Quiz Question

In Paul 2024 et al., on postoperative analgesia with BLIS vs fentanyl in amputation, at which time point did BLIS show significantly lower pain scores?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. BLIS pain scores were significantly lower at 6 h; equivalence was not shown at this time point.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6 hours.
BLIS pain scores were significantly lower at 6 h; equivalence was not shown at this time point.

🔍 Key Findings

  • BLIS (bupivacaine liposome injectable solution) provided equivalent analgesia to fentanyl CRI based on CMPS-SF scores at all time points except 6h, where BLIS was superior
  • Fewer adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation) were noted in the BLIS group
  • BLIS dogs ate sooner postoperatively (median 6h vs 9h in control)
  • Sedation occurred in 2/20 dogs in BLIS group vs 10/20 in fentanyl group
  • Vomiting occurred in 0/20 BLIS dogs vs 4/20 in fentanyl group
  • Rescue analgesia rates were similar (5 BLIS vs 4 fentanyl group), confirming noninferiority
  • Owner-reported VAS scores were lower for BLIS on day 1 a.m. and p.m. despite variability
  • Results suggest BLIS could reduce opioid reliance post-amputation

Paul

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Comparison of bupivacaine liposome injectable solution and fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing limb amputation

2024-6-VS-paul-1

Article Title: Comparison of bupivacaine liposome injectable solution and fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing limb amputation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Parker 2023 et al., on Locoregional analgesia in TPLO, which locoregional technique was rated as having the fewest adverse effects?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. PNB was selected by 75% of respondents as having the lowest rate of adverse effects compared to LE and PI.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Peripheral nerve block.
PNB was selected by 75% of respondents as having the lowest rate of adverse effects compared to LE and PI.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Peripheral nerve block (PNB) was preferred by 79% of anesthesiologists; lumbosacral epidural (LE) by 21%; PI <1%.
  • Time since board-certification significantly influenced preference: PNB favored by newer diplomates, LE favored by more senior ones (p < .001).
  • Employment sector mattered: PNB was preferred more in private practice, LE more in academia (p = .003).
  • PNB perceived as more effective, with 78% reporting 81–100% effectiveness; compared to 55% for LE.
  • PNB associated with fewer adverse effects (75%) than LE (4%) and PI (21%).
  • PNB required less rescue analgesia intraoperatively (57%) and postoperatively (54%) than LE or PI.
  • LE preferred for bilateral TPLOs and in smaller dogs; PNB for larger dogs, due to motor function preservation.
  • Dexmedetomidine was the most common additive to PNB; bupivacaine-only was most used for PNB.

Parker

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

2023-4-VS-parker-5

Article Title: Pelvic limb anesthesia and analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO): A survey of board-certified anesthesiologists

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Sandberg 2024 et al., which joint was most affected by the tactical harness in all planes of motion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All planes of motion in the elbow showed significant alteration during both walk and trot when harness was worn:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Elbow.
All planes of motion in the elbow showed significant alteration during both walk and trot when harness was worn:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Tactical harness use altered kinematics in all forelimb joints
  • Elbow most affected: increased extension, internal rotation, abduction at walk and trot
  • Carpus: reduced flexion, increased abduction at walk
  • Shoulder: least affected, but showed reduced flexion and increased abduction during walk
  • Only significant ROM increases:
    • Shoulder frontal plane (22%)
    • Elbow transverse plane (19%) at walk
  • Results suggest potential functional limitations from harness use during duty

Sandberg

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Influence of Wearing a Tactical Harness on Three-Dimensional Thoracic Limb Kinematics

2024-2-VCOT-sandberg-1

Article Title: Influence of Wearing a Tactical Harness on Three-Dimensional Thoracic Limb Kinematics

