Quiz Question

In Mancusi 2026 et al., on cup impactor accuracy, what is the ideal angle of lateral opening (ALO) recommended for Zurich cementless total hip replacement cups in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The literature and this study identify approximately 45° as the ideal ALO to minimize luxation risk after canine THR.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 45 degrees.
The literature and this study identify approximately 45° as the ideal ALO to minimize luxation risk after canine THR.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cup positioning accuracy for the angle of lateral opening (ALO) was significantly influenced by impactor design for beginner surgeons.
  • The prototype impactor reduced ALO mean error for the beginner surgeon (1.8°) compared with the standard impactor (3.9°).
  • Senior surgeons achieved similar ALO accuracy regardless of impactor type, suggesting experience mitigates instrument limitations.
  • Beginner surgeons using the standard impactor tended to place cups with excessive ALO (~48.9°), deviating from the ideal 45°.
  • Cup retroversion accuracy was not significantly affected by the impactor type, indicating it depends more on surgeon experience and anatomical landmark recognition.
  • Typical acceptable retroversion range for Zurich THR cups is approximately 15–25°, matched to the patient’s acetabular anatomy.
  • Prototype impactor design improvements included ergonomic handle, wider hammering surface, shorter aiming bar, and cup-size–specific holders, improving instrument stability and alignment.
  • Improved instrument ergonomics may facilitate safer learning curves for surgeons performing canine total hip replacement.

Mancusi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2026

Comparison between Two Zurich Cementless Total Hip Replacement Cup Impactor Types in the Accuracy of Cup Positioning: An In Vitro Study

2026-2-vcot-mancusi-1

Article Title: Comparison between Two Zurich Cementless Total Hip Replacement Cup Impactor Types in the Accuracy of Cup Positioning: An In Vitro Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Vandekerckhove 2026 et al., on hip laxity forces, what was the median maximal Laxity Index (LImax) observed in the study population?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The reported median LImax was 0.48, with a range from 0.32 to 0.78.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.48.
The reported median LImax was 0.48, with a range from 0.32 to 0.78.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Applied force and hip laxity showed a predictable force–laxity relationship, validating previous cadaver findings in live sedated dogs.
  • 90% of hip joints achieved ≥90% of maximal laxity at 80.45 N, establishing a practical minimum force target during stress radiography.
  • LImax was not significantly affected by osteoarthritis, sex, age, or side, supporting robustness of the technique.
  • Body weight significantly influenced both LImax and force–laxity curves, although this may reflect study population bias.
  • Median LImax was 0.48 (range 0.32–0.78), with maximal laxity reached at forces ranging from 66–123 N.
  • The force–laxity curve demonstrated a rapid rise followed by a plateau, indicating a threshold beyond which additional force yields minimal additional subluxation.
  • Sedated dogs required approximately 15 N less force than cadavers to reach adequate laxity, likely due to muscle relaxation and absence of postmortem stiffness.
  • The VMBDmD stress radiography technique demonstrated clinical practicality and reproducibility, supporting its use for canine hip dysplasia screening.

Vandekerckhove

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2026

Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiography to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint in Sedated Dogs

2026-3-vcot-vandekerckhove-3

Article Title: Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiography to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint in Sedated Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Weichert 2026 et al., on feline CMF fractures, which temporomandibular joint structure was most frequently involved in fractures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most TMJ fractures involved the condylar process, accounting for the majority of the 23 TMJ fractures identified.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Condylar process.
Most TMJ fractures involved the condylar process, accounting for the majority of the 23 TMJ fractures identified.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mandibular fractures were the most common injury, occurring in 40/48 cats, often affecting multiple mandibular regions simultaneously.
  • Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injuries were frequent, present in 27/48 cats, with 23 fractures and 4 luxations, most commonly involving the condylar process.
  • Maxillofacial fractures involving nasal and palatal structures occurred in 36/48 cats, frequently producing airway obstruction due to fragment displacement or swelling.
  • Orbital fractures occurred in 30/48 cats, predominantly affecting the dorsomedial orbital wall and often associated with nasal airway obstruction.
  • Pterygoid bone fractures (25/48) were clinically important, frequently causing medial displacement and obstruction of the nasopharyngeal airway.
  • Combined involvement of multiple functional systems was common, with 36/48 cats showing concurrent injuries affecting oral cavity and nasal airway function.
  • Neurocranial fractures were uncommon (6/48) but occurred only in cases with severe, multifocal CMF trauma.
  • CT imaging was essential for diagnosis, as many orbital and skull fractures were difficult or impossible to detect clinically.

