Quiz Question

In Thibault 2023 et al., on DPO for THR luxation, what was the reported impact of DPO on angle of lateral opening (ALO) and version angle (VA)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. DPO resulted in a median 11° decrease in ALO and an 8° increase in VA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is ALO decreased and VA increased.
DPO resulted in a median 11° decrease in ALO and an 8° increase in VA.

2023-8-VS-thibault-3

Article Title:

Journal:

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Berger 2023 et al., on elbow COR estimation, why may it be challenging to match COR in diseased elbows with the normal contralateral joint?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FMCP causes caudal displacement of COR and landmark changes, complicating surgical alignment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Because FMCP alters bone landmarks and geometry.
FMCP causes caudal displacement of COR and landmark changes, complicating surgical alignment.

🔍 Key Findings

  • COR of elbows with FMCP was significantly more caudal compared to normal elbows, based on CT-derived geometry.
  • In normal elbows, 74% of medial and 93% of lateral axes exited cranial and distal to the epicondyles.
  • In FMCP elbows, 81% of medial and 70% of lateral axes exited caudal and distal to the epicondyles.
  • Different landmark combinations produced slightly different COR approximations, especially between humeral vs. radius/ulna-based axes.
  • The medial-lateral axis using trochlea and capitulum centers provided the most consistent COR approximation.
  • COR estimations based on diseased elbows may not match normal joint geometry, impacting implant alignment accuracy.
  • External epicondylar landmarks may be useful intraoperatively to estimate COR location, but variability limits precision.
  • Drill diameter size may buffer small COR differences, but impact in advanced disease or bilateral cases remains unclear.

Berger

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

2023-1-VS-berger-4

Article Title: The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In McCarthy 2022 et al., on 3D drill guide accuracy, what was the primary finding regarding drill angle deviation in the 3D-GDT group versus FHDT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3D-GDT significantly reduced deviation in both planes, supporting increased accuracy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Craniocaudal and dorsoventral angles were significantly lower with 3D-GDT.
3D-GDT significantly reduced deviation in both planes, supporting increased accuracy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed drill guides (3D-GDT) significantly reduced craniocaudal and dorsoventral drilling angle deviation compared to free-hand drilling technique (FHDT), with statistical significance (p < .0001 and p = .01 respectively).
  • No sacral corridor breaches occurred with 3D-GDT, whereas FHDT resulted in 20% drill exit incidences (3/15 cases).
  • 3D-GDT had lower deviation from optimal drill trajectory at end points in all axes: craniocaudal (1.84 ± 1.6 mm vs. 4.18 ± 2.4 mm), dorsoventral (1.11 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.4 ± 1.5 mm), and 3D linear (2.47 ± 1.4 mm vs. 5.35 ± 2.2 mm), all statistically significant.
  • Strong correlation (r = 0.77) between CT and 3D software measurements validated method reliability.
  • 3D guide trajectories showed consistent proximity to the optimal trajectory, especially at drill endpoints, indicating reduced variability in execution.
  • 3D-GDT was developed using open-source software and inexpensive materials, supporting future clinical application.
  • Major errors in FHDT occurred primarily at the drill endpoint, underscoring the challenge of maintaining optimal angulation during free-hand drilling.
  • The sacral corridor was recharacterized as pyramidal (not quadrilateral), with implications for safer implant placement.

McCarthy

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

2022-1-VS-mccarthy-1

Article Title: Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Heikkilä 2024 et al., on COPLA scaffold evaluation, which parameter improved significantly only in unilaterally operated COPLA limbs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only the unilaterally operated COPLA limbs showed a significant improvement in static weight-bearing at 1.5 years (p=0.015):contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Static weight-bearing on operated limb.
Only the unilaterally operated COPLA limbs showed a significant improvement in static weight-bearing at 1.5 years (p=0.015):contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 22 dogs (36 shoulders) with shoulder OCD randomly assigned to COPLA scaffold (n=19) or Control (n=17) group
  • At 6 months: Significantly fewer dogs in COPLA group had OA (14% vs. 67%; p = 0.019)
  • At 1.5 years: OA prevalence increased in both groups with no significant difference (COPLA: 64%, Control: 60%)
  • HCPI (pain index) increased significantly at 1 week post-op in COPLA dogs only (p = 0.001), but later normalized
  • Static weight-bearing improved only in unilaterally operated COPLA limbs (p = 0.015)
  • One dog in COPLA group had a fragment dislodge requiring arthroscopic removal
  • Overall, COPLA scaffold may provide short-term benefit in OA reduction, but long-term outcomes were similar