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Simpson 2022 et al., on feline cholecystectomy outcomes, what was the survival rate to hospital discharge?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 18 of 23 cats survived to discharge, equating to a 78.3% survival rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 78.3%.
18 of 23 cats survived to discharge, equating to a 78.3% survival rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cholelithiasis was the most common indication for cholecystectomy in cats.
  • Perioperative complications were frequent, with intraoperative hypotension in all recorded cases and postoperative anemia in 14 cats.
  • Perioperative mortality was 21.7%, lower than historical rates for feline biliary surgery.
  • 78.3% of cats survived to discharge, and 83.3% of those lived >6 months; 44.4% survived >3 years.
  • Vomiting was the most common short- and long-term complication, though most cats were medically managed.
  • Concurrent EHBDO was not a contraindication provided CBD patency was restored.
  • Positive bacterial cultures were found in 15 cats, with E. coli and Enterococcus faecalis most common.
  • Owner-reported outcomes were excellent in all cats that survived long-term.

Simpson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

2022-1-VS-simpson-4

Article Title: Cholecystectomy in 23 cats (2005‐2021)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Welsh 2023 et al., on TTAF fixation methods, what was the estimated quadriceps force at a walk used as a benchmark for load testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 240 N was cited as the estimated quadriceps force during walking, used to benchmark construct strength.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 240 N.
240 N was cited as the estimated quadriceps force during walking, used to benchmark construct strength.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Two-pin fixation had significantly greater strength (639 N) than single-pin fixation (426 N) in TTAF models (p = .003).
  • Stiffness was also higher with two-pin constructs (72 N/mm vs 57 N/mm); statistically significant (p = .029).
  • Both fixation types withstood loads greater than quadriceps force in dogs at a walk (240 N), indicating clinical viability.
  • Failure was most commonly due to pin bending or pullout (82%), with fewer cases of ligament tearing or epiphyseal fracture.
  • K-wire insertion angle (KWIA) did not significantly differ between fixation types (p = .13).
  • Single larger pins delivered ~68% of the strength and ~83% of the stiffness of two smaller vertically aligned pins.
  • Clinical implication: Two vertically aligned pins are biomechanically superior for TTAF fixation in canine models.
  • Study used mature cadavers, which may underestimate loads and stiffness compared to immature clinical cases.

Welsh

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

2023-5-VS-welsh-5

Article Title: Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Anderson 2024 et al., what recommendation did authors give to help detect this complication early?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only routine in-person gait assessments identified this nerve injury, not owner observation:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Routine post-op gait assessments.
Only routine in-person gait assessments identified this nerve injury, not owner observation:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 3 dogs developed permanent fibular nerve dysfunction following TPLO
  • Common findings:
    • Drill hole or screw in caudal tibial cortex just distal to osteotomy
    • Caudal malpositioning of TPLO plate (esp. right limb of case 3)
    • Post-op signs: cranial tibial atrophy, knuckling, exaggerated gait, no hock flexion
  • One case had confirmed deep/superficial fibular neuropathy via electrodiagnostics
  • Recommended prevention: avoid overly caudal drill paths; careful gait assessment at follow-up is key

Anderson

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

2024-3-VCOT-anderson-5

Article Title: Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Duffy 2022 et al., on barbed suture oversew, what was the **most common leakage site** among all FEESA groups regardless of suture type?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Over 80% of leakage in all groups occurred at the anastomotic crotch, not staple lines or suture holes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Crotch of the anastomosis.
Over 80% of leakage in all groups occurred at the anastomotic crotch, not staple lines or suture holes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Oversewing the transverse staple line using barbed suture showed no difference in initial (ILP) or maximum leakage pressure (MLP) compared to monofilament suture (p = .439 and .644).
  • Barbed suture repairs were ~18% faster (25 seconds faster; p < .001) than monofilament suture.
  • No difference was found between unidirectional and bidirectional barbed sutures in leakage resistance or repair time (p = .697).
  • Mean ILP and MLP were significantly higher in control jejunal segments (6.6x and 5.1x greater respectively; p < .001).
  • Leakage consistently occurred at the crotch of the FEESA in all oversew groups (>80%), not the staple line.
  • All oversewn techniques leaked at supraphysiologic pressures, indicating clinical safety against in vivo leakage.
  • No leakage was observed from barbed suture holes, addressing concerns of tissue trauma due to barb design.
  • The study supports barbed suture as a viable alternative to conventional monofilament suture for FEESA oversew in dogs.