Weichert

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2026

Assessment of Fracture Distribution and Involvement of Functional Systems Following Craniomaxillofacial Trauma in 48 Cats

2026-2-vcot-weichert-2

Article Title: Assessment of Fracture Distribution and Involvement of Functional Systems Following Craniomaxillofacial Trauma in 48 Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Vandekerckhove 2026 et al., on hip laxity forces, which variable was significantly associated with maximal Laxity Index (LImax)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Weight was the only factor significantly associated with LImax; age, OA, sex, and side were not significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Body weight.
Weight was the only factor significantly associated with LImax; age, OA, sex, and side were not significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Applied force and hip laxity showed a predictable force–laxity relationship, validating previous cadaver findings in live sedated dogs.
  • 90% of hip joints achieved ≥90% of maximal laxity at 80.45 N, establishing a practical minimum force target during stress radiography.
  • LImax was not significantly affected by osteoarthritis, sex, age, or side, supporting robustness of the technique.
  • Body weight significantly influenced both LImax and force–laxity curves, although this may reflect study population bias.
  • Median LImax was 0.48 (range 0.32–0.78), with maximal laxity reached at forces ranging from 66–123 N.
  • The force–laxity curve demonstrated a rapid rise followed by a plateau, indicating a threshold beyond which additional force yields minimal additional subluxation.
  • Sedated dogs required approximately 15 N less force than cadavers to reach adequate laxity, likely due to muscle relaxation and absence of postmortem stiffness.
  • The VMBDmD stress radiography technique demonstrated clinical practicality and reproducibility, supporting its use for canine hip dysplasia screening.

Vandekerckhove

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2026

Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiography to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint in Sedated Dogs

2026-3-vcot-vandekerckhove-2

Article Title: Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiography to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint in Sedated Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Scharpf 2026 et al., on radioulnar joint morphology, which radioulnar compartments demonstrated significant malformation in dogs with MCD?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study identified significantly decreased radioulnar ratios in central, centrolateral, and lateral regions, indicating malformation and incongruity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Central, centrolateral, and lateral compartments.
The study identified significantly decreased radioulnar ratios in central, centrolateral, and lateral regions, indicating malformation and incongruity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dogs with MCD demonstrated significant radioulnar joint malformation in the central, centrolateral, and lateral compartments on transverse CT imaging.
  • Radioulnar ratios were significantly decreased at measurement points 3–5 in MCD elbows (p = 0.044), indicating widening and incongruity of the radioulnar joint space.
  • Medial and mediocentral radioulnar compartments remained congruent, showing no significant differences between MCD and control elbows.
  • Radioulnar opening angle did not differ between groups, suggesting that joint malformation was localized rather than reflected by global angular changes.
  • No evidence of radioulnar step formation was identified, despite previous theories linking step incongruity to MCD development.
  • Gender, breed, and body weight were not associated with radioulnar ratios, suggesting morphology rather than demographic factors influenced findings.
  • Central and lateral radioulnar pathology may be missed during routine medial elbow arthroscopy, potentially contributing to persistent clinical signs after treatment.
  • Radioulnar malformation may contribute both to MCD pathogenesis and to incomplete success following arthroscopic treatment.

