Quiz Question

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., on hip toggle stabilization, which intraoperative complication occurred most frequently?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. K-wire complications (loss or misplacement) occurred in multiple joints, highlighting it as the most frequent issue.
Incorrect. The correct answer is K-wire misplacement or loss during drilling.
K-wire complications (loss or misplacement) occurred in multiple joints, highlighting it as the most frequent issue.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization (AA-HTS) was successfully completed in all 14 feline cadaver joints.
  • Femoral and acetabular tunnel creation was feasible in all cases, though femoral tunnel placement had a higher rate of deviations.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 5/14 joints, mostly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.
  • Minor articular cartilage injury (<10% total cartilage area) occurred in 10/14 joints, but no injury to neurovascular or intrapelvic structures.
  • Thirteen surgical technique deviations (8 major, 5 minor) were identified in 7 joints, all involving the femoral tunnel.
  • Toggle passage through the femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, being mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Postoperative CT and gross dissection confirmed all toggles and buttons were in correct position, without damage to major surrounding structures.
  • No deviations, complications, or cartilage injuries occurred in the last 4 joints, suggesting a learning curve effect.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-6-VS-espinel-1

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In McCagherty 2025 et al., on WID detection accuracy, what was the main type of bacterial population detected in most wound infections?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Most wounds were polymicrobial and dominated by anaerobic species.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Polymicrobial with anaerobic predominance.
Most wounds were polymicrobial and dominated by anaerobic species.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bacterial fluorescence was detected in all wounds (17 dogs, 4 cats) using the point-of-care wound imaging device (WID).
  • The WID confirmed the presence of clinically relevant wound infection in all evaluated cases at the time of imaging.
  • No significant difference was found in bacterial yield or burden between image-guided and non-guided swabs (QBC and PCR; p > 0.05).
  • The WID helped guide wound debridement in some cases by localizing areas of fluorescence, especially in necrotic tissue.
  • Most infections were polymicrobial and dominated by anaerobes, highlighting the need for anaerobic culture inclusion.
  • PCR analysis showed low bacterial DNA yields, often complicated by host DNA contamination, limiting its utility.
  • The study did not evaluate sensitivity/specificity of WID, as only fluorescence-positive wounds were included.
  • Clinical utility of WID lies in immediate visual confirmation of infection, supporting timely antimicrobial treatment decisions.

McCagherty

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Diagnostic value of a point of care bacterial fluorescence imaging device for detecting wound infections in dogs and cats

2025-6-VS-mccagherty-5

Article Title: Diagnostic value of a point of care bacterial fluorescence imaging device for detecting wound infections in dogs and cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., which postoperative complication occurred at a similar frequency between groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative aspiration pneumonia occurred rarely and similarly (S: 4, FFP: 5; no significant difference).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Aspiration pneumonia.
Postoperative aspiration pneumonia occurred rarely and similarly (S: 4, FFP: 5; no significant difference).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Sample: 124 dogs (64 S, 60 FFP); French Bulldogs most common (54/124)
  • Pre-op clinical signs: Exercise intolerance (34/124), stertor (22), regurgitation (7), vomiting (12)
  • Operative time (no concurrent procedure): Longer in FFP (75 vs 51 min, p = .02)
  • Anesthetic time: Longer in FFP (111 vs 80 min, p = .02)
  • Anesthetic complications: Similar rates (FFP 50, S 49; p = .30)
  • Post-op regurgitation: 27/124 (S: 17, FFP: 10; p = .18)
  • Post-op aspiration pneumonia: Rare (S: 4, FFP: 5)
  • Major complications: Rare (5/124); 2 dogs euthanized post-op (1 per group)
  • Revision surgery: Needed in 7/124 (3 S, 4 FFP)

