Quiz Question

In Peycke 2022 et al., on CBLO in immature dogs, which structure must be **avoided during osteotomy** to preserve growth potential?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Avoiding the proximal tibial physis is key to preserving growth in skeletally immature dogs during CBLO.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Proximal tibial physis.
Avoiding the proximal tibial physis is key to preserving growth in skeletally immature dogs during CBLO.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBLO was effective for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs with CrCL injuries, avoiding disruption of proximal tibial growth plates.
  • Radiographic union of the osteotomy occurred in a mean of 6 weeks (range: 4–8 weeks), indicating rapid bone healing.
  • Full limb function was restored in all cases by long-term follow-up (mean 23 months), including dogs with initial complications.
  • Two dogs developed 19° valgus deformities due to screw interference with the proximal tibial physis; both were corrected surgically with return to function.
  • One dog developed 10° recurvatum due to over-rotation of the tibial plateau, but retained full function without revision.
  • CCS (countersink compression screw) caused early apophyseal closure in older dogs but had no adverse clinical effects.
  • In contrast, K-wire or plate-only fixation preserved open apophysis, suggesting implant choice may influence growth.
  • No meniscal injuries were observed, and all CrCL injuries were managed arthroscopically — 6 complete, 6 partial, 4 avulsions.

Peycke

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

2022-3-VS-peycke-1

Article Title: Center of rotation of angulation-based leveling osteotomy for stifle stabilization in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2024 et al., what patient factor was associated with higher preoperative and postoperative TPAs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Small dogs had significantly higher pre- and postoperative TPAs than large dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Small body size.
Small dogs had significantly higher pre- and postoperative TPAs than large dogs.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study Design: Retrospective study of 100 radiographs using in silico and clinical data
  • Mean preoperative TPA: 28.6°, higher in small dogs than large (p = .02)
  • Mean planned TPA (in silico): 7.6°, not achieving 5° target (p < .01)
  • Median postoperative TPA: 5.5° overall; higher in small dogs (7°) vs large (4.5°) (p = .06)
  • Postoperative ostectomy position: More distal than recommended; average = 8.6 mm
  • Increased distalizationgreater under-correction of TPA (p = .01)
  • Most accurate correction occurred when ostectomy was ≤7.5 mm from patellar tendon
  • Wedge angle categories (TPA-Pre minus 5–2°) were used based on pre-op TPA

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

2024-1-VS-banks-4

Article Title: A mismatch of planning and achieved tibial plateau angle in cranial closing wedge surgery: An in silico and clinical evaluation of 100 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Scheuermann 2023 et al., on MIPO with 3D-printed bone models, what postoperative alignment difference was noted in the FRS group compared to the virtual surgical plan?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FRS use caused a small but significant increase in recurvatum (median 2.9°, *P = .03*).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased recurvatum.
FRS use caused a small but significant increase in recurvatum (median 2.9°, *P = .03*).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Precontoured plates based on 3D-printed femurs produced accurate femoral alignment (median deviations <3 mm or <3° in all planes).
  • Both fracture reduction system (FRS) and intramedullary pin (IMP) methods achieved near-anatomic alignment in cadaveric femoral fractures.
  • FRS required fewer fluoroscopic images (median 7 vs. 26, P = .001), but longer surgical time (median 43 vs. 29 min, P = .011).
  • Sagittal plane alignment: FRS led to mild increased recurvatum (median 2.9°), but still within near-anatomic limits (<5°).
  • Axial alignment: Both groups achieved near-anatomic torsion (<10°), though one IMP case had acceptable (not near-anatomic) alignment.
  • Custom drill guides and FRS improved fluoroscopy efficiency but were cumbersome and time-consuming to use. Authors do not recommend current prototype for clinical use.
  • Clinical significance: 3D printed models allow accurate precontouring, reducing intra-op plate adjustment; custom guides may reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D-printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

