Quiz Question

In Scheuermann 2023 et al., on MIPO with 3D-printed bone models, what postoperative alignment difference was noted in the FRS group compared to the virtual surgical plan?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FRS use caused a small but significant increase in recurvatum (median 2.9°, *P = .03*).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased recurvatum.
FRS use caused a small but significant increase in recurvatum (median 2.9°, *P = .03*).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Precontoured plates based on 3D-printed femurs produced accurate femoral alignment (median deviations <3 mm or <3° in all planes).
  • Both fracture reduction system (FRS) and intramedullary pin (IMP) methods achieved near-anatomic alignment in cadaveric femoral fractures.
  • FRS required fewer fluoroscopic images (median 7 vs. 26, P = .001), but longer surgical time (median 43 vs. 29 min, P = .011).
  • Sagittal plane alignment: FRS led to mild increased recurvatum (median 2.9°), but still within near-anatomic limits (<5°).
  • Axial alignment: Both groups achieved near-anatomic torsion (<10°), though one IMP case had acceptable (not near-anatomic) alignment.
  • Custom drill guides and FRS improved fluoroscopy efficiency but were cumbersome and time-consuming to use. Authors do not recommend current prototype for clinical use.
  • Clinical significance: 3D printed models allow accurate precontouring, reducing intra-op plate adjustment; custom guides may reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D-printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

2023-7-VS-scheuermann-3

Article Title: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D-printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Eskelinen 2025 et al., on Plate–Pin fixation for MPL, what was the most common cause of minor complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Pin-related issues (migration, bending, breakage) accounted for most minor complications.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pin migration or breakage.
Pin-related issues (migration, bending, breakage) accounted for most minor complications.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Plate–Pin TTT fixation resolved MPL in 64/65 stifles with low recurrence (1.5%) and good lameness outcomes postoperatively.
  • Complication rate was 21.5% (14/65 stifles), mostly minor (57%); major issues included pin migration, fracture, or capsular failure.
  • Pin-related issues accounted for 8 of 20 total complications, highlighting implant refinement is needed.
  • No avulsions, TT fixation failures, or luxation recurrence occurred in cases where surgical technique was followed precisely.
  • Surgical deviations increased complication risk 11.3× (p < 0.05), suggesting adherence to protocol is critical.
  • Single-session bilateral MPL surgery had comparable complication rate (3/20) to unilateral surgery (11/45).
  • Screw breakage occurred in 3 cases, suggesting at least 3 screws may be needed for secure TT fixation.
  • Authors suggest temporary pin fixation and later removal may reduce complications, though prospective studies are needed.

Eskelinen

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

2025-4-VCOT-eskelinen-3

Article Title: Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Violini 2024 et al., on 3D-guided spinal stabilization in brachycephalic dogs, what postoperative complication occurred due to PMMA cement overextension?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A fracture of T4 spinous process was attributed to PMMA extending cranially into a mobile segment:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}.
Incorrect. The correct answer is T4 spinous process fracture.
A fracture of T4 spinous process was attributed to PMMA extending cranially into a mobile segment:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spinal stabilization with 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides (3D-PSGs) was safe, with no immediate perioperative complications reported.
  • 84% of pedicle screws were optimally placed, and only 0.5% breached the spinal canal, reflecting high placement accuracy.
  • 80% of dogs experienced no neurologic deterioration postoperatively, indicating reliable short-term safety.
  • 3D-PSGs were accurate and reproducible, even across multiple institutions and surgeons.
  • Mid-term outcomes were favorable: all dogs were ambulatory, and 90% had static or improved neurologic signs.
  • 7 of 10 mid-term follow-ups showed abnormal gait, though owners rated lifestyle ≥3/5, suggesting acceptable function.
  • 3D-printed guides enabled precise pedicle screw placement in deformed vertebrae, expanding options in small breeds.
  • One dog suffered a T4 spinous process fracture due to overextension of PMMA cement, emphasizing the need for cement placement caution.

Violini

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

2024-4-VS-violini-3

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Carvajal 2025 et al., on femoral stem breakage, what was the most common radiographic finding among failed implants?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Varus malalignment was present in 10 of 14 failed cases, with a median angle of 3.9°.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Varus alignment of femoral stem.
Varus malalignment was present in 10 of 14 failed cases, with a median angle of 3.9°.

