Quiz Question

In Scott 2025 et al., on acetabular cup revision, what was the most common indication for revision surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Seven of the nine dogs underwent revision due to prosthetic luxation, most commonly ventral.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Luxation.
Seven of the nine dogs underwent revision due to prosthetic luxation, most commonly ventral.

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 9 dogs underwent revision of osteointegrated acetabular cups after total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Revision Indications:

  • 7 luxations (5 ventral, 2 craniodorsal)
  • 1 femoral stem fracture
  • 1 aseptic stem loosening

Implants:

  • 8 BFX cups, 1 Helica; all revised to BFX
  • 7/9 required a larger cup than original

Cup removal: Required sectioning with a high-speed burr and modular osteotome; removal fragments extracted

Complications:

  • 1 recurrent luxation
  • 1 low-grade infection with possible metallic debris-associated osteolysis
  • 2 femoral fissures managed intraoperatively

Outcomes:

  • Good to excellent function in 6/6 dogs available at median 621 days
  • Minimal complications with success in re-osteointegration of new cup

Clinical takeaway: Revision of stable, ingrown cups is feasible and offers an alternative to pelvic osteotomies; typically requires upsizing

Scott

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

2025-3-VS-scott-1

Article Title: Revision of osteointegrated acetabular cup prostheses in nine dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In McKay 2023 et al., on patellar tendon augmentation, what was the most common mode of failure in the suprapatellar TBW group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Wire unraveling was the most frequent failure in the suprapatellar group (67%).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Wire unraveling.
Wire unraveling was the most frequent failure in the suprapatellar group (67%).

2023-8-VS-mckay-2

Article Title:

Journal:

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Chitty 2025 et al., on tibial fracture fixation in immature dogs, which complication was most common in the external fixation group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Pin tract morbidity was the most common complication in dogs receiving external skeletal fixation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pin tract morbidity.
Pin tract morbidity was the most common complication in dogs receiving external skeletal fixation.

🔍 Key Findings

Internal fixation (IF) group (n=59):

  • Complication rate: 20.3%
  • Major complications: 15.3%
  • Longer time to discharge if complications occurred (median: 12.5 weeks)

External skeletal fixation (ESF) group (n=36):

  • Complication rate: 55.6% (p < .001 vs IF)
  • Major complications: 52.8%
  • Most common issue: pin tract morbidity

Multivariable analysis:

  • Use of IF significantly reduced odds of complications (OR 0.23, p = .004)
  • Use of post-op antibiotics associated with increased odds of complications (OR 3.53, p = .028)

Fixation choice influenced by age:

  • Older puppies more likely to receive IF (OR 1.25 per week increase in age, p < .001)

Breed & fracture distribution:

  • Common breeds: Labrador, Border Collie, Whippet
  • Common fracture sites: middle and proximal third of tibia

Chitty

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

2025-4-VS-chitty-2

Article Title: Short‐term complications of internal versus external fixation of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures in 95 skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Sadowitz 2023 et al., on screw angle & speed, which factor most strongly contributed to increased TCF risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found angle deviation from the pilot hole was the strongest predictor of TCF formation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Off-axis insertion angle.
The study found angle deviation from the pilot hole was the strongest predictor of TCF formation.

2023-8-VS-sadowitz-3

Article Title:

Journal:

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Scheuermann 2023 et al., on femoral MIPO alignment, which of the following was significantly different in the FRS group compared to the virtual plan?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FRS resulted in increased recurvatum (median 2.9°; P = .03), but all remained within acceptable range.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Sagittal plane alignment.
FRS resulted in increased recurvatum (median 2.9°; P = .03), but all remained within acceptable range.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Precontoured plates using 3D-printed femoral models achieved near-anatomic alignment in all cadaver limbs.
  • Fracture reduction system (FRS) required significantly fewer fluoroscopy images than intramedullary pin (IMP) methods (7 vs 26, P = .001).
  • Despite longer surgical time (43 vs 29 minutes, P = .011), FRS showed equally accurate or better alignment compared to IMP.
  • Femoral length, frontal, sagittal, and axial alignment were all within near-anatomic thresholds (<10 mm or <5° deviation) in both groups.
  • FRS was associated with more consistent length maintenance, with IMP showing a median shortening of 2.3 mm (P = .03).
  • Axial plane deviation was statistically different in the FRS group (P = .04), but still clinically acceptable.
  • Study highlights potential for custom 3D-printed guides to reduce radiation exposure and improve precision in MIPO procedures.
  • Authors caution that FRS was time-consuming and cumbersome, suggesting design refinements needed for clinical use.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D‐printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

2023-6-VS-scheuermann-4

Article Title: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D‐printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Gollnick 2024 et al., on TCTF risk with Arthrex STS in TPLO, which factor most contributed to serious tibial fracture following TCTF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both major complications were associated with angulated cortical screws in the distal plate holes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Angled cortical screw in distal hole.
Both major complications were associated with angulated cortical screws in the distal plate holes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 42% of dogs (33/78) treated with Arthrex 3.5 mm STS during TPLO developed radiographic TCTF
  • TCTFs occurred exclusively distal to the osteotomy
  • 14% of screws (36/250) distal to the osteotomy were associated with TCTFs
  • 6% of dogs with TCTFs developed major complications (e.g., complete tibial fracture requiring surgical revision)
  • Angulation of cortical STS screws, especially in the distal plate holes, was a key contributor to complications
  • Locking screws were also involved, but cortical screws angled improperly were overrepresented in serious outcomes
  • Revision recommendations included preemptive fixation for large TCTFs or angulated screw placements
  • Use of non-self-tapping screws (NSTS) previously showed a <1% TCTF rate, supporting higher risk with STS