Scharpf

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2026

Assessment of the Conformation of the Radioulnar Joint Comparing Dogs with and without Medial Coronoid Disease

2026-3-vs-scharpf-1

Article Title: Assessment of the Conformation of the Radioulnar Joint Comparing Dogs with and without Medial Coronoid Disease

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Zann 2023 et al., In Long-term outcomes after proximal humeral OC debridement in dogs, what was a consistent finding in all shoulders treated surgically for proximal humeral osteochondrosis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All surgically treated shoulders developed OA and synovitis, with incomplete cartilage infilling.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Moderate-to-severe synovitis.
All surgically treated shoulders developed OA and synovitis, with incomplete cartilage infilling.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 20 dogs (26 shoulders) evaluated at mean 3.5 years post-surgery after arthroscopic or open debridement.
  • Ipsilateral muscle atrophy and decreased range of motion (↓ extension, ↓ flexion) in affected limbs compared to contralateral healthy shoulders.
  • All treated shoulders developed osteoarthritis, confirmed radiographically, by CT, and arthroscopically.
  • Moderate to severe synovitis was present in all shoulders; lesions showed patchy, incomplete cartilage infilling even up to 8.9 years post-op.
  • Kinetic gait analysis showed no significant differences in PVF/VI between affected and unaffected limbs, despite mild lameness clinically.
  • Owners reported good to very good mobility (median LOAD = 6), often underestimating clinical lameness.
  • CT detected larger lesion dimensions than radiographs (wider, deeper defects).
  • Despite progression of OA, surgical debridement was associated with satisfactory long-term function, though not prevention of degenerative changes.

Zann

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

2023-7-VS-zann-1

Article Title: Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Beer 2026 et al., on synovial CRP biomarkers, what was the median synovial CRP concentration reported in dogs with osteoarthritis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs with osteoarthritis had markedly lower synovial CRP concentrations than inflammatory arthropathy groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.2 mg/L.
Dogs with osteoarthritis had markedly lower synovial CRP concentrations than inflammatory arthropathy groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Synovial CRP was significantly lower in osteoarthritis than both IMPA and bacterial infective arthritis (p=0.001 for both comparisons).
  • Synovial CRP could not differentiate IMPA from bacterial infective arthritis (p=0.721), limiting its value as a stand-alone diagnostic test.
  • Median synovial CRP concentrations were 0.2 mg/L (OA), 65.79 mg/L (IMPA), and 60.8 mg/L (infective arthritis).
  • Synovial CRP is useful for distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory arthropathies, but not infectious from sterile inflammatory disease.
  • Synovial neutrophil count positively correlated with synovial CRP in IMPA and infective arthritis, supporting CRP as a marker of joint inflammation.
  • Serum and synovial CRP showed a moderate positive correlation in IMPA cases (r=0.52), although not statistically significant.
  • Higher synovial CRP was associated with increased lameness severity in osteoarthritis (r=0.91, p=0.004).
  • Diagnosis of bacterial infective arthritis remains multifactorial, requiring integration of history, cytology, culture, and treatment response rather than CRP alone.

Beer

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2026

Synovial Fluid C-Reactive Protein as a Biomarker in Osteoarthritis, Immune-Mediated Polyarthritis and Bacterial Infective Arthritis

2026-3-vcot-beer-3

Article Title: Synovial Fluid C-Reactive Protein as a Biomarker in Osteoarthritis, Immune-Mediated Polyarthritis and Bacterial Infective Arthritis