🔍 Key Findings

Incidence of BFX lateral bolt stem breakage: 2.95% (13 dogs, 14 stems)

Implant factors:

  • 13/14 were BFX lateral bolt stems (sizes #5–7)
  • +9 necks used in 5/11 of 17 mm heads
  • 10/14 stems undersized based on radiographs
  • 10/13 dogs exceeded weight limits for implanted stem size

Malalignment:

  • 10/14 had varus alignment (median 3.9°)
  • 8/14 had insufficient proximodistal seating

Breakage site: Proximolateral shoulder in all cases

Revision outcomes:

  • 11 revised (7 CFX, 3 larger BFX, 1 collared)
  • 9/10 revised dogs regained full function
  • Complications: 1 rebreakage, 1 periprosthetic fracture, 1 fixation failure

Histopathology:

  • Electron microscopy showed fatigue striations and incomplete bead fusion

Conclusion: Avoid small BFX lateral bolt stems if undersized or if long necks required; use weight guidelines to prevent fatigue failure.

Carvajal

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

2025-3-VS-carvajal-1

Article Title: Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Israel 2022 et al., on cerclage wire in THR, what is a biomechanical benefit of cerclage application around the proximal femur?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Studies show cerclage wires increase torsional failure thresholds by about 20%, aiding fracture prevention.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increases peak torque resistance by ~20%.
Studies show cerclage wires increase torsional failure thresholds by about 20%, aiding fracture prevention.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No proximal femoral fractures occurred in any of the 184 hips with cerclage wire placement
  • Cerclage wire was well tolerated, with no failures or complications related to the wire
  • Application of a single cerclage wire took <10 minutes, was cost-effective, and required minimal instrumentation
  • 3 postoperative complications (1 fissure, 2 fractures) occurred distal to the cerclage site, near the stem tip, requiring plate/screw fixation
  • All dogs returned to normal activity, and all owners were satisfied with the outcome
  • Cerclage placement location is critical—must be proximal to the lesser trochanter and close to the calcar to resist hoop strain
  • Biomechanical evidence supports that cerclage wires improve resistance to hoop strain and subsidence of cementless stems
  • Press-fit cementless stems may settle, but when supported by cerclage, this does not result in fractures even in undersized implants

Israel

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

2022-2-VS-israel-5

Article Title: Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Johnson 2022 et al., on PET implant outcomes, what was the most common site of failure identified in torn implants?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Midbody tears were identified arthroscopically in all failed implants, suggesting fatigue failure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Midbody of the implant.
Midbody tears were identified arthroscopically in all failed implants, suggesting fatigue failure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Only 2 of 10 PET implants were fully intact and functional at 6 months post-op.
  • Owner-reported function (LOAD scores) improved by 51.7% (p = .008) over 6 months.
  • Gait asymmetry improved by 86% (p = .002) postoperatively.
  • Implant failure occurred in the midbody of the PET device, suggesting fatigue as a failure mechanism.
  • One dog (10%) developed implant infection, necessitating implant removal.
  • Implant fixation method (screws + washers + interference screw) was mechanically adequate and technically simple.
  • Partially intact implants (4/10) still showed improved clinical outcomes, despite structural compromise.
  • Midbody tearing and lack of long-term integrity prohibit continued use of this PET implant in CCL repair.

Johnson

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Outcome of cranial cruciate ligament replacement with an enhanced polyethylene terephthalate implant in the dog: A pilot clinical trial

2022-8-VS-johnson-2

Article Title: Outcome of cranial cruciate ligament replacement with an enhanced polyethylene terephthalate implant in the dog: A pilot clinical trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Danielski 2022 et al., on humero-anconeal incongruity, what was the proposed mechanism by which HIF may develop in spaniel breeds?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Study findings supported mechanical impingement leading to stress fissures in the medial humeral condyle.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Humero-anconeal incongruity causing focal stress.
Study findings supported mechanical impingement leading to stress fissures in the medial humeral condyle.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A novel caudo-medial arthroscopic portal allowed visualization of previously undescribed cartilage lesions on the caudal medial humeral condyle.
  • A consistent focal cartilage lesion (HA lesion) was observed in 100% of elbows with HIF (21/21), but in none of the 31 elbows without HIF.
  • Lesions varied from indentations to full-thickness cartilage loss, typically elliptical and located just medial to the humeral condyle isthmus.
  • A clunk-like sensation and dynamic engagement of the anconeal process into the lesion were observed in 16/21 elbows with HIF during elbow manipulation.
  • In 5/21 elbows, engagement of the anconeal process led to observable widening of the HIF line, suggesting dynamic instability.
  • Findings support a novel concept of humero-anconeal incongruity as a contributor to the pathogenesis of HIF.
  • Spaniel breed was not a confounder—the lesion was only present in elbows with HIF, regardless of breed.
  • The study suggests potential for using arthroscopy as a screening tool for early detection of humero-anconeal incongruity and HIF risk.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

