Quiz Question

In Canever 2022 et al., on labial flap vascular anatomy, what postoperative complication occurred in Case 1 that required management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Case 1 experienced dislodgement of the esophagostomy tube but the flap healed fully.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Esophagostomy tube dislodgement.
Case 1 experienced dislodgement of the esophagostomy tube but the flap healed fully.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Superior and inferior labial arteries in cats perfuse robust angiosomes, which support musculomucosal axial pattern flaps.
  • Cadaver angiography confirmed vascular anatomy, with consistent patterns between sides and among specimens.
  • The vascular supply is located primarily in the musculomucosal layer, not the skin, critical for flap viability.
  • Flap harvest requires inclusion of the orbicularis oris (± buccinator) muscle to ensure vascular integrity and flap survival.
  • Two clinical cases demonstrated successful use of superior and inferior labial musculomucosal flaps for palatal reconstruction with complete flap survival and resolution of clinical signs.
  • Intraoperative transillumination aided vessel localization, facilitating surgical planning and flap design.
  • No cases of distal flap necrosis or dehiscence occurred, although mild donor site morbidity (lip retraction, mucosal denuding) was noted.
  • These flaps offer a valuable option when local tissues are compromised, especially after failed previous repairs or radiation therapy.

Canever

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Evaluation of the superior and inferior labial musculomucosal flaps in cats: An angiographic study and case series

2022-4-VS-canever-4

Article Title: Evaluation of the superior and inferior labial musculomucosal flaps in cats: An angiographic study and case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Horwood 2024 et al., on complications in luxoid hip dysplasia, what was the most common surgical revision performed for dorsal luxation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most luxated LH dogs were revised with femoral neck lengthening and/or increased head size to restore stability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased femoral neck length.
Most luxated LH dogs were revised with femoral neck lengthening and/or increased head size to restore stability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Luxoid hip dysplasia (LH) was present in 8% of THA cases and significantly increased risk of major complications (p < .001).
  • Intraoperative fissures/fractures were 3x more likely in LH dogs vs non-LH (39% vs 16%, p = .001).
  • Dorsal luxation was more frequent in LH dogs (28% vs 4%, p = .019).
  • Acetabular cup placement with ALO >35° was associated with luxation in LH dogs.
  • Morphologic abnormalities (e.g., femoral valgus, lateralization/medialization of cortices) were common in LH and may complicate implantation.
  • Despite higher risk, 94% of LH dogs achieved satisfactory outcomes after appropriate revisions.
  • Younger age and lighter weight characterized LH dogs (mean age 14.7 months vs 40.9 months, p < .001).
  • All LH dogs were treated with cementless stems; prophylactic cerclage was rarely used.

Horwood

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Complications and outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in dogs with luxoid hip dysplasia: 18 cases (2010–2022)

2024-4-VS-horwood-3

Article Title: Complications and outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in dogs with luxoid hip dysplasia: 18 cases (2010–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Curuci 2024 et al., which of the following statements best describes the complication rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only minor complications were noted (2/18), with no revisions or treatments required:contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Minor complications in 2/18 stifles.
Only minor complications were noted (2/18), with no revisions or treatments required:contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 16 dogs (18 stifles) with CrCL rupture and TPA >34° were treated using the DCTPLO
  • Mean TPA correction: from 39.4° to 6.3°
  • Bone union at 60 days in 17/18 stifles; remaining healed by 90 days
  • Minor complications (e.g., small wedge gaps) in 2/18 stifles — no major complications
  • Patellar ligament thickening seen in 16/18 stifles but no clinical signs noted
  • The technique enabled safer reduction with less risk of tibial crest fracture vs. conventional TPLO

Curuci

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Double-Cut Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy for the Management of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency in Dogs with an Excessive Plateau Angle: Early Clinical Results in 16 Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-curuci-5