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

2024-1-VS-miller-3

Article Title: Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Devriendt 2022 et al., on EHPSS blood testing, what was a noted **limitation** of the SHA test in clinical practice?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. SHA requires ELISA for measurement, limiting its practicality in everyday clinical settings.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Can only be measured by ELISA, limiting routine use.
SHA requires ELISA for measurement, limiting its practicality in everyday clinical settings.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fasting ammonia (FA) was the most specific test (100%) for confirming EHPSS closure postoperatively.
  • Serum hyaluronic acid (SHA) and MEGX at 15 minutes post-lidocaine were the most sensitive tests (96.9% and 96.2%, respectively).
  • SHA combined with MEGX T15, or with FA or postprandial serum bile acids (SBA), provided 100% sensitivity with good specificity (72.4–82.8%).
  • SHA levels remained elevated in all dogs with persistent shunting, even when other tests were normal.
  • Paired SBA had moderate sensitivity (90%) and variable specificity (89%).
  • The L/MEGX test at 30 min was less useful than at 15 min for assessing closure.
  • Traditional SBA testing showed reduced utility postoperatively; normal values did not rule out persistent shunting.
  • Blood tests improved when combined, but imaging remains essential to definitively confirm EHPSS closure.

Devriendt

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment

2022-7-VS-devriendt-5

Article Title: Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Logothetou 2024 et al., on SPF complications, which patient factor was independently associated with increased complication risk on multivariable analysis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Higher bodyweight significantly increased the odds of complications (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Bodyweight.
Higher bodyweight significantly increased the odds of complications (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Complication rate for subdermal plexus flaps (SPFs) in dogs was 53.6%.
  • Skin staples had a numerically higher complication rate (72.2%) than sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant due to small sample size.
  • Most common complication was wound dehiscence (35%), followed by seroma (14%) and wound discharge (14%).
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with higher complication risk (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).
  • Advancement flaps were associated with a lower incidence of complications on univariable analysis (p < .001).
  • Head region flap closures had fewer complications, while proximal pelvic limb closures had the highest complication rate.
  • Age was a risk factor—each additional year increased odds of complications (OR = 1.019; p = .004).
  • Closure technique did not significantly influence complication severity, though staple use was numerically worse.

Logothetou

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

2024-3-VS-logothetou-2

Article Title: Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Peng 2025 et al., on topical amikacin gel, at what time point were serum levels consistently above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All detectable serum concentrations >2.5 μg/mL occurred at ~2 hours post-application【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2 hours post-application.
All detectable serum concentrations >2.5 μg/mL occurred at ~2 hours post-application【90†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Determine if topical 45 mg/mL amikacin in CMC gel leads to systemic absorption in dogs with wounds.

Dogs enrolled: 11 client-owned dogs, with 31 applications of the gel.

Serum findings:

  • Only 5 of 153 samples were above the 2.5 µg/mL quantification limit
  • All values remained <5 µg/mL, the presumed toxicity threshold
  • No correlation was found between dose-related parameters (mg, mg/kg, mg/cm²) and serum amikacin levels

Peak concentrations were observed at ~2 hours post-application, declining rapidly thereafter

No nephrotoxicity observed, and most values were below detection

Conclusion: Topical amikacin gel appears safe at doses up to 24.9 mg/kg, with minimal systemic absorption

Peng

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

2025-3-VS-peng2-2

Article Title: Serum amikacin concentrations in dogs with naturally occurring open wounds treated with topical amikacin in carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Gant 2025 et al., on skin prep and SSI, what was associated with a significantly increased risk of surgical site infection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lift >10 mm of the iodophor-impregnated incise drape was significantly associated with a higher SSI risk (p = .026).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significant lift of iodophor-impregnated incise drape.
Lift >10 mm of the iodophor-impregnated incise drape was significantly associated with a higher SSI risk (p = .026).

🔍 Key Findings

  • No statistically significant difference in overall SSI rates: 9.2% (chlorhexidine) vs. 7.38% (iodophor) (p = .25).
  • Significant drape lift occurred in 13.2% of cases; those with lift had 2.72× increased risk of SSI (p = .026).
  • Increased body weight was a statistically significant risk factor for SSI (p = .008): each 1 kg increased SSI risk by 3%.
  • Use of glutaraldehyde was associated with a 2.38× increased risk of SSI (p = .055, approaching significance).
  • No difference in SSI rates based on surgeon training level or surgical classification (clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated).