2022-1-VS-danielski2-4

Article Title: Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Redolfi 2024 et al., what was the most common major complication observed after TPLO-TTT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgical site infections occurred in 3/24 stifles; the most frequent major complication
Incorrect. The correct answer is Surgical site infection.
Surgical site infections occurred in 3/24 stifles; the most frequent major complication

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study of 24 stifles in 22 dogs with concurrent CCLR and grade III–IV MPL treated via TPLO-TTT
  • Major complications: 4/24 (3 surgical site infections, 1 MPL reluxation); minor complications: 5/24
  • Long-term follow-up (median 27 months): 21/22 dogs sound, 23/24 stifles resolved
  • Patellar ligament thickening observed post-op in 4 cases, resolved with rehab
  • The only case of MPL reluxation involved untreated tibial torsion, suggesting case selection is critical

Redolfi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Complications and Long-Term Outcomes after Combined Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy and Tibial Tuberosity Transposition for Treatment of Concurrent Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Grade III or IV Medial Patellar Luxation

2024-1-VCOT-redolfi-2

Article Title: Complications and Long-Term Outcomes after Combined Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy and Tibial Tuberosity Transposition for Treatment of Concurrent Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Grade III or IV Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Chitty 2025 et al., on tibial fracture fixation in immature dogs, what was the major complication rate observed in the external fixation group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Major complications occurred in 52.8% of dogs treated with external skeletal fixation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 52.8%.
Major complications occurred in 52.8% of dogs treated with external skeletal fixation.

🔍 Key Findings

Internal fixation (IF) group (n=59):

  • Complication rate: 20.3%
  • Major complications: 15.3%
  • Longer time to discharge if complications occurred (median: 12.5 weeks)

External skeletal fixation (ESF) group (n=36):

  • Complication rate: 55.6% (p < .001 vs IF)
  • Major complications: 52.8%
  • Most common issue: pin tract morbidity

Multivariable analysis:

  • Use of IF significantly reduced odds of complications (OR 0.23, p = .004)
  • Use of post-op antibiotics associated with increased odds of complications (OR 3.53, p = .028)

Fixation choice influenced by age:

  • Older puppies more likely to receive IF (OR 1.25 per week increase in age, p < .001)

Breed & fracture distribution:

  • Common breeds: Labrador, Border Collie, Whippet
  • Common fracture sites: middle and proximal third of tibia

Chitty

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

2025-4-VS-chitty-1

Article Title: Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Perry 2025 et al., on I-Loc fracture fixation, which factor most increased the risk of surgical site infection and implant removal?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most SSIs occurred in open fractures, with implant removal required in over 20% of open cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Open fractures.
Most SSIs occurred in open fractures, with implant removal required in over 20% of open cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • High union rate with low complications was achieved using the I-Loc angle-stable interlocking nail across 243 canine long-bone fractures.
  • Mean time to clinical union was 8.3 weeks, faster than many historical plate-rod or non-angle-stable nail reports.
  • Major complications occurred in only 5.3% and minor complications in 9.1% of cases.
  • Most fractures were diaphyseal (75%) and comminuted (62%), demonstrating effectiveness in complex fracture patterns.
  • Ancillary implants were uncommon (21%), mainly used in epi-/metaphyseal fractures or for anatomic reconstruction.
  • Postoperative missed bolt rate was very low (0.94%), reflecting improved targeting accuracy.
  • Open fractures carried a substantially higher risk of SSI and implant removal compared with closed fractures.
  • Prebending of tibial nails was strongly recommended to follow natural recurvatum and avoid iatrogenic alignment errors.

Perry

Veterinary Surgery

8

2025

Outcomes of 243 dogs with traumatic fractures treated with the I-Loc interlocking nail

2025-8-VS-perry-4

Article Title: Outcomes of 243 dogs with traumatic fractures treated with the I-Loc interlocking nail

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Orthopedic Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.