Article Title: Double-Cut Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy for the Management of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency in Dogs with an Excessive Plateau Angle: Early Clinical Results in 16 Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Simpson 2022 et al., on feline cholecystectomy outcomes, which statement best reflects long-term prognosis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Over 44% survived >3 years, and owner-reported outcomes were excellent in most cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Long-term survival is common with good quality of life.
Over 44% survived >3 years, and owner-reported outcomes were excellent in most cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cholelithiasis was the most common indication for cholecystectomy in cats.
  • Perioperative complications were frequent, with intraoperative hypotension in all recorded cases and postoperative anemia in 14 cats.
  • Perioperative mortality was 21.7%, lower than historical rates for feline biliary surgery.
  • 78.3% of cats survived to discharge, and 83.3% of those lived >6 months; 44.4% survived >3 years.
  • Vomiting was the most common short- and long-term complication, though most cats were medically managed.
  • Concurrent EHBDO was not a contraindication provided CBD patency was restored.
  • Positive bacterial cultures were found in 15 cats, with E. coli and Enterococcus faecalis most common.
  • Owner-reported outcomes were excellent in all cats that survived long-term.

Simpson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

2022-1-VS-simpson-5

Article Title: Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., how did anesthesia time compare between FFP and staphylectomy groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Anesthetic time was significantly longer in the FFP group (median 111 min vs 80 min; p = .02).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Longer in FFP.
Anesthetic time was significantly longer in the FFP group (median 111 min vs 80 min; p = .02).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Sample: 124 dogs (64 S, 60 FFP); French Bulldogs most common (54/124)
  • Pre-op clinical signs: Exercise intolerance (34/124), stertor (22), regurgitation (7), vomiting (12)
  • Operative time (no concurrent procedure): Longer in FFP (75 vs 51 min, p = .02)
  • Anesthetic time: Longer in FFP (111 vs 80 min, p = .02)
  • Anesthetic complications: Similar rates (FFP 50, S 49; p = .30)
  • Post-op regurgitation: 27/124 (S: 17, FFP: 10; p = .18)
  • Post-op aspiration pneumonia: Rare (S: 4, FFP: 5)
  • Major complications: Rare (5/124); 2 dogs euthanized post-op (1 per group)
  • Revision surgery: Needed in 7/124 (3 S, 4 FFP)

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

2024-1-VS-miller-2

Article Title: Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In O'Marra 2026 et al., on perioperative septic peritonitis, which of the following is a recommended strategy to mitigate intra-abdominal hypertension in at-risk veterinary patients?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. IAH can compromise healing and perfusion. Recommended strategies include decompression techniques, sedation, and open abdomen management.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Open abdomen management.
IAH can compromise healing and perfusion. Recommended strategies include decompression techniques, sedation, and open abdomen management.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Early enteral nutrition (<24–48 hrs) is associated with improved survival and reduced hospitalization in dogs with septic peritonitis.
  • Appropriate empirical antimicrobials improve survival in cats, but data are mixed in dogs.
  • Recurrent septic peritonitis (RecSP) has poor survival (0%–43.9%); most common cause is gastrointestinal dehiscence.
  • Intraoperative hypotension and preoperative hypoalbuminemia may increase dehiscence risk, though findings are inconsistent.
  • Lidocaine CRI during surgery improves survival over opioids alone in dogs.
  • Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is not recommended due to risks of coagulopathy and kidney injury; albumin use is controversial.
  • Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is under-recognized but contributes to mortality; IAP monitoring should be considered.
  • Diagnostic tests (effusion lactate, glucose, cytology) are unreliable for detecting RecSP; clinical judgment and ultrasound are advised.

O'Marra

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

2026-1-VS-omarra-5

Article Title: Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Larose 2024 et al., on laparoscopic liver biopsies in dogs, what was the key clinical implication of using a 3 mm CBF in small dogs for liver biopsy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite smaller samples, the 3 mm CBF yielded adequate tissue for diagnosis in most dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It was sufficient for histologic diagnosis.
Despite smaller samples, the 3 mm CBF yielded adequate tissue for diagnosis in most dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Histologic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm biopsies was 90%, with a Gwet's AC1 of 0.81 (p < .0001).
  • 5 mm biopsies yielded significantly more portal triads and lobules than 3 mm samples (p = .0003 and p < .0001).
  • Crush artifacts were significantly higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), though fragmentation scores were similar (p = .935).
  • Both forceps produced adequate samples for histopathology, copper quantification, and bacterial culture.
  • No hemorrhage requiring intervention occurred, and both sizes were deemed safe and minimally invasive.
  • Surface area ≥40 mm² strongly predicted ≥11 portal triads, a desirable threshold for reliable histopathology.
  • Use of 3 mm instruments was easier in small dogs (<12 kg), but more challenging in larger dogs due to shaft length.
  • Clinical diagnoses were unaffected by forceps size, even in the one discordant histologic pair.