Gant

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Influence of skin preparation on surgical site infection and lift of adhesive surgical drapes

2025-3-VS-gant-1

Article Title: Influence of skin preparation on surgical site infection and lift of adhesive surgical drapes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Smith 2025 et al., on bacterial cultures in TECA dehiscence, what was observed about methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus spp. cultured at incisional dehiscence?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Of the Staphylococcus spp. found at dehiscence, 80% were methicillin resistant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 80% were resistant.
Of the Staphylococcus spp. found at dehiscence, 80% were methicillin resistant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Only 1 of 12 dogs (8.3%) cultured the same single organism (Staphylococcus schleiferi) at TECA and dehiscence sites.
  • In 58.3% (7/12), none of the bacteria from TECA cultures were found at dehiscence.
  • Staphylococcus spp. were isolated in 83.3% of dehiscence samples.
  • Methicillin resistance was high among Staphylococcus isolates: 80% at dehiscence.
  • Antibiotic susceptibility differed in 57% (4/7) of cases where the same bacteria were cultured at both time points.
  • TECA cultures were not predictive of bacteria at incisional dehiscence.
  • 75% of dogs healed with either medical or surgical management.

Recommendation: Repeat cultures at dehiscence to guide antibiotic therapy.

Smith

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

2025-3-VS-smith-4

Article Title: Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Glenn 2024 et al., on client-based SSI surveillance, which algorithm demonstrated the highest overall accuracy for detecting SSIs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Algorithm 3 had the highest accuracy (95.5%) in detecting surgical site infections from client responses.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Algorithm 3.
Algorithm 3 had the highest accuracy (95.5%) in detecting surgical site infections from client responses.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Algorithm 3 had the highest overall accuracy (95.5%) in diagnosing SSIs from client questionnaires.
  • Active surveillance identified 19.4% more SSIs compared to passive surveillance alone.
  • SSI rate was 8.22% across 754 surgeries; 33.9% of SSIs required revision surgery.
  • Client-based responses were 37.9% more frequent than those from referring veterinarians.
  • Deep/implant SSIs could be missed if not associated with visible wound healing problems.
  • Two late SSIs (after 90 days) occurred, both linked to implant surgeries.
  • Algorithm 1 was the most sensitive (87.1%) but less specific; useful for screening.
  • Algorithm 2 had the highest specificity (97.9%); useful as a “rule-in” diagnostic method.

Glenn

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

2024-8-VS-glenn-1

Article Title: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Parlier 2024 et al., on insufflation effects on portal pressure in dogs, which of the following factors significantly affected portal pressure measurements?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No statistical effect was found from weight, ratio, or insufflation round.
Incorrect. The correct answer is None of the above.
No statistical effect was found from weight, ratio, or insufflation round.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal pressure increased proportionally with insufflation pressure: 38% at 6 mmHg, 95% at 10 mmHg, and 175% at 14 mmHg.
  • Exponential model: average increase of 7.45% per mmHg of insufflation pressure (CI: 4.7–10.2%).
  • No systemic hemodynamic adverse effects were observed; MAP remained >60 mmHg throughout.
  • Portal hypertension threshold (15 mmHg) predicted at ~6.4 mmHg insufflation pressure.
  • No statistical impact from patient weight, pressure-to-weight ratio, or order of insufflation rounds.
  • Measurement technique was feasible and safe, with only minor challenges (e.g., catheter kinking).
  • The study supports use of the lowest insufflation pressure needed for visualization to avoid portal hypertension.
  • Baseline portal pressures returned after desufflation, supporting comparison pre- and post-attenuation.

Parlier

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

2024-4-VS-parlier-4

Article Title: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Infection
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.