Quiz Question

In Glenn 2024 et al., on comparative surveillance methods, how did active surveillance affect SSI detection rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24% over passive surveillance alone.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased by 24%.
Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24% over passive surveillance alone.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 754 soft tissue or orthopedic procedures in dogs and cats
  • SSI Rate: 62/754 (8.2%)
  • Algorithms Evaluated:
    • Algorithm 1: Highest sensitivity (87.1%) → best for "rule-out"
    • Algorithm 2: Highest specificity (97.9%) → best for "rule-in"
    • Algorithm 3: Highest overall accuracy (95.5%)
  • Active vs. Passive Surveillance:
    • Active surveillance detected 12 additional SSIs (19.4%) missed by passive
    • Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24%
  • Timing: Most SSIs occurred within 30 days; late infections (after 90 days) were rare and implant-related
  • Conclusion: Client questionnaires are a valid and scalable tool for SSI detection; active surveillance improves outcomes

Glenn

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

2024-1-VS-glenn-2

Article Title: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Smith 2025 et al., on bacterial cultures in TECA dehiscence what was the conclusion about using intraoperative cultures to guide treatment of dehiscence?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cultures during TECA were not reliable predictors of pathogens at dehiscence and repeat cultures were recommended.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They were not predictive and new cultures should be performed.
Cultures during TECA were not reliable predictors of pathogens at dehiscence and repeat cultures were recommended.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Only 1 of 12 dogs (8.3%) cultured the same single organism (Staphylococcus schleiferi) at TECA and dehiscence sites.
  • In 58.3% (7/12), none of the bacteria from TECA cultures were found at dehiscence.
  • Staphylococcus spp. were isolated in 83.3% of dehiscence samples.
  • Methicillin resistance was high among Staphylococcus isolates: 80% at dehiscence.
  • Antibiotic susceptibility differed in 57% (4/7) of cases where the same bacteria were cultured at both time points.
  • TECA cultures were not predictive of bacteria at incisional dehiscence.
  • 75% of dogs healed with either medical or surgical management.

Recommendation: Repeat cultures at dehiscence to guide antibiotic therapy.

Smith

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

2025-3-VS-smith-2

Article Title: Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Folk 2025 et al., on vessel sealing device reuse, what type of sterilization method was used after splenectomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Devices were sterilized using EtO (ethylene oxide) between uses, and no viable aerobic bacteria were cultured post-sterilization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ethylene oxide.
Devices were sterilized using EtO (ethylene oxide) between uses, and no viable aerobic bacteria were cultured post-sterilization.

🔍 Key Findings

40 dogs underwent splenectomy using 16 bipolar vessel sealing devices (VSDs)
Devices were reused up to 4 times after handwashing and ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization
Biologic debris was found in 100% of devices, specifically under the transection blade, even after a single use

  • Mostly scant (14/16) or mild (2/16) debris

No devices or debris yielded positive aerobic culture after EtO sterilization
EtO sterilization proved microbiologically effective despite visible residue
Perioperative failure rate: 1 device (malfunctioned during first activation)

Folk

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Incidence of residual biologic debris and contamination of reused bipolar vessel sealing devices after ethylene oxide sterilization following splenectomy

2025-3-VS-folk-1

Article Title: Incidence of residual biologic debris and contamination of reused bipolar vessel sealing devices after ethylene oxide sterilization following splenectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was a noted potential **benefit** of cell salvage over allogeneic transfusion in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cell salvage removes leukocytes, potentially reducing transfusion reactions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Removal of leukocytes, reducing cytokine-mediated effects.
Cell salvage removes leukocytes, potentially reducing transfusion reactions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-5

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In You 2025 et al., on barbed sutures for lung lobectomy, what was the most common site of air leakage in the barbed suture group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Leakage in the BA group was most frequently seen near the loop effector zone, although overall leakage remained low.
Incorrect. The correct answer is At loop effector end.
Leakage in the BA group was most frequently seen near the loop effector zone, although overall leakage remained low.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Barbed sutures showed comparable leakage pressure to traditional sutures and stapling devices (p = .36).
  • No bronchial leaks occurred at physiological pressure (<20 cmH₂O) in any group.
  • Leakage at supraphysiologic pressure (20–80 cmH₂O) occurred in 90% of stapler, 80% of traditional, and 60% of barbed suture closures.
  • Barbed sutures reduced ligation time significantly compared to traditional sutures (10.7 vs. 14.1 minutes, p < .01).
  • Staplers remained fastest, with mean ligation time of 2.4 minutes.
  • No knot failure or suture breakage was observed in barbed or traditional suture groups.
  • Leakage in barbed sutures occurred mostly at the loop effector zone, but remained within acceptable limits.
  • Barbed sutures may offer an effective alternative when staplers are unavailable, impractical, or cost-prohibitive.

You

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Evaluation of a knotless barbed suture for canine total lung lobectomy: An ex vivo study

2025-7-VS-you-3

Article Title: Evaluation of a knotless barbed suture for canine total lung lobectomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Muroi 2024 et al., on radius plate stress effects, what was the significant effect of locking plate (LP) placement on cranial cortical bone stress?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FEA showed LP placement reduced maximum principal (tensile) stress significantly on the cranial cortex.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It significantly decreased tensile (maximum principal) stress.
FEA showed LP placement reduced maximum principal (tensile) stress significantly on the cranial cortex.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Finite element analysis compared intact radii vs. locking plates placed 1 mm or 3 mm above the bone
  • LP placement significantly reduced tensile (maximum principal) stress on cranial cortex, potentially causing implant-induced osteoporosis
  • Shell element findings:
    • Max principal stress significantly lower in both LP groups vs. intact (p < 0.05)
  • Solid element findings:
    • Equivalent stress higher and max principal stress lower in LP groups
  • Implication: Tension reduction may impair bone remodeling; implant design and placement height affect stress environment