Heikkila

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-heikkila-3

Article Title: Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Antonakakis 2022 et al., on telovelar tumor resection, what postoperative imaging finding confirmed complete resection of the tumor?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative MRI showed the fourth ventricle was filled with fluid and no residual mass.
Incorrect. The correct answer is MRI showing fluid-filled fourth ventricle.
Postoperative MRI showed the fourth ventricle was filled with fluid and no residual mass.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Telovelar approach enabled complete resection of a fourth ventricle choroid plexus tumor in a dog without postoperative complications.
  • Postoperative MRI confirmed gross total tumor removal, and the dog remained neurologically normal 28 months post-surgery.
  • The tela choroidea was used as a surgical landmark and incised to allow atraumatic access to the tumor.
  • Cerebellum was spared using this technique, minimizing risk of cerebellar injury (e.g., cerebellar mutism).
  • No hemorrhagic complications were noted during surgery due to dissection through avascular planes.
  • Histopathology favored choroid plexus carcinoma based on mitotic index (9/10 HPFs), though definitive diagnosis remained pending.
  • The case highlights the utility of telovelar over transvermian approach, given its minimally traumatic nature and improved exposure.
  • Survival beyond 2 years without adjunctive therapy suggests surgical excision alone may be curative in select cases.

Antonakakis

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

2022-8-VS-antonakakis-2

Article Title: Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Mullen 2024 et al., on NIRF for GDV, what intraoperative variable was significantly different between viable and nonviable groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Nonviable dogs had significantly higher pre-op lactate (8.55 vs 4.89 mmol/L, p=0.03).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Preoperative lactate.
Nonviable dogs had significantly higher pre-op lactate (8.55 vs 4.89 mmol/L, p=0.03).

🔍 Key Findings

  • NIRF altered surgical strategy in 3 of 20 GDV dogs, identifying necrosis not appreciated subjectively.
  • Fundic fluorescence <10% indicated histologically confirmed gastric necrosis.
  • In 1 dog, NIRF revealed nonviability despite the surgeon’s impression of viability.
  • Staple line fluorescence resembled viable tissue in the only stapled gastrectomy, suggesting preservation of perfusion.
  • GDV dogs (even “viable”) showed lower fluorescence vs. healthy controls, indicating subclinical vascular compromise.
  • Histology confirmed full-thickness necrosis in all 4 dogs with NIRF-defined nonviability.
  • Pre-op lactate was significantly higher in nonviable GDV dogs (8.55 vs 4.89 mmol/L, p=0.03).
  • No complications were reported from ICG use; imaging was safe and repeatable.

Mullen

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Use of real-time near-infrared fluorescence to assess gastric viability in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus: A case-control study

2024-4-VS-mullen-5

Article Title: Use of real-time near-infrared fluorescence to assess gastric viability in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus: A case-control study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Konno 2026 et al., on hepatic mass resection risks, what was the significance of the corrected distance from the mass to the CVC?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Corrected distance was significantly associated with complications (OR: 0.666 per 0.1 cm/kg; p = .017).
Incorrect. The correct answer is It was a key risk factor for severe complications.
Corrected distance was significantly associated with complications (OR: 0.666 per 0.1 cm/kg; p = .017).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Postoperative complications occurred in 17.7% of dogs undergoing hepatic mass resection; mortality was 6.3%
  • Shorter corrected distance from hepatic mass to CVC (per 0.1 cm/kg decrease) was significantly associated with increased complications (OR: 0.666; p = .017)
  • Presence of underlying disease increased complication risk (OR: 2.703; p = .007)
  • Intraoperative hypotension was a strong predictor of complications (OR: 3.589; p = .019)
  • Surgical time was borderline significant in multivariable models (OR: 1.011 per min; p = .052)
  • Liver lobe location (left, central, right) was not significantly associated with complications
  • Prothrombin time (PT) correlated with complication risk in univariable analysis but was not consistently significant in multivariable models
  • CT evaluation of mass proximity to the CVC is a useful preoperative predictor of complication risk

Konno

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Risk factors for complications associated with canine hepatic mass resection: A study of 96 cases

2026-1-VS-konno-2

Article Title: Risk factors for complications associated with canine hepatic mass resection: A study of 96 cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Isono 2025 et al., on tibial malalignment in MPL, which of the following parameters was newly introduced and found to correlate with both TTA and CRA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The PTMTA was a new angle introduced in this study that showed strong correlation with both TTA and CRA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Proximal Tibia Metatarsal Angle (PTMTA).
The PTMTA was a new angle introduced in this study that showed strong correlation with both TTA and CRA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal Tibia Metatarsal Angle (PTMTA) was significantly increased in dogs with grade 3 and 4 MPL, making it a useful marker for severity.
  • PTMTA strongly correlated with Tibial Torsion Angle (TTA) (r = 0.733) and Crural Rotation Angle (CRA) (r = 0.643), integrating multiple morphological deformities.
  • Grade 4 MPL cases showed significant internal tibial torsion, increased mMPTA, and decreased MDTT/PTW—indicating both rotation and medial displacement.
  • DTMTA was significantly more negative in grade 4, indicating a consistent pattern of internal foot rotation with disease severity.
  • PTMTA can be visually assessed during palpation, offering preoperative utility without CT.
  • Among toy poodles, PTMTA showed significant differences even between grades 3 and normal, suggesting breed-specific severity patterns.
  • Corrective osteotomy may need to address tibial as well as femoral deformities in severe MPL cases with high PTMTA.
  • Younger dogs with grade 4 MPL had more severe deformities, possibly due to early onset or developmental progression.

Isono

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-4-VCOT-isono-1

Article Title: Tibial Torsion Malalignment in Small Dogs with Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Longo 2023 et al., on CT trochlear measurements, what best describes the significance of FTA and FTRIA in surgical planning for MPL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FTA and FTRIA had lower sensitivity and specificity than FTGA and were less reliable for guiding surgical decisions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They were less predictive than FTGA and had lower sensitivity.
FTA and FTRIA had lower sensitivity and specificity than FTGA and were less reliable for guiding surgical decisions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dogs with MPL had significantly shallower femoral trochlear grooves compared to controls, based on CT-measured femoral trochlear groove angle (FTGA).
  • FTGA >134° in small breeds (SB) and >128° in medium/large breeds (MLB) were associated with MPL and can serve as surgical thresholds for considering trochleoplasty.
  • FTA and FTRIA measurements were less reliable, showing lower sensitivity/specificity than FTGA.
  • Inter-rater reliability for FTGA was excellent (ICC > 0.9), supporting its use in clinical decision-making.
  • FTGA differed significantly between SB and MLB dogs, suggesting anatomical variation influences MPL predisposition.
  • Dogs with MPL but with FTGA below threshold may not benefit from trochleoplasty, supporting individualized surgical planning.
  • CT provides more precise and reproducible evaluation of trochlear morphology than radiography or ultrasound.
  • The study introduces a CT protocol using P25 and P50 reference points for consistent FTGA measurement.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-longo-3

Article Title: Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Knudsen 2024 et al., on clinical application, what was the negative predictive value of CTA during second reading for experienced observers?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. NPV was reported as ≥91% in the second reading for all observers, indicating strong ability to rule out meniscal injury.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 91–100%.
NPV was reported as ≥91% in the second reading for all observers, indicating strong ability to rule out meniscal injury.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study Design: Prospective case series of 52 scans from 44 dogs with CCL injury.
  • Main Technique: 16-slice CTA; evaluated by 3 observers with varying experience; validated against surgical mini-medial arthrotomy findings.
  • Diagnostic Metrics (Reading 2):
    • Sensitivity: 1.00 (Observers 1 & 2), 0.93 (Observer 3)
    • Specificity: 0.78–0.91
    • Positive Likelihood Ratio: Up to 10.71
    • Negative Likelihood Ratio: As low as 0.08
    • Accuracy: 90%+ for all in Reading 2
  • Observer Effect: Significant improvement between first and second reading for less experienced observers (p < 0.05); learning curve evident.
  • Meniscal lesions found:
    • 9/12 in suspected late meniscal injury cases
    • 19/40 in newly diagnosed CCL cases
    • Most common = bucket handle tears
  • Conclusion: Multidetector CTA is a clinically useful, non-invasive tool for identifying medial meniscal lesions in dogs with CCL disease.

Knudsen

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

2024-1-VS-knudsen-4

Article Title: Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Imaging & Decision-Making
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.