Quiz Question

In Duffy 2022 et al., on crotch suture techniques, which technique resulted in the highest **initial leakage pressure** during FEESA in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. SCCS produced the highest ILP at 47.6 mm Hg, significantly higher than all other techniques.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS).
SCCS produced the highest ILP at 47.6 mm Hg, significantly higher than all other techniques.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Augmenting FEESA with two simple interrupted crotch sutures (TCS) or simple continuous crotch suture (SCCS) significantly increased initial leakage pressure (ILP) compared to no suture or a single suture (NCS, SICS).
  • SCCS had the highest ILP (47.6 mm Hg), followed by TCS (37.8 mm Hg), SICS (33.0 mm Hg), and NCS (27.1 mm Hg).
  • All crotch suture types increased maximal leakage pressure (MLP) compared to no crotch suture.
  • Leakage from the crotch occurred most commonly in NCS (67%) and SICS (50%), but only 8% with TCS and 0% with SCCS.
  • SCCS was the only technique where leakage never occurred at the crotch site.
  • SCCS had the highest MLP (100.6 mm Hg), supporting its use in clinical settings with high-risk patients.
  • Intraluminal pressures during leakage in NCS constructs were sometimes below normal physiologic pressures, emphasizing risk of leakage without crotch suture.
  • The transverse staple line never leaked in any group, indicating the crotch is the primary weak point.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

2022-4-VS-duffy-1

Article Title: Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Violini 2024 et al., on 3D-guided spinal stabilization in brachycephalic dogs, what clinical finding was reported in 7 of 10 mid-term cases despite all being ambulatory?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most owners reported residual abnormal gait (scuffing, wide stance) despite ambulatory status:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Abnormal gait.
Most owners reported residual abnormal gait (scuffing, wide stance) despite ambulatory status:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spinal stabilization with 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides (3D-PSGs) was safe, with no immediate perioperative complications reported.
  • 84% of pedicle screws were optimally placed, and only 0.5% breached the spinal canal, reflecting high placement accuracy.
  • 80% of dogs experienced no neurologic deterioration postoperatively, indicating reliable short-term safety.
  • 3D-PSGs were accurate and reproducible, even across multiple institutions and surgeons.
  • Mid-term outcomes were favorable: all dogs were ambulatory, and 90% had static or improved neurologic signs.
  • 7 of 10 mid-term follow-ups showed abnormal gait, though owners rated lifestyle ≥3/5, suggesting acceptable function.
  • 3D-printed guides enabled precise pedicle screw placement in deformed vertebrae, expanding options in small breeds.
  • One dog suffered a T4 spinous process fracture due to overextension of PMMA cement, emphasizing the need for cement placement caution.

Violini

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

2024-4-VS-violini-4

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Carrera 2024 et al., what was the observed long-term effect on aLDFA and tibial torsion at 1-year postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Extensor mechanism alignment was maintained long-term, with no reluxations or deformity progression:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is All values remained close to immediate postoperative values.
Extensor mechanism alignment was maintained long-term, with no reluxations or deformity progression:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 5 juvenile dogs (mean age 7.2 months) with grade III–IV MPL were treated surgically.
  • Most had femoral varus + external tibial torsion; some had shallow trochlear grooves.
  • Distal femoral osteotomy was performed in 4/5 dogs; Tibial tuberosity transposition (TTT) in 3/5; Sulcoplasty in 2/5.
  • Mean time to weight bearing: 9.8 ± 5.5 days; healing: 55 ± 24 days
  • No reluxations, and final radiographic values for aLDFA and torsion were maintained at 1 year.
  • One complication due to domestic trauma, not surgical failure.
  • Early surgery appeared to preserve alignment and prevent deformity progression.

Carrera

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

2024-2-VCOT-carrera-4

Article Title: Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Radke 2022 et al., on outcome measure validation, what was the COSMIN justification for not assessing internal consistency in the LOAD instrument?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Formative models do not require internal consistency analysis since items are not necessarily correlated.
Incorrect. The correct answer is LOAD is based on a formative model rather than a reflective one.
Formative models do not require internal consistency analysis since items are not necessarily correlated.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBPI, COI, and LOAD are recommended for assessing canine osteoarthritis based on COSMIN criteria.
  • COI scored highest in development rigor and evidence quality among evaluated OROMs.
  • Internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness were commonly validated, though no OROMs reported measurement error.
  • LOAD was considered formative, and internal consistency assessment was deemed unnecessary.
  • CBPI and COI showed sufficient internal consistency, but CBPI’s factor structure was inconsistent across studies.
  • All 6 evaluated OROMs (CBPI, COI, LOAD, BHSII, HCPI, HVAS) were quick to complete (under 5 min).
  • Three tools—BHSII, HCPI, HVAS—need more evidence before recommendation; only CBPI, COI, and LOAD are Category A (recommended).
  • Future studies should assess interpretability, including measurement error and clinically meaningful change scores (MIC, SDC).

