains unclear.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Uncertain, likely minimal impact.
The absolute difference in stiffness was small (2.08 N/mm), so the clinical impact remains unclear.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bending tees significantly increased mediolateral bending stiffness, but not craniocaudal stiffness, in plate-bone constructs.
  • Mean mediolateral stiffness was 43.2 N/mm with tees vs. 41.1 N/mm without (p = 0.0042), though the absolute difference was small.
  • No significant differences were found in craniocaudal bending stiffness between constructs with or without tees (p = 0.89).
  • Plastic deformation occurred in all constructs; no screw pull-out or implant breakage was observed.
  • SOP nodes may resist compressive but not tensile deformation, suggesting variable mechanical contributions depending on loading direction.
  • Craniocaudal bending had greater stiffness than mediolateral due to higher area moment of inertia along the node diameter.
  • Clinical relevance of added stiffness from tees remains unclear, warranting further in vivo and cyclic testing.
  • This was the first study to directly test SOP constructs with/without tees over a fracture gap in multiple planes.

Lu

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2025

Comparison of Bending Stiffness between String of Pearls Plate-Bone Substitute Constructs with and without Bending Tees in a Fracture Gap Model

2025-2-VCOT-lu-4

Article Title: Comparison of Bending Stiffness between String of Pearls Plate-Bone Substitute Constructs with and without Bending Tees in a Fracture Gap Model

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Farrugia 2025 et al., on BODPUO location effects, which of the following had **no significant association** with change in ulna angle?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Osteotomy length did not influence postoperative change in ulna angle after adjusting for osteotomy location.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Osteotomy length.
Osteotomy length did not influence postoperative change in ulna angle after adjusting for osteotomy location.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal BODPUOs (closer to 26–28% of ulna length) resulted in greater increases in proximal ulna tilt postoperatively (up to 18°).
  • Distal osteotomies (closer to 48–49%) yielded minimal change in ulna angle.
  • Strong linear relationship between osteotomy location and change in angle; correlation coefficient = 0.73.
  • Initial proximal ulna angle (IPUA) influences results—angles closer to 90° yielded greater changes.
  • Craniocaudal osteotomy angle had minimal impact on tilt change after adjusting for location.
  • Osteotomy length had no significant effect on change in angle.
  • Prediction intervals showed wide individual variation in outcomes, especially with more proximal osteotomies.
  • No increase in complications was associated with more proximal osteotomies, contrary to past assumptions.

Farrugia

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

2025-6-VS-farrugia-4

Article Title: Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Hawker 2024 et al., on checklist attitudes, which implementation strategy was most commonly associated with SSC success?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ongoing SSC modification was reported by 67.9% as a key strategy to improve uptake.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Modification based on staff feedback.
Ongoing SSC modification was reported by 67.9% as a key strategy to improve uptake.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 67.9% of respondents reported using SSCs, with most indicating frequent use (64% used in every surgery).
  • 78.7% agreed SSCs reduce complications, and 89.6% believed SSCs improve communication.
  • Respondents not using SSCs were more likely to view them as a waste of time (p < .001).
  • Forgetfulness (39.6%) and time constraints (36.5%) were leading reasons for checklist noncompletion.
  • Only 23.3% had SSC training during surgical residency, with newer diplomates more likely to have had exposure (p < .001).
  • Key strategies to improve uptake included: staff feedback modifications (67.9%), formal designation of initiator (48.6%), and training (52.2%).
  • Surgeons and OR staff were most commonly identified as noncompliant team members.
  • SSC use was more frequent in small animal practices, and mandating SSCs by management was favored but not always effective alone.

Hawker

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

2024-5-VS-hawker-3

Article Title: Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Farrell 2022 et al., on checklist reliability in OVH simulation, what was the main benefit of using digital recordings for student performance assessment?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Digital recordings allowed multiple raters to evaluate performance without introducing bias.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Enabled blinded multi-rater evaluation.
Digital recordings allowed multiple raters to evaluate performance without introducing bias.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 39 of 40 checklist items for simulated OVH surgical assessment had good content validity (CVI = 0.81)
  • Only 1 of 6 items from the OSATS GRS (respect for tissue) met inclusion criteria (CVI = 0.80)
  • Checklist showed strong reliability (G-coefficient = 0.85) for moderate-stakes exams
  • Modified OSATS GRS showed acceptable reliability (G-coefficient = 0.79)
  • Two raters needed for acceptable reliability in high-stakes exams when using the checklist
  • Minimal interrater bias found; variance largely due to interaction among student, rater, and item
  • Digital recordings were a reliable method of evaluating surgical performance
  • Study supports using checklist over OSATS GRS for assessing preclinical students on simulated models

