Quiz Question

In Parlier 2024 et al., on insufflation effects on portal pressure in dogs, what clinical recommendation did the authors make regarding insufflation pressure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors recommended using the minimum insufflation pressure necessary to visualize the abdomen.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Use lowest pressure to allow visualization.
Authors recommended using the minimum insufflation pressure necessary to visualize the abdomen.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal pressure increased proportionally with insufflation pressure: 38% at 6 mmHg, 95% at 10 mmHg, and 175% at 14 mmHg.
  • Exponential model: average increase of 7.45% per mmHg of insufflation pressure (CI: 4.7–10.2%).
  • No systemic hemodynamic adverse effects were observed; MAP remained >60 mmHg throughout.
  • Portal hypertension threshold (15 mmHg) predicted at ~6.4 mmHg insufflation pressure.
  • No statistical impact from patient weight, pressure-to-weight ratio, or order of insufflation rounds.
  • Measurement technique was feasible and safe, with only minor challenges (e.g., catheter kinking).
  • The study supports use of the lowest insufflation pressure needed for visualization to avoid portal hypertension.
  • Baseline portal pressures returned after desufflation, supporting comparison pre- and post-attenuation.

Parlier

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

2024-4-VS-parlier-5

Article Title: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Nash 2024 et al., on esophageal pH monitoring, what was the defined upper reference limit for distal GER events per hour in healthy nonbrachycephalic dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study defined the upper reference limit for distal GER events per hour as 2.4 based on nonparametric analysis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.4.
The study defined the upper reference limit for distal GER events per hour as 2.4 based on nonparametric analysis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Esophageal pH-monitoring was well tolerated in all 35 nonbrachycephalic dogs, with no major adverse events reported.
  • Distal GER occurred in 80% of dogs, but events were typically brief and non-productive; proximal GER occurred in only 39%.
  • Upper reference limits for GER were 2.4 events/hour (distal) and 0.4 events/hour (proximal).
  • Cumulative acid exposure was minimal: upper limits were 2.3% (distal) and 0% (proximal).
  • Comparison with brachycephalic dogs shows significantly higher GER frequency and duration, validating the diagnostic utility of pH monitoring.
  • Transnasal probe placement under light anesthesia was safe and less morbid compared to percutaneous or conscious techniques.
  • No expelled or productive regurgitation occurred, despite some GER events, indicating efficient esophageal clearance in healthy dogs.
  • Diet and fasting duration may affect GER, but these were not controlled variables in this study.

Nash

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

2024-8-VS-nash-1

Article Title: Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Nash 2024 et al., on esophageal pH monitoring, what percentage of dogs experienced proximal GER events during the recording period?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 12 of 31 dogs with dual sensors had proximal GER, corresponding to 39%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 39%.
Only 12 of 31 dogs with dual sensors had proximal GER, corresponding to 39%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Esophageal pH-monitoring was well tolerated in all 35 nonbrachycephalic dogs, with no major adverse events reported.
  • Distal GER occurred in 80% of dogs, but events were typically brief and non-productive; proximal GER occurred in only 39%.
  • Upper reference limits for GER were 2.4 events/hour (distal) and 0.4 events/hour (proximal).
  • Cumulative acid exposure was minimal: upper limits were 2.3% (distal) and 0% (proximal).
  • Comparison with brachycephalic dogs shows significantly higher GER frequency and duration, validating the diagnostic utility of pH monitoring.
  • Transnasal probe placement under light anesthesia was safe and less morbid compared to percutaneous or conscious techniques.
  • No expelled or productive regurgitation occurred, despite some GER events, indicating efficient esophageal clearance in healthy dogs.
  • Diet and fasting duration may affect GER, but these were not controlled variables in this study.

Nash

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

2024-8-VS-nash-4

Article Title: Esophageal pH‐monitoring in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A reference

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wylie 2025 et al., on femoral implant accuracy, what was the overall effect of internal brace augmentation on pivot shift grades at 6 weeks?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. At 6-week follow-up, 90.9% of stifles showed improvement in pivot shift grade, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pivot shift grades improved in over 90% of stifles.
At 6-week follow-up, 90.9% of stifles showed improvement in pivot shift grade, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Accurate femoral isometric placement was achieved in 63% of cases, significantly more with SwiveLock (78.6%) than FASTak (38.9%).
  • Inaccurate placement was associated with increased internal tibial rotation at follow-up (p = .009), suggesting potential implant failure.
  • Pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles postoperatively, regardless of implant positioning accuracy.
  • SwiveLock implants had a faster learning curve and higher placement accuracy than FASTak.
  • Higher patient weight was linked to more accurate implant placement (p = .012), likely due to easier anatomical landmark identification.
  • No correlation found between implant type or positioning accuracy and final pivot shift grade at 6 weeks.
  • Minor and major complications were low and not significantly different between implant types.
  • A simplified 2-grade pivot shift system was proposed for clinical use (Grade 1: glide, Grade 2: clunk), aiding intraoperative decision-making.