Radke

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Evidence‐based evaluation of owner‐reported outcome measures for canine orthopedic care – a COSMIN evaluation of 6 instruments

2022-2-VS-radke-2

Article Title: Evidence‐based evaluation of owner‐reported outcome measures for canine orthopedic care – a COSMIN evaluation of 6 instruments

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Dekerle 2022 et al., on ectopic ureter correction, what was the **median duration of continence** after surgery in dogs that became continent?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The median duration of continence postoperatively was 66 months.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 66 months.
The median duration of continence postoperatively was 66 months.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cystoscopic-guided laser ablation (CLA) was associated with significantly fewer minor complications (13%) than neoureterostomy (100%) (P < .01)
  • CLA resulted in significantly fewer recurrences of incontinence compared to neoureterostomy (0/7 vs 5/12; P < .05)
  • 80% of dogs achieved continence within 1 month postoperatively, with a median continence score of 10
  • Long-term continence was achieved in 88% of dogs, with or without adjunctive treatment, over a median of 66 months
  • Major complications occurred in only 8% of dogs, and all were successfully managed with surgical revision
  • Persistent ureteral remnants were seen only in neoureterostomy dogs, potentially contributing to incontinence recurrence
  • All dogs with incontinence recurrence responded to medical treatment, while only 1/5 with persistent incontinence after surgery did
  • CLA is recommended over open surgery for iEU correction, due to lower complication and recurrence rates

Dekerle

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Outcomes of 25 female dogs treated for ectopic ureters by open surgery or cystoscopic-guided laser ablation

2022-4-VS-dekerle-3

Article Title: Outcomes of 25 female dogs treated for ectopic ureters by open surgery or cystoscopic-guided laser ablation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Kang 2022 et al., on 3D scaffold reconstruction, what was the Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement trend in the scaffold area over time?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. HU values rose over time, indicating progressive tissue ingrowth (though not full bone regeneration).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased from 20.4 to ~98.
HU values rose over time, indicating progressive tissue ingrowth (though not full bone regeneration).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Patient-specific 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffold enabled successful zygomatic arch reconstruction in a dog.
  • Complete surgical resection of a zygomatic parosteal osteosarcoma was achieved, with a 0.3 mm histologically clean margin.
  • Post-op imaging showed progressive tissue ingrowth into the scaffold, with Hounsfield Units increasing from 20.4 to 97.8 over 10 months.
  • No complications (e.g., infection, displacement) or tumor recurrence were noted at 16-month follow-up.
  • Use of a patient-specific osteotomy guide improved anatomical fit and facilitated precise excision and implant placement.
  • Facial symmetry and orbital stability were maintained throughout follow-up.
  • The scaffold remained structurally stable despite limited bone regeneration, suggesting connective tissue filled the defect.
  • Topical mitomycin C was applied intraoperatively for possible anti-neoplastic effect, but efficacy remains unclear.

Kang

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Zygomatic arch reconstruction with a patient-specific polycaprolactone beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold after parosteal osteosarcoma resection in a dog

2022-8-VS-kang-4

Article Title: Zygomatic arch reconstruction with a patient-specific polycaprolactone beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold after parosteal osteosarcoma resection in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Picavet 2026 et al., on sesamoid displacement radiography, how frequently did cranial tibial subluxation persist after TPLO in dogs that had preoperative subluxation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All dogs with preoperative CTS still had postoperative CTS, although the degree was significantly reduced.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All affected dogs but at reduced magnitude.
All dogs with preoperative CTS still had postoperative CTS, although the degree was significantly reduced.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Popliteal sesamoid displacement (PSD) was identified in 14.4% of dogs with CCLD on preoperative 90° flexion radiographs, indicating it is an uncommon but notable radiographic finding.
  • Dogs with PSD had significantly greater cranial tibial subluxation (CTS) preoperatively compared with dogs without PSD.
  • Popliteal sesamoid reduction occurred in 100% of cases after TPLO, suggesting that proper TPLO mechanics restore normal sesamoid position.
  • Postoperative CTS persisted in all dogs that had preoperative CTS (50.3%), although the magnitude of subluxation was significantly reduced after TPLO.
  • Osteotomy positioning (centered vs distally centered) did not significantly influence postoperative CTS, indicating residual translation is not strongly affected by osteotomy placement.
  • Postoperative tibial plateau angle (TPA) showed a weak negative correlation with residual CTS, suggesting lower TPAs may slightly reduce postoperative tibial translation.
  • PSD appears to be associated with more pronounced stifle instability prior to surgery, serving as a radiographic indicator of more severe CCLD biomechanics.
  • Radiographic evaluation of popliteal sesamoid reduction may provide an additional objective indicator of residual cranio-caudal instability following TPLO.