Muroi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Stress Changes in the Canine Radius after Locking Plate Fixation Using Finite Element Analysis

2024-3-VCOT-muroi-1

Article Title: Stress Changes in the Canine Radius after Locking Plate Fixation Using Finite Element Analysis

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Heikkilä 2024 et al., on COPLA scaffold evaluation, which adverse event was observed in the COPLA group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One COPLA-treated dog developed lameness due to a dislodged fragment from the lesion site requiring arthroscopic removal:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fragment dislodgment requiring repeat arthroscopy.
One COPLA-treated dog developed lameness due to a dislodged fragment from the lesion site requiring arthroscopic removal:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 22 dogs (36 shoulders) with shoulder OCD randomly assigned to COPLA scaffold (n=19) or Control (n=17) group
  • At 6 months: Significantly fewer dogs in COPLA group had OA (14% vs. 67%; p = 0.019)
  • At 1.5 years: OA prevalence increased in both groups with no significant difference (COPLA: 64%, Control: 60%)
  • HCPI (pain index) increased significantly at 1 week post-op in COPLA dogs only (p = 0.001), but later normalized
  • Static weight-bearing improved only in unilaterally operated COPLA limbs (p = 0.015)
  • One dog in COPLA group had a fragment dislodge requiring arthroscopic removal
  • Overall, COPLA scaffold may provide short-term benefit in OA reduction, but long-term outcomes were similar

Heikkila

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-heikkila-4

Article Title: Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cherzan 2023 et al., on subcutaneous mast cell tumors, what was the median disease-free interval (DFI) for dogs with lymph node metastasis from subcutaneous mast cell tumors?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lymph node metastasis significantly reduced DFI to a median of 194 days.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 194 days.
Lymph node metastasis significantly reduced DFI to a median of 194 days.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Local recurrence occurred in 17.8% of dogs, and was associated with significantly decreased survival (551 vs 1722 days, p = .0038).
  • Lymph node metastasis occurred in 26.7% of dogs and was significantly associated with shorter disease-free interval (194 vs not reached, p = .0012) and lower survival (551 vs 1722 days, p = .043).
  • Mitotic index >7 was significantly associated with higher recurrence (80% vs 22.5%, p = .02), shorter DFI (139 vs not reached days, p < .001), and shorter survival (247 vs 1722 days, p = .05).
  • Infiltrative growth pattern was associated with shorter DFI (268 vs 1864 days, p = .011), but not with survival or recurrence.
  • Incomplete margins (≤1 mm) were not significantly associated with recurrence (p = .085), but did correlate with shorter DFI (p = .043).
  • Chemotherapy or radiation therapy was associated with shorter DFI and survival, likely due to selection bias for more aggressive disease.
  • Tumor size >3 cm was associated with decreased survival (p = .031), but not with recurrence or DFI.
  • Multinucleation and necrosis were not associated with prognosis outcomes.

Cherzan

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Factors affecting prognosis in canine subcutaneous mast cell tumors: 45 cases

2023-4-VS-cherzan-2

Article Title: Factors affecting prognosis in canine subcutaneous mast cell tumors: 45 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lemmon 2025 et al., on synovitis severity scoring, what variable was most strongly associated with increased cartilage damage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with worse cartilage grades (OR = 2.1, p = .042).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Synovitis severity score.
Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with worse cartilage grades (OR = 2.1, p = .042).

🔍 Key Findings

Synovitis was present in 100% of canine stifles with CCL disease (n = 163).

The most frequent severity score was 3/5 (55.2%), followed by 4/5 (24.5%).

Higher synovitis scores were significantly associated with:

  • Higher median cartilage scores (p = .042, OR = 2.1 per unit increase)
  • Longer duration of clinical signs (p < .001, OR = 1.27 per month)

Bodyweight (p = .083) and sex (p = .17) were not statistically significant in multivariable analysis.

Bucket handle meniscal tears were not associated with synovitis severity.

Clinical implication: Earlier intervention may help reduce synovitis and slow OA progression.

Lemmon

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

2025-3-VS-lemmon-2

Article Title: Arthroscopic synovitis severity scoring in canine stifles with cranial cruciate ligament disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Wood 2024 et al., on knot security and locking throws, what was the effect of a single locking throw on holding strength?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Adding a single locking throw increased the holding strength for all five knots tested.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased in all knots.
Adding a single locking throw increased the holding strength for all five knots tested.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Adding a single locking throw significantly increased holding security for specific knots, including the surgeon's throw (p = .0001) and square throw (p = .0002).
  • For the Miller's throw (p = .166) and strangle throw (p = .808), no significant improvement was observed with a locking throw.
  • After locking throw addition, all five knots leaked at similar pressures (p = .5233), and these pressures exceeded physiologic arterial pressures.
  • Surgeon's throw without a locking throw had the lowest leak pressure (62.5 ± 46.2 mm Hg), below physiologic arterial values.
  • The square throw without locking also leaked below physiologic pressures (148.7 ± 109.4 mm Hg), though it outperformed the surgeon's throw.
  • Miller’s and strangle throws performed significantly better than square or surgeon’s throws without locking, achieving leak pressures >200 mm Hg.
  • All knots used 2-0 polyglyconate monofilament (Maxon); no comparisons across suture types or sizes were performed.
  • Authors concluded that correct tensioning and locking throw addition are key to safe vascular ligation. Miller’s, strangle, or slip knots are preferred for challenging surgical fields.

Wood

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

2024-4-VS-wood-3

Article Title: Influence of a single locking throw on the in vitro holding security of five friction knots using two monofilament suture materials in a canine model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Infection
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.