Farrell

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

2022-5-VS-farrell-5

Article Title: Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Williams 2024 et al., on cardiovascular safety, what perioperative effect was observed with adrenaline in the nerve block?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No cardiovascular instability (tachycardia, arrhythmias, hypertension) was observed with adrenaline use in the nerve block.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant adverse effects.
No cardiovascular instability (tachycardia, arrhythmias, hypertension) was observed with adrenaline use in the nerve block.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial
  • Population: 32 brachycephalic dogs undergoing cut-and-sew sharp staphylectomy
  • Groups: Adrenaline + lidocaine (Group A) vs. Lidocaine only (Group NA)
  • Main Findings:
    • Total hemorrhage significantly lower in Group A (median 1.82 g) vs Group NA (7.95 g); p = .013
    • Normalized hemorrhage significantly lower in Group A; p = .021
    • Surgeon-assigned hemorrhage scores significantly lower in Group A; p = .029
    • No adverse effects (tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia, etc.) noted from adrenaline use
    • Breed effect: English Bulldogs bled more overall even after normalization
  • Clinical Implication: Adrenaline in nerve blocks reduces hemorrhage without added risk

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-1-VS-williams-3

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Ferreira 2025 et al., on heated pneumoperitoneum in dogs, what best describes the clinical outcome of all patients in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 15 dogs recovered uneventfully and were discharged on the day of surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All animals recovered and were discharged same day.
All 15 dogs recovered uneventfully and were discharged on the day of surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Heated CO₂ insufflation reduced perioperative hypothermia during laparoscopic ovariectomy compared to nonheated CO₂.
  • Final body temperature was significantly higher in the heated group (36.03°C) than in the nonheated group (34.93°C).
  • Temperature reduction correlated with surgical duration only in the nonheated group (p < .05).
  • Heated CO₂ delayed temperature drop, occurring after 20 minutes vs. 5 minutes in nonheated cases.
  • No significant differences between groups in anesthetic, surgical, or insufflation times.
  • All dogs recovered uneventfully and were discharged the same day.
  • Heated CO₂ may offer greater benefit in longer procedures or in small-sized dogs prone to hypothermia.
  • No adverse effects were attributed to heated gas use in this clinical trial.

Ferreira

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Effect of heated pneumoperitoneum on body temperature in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy—A randomized controlled trial

2025-5-VS-ferreira-5

Article Title: Effect of heated pneumoperitoneum on body temperature in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy—A randomized controlled trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Guénégo 2025 et al., on AMA-based CCWO, which subgroup had the most consistent axis alignment postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Realignment of AA and MA was achieved more consistently in dogs with higher pre-op AMA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Dogs with AMA > 2.4°.
Realignment of AA and MA was achieved more consistently in dogs with higher pre-op AMA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • AMA-based CCWO realigned the anatomical and mechanical axes in 82% of dogs >50 kg, with postoperative AMA angle of 0° in most cases.
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) rate was only 0.5%, markedly lower than TPLO-reported rates in similar populations (up to 37.5%).
  • All osteotomies achieved Grade 4 healing by 8 weeks, with no implant failures.
  • AMA-based planning based on preoperative AMA and TPA allowed for better correction of proximal tibial angulation compared to TPLO in large dogs.
  • Use of a double locking plate (DLP) fixation and Robert Jones bandage (RJB) contributed to improved mechanical stability and infection prevention.
  • Dogs with AMA angle >3.4° (hyper-CCAPT) were 38% of the cohort, supporting AMA as a critical metric in planning.
  • Postoperative alignment of the AA and MA was more consistently achieved when preoperative AMA was >2.4°, confirming suitability of AMA-based CCWO for severe angulation.
  • Most infections in TPLOs occur within 15 days, but RJB plus antibiotics in this study appeared protective, suggesting benefit for early-phase SSI prevention.

Guénégo

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

2025-3-VCOT-guenego-5

Article Title: Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Research & Evidence
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.