Quiz Question

In Foster 2026 et al., on right hepatic lobectomy, what was the overall perioperative mortality rate in the study population?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Two dogs died perioperatively, yielding a 2.9% mortality rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 2.9%.
Two dogs died perioperatively, yielding a 2.9% mortality rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Perioperative mortality rate was low (2.9%), with no intraoperative deaths reported.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 54.3% of dogs, most commonly hemorrhage and cardiovascular events.
  • 21% of dogs required blood transfusions, though transfusion was not associated with higher complication risk.
  • Advanced hemodynamic support (fluid + cardiovascular) was significantly associated with short-term complications (OR 17.3, p = .029) and shorter survival.
  • No surgical method (e.g., TA stapler, vessel sealing device, hilar resection) was associated with increased risk of complications.
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the most common diagnosis (53%), with an MST of 741 days and 17.6% recurrence.
  • Surgical margins (complete vs incomplete) were not associated with overall survival time in dogs with HCC.
  • The use of preoperative CT and improved surgical instrumentation may have contributed to the lower observed mortality.

Foster

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Outcomes and prognostic variables associated with right divisional hepatic lobectomies in 70 dogs

2026-1-VS-foster-4

Article Title: Outcomes and prognostic variables associated with right divisional hepatic lobectomies in 70 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Ferreira 2025 et al., on heated pneumoperitoneum in dogs, what was the primary finding comparing heated to nonheated CO₂?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dogs insufflated with heated CO₂ had significantly higher final temperatures than those receiving nonheated gas.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Heated CO₂ improved final body temperature.
Dogs insufflated with heated CO₂ had significantly higher final temperatures than those receiving nonheated gas.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Heated CO₂ insufflation reduced perioperative hypothermia during laparoscopic ovariectomy compared to nonheated CO₂.
  • Final body temperature was significantly higher in the heated group (36.03°C) than in the nonheated group (34.93°C).
  • Temperature reduction correlated with surgical duration only in the nonheated group (p < .05).
  • Heated CO₂ delayed temperature drop, occurring after 20 minutes vs. 5 minutes in nonheated cases.
  • No significant differences between groups in anesthetic, surgical, or insufflation times.
  • All dogs recovered uneventfully and were discharged the same day.
  • Heated CO₂ may offer greater benefit in longer procedures or in small-sized dogs prone to hypothermia.
  • No adverse effects were attributed to heated gas use in this clinical trial.

Ferreira

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Effect of heated pneumoperitoneum on body temperature in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy—A randomized controlled trial

2025-5-VS-ferreira-1

Article Title: Effect of heated pneumoperitoneum on body temperature in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy—A randomized controlled trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Poggi 2025 et al., on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cats, what was the reported median postoperative hospitalization duration?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The median hospitalization time following surgery was 3 days (range 2–4 days).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3 days.
The median hospitalization time following surgery was 3 days (range 2–4 days).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was successfully performed in all 22 cats without conversion to open surgery.
  • Complication rate was low: 3 cats had postoperative complications (1 seroma, 1 vomiting, 1 EHBDO and death).
  • Median operating time was 41 minutes; median hospitalization was 3 days.
  • No cases required conversion to open laparotomy, even in cats as small as 2.5 kg.
  • Common devices used: Hemoclips or Hem-o-lok for cystic duct ligation; Ligasure, harmonic scalpel, or j-hook for dissection.
  • Most common indications: cholelithiasis (9/22) and cholecystitis (10/22), with one biliary mucocele and one adenoma.
  • Histopathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases; concurrent liver or intestinal biopsies were performed in some cats.
  • Postoperative AUS and bloodwork were routine and important for detecting early signs of EHBDO.

Poggi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

2025-5-VS-poggi-5

Article Title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Sabol 2024 et al., what critical structure was sometimes <1 mm from the pedicle trajectory in large dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The azygos vein, lungs, and aorta were often <1 mm from implants, especially mid-thoracic:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Azygos vein.
The azygos vