Quiz Question

In Anderson 2023 et al., on French Bulldogs with humeral condylar fractures, what fixation method was associated with the highest risk of major complications in French Bulldogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This combination had a 7.62x higher risk of major complications (p = .009).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Transcondylar screw + K-wires.
This combination had a 7.62x higher risk of major complications (p = .009).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lateral humeral condylar fractures (LHCF) were most common, comprising 63.6% of cases.
  • Transcondylar screw (TCS) + K-wire(s) fixation had a 7.62x higher risk of major complications compared to other methods (p = .009).
  • All cases of TCS migration occurred in the TCS + K-wire group; none occurred with plate fixation.
  • Overall complication rate was 40.9%, with 29.5% being major and requiring intervention.
  • Contralateral humeral intracondylar fissures (HIF) were found in 58.1% of French Bulldogs with CT data.
  • No significant association between age and presence of HIF, but fissure length increased with age (R = 0.47, p = .048).
  • Younger, lighter dogs had higher complication and screw migration rates, possibly due to softer bone and smaller condyles.
  • TCS + plate fixation had the lowest complication rate, suggesting biomechanical superiority.

Anderson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Humeral condylar fractures and fissures in the French bulldog

2023-1-VS-anderson-2

Article Title: Humeral condylar fractures and fissures in the French bulldog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kang 2024 et al., on sacroiliac fixation strength, which construct had significantly higher maximum failure load under rotational force testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Double HCS provided significantly higher failure load vs single lag screw fixation
Incorrect. The correct answer is Double 2.3-mm headless cannulated screws.
Double HCS provided significantly higher failure load vs single lag screw fixation

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 20 cats with pelvic fractures treated using locking plates with only cortical screws
  • 28 fractures stabilized (ilium: 17, acetabulum: 6, ischium: 3, pubis: 2)
  • Implants: Primarily 1.5/2.0 mm LCPs or String-of-Pearls plates
  • Major complications in 2/20 cases (10%): sciatic entrapment, malunion requiring THA
  • Minor complications in 2/20 cases (10%): plate impingement, transient lameness
  • Clinical union in all cats by 8 weeks; all cats returned to full function
  • Authors conclude cortical screws alone can provide adequate fixation in feline pelvic fractures if screw purchase and bone quality are sufficient

Kang

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Biomechanical Comparison of Double 2.3-mm Headless Cannulated Self-Compression Screws and Single 3.5-mm Cortical Screw in Lag Fashion in a Canine Sacroiliac Luxation Model

2024-1-VCOT-kang-1

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Double 2.3-mm Headless Cannulated Self-Compression Screws and Single 3.5-mm Cortical Screw in Lag Fashion in a Canine Sacroiliac Luxation Model

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Buote 2023 et al., on laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG), on LVSG, which device was primarily used for stomach transection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Endo GIA staplers with purple TriStaple cartridges were used in both live cats.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Endo GIA stapler with TriStaple cartridge.
Endo GIA staplers with purple TriStaple cartridges were used in both live cats.

🔍 Key Findings

  • LVSG was successfully performed in 9/10 cadavers and both live cats, demonstrating procedural feasibility.
  • Mean stomach resected was 27.6% of total weight in cadavers, with no leaks in 8/8 tested or either live patient.
  • Mean surgical time: 110.4 min (cadavers) and 115 min (live cats); no intra- or postoperative complications observed.
  • Stenosis near the incisura occurred in 2 cadavers; attributed to staple placement too close to the lesser curvature.
  • 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs) improved ergonomics and were used in 6/10 cadavers and both live procedures.
  • Live cats lost 21–24% body weight over 3 months, with full return to pre-surgical BCS and no GI complications.
  • Orogastric tube and proper tensioning were critical in preventing gastric stenosis during staple placement.
  • No reinforcement or oversew was used on the staple line; TriStaple cartridges provided reliable closure.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

2023-7-VS-buote2-4

Article Title: Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Butare-Smith 2022 et al., on cerclage knot biomechanics, which cerclage knot had the **highest initial tension** before testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Double-loop had significantly higher resting tension, contributing to better fatigue resistance.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Double-loop knot (323 N).
Double-loop had significantly higher resting tension, contributing to better fatigue resistance.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Double-loop cerclage resisted the highest peak load (805 N) and maintained tension longer than twist (488 N) and single-loop (397 N) configurations.
  • Double-loop cerclage sustained 500,000 cycles at 60–80% of peak load in some cases without loosening, outperforming other types.
  • Twist knots loosened rapidly, often within 10 cycles even at low loads (100–390 N).
  • Single-loop knots performed better than twist, with partial resistance up to 100,000 cycles at 160 N, but showed wide variability.
  • All loosening occurred before wire breakage, indicating clinical failure would happen from slack, not fracture.
  • Double-loop cerclage had highest initial tension (323 N) compared to single-loop (124 N) and twist (69 N).
  • Fatigue limit was not identified for twist, since they all loosened early at even 20% of peak load.
  • Clinical recommendation: double-loop cerclage is best for resisting repeated subfailure loading, ideal for fissure prevention or fragment stabilization.