Gollnick

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Tibial fracture associated with use of Arthrex self‐tapping screws during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs and development of transcortical tibial fracture

2024-6-VS-gollnick-3

Article Title: Tibial fracture associated with use of Arthrex self‐tapping screws during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs and development of transcortical tibial fracture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Jenkins 2022 et al., on medial epicondylar fissure fracture, what was the most common postoperative complication reported?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Screw loosening was the most common complication (11.2%), both with and without MEFF.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Screw loosening.
Screw loosening was the most common complication (11.2%), both with and without MEFF.

🔍 Key Findings

  • MEFF occurred in 11.4% (10/88 elbows) following medial-to-lateral transcondylar screw placement in dogs with HIF.
  • Screw size to condylar height ratio >41% significantly increased MEFF risk (P = .004, OR 1.52).
  • MEFF was not recognized intraoperatively in 60% of cases and was only seen on follow-up or retrospective imaging review.
  • Screw loosening was the most common complication (11.2%), observed both with and without MEFF.
  • MEFF tended to increase the risk of screw loosening (P = .06), but was not statistically significant.
  • Most MEFFs did not require treatment and healed radiographically by 14–17 weeks in monitored cases.
  • Shaft screws were used in all MEFF cases, but shaft vs cortical design was not significantly associated with MEFF.
  • The clinical impact of MEFF was minor in most cases, although long-term significance is unknown.

Jenkins

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Medial epicondylar fissure fracture as a complication of transcondylar screw placement for the treatment of humeral intracondylar fissure

2022-4-VS-jenkins-3

Article Title: Medial epicondylar fissure fracture as a complication of transcondylar screw placement for the treatment of humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Mullins 2023 et al., on thoracolumbar pin placement, what was a key **limitation** of the FHP technique noted in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FHP required training and anatomical familiarity, which impacted intraoperative deviation rates.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Steep learning curve and operator experience dependency.
FHP required training and anatomical familiarity, which impacted intraoperative deviation rates.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Both free-hand probing (FHP) and 3D-printed guides (3DPG) enabled accurate spinal pin placement, with 87.5% vs 96.4% of pins graded as optimal (Grade I).
  • 3DPGs had fewer intraoperative deviations (0/56 pins) compared to 6/56 with the FHP technique.
  • No pins using either method fully breached the medial vertebral canal (Grade IIb) — a critical safety outcome.
  • Pins placed using 3DPGs required less time overall (mean 2.6 min) than FHP (mean 4.5 min).
  • FHP required specific experience and has a learning curve, whereas 3DPG use requires CAD software and 3D printing access.
  • FHP had more lateral canal violations (Grade IIIa: 4/56 vs 0/56 for 3DPG), suggesting slightly less precision.
  • Both techniques were safe, and all deviations were recognized and corrected intraoperatively.
  • 3DPGs may offer practical advantages in clinical settings lacking surgical expertise, while FHP allows immediate intervention without 3D printing delay.

Mullins

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Accuracy of pin placement in the canine thoracolumbar spine using a free-hand probing technique versus 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides: An ex-vivo study

2023-5-VS-mullins-4

Article Title: Accuracy of pin placement in the canine thoracolumbar spine using a free-hand probing technique versus 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides: An ex-vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kennedy 2024 et al., which portal had the highest rate of articular cartilage injury?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 60% of shoulders had IACI at the caudal instrument portal vs 25% at the middle portal:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Caudal instrument portal.
60% of shoulders had IACI at the caudal instrument portal vs 25% at the middle portal:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 20 shoulders from 11 medium-to-large breed dogs evaluated
  • Lateral portals used: middle arthroscopic, caudal instrument, cranial egress
  • Musculotendinous lesions unavoidable, but small (18G needle); seen in deltoideus (90%), infraspinatus, teres minor, etc.
  • Neurovascular safety:
    • Caudal portal was closest to axillary artery/nerve branches (as close as 7 mm)
    • Only 2/20 shoulders (10%) had omobrachial vein penetrated
  • Cartilage injuries (IACI) occurred in 65%, primarily minor linear defects; use of guarded cannulas and distractors suggested for minimization
  • Supports overall safety of lateral shoulder arthroscopy with portal placement awareness

Kennedy

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Evaluation of Canine Shoulder Arthroscopy for Anatomical and Safety Considerations

2024-4-VCOT-kennedy-2

Article Title: Evaluation of Canine Shoulder Arthroscopy for Anatomical and Safety Considerations

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In McKay 2023 et al., on patellar tendon augmentation, which method provided the highest construct stiffness?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The combined TBW group showed significantly higher construct stiffness compared to single-method augmentations.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Combined transpatellar and suprapatellar TBW.
The combined TBW group showed significantly higher construct stiffness compared to single-method augmentations.

2023-8-VS-mckay-1

Article Title:

Journal:

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Orthopedic Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.