Larose

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

2024-4-VS-larose1-4

Article Title: Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Nicetto 2024 et al., how many dogs experienced full functional recovery following TRP implantation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative function was full in 57 of 60 stifles (48 dogs), acceptable in 2, and unacceptable in 1.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 57/60.
Postoperative function was full in 57 of 60 stifles (48 dogs), acceptable in 2, and unacceptable in 1.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 48 dogs (60 stifles) underwent custom 3D-printed TRP implantation for patellar luxation
  • 24 treated with TRP alone; 36 with additional procedures (e.g., DFO, TTT)
  • Success rate: 59/60 corrected patellar tracking
  • Functional outcome: 57/60 full function, 2 acceptable, 1 unacceptable
  • Complication rate: 3 total (2 minor, 1 major recurrence)
  • TRP spares cartilage unlike trochleoplasty, offering implant-based ridge augmentation
  • No implant loosening or infection observed

Nicetto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

2024-2-VCOT-nicetto-5

Article Title: Trochlear Ridge Prostheses for Reshaping Femoral Trochlear Ridges in Dogs with Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, which pain scoring tool showed significant postoperative improvement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) scores significantly improved from pre-op to final follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CBPI.
Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) scores significantly improved from pre-op to final follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Retrospective case series of 15 dogs (19 tarsi) with talar OCD.
  • Technique: Modified arthroscopic approach with both scope and instrument portals on the same side as the lesion.
  • Outcomes:
    • Good to excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes in 11/14 dogs.
    • Statistically significant improvement in CBPI (p < .05) and VAS scores (p < .05).
    • Minor postoperative complications (synovial cysts) in 4/13 tarsi, all resolved spontaneously.
    • No major intraoperative complications; 1/19 required mini-arthrotomy due to fragment size.
  • Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): Progression noted in 10/14 cases, despite good functional outcomes.
  • Fragment Characteristics: Multiple osteochondral fragments were present in most cases, with 17/19 lesions on the medial talar ridge.
  • Technical Advantage: Lower conversion rate to arthrotomy (1/19) compared to previous studies (Gielen et al. and Miller & Beale).

Cruciani

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

2025-1-VS-cruciani-4

Article Title: A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Welsh 2023 et al., on TTAF fixation methods, what was the estimated quadriceps force at a walk used as a benchmark for load testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 240 N was cited as the estimated quadriceps force during walking, used to benchmark construct strength.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 240 N.
240 N was cited as the estimated quadriceps force during walking, used to benchmark construct strength.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Two-pin fixation had significantly greater strength (639 N) than single-pin fixation (426 N) in TTAF models (p = .003).
  • Stiffness was also higher with two-pin constructs (72 N/mm vs 57 N/mm); statistically significant (p = .029).
  • Both fixation types withstood loads greater than quadriceps force in dogs at a walk (240 N), indicating clinical viability.
  • Failure was most commonly due to pin bending or pullout (82%), with fewer cases of ligament tearing or epiphyseal fracture.
  • K-wire insertion angle (KWIA) did not significantly differ between fixation types (p = .13).
  • Single larger pins delivered ~68% of the strength and ~83% of the stiffness of two smaller vertically aligned pins.
  • Clinical implication: Two vertically aligned pins are biomechanically superior for TTAF fixation in canine models.
  • Study used mature cadavers, which may underestimate loads and stiffness compared to immature clinical cases.

Welsh

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

2023-5-VS-welsh-5

Article Title: Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Postoperative Care & Outcomes
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.