2023-7-VS-scheuermann-3

Article Title: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D-printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Anderson 2023 et al., on French Bulldogs with humeral condylar fractures, which factor was **not significantly associated** with the presence of a contralateral HIF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. HIF presence was not significantly more common in younger dogs (p = .129).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Younger age.
HIF presence was not significantly more common in younger dogs (p = .129).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lateral humeral condylar fractures (LHCF) were most common, comprising 63.6% of cases.
  • Transcondylar screw (TCS) + K-wire(s) fixation had a 7.62x higher risk of major complications compared to other methods (p = .009).
  • All cases of TCS migration occurred in the TCS + K-wire group; none occurred with plate fixation.
  • Overall complication rate was 40.9%, with 29.5% being major and requiring intervention.
  • Contralateral humeral intracondylar fissures (HIF) were found in 58.1% of French Bulldogs with CT data.
  • No significant association between age and presence of HIF, but fissure length increased with age (R = 0.47, p = .048).
  • Younger, lighter dogs had higher complication and screw migration rates, possibly due to softer bone and smaller condyles.
  • TCS + plate fixation had the lowest complication rate, suggesting biomechanical superiority.

Anderson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Humeral condylar fractures and fissures in the French bulldog

2023-1-VS-anderson-5

Article Title: Humeral condylar fractures and fissures in the French bulldog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Welsh 2023 et al., on TTAF fixation methods, what was the estimated quadriceps force at a walk used as a benchmark for load testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 240 N was cited as the estimated quadriceps force during walking, used to benchmark construct strength.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 240 N.
240 N was cited as the estimated quadriceps force during walking, used to benchmark construct strength.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Two-pin fixation had significantly greater strength (639 N) than single-pin fixation (426 N) in TTAF models (p = .003).
  • Stiffness was also higher with two-pin constructs (72 N/mm vs 57 N/mm); statistically significant (p = .029).
  • Both fixation types withstood loads greater than quadriceps force in dogs at a walk (240 N), indicating clinical viability.
  • Failure was most commonly due to pin bending or pullout (82%), with fewer cases of ligament tearing or epiphyseal fracture.
  • K-wire insertion angle (KWIA) did not significantly differ between fixation types (p = .13).
  • Single larger pins delivered ~68% of the strength and ~83% of the stiffness of two smaller vertically aligned pins.
  • Clinical implication: Two vertically aligned pins are biomechanically superior for TTAF fixation in canine models.
  • Study used mature cadavers, which may underestimate loads and stiffness compared to immature clinical cases.

Welsh

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

2023-5-VS-welsh-5

Article Title: Biomechanical comparison of one pin versus two pin fixation in a canine tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In de Moya 2023 et al., on FGPP of femoral capital physeal/neck fractures, what was the overall healing outcome?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most fractures healed satisfactorily, though complications occurred in ~40% of cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 10/13 fractures healed successfully.
Most fractures healed satisfactorily, though complications occurred in ~40% of cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 11 dogs, 13 fractures (mostly Salter-Harris type I) were repaired with FGPP using Kirschner wires.
  • 10/13 fractures achieved satisfactory healing with good limb function at ~43 days median follow-up.
  • Major complications occurred in 5 dogs: intra-articular pin placement, implant migration (2), implant failure with nonunion, and malunion.
  • 2 dogs presenting >15 days post-injury with radiographic remodeling were poor candidates → higher risk of nonunion/malunion.
  • Preoperative displacement was mostly mild (10/13 fractures); these had better outcomes than chronic or severely displaced cases.
  • Median surgical time: 60 minutes (range 45–75), all performed percutaneously without conversion to open.
  • Elective pin removal was performed in 5 cases; migration occurred with both short and long cut wires.
  • Femoral neck resorption (“apple-coring”) was rare (2/10 healed cases) and thought to be less frequent than after ORIF due to reduced vascular disruption.

de Moya

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Closed reduction and fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

2023-7-VS-demoya-1

Article Title: Closed reduction and fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Carrera 2024 et al., what was the average time to radiographic bone healing following early MPL surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean time to healing was 55 ± 24 days, consistent across osteotomy techniques:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 55 days.
Mean time to healing was 55 ± 24 days, consistent across osteotomy techniques:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 5 juvenile dogs (mean age 7.2 months) with grade III–IV MPL were treated surgically.
  • Most had femoral varus + external tibial torsion; some had shallow trochlear grooves.
  • Distal femoral osteotomy was performed in 4/5 dogs; Tibial tuberosity transposition (TTT) in 3/5; Sulcoplasty in 2/5.
  • Mean time to weight bearing: 9.8 ± 5.5 days; healing: 55 ± 24 days
  • No reluxations, and final radiographic values for aLDFA and torsion were maintained at 1 year.
  • One complication due to domestic trauma, not surgical failure.
  • Early surgery appeared to preserve alignment and prevent deformity progression.