Wylie

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

2025-7-VS-wylie-3

Article Title: Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Otero Balda 2025 et al., on Short-term outcomes after feline cPSS surgery, which clinical variable was associated with the **lowest** odds of 30-day survival?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Propofol use was a negative prognostic factor (OR 0.112, p = .0008), likely reflecting more severe disease.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Treatment with propofol.
Propofol use was a negative prognostic factor (OR 0.112, p = .0008), likely reflecting more severe disease.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 78% of cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after congenital portosystemic shunt (cPSS) surgery survived to 30 days.
  • Postattenuation seizures (PAS) were associated with significantly decreased 30-day survival (50% vs. 78%; OR: 0.015, p = .005).
  • Treatment of PANS with propofol was a negative prognostic factor (OR: 0.112, p = .0008).
  • Generalized PAS accounted for most seizure cases and were more frequently fatal than focal or unknown-type seizures.
  • Pretreatment with levetiracetam (LEV1 protocol) showed a trend toward improved survival (100% vs. 60.6% in untreated cats), though not statistically significant (p = .06).
  • Shunt morphology, method of attenuation, and study period (early vs. late) were not significantly associated with 30-day survival.
  • Electrolyte, glucose, and ammonia abnormalities were not strongly linked to survival outcomes in this study.
  • Majority of PAS-related deaths were due to uncontrolled generalized seizures or euthanasia because of severity.

Otero Balda

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

2025-5-VS-otero-2

Article Title: Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Fracka 2024 et al., on perioperative risk factors, which surgical technique was associated with a significantly higher odds of complicated recovery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Staphylectomy was associated with a 59-fold increased risk of complications compared to FFP (p = .0002).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Staphylectomy.
Staphylectomy was associated with a 59-fold increased risk of complications compared to FFP (p = .0002).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Staphylectomy was linked to higher risk of complicated recovery than folded flap palatoplasty (OR = 59.29, p = .0002).
  • Laryngeal collapse > Grade 2 was strongly associated with poor recovery (OR = 97.13, p < .0001).
  • Longer general anesthesia duration increased the risk of complications (OR = 1.01 per min, p = .0051).
  • Increasing age significantly raised the odds of perioperative complication (OR = 1.04 per month, p = .0113).
  • History of aspiration pneumonia was only found in dogs with complications, though not in final model due to instability.
  • Complicated recovery included >12 h O₂ therapy, tracheostomy, or death.
  • FFP may reduce pharyngeal-laryngeal edema, possibly improving immediate outcomes.
  • Bulldogs comprised 80% of population, with French Bulldogs most common (63%).

Fracka

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Risk factors for complicated perioperative recovery in dogs undergoing staphylectomy or folded flap palatoplasty: Seventy-six cases (2018–2022)

2024-4-VS-fracka-1

Article Title: Risk factors for complicated perioperative recovery in dogs undergoing staphylectomy or folded flap palatoplasty: Seventy-six cases (2018–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Price 2024 et al., on left-sided TD ligation in dogs, which procedure was successfully completed via the same incision as TD ligation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 10 cadavers had this procedure performed via the same left thoracotomy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Subphrenic pericardiectomy.
All 10 cadavers had this procedure performed via the same left thoracotomy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Left fourth intercostal thoracotomy allowed successful thoracic duct (TD) ligation in 9/10 canine cadavers.
  • 10/13 clinical cases had a single TD branch at the left fourth intercostal space, indicating lower anatomical complexity.
  • All TD branches at this site were lateral to the esophagus, simplifying surgical access.
  • Unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy was successfully performed via the same incision in 10/10 cadavers.
  • Fewer TD branches at the fourth intercostal space than traditional caudal sites may reduce the risk of missed collaterals.
  • In contrast, traditional caudal TD ligation sites had up to 5 branches, requiring broader dissection.
  • No cadaver had right-sided TD branches, reducing surgical complexity at the studied location.
  • Contrast-confirmed ligation was effective in 90% (9/10) cadavers on CT imaging.