Butare-Smith

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Double-loop cerclage resists greater loads for more cycles than twist and single-loop cerclage

2022-2-VS-butare-smith-3

Article Title: Double-loop cerclage resists greater loads for more cycles than twist and single-loop cerclage

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, what was the primary reason for anchoring the plate to the tendon instead of the bone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Small proximal calcaneal fragments limited conventional screw fixation, necessitating tendon anchoring.
Incorrect. The correct answer is The proximal bone fragments were too small for screw purchase.
Small proximal calcaneal fragments limited conventional screw fixation, necessitating tendon anchoring.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bone-to-tendon plate fixation allowed successful stabilization of a highly comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog with fragments too small for traditional fixation.
  • The plate was sutured to the common calcaneal tendon using a figure-of-8 pattern, bypassing the need for screw fixation into small proximal fragments.
  • Radiographic union was achieved by 17 weeks, though considered delayed, with the dog returning to normal function by 36 weeks post-op.
  • A second surgery was required to replace the tendon-anchored plate with a calcaneus-only plate due to skin ulceration and implant prominence.
  • Implant-associated infection was suspected; cultures confirmed Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, managed with doxycycline and clindamycin.
  • Use of human placental matrix (hPM) and both autogenous and allogenic bone grafts supported healing, though their specific contribution remains uncertain.
  • Postoperative complications included delayed union and skin ulceration, emphasizing challenges of implant design and soft tissue management.
  • This is the first report of using a bone-to-tendon plate for a calcaneus fracture in dogs and demonstrates its potential in cases where traditional methods are not viable.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Use of a bone‐to‐tendon plate to stabilize a comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog

2022-5-VS-evers-1

Article Title: Use of a bone‐to‐tendon plate to stabilize a comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kang 2024 et al., on sacroiliac fixation strength, which implant required significantly longer placement time?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean placement time for HCS was 712 sec vs 379 sec for CS group (p<0.001)
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.3-mm headless cannulated screws.
Mean placement time for HCS was 712 sec vs 379 sec for CS group (p<0.001)

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 20 cats with pelvic fractures treated using locking plates with only cortical screws
  • 28 fractures stabilized (ilium: 17, acetabulum: 6, ischium: 3, pubis: 2)
  • Implants: Primarily 1.5/2.0 mm LCPs or String-of-Pearls plates
  • Major complications in 2/20 cases (10%): sciatic entrapment, malunion requiring THA
  • Minor complications in 2/20 cases (10%): plate impingement, transient lameness
  • Clinical union in all cats by 8 weeks; all cats returned to full function
  • Authors conclude cortical screws alone can provide adequate fixation in feline pelvic fractures if screw purchase and bone quality are sufficient

Kang

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Biomechanical Comparison of Double 2.3-mm Headless Cannulated Self-Compression Screws and Single 3.5-mm Cortical Screw in Lag Fashion in a Canine Sacroiliac Luxation Model

2024-1-VCOT-kang-5

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Double 2.3-mm Headless Cannulated Self-Compression Screws and Single 3.5-mm Cortical Screw in Lag Fashion in a Canine Sacroiliac Luxation Model

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Deprey 2022 et al., on gap fracture implants, what was the failure mode of the LCP constructs under axial compression?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The LCP constructs failed by plate bending at the screw holes in compression testing.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Plate bending at open screw holes.
The LCP constructs failed by plate bending at the screw holes in compression testing.

🔍 Key Findings

  • NAS-ILN had significantly greater stiffness in both axial compression and 4-point bending compared to LCP constructs.
  • Ultimate load to failure was significantly higher for NAS-ILN in compression (804 N vs 328 N) and bending (25.7 Nm vs 16.3 Nm).
  • Torsional stiffness and angular deformation were similar, but NAS-ILN resisted higher torque to failure than LCP (22.5 Nm vs 19.1 Nm).
  • No slack was observed with the NAS-ILN construct, unlike older nail designs.
  • Failure modes differed: LCPs failed via plate bending; NAS-ILNs failed at the implant or bone near screw holes.
  • Titanium alloy and curved design of NAS-ILN provides better anatomic fit and more uniform stress distribution.
  • A third, perpendicular locking hole in NAS-ILN may enhance torsional stability but was not utilized in this study.
  • The curved, angle-stable design of NAS-ILN is a novel advancement in veterinary orthopedics.

Deprey

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

2022-8-VS-deprey-2

Article Title: Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Low 2024 et al., what was the effect of TCS placement method on screw angulation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Screw angulation was significantly lower with 3D-printed guides compared to other methods:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3D guide produced smallest angle.
Screw angulation was significantly lower with 3D-printed guides compared to other methods:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 47 dogs (57 elbows) underwent TCS placement for HIF
  • Overall complication rate = 17.5%
    • Minor: seromas (7 elbows)
    • Major: septic arthritis (3 elbows) — all resolved with antibiotics
  • No screw failures, medial epicondylar fractures, or catastrophic outcomes noted
  • Long-term follow-up in 41 dogs (50 elbows):
    • 90% full function, 10% acceptable function
    • Mean follow-up = ~2.5 years
  • Increased age was significantly protective (p = 0.0051; OR = 0.61)
  • TCS placement method (freehand, guide, aiming device) significantly impacted screw angulation but not complication rate
  • Outcome not affected by presence of complications

Low

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Long-Term Outcome and Complications after Transcondylar Screw Placement for Canine Humeral Intracondylar Fissure

2024-4-VCOT-low-5

Article Title: Long-Term Outcome and Complications after Transcondylar Screw Placement for Canine Humeral Intracondylar Fissure

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Danielski 2025 et al., on PUO complication reduction, how did **IM pin breakage** affect clinical outcomes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Although breakage occurred in 11.8% of cases, no healing delays were observed.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It had no effect on bone healing.
Although breakage occurred in 11.8% of cases, no healing delays were observed.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined intramedullary (IM) pin and rhBMP-2 use resulted in a low complication rate (7.4%) after proximal ulnar osteotomy (PUO).
  • Major complications occurred in 5.3% of cases (4 infections, 1 pin breakage with ulnar tilt requiring revision).
  • Minor complications occurred in 2.1% of cases (seroma, delayed union).
  • No cases of non-union were observed; 98.9% of limbs achieved radiographic healing by 6 weeks.
  • IM pin breakage was noted in 11.8% of limbs but did not affect healing outcomes.
  • Chondrodystrophic breeds made up 64.8% of the cohort and tolerated the procedure well.
  • Compared to prior studies, complication rates were substantially reduced with this technique (prior major: 13.9%; this study: 5.3%).
  • The use of rhBMP-2 likely enhanced early bone healing and provided biologic support, particularly important in breeds at higher risk of complications.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Impact of intramedullary pinning and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 on postoperative complications after proximal ulnar osteotomy in dogs

2025-6-VS-danielski-4

Article Title: Impact of intramedullary pinning and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 on postoperative complications after proximal ulnar osteotomy in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Butare-Smith 2022 et al., on cerclage knot biomechanics, what was the typical failure mode of the twist cerclage under cyclic loading?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Twist cerclage consistently failed by untwisting, often within 10 cycles.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Knot untwisting and loosening.
Twist cerclage consistently failed by untwisting, often within 10 cycles.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Double-loop cerclage resisted the highest peak load (805 N) and maintained tension longer than twist (488 N) and single-loop (397 N) configurations.
  • Double-loop cerclage sustained 500,000 cycles at 60–80% of peak load in some cases without loosening, outperforming other types.
  • Twist knots loosened rapidly, often within 10 cycles even at low loads (100–390 N).
  • Single-loop knots performed better than twist, with partial resistance up to 100,000 cycles at 160 N, but showed wide variability.
  • All loosening occurred before wire breakage, indicating clinical failure would happen from slack, not fracture.
  • Double-loop cerclage had highest initial tension (323 N) compared to single-loop (124 N) and twist (69 N).
  • Fatigue limit was not identified for twist, since they all loosened early at even 20% of peak load.
  • Clinical recommendation: double-loop cerclage is best for resisting repeated subfailure loading, ideal for fissure prevention or fragment stabilization.

Butare-Smith

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Double-loop cerclage resists greater loads for more cycles than twist and single-loop cerclage

2022-2-VS-butare-smith-2

Article Title: Double-loop cerclage resists greater loads for more cycles than twist and single-loop cerclage

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Implant Selection & Configuration
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.