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Beer 2026 et al., on synovial CRP biomarkers, which finding best described synovial CRP concentrations among disease groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Synovial CRP distinguished inflammatory from non-inflammatory arthropathies but not specific inflammatory causes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Synovial CRP was significantly lower in osteoarthritis than both IMPA and infective arthritis.
Synovial CRP distinguished inflammatory from non-inflammatory arthropathies but not specific inflammatory causes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Synovial CRP was significantly lower in osteoarthritis than both IMPA and bacterial infective arthritis (p=0.001 for both comparisons).
  • Synovial CRP could not differentiate IMPA from bacterial infective arthritis (p=0.721), limiting its value as a stand-alone diagnostic test.
  • Median synovial CRP concentrations were 0.2 mg/L (OA), 65.79 mg/L (IMPA), and 60.8 mg/L (infective arthritis).
  • Synovial CRP is useful for distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory arthropathies, but not infectious from sterile inflammatory disease.
  • Synovial neutrophil count positively correlated with synovial CRP in IMPA and infective arthritis, supporting CRP as a marker of joint inflammation.
  • Serum and synovial CRP showed a moderate positive correlation in IMPA cases (r=0.52), although not statistically significant.
  • Higher synovial CRP was associated with increased lameness severity in osteoarthritis (r=0.91, p=0.004).
  • Diagnosis of bacterial infective arthritis remains multifactorial, requiring integration of history, cytology, culture, and treatment response rather than CRP alone.

Beer

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2026

Synovial Fluid C-Reactive Protein as a Biomarker in Osteoarthritis, Immune-Mediated Polyarthritis and Bacterial Infective Arthritis

2026-3-vcot-beer-1

Article Title: Synovial Fluid C-Reactive Protein as a Biomarker in Osteoarthritis, Immune-Mediated Polyarthritis and Bacterial Infective Arthritis

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., in Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats, what type of cartilage injury was most commonly observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cartilage injury occurred in 10 joints, all classified as minor (<10% area affected).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Minor cartilage injury involving <10% of surface.
Cartilage injury occurred in 10 joints, all classified as minor (<10% area affected).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 14 joints from 7 cat cadavers underwent AA-HTS successfully.
  • Median surgical time: 46.5 min (29–144), including 7 min for arthroscopy and 40 min for toggle placement.
  • Intraoperative complications in 5/14 joints: 4 related to femoral tunnel creation, 1 toggle lodging.
  • Toggle passage through femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Cartilage injury occurred in 10 joints, but all were minor (<10% of cartilage area).
  • 13 deviations from planned technique were identified (8 major, 5 minor), all involving femoral tunnel placement.
  • No neurovascular, intrapelvic, or major periarticular injuries occurred.
  • Authors conclude: AA-HTS is feasible in cats, but associated with high rates of minor iatrogenic cartilage damage, intra-op complications, and technique deviations.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-7-VS-espinel-3

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Danielski 2022 et al., on humero-anconeal incongruity, what dynamic sign was frequently observed during elbow manipulation in dogs with HIF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This sign was observed in 16/21 elbows with HIF during dynamic arthroscopy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Clunk-like sensation with anconeal engagement into lesion.
This sign was observed in 16/21 elbows with HIF during dynamic arthroscopy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A novel caudo-medial arthroscopic portal allowed visualization of previously undescribed cartilage lesions on the caudal medial humeral condyle.
  • A consistent focal cartilage lesion (HA lesion) was observed in 100% of elbows with HIF (21/21), but in none of the 31 elbows without HIF.
  • Lesions varied from indentations to full-thickness cartilage loss, typically elliptical and located just medial to the humeral condyle isthmus.
  • A clunk-like sensation and dynamic engagement of the anconeal process into the lesion were observed in 16/21 elbows with HIF during elbow manipulation.
  • In 5/21 elbows, engagement of the anconeal process led to observable widening of the HIF line, suggesting dynamic instability.
  • Findings support a novel concept of humero-anconeal incongruity as a contributor to the pathogenesis of HIF.
  • Spaniel breed was not a confounder—the lesion was only present in elbows with HIF, regardless of breed.
  • The study suggests potential for using arthroscopy as a screening tool for early detection of humero-anconeal incongruity and HIF risk.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

2022-1-VS-danielski2-3

Article Title: Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Joint Disorders
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.