Picavet

Veterinary Surgery

2

2026

Radiographic assessment of popliteal sesamoid position and cranial tibial subluxation in canine stifle joints undergoing TPLO: A retrospective study of 163 dogs

2026-2-vs-picavet-4

Article Title: Radiographic assessment of popliteal sesamoid position and cranial tibial subluxation in canine stifle joints undergoing TPLO: A retrospective study of 163 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Evers 2023 et al., on medial meniscal tear detection, what was concluded regarding the morbidity associated with needle arthroscopy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No significant difference in lameness scores was noted before and after NA, indicating minimal morbidity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It showed no significant morbidity.
No significant difference in lameness scores was noted before and after NA, indicating minimal morbidity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Needle arthroscopy (NA) had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing medial meniscal tears in dogs with CCLR.
  • NA missed 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscal tear, both nondisplaced and stable.
  • Visibility of all meniscal horns was significantly lower with NA compared to standard arthroscopy (SA) (P < .005 for all horns).
  • Probing the caudal horn of the lateral meniscus was significantly more difficult with NA (P = .0017), though medial horn probing was similar.
  • Mean NA procedure time was 8 ± 3 minutes, significantly shorter than SA (15 ± 9 min, P = .0041).
  • No increase in lameness observed after NA, indicating minimal procedural morbidity.
  • NA was performed under sedation in most dogs, though 10/26 required additional chemical restraint or short anesthesia.
  • NA was most accurate for displaced vertical longitudinal tears, with all 14 correctly identified; one stable tear and a lateral tear were missed.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

2023-6-vs-evers-5

Article Title: Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Griffin 2025 et al., on SLN mapping with ICG, what was the histologic diagnosis of the pulmonary mass?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Histopathology confirmed a completely excised grade 1 pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Grade 1 adenocarcinoma.
Histopathology confirmed a completely excised grade 1 pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Case: 9-year-old Labrador with a right caudal pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
  • Technique: Peritumoral injection of indocyanine green (ICG) under VATS guidance, followed by near-infrared (NIR) imaging.
  • SLN identified: Right tracheobronchial lymph node fluoresced and was safely extirpated.
  • Histology: Grade 1 adenocarcinoma, pneumonia, reactive node.
  • Outcome: Patient deteriorated and died on postoperative day 3 due to systemic complications (not linked to surgical technique).
  • Clinical relevance: First clinical application of SLN mapping for canine pulmonary neoplasia; method feasible with open or minimally invasive approaches.

Griffin

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green via video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary pulmonary neoplasia in a dog

2025-1-VS-griffin-5

Article Title: Intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green via video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary pulmonary neoplasia in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Duffy 2022 et al., on barbed suture oversew, what was observed regarding leakage through **suture holes in barbed suture constructs**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite wider tissue tracks from barbs, no leakage was observed at suture holes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No leakage observed through suture holes.
Despite wider tissue tracks from barbs, no leakage was observed at suture holes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oversewing the transverse staple line using barbed suture showed no difference in initial (ILP) or maximum leakage pressure (MLP) compared to monofilament suture (p = .439 and .644).
  • Barbed suture repairs were ~18% faster (25 seconds faster; p < .001) than monofilament suture.
  • No difference was found between unidirectional and bidirectional barbed sutures in leakage resistance or repair time (p = .697).
  • Mean ILP and MLP were significantly higher in control jejunal segments (6.6x and 5.1x greater respectively; p < .001).
  • Leakage consistently occurred at the crotch of the FEESA in all oversew groups (>80%), not the staple line.
  • All oversewn techniques leaked at supraphysiologic pressures, indicating clinical safety against in vivo leakage.
  • No leakage was observed from barbed suture holes, addressing concerns of tissue trauma due to barb design.
  • The study supports barbed suture as a viable alternative to conventional monofilament suture for FEESA oversew in dogs.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

2022-5-VS-duffy-4

Article Title: Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Postoperative Care & Outcomes
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.