Price

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

2024-3-VS-price-5

Article Title: Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Fracka 2024 et al., on perioperative risk factors, how did increasing age affect the likelihood of a complicated recovery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Each month of age increased complication odds by 1.04× (OR = 1.04, p = .0113).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased odds by 4% per month.
Each month of age increased complication odds by 1.04× (OR = 1.04, p = .0113).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Staphylectomy was linked to higher risk of complicated recovery than folded flap palatoplasty (OR = 59.29, p = .0002).
  • Laryngeal collapse > Grade 2 was strongly associated with poor recovery (OR = 97.13, p < .0001).
  • Longer general anesthesia duration increased the risk of complications (OR = 1.01 per min, p = .0051).
  • Increasing age significantly raised the odds of perioperative complication (OR = 1.04 per month, p = .0113).
  • History of aspiration pneumonia was only found in dogs with complications, though not in final model due to instability.
  • Complicated recovery included >12 h O₂ therapy, tracheostomy, or death.
  • FFP may reduce pharyngeal-laryngeal edema, possibly improving immediate outcomes.
  • Bulldogs comprised 80% of population, with French Bulldogs most common (63%).

Fracka

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Risk factors for complicated perioperative recovery in dogs undergoing staphylectomy or folded flap palatoplasty: Seventy-six cases (2018–2022)

2024-4-VS-fracka-3

Article Title: Risk factors for complicated perioperative recovery in dogs undergoing staphylectomy or folded flap palatoplasty: Seventy-six cases (2018–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Radke 2022 et al., on outcome measure validation, what feature contributed to recommending CBPI, COI, and LOAD for clinical use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These tools met COSMIN Category A criteria for recommendation based on their measurement properties.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Each showed sufficient content validity and (when applicable) internal consistency.
These tools met COSMIN Category A criteria for recommendation based on their measurement properties.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBPI, COI, and LOAD are recommended for assessing canine osteoarthritis based on COSMIN criteria.
  • COI scored highest in development rigor and evidence quality among evaluated OROMs.
  • Internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness were commonly validated, though no OROMs reported measurement error.
  • LOAD was considered formative, and internal consistency assessment was deemed unnecessary.
  • CBPI and COI showed sufficient internal consistency, but CBPI’s factor structure was inconsistent across studies.
  • All 6 evaluated OROMs (CBPI, COI, LOAD, BHSII, HCPI, HVAS) were quick to complete (under 5 min).
  • Three tools—BHSII, HCPI, HVAS—need more evidence before recommendation; only CBPI, COI, and LOAD are Category A (recommended).
  • Future studies should assess interpretability, including measurement error and clinically meaningful change scores (MIC, SDC).

Radke

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Evidence‐based evaluation of owner‐reported outcome measures for canine orthopedic care – a COSMIN evaluation of 6 instruments

2022-2-VS-radke-5

Article Title: Evidence‐based evaluation of owner‐reported outcome measures for canine orthopedic care – a COSMIN evaluation of 6 instruments

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Bresciani 2022 et al., on modified urethrostomy outcomes, what was the most common early postoperative complication in cats undergoing mPPU?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All cats experienced mild incontinence and skin scalding early post-op, which resolved spontaneously.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Peristomal dermatitis and mild incontinence.
All cats experienced mild incontinence and skin scalding early post-op, which resolved spontaneously.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified prepubic urethrostomy (mPPU) was effective for managing proximal urethral obstructions in male cats.
  • All 8 cats regained voluntary urination within 24 hours postoperatively.
  • Early urinary incontinence and peristomal dermatitis occurred in all cats but were self-limiting.
  • Two cats (25%) required surgical revision due to stomal obstruction from weight gain and abdominal fat.
  • No intraoperative complications were reported in any of the 8 cats.
  • Follow-up (13–84 months) showed sustained urinary continence and owner satisfaction in all cases.
  • The rectus abdominis muscle tunnel likely increased outflow resistance, minimizing persistent incontinence.
  • Recurrent hematuria and dysuria occurred in 3 cats but were managed conservatively.

Bresciani

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Modified prepubic urethrostomy with body wall tunneling: Description of technique and long-term outcome in eight male cats

2022-2-VS-bresciani-1

Article Title: Modified prepubic urethrostomy with body wall tunneling: Description of technique and long-term outcome in eight male cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Postoperative Care & Outcomes
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.