Carrera

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

2024-2-VCOT-carrera-3

Article Title: Early Surgical Management of Medial Patellar Luxation in Juvenile Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Williams 2024 et al., on breed effects, which breed exhibited significantly greater hemorrhage, even after normalization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. English Bulldogs had significantly higher normalized hemorrhage than other breeds (p = .048).
Incorrect. The correct answer is English Bulldog.
English Bulldogs had significantly higher normalized hemorrhage than other breeds (p = .048).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial
  • Population: 32 brachycephalic dogs undergoing cut-and-sew sharp staphylectomy
  • Groups: Adrenaline + lidocaine (Group A) vs. Lidocaine only (Group NA)
  • Main Findings:
    • Total hemorrhage significantly lower in Group A (median 1.82 g) vs Group NA (7.95 g); p = .013
    • Normalized hemorrhage significantly lower in Group A; p = .021
    • Surgeon-assigned hemorrhage scores significantly lower in Group A; p = .029
    • No adverse effects (tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia, etc.) noted from adrenaline use
    • Breed effect: English Bulldogs bled more overall even after normalization
  • Clinical Implication: Adrenaline in nerve blocks reduces hemorrhage without added risk

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-1-VS-williams-4

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Forzisi 2025 et al., on femoral growth post-THR, what was the relationship between age at surgery and femoral length difference?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No statistical association was found between age and femoral length change (p = .462–.745).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Age at surgery had no significant effect.
No statistical association was found between age and femoral length change (p = .462–.745).

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 24 dogs (<8.5 months) undergoing unilateral cementless THR.
Growth Impact:

  • Operated femurs showed ~11.5% less trochanteric growth than controls (p = .002).
  • No significant difference in femoral diaphyseal + epiphyseal length (p = .712) or femur overall (p = .465).

Cortical Width:

  • Increased significantly at 10 mm distal to trochanter (4.6% increase, p = .037) and at 50% femoral length (8.5% increase, p = .030).

Clinical relevance: Despite measurable changes, no clinically significant impairment to femoral length occurred.
Effect Sizes:

  • Moderate negative for trochanteric growth.
  • Moderate positive for proximal femoral width.

Forzisi

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Evaluation of the effects of cementless total hip replacement on femoral length in skeletally immature dogs

2025-1-VS-forzisi-5

Article Title: Evaluation of the effects of cementless total hip replacement on femoral length in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Nagahiro 2023 et al., on quadriceps-femoral mismatch, which MPL grade was associated with significantly shorter quadriceps muscle length relative to femoral length?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. QML/FL was significantly lower in grade IV compared to grades I–III, indicating a shortened quadriceps muscle in severe MPL.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Grade IV.
QML/FL was significantly lower in grade IV compared to grades I–III, indicating a shortened quadriceps muscle in severe MPL.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Quadriceps muscle length/femoral length ratio (QML/FL) was significantly lower in dogs with grade IV MPL than grades I–III (p ≤ .002).
  • Shortened QML was associated with increased femoral torsion angle (FTA) and increased aLDFA, indicating correlation with femoral deformity.
  • QML/FL increased with age, possibly due to muscular development or reduced deformity in older dogs (p = .004).
  • Grade IV MPL dogs had QML/FL < 0.87, the lower normal limit based on healthy beagles, suggesting clinically significant muscle shortening.
  • PLL/PL ratio (used to diagnose patella alta) was not associated with QML/FL or MPL severity in small breeds.
  • QML/FL can help preoperatively identify candidates for femoral shortening ostectomy, improving femoropatellar alignment.
  • Multivariate regression model confirmed QML/FL is independently influenced by age, FTA, and aLDFA (R² = 0.45).
  • CT-based 3D measurements enabled objective, noninvasive quantification of femoral and muscle alignment parameters.

Nagahiro

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Evaluation of the quadriceps muscle length to femoral length ratio in small breed dogs with medial patellar luxation

2023-4-VS-nagahiro-1

Article Title: Evaluation of the quadriceps muscle length to femoral length ratio in small breed dogs with medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Pediatrics & Growth Plate Considerations
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.