Duffy

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

2022-5-VS-duffy-2

Article Title: Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Danielski 2024 et al., on PUO effect on HIF, what percentage of elbows demonstrated subjective partial or complete healing on follow-up CT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Subjective healing was observed in 41 out of 51 elbows, amounting to 80.3% of the cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 80.3%.
Subjective healing was observed in 41 out of 51 elbows, amounting to 80.3% of the cases.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Sample: 51 elbows from 35 spaniel dogs
  • Healing Rate: Subjective healing (complete or partial) in 80.3% of elbows; complete in 54.9%
  • Objective HU analysis: Mean HU increased from 640 (pre-op) to 835 (follow-up) (p = .001)
  • Age Effect: Dogs <14 months showed the greatest HU increase (+384 HU) and had wider fissures with less sclerosis
  • Complications:
    • Major: 5 dogs (6 limbs); 4 related to fissure healing (7.8%), 2 related to PUO healing (3.9%)
    • Minor: 3 cases (5.8%) due to IM pin migration
  • Sclerosis: Older dogs had more humeral condyle sclerosis, possibly limiting healing
  • PUO Effectiveness: Confirmed cranio-proximal displacement of anconeal process; aimed to relieve humero-anconeal incongruity
  • Control Comparison: Avoids complications associated with transcondylar screw (infection, breakage)

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Influence of oblique proximal ulnar osteotomy on humeral intracondylar fissures in 35 spaniel breed dogs

2024-2-VS-danielski-1

Article Title: Influence of oblique proximal ulnar osteotomy on humeral intracondylar fissures in 35 spaniel breed dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Heikkilä 2024 et al., on COPLA scaffold evaluation, what was the key finding at 1.5 years postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. At 1.5 years, both groups had a high prevalence of OA with no significant difference between COPLA and Control shoulders (64% vs. 60%):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant group differences in OA prevalence.
At 1.5 years, both groups had a high prevalence of OA with no significant difference between COPLA and Control shoulders (64% vs. 60%):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 22 dogs (36 shoulders) with shoulder OCD randomly assigned to COPLA scaffold (n=19) or Control (n=17) group
  • At 6 months: Significantly fewer dogs in COPLA group had OA (14% vs. 67%; p = 0.019)
  • At 1.5 years: OA prevalence increased in both groups with no significant difference (COPLA: 64%, Control: 60%)
  • HCPI (pain index) increased significantly at 1 week post-op in COPLA dogs only (p = 0.001), but later normalized
  • Static weight-bearing improved only in unilaterally operated COPLA limbs (p = 0.015)
  • One dog in COPLA group had a fragment dislodge requiring arthroscopic removal
  • Overall, COPLA scaffold may provide short-term benefit in OA reduction, but long-term outcomes were similar

Heikkila

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-heikkila-2

Article Title: Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Antonakakis 2022 et al., on telovelar tumor resection, how long did the dog remain neurologically normal after surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The dog remained neurologically normal 28 months after surgery with no recurrence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 28 months.
The dog remained neurologically normal 28 months after surgery with no recurrence.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Telovelar approach enabled complete resection of a fourth ventricle choroid plexus tumor in a dog without postoperative complications.
  • Postoperative MRI confirmed gross total tumor removal, and the dog remained neurologically normal 28 months post-surgery.
  • The tela choroidea was used as a surgical landmark and incised to allow atraumatic access to the tumor.
  • Cerebellum was spared using this technique, minimizing risk of cerebellar injury (e.g., cerebellar mutism).
  • No hemorrhagic complications were noted during surgery due to dissection through avascular planes.
  • Histopathology favored choroid plexus carcinoma based on mitotic index (9/10 HPFs), though definitive diagnosis remained pending.
  • The case highlights the utility of telovelar over transvermian approach, given its minimally traumatic nature and improved exposure.
  • Survival beyond 2 years without adjunctive therapy suggests surgical excision alone may be curative in select cases.

Antonakakis

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

2022-8-VS-antonakakis-5

Article Title: Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Postoperative Care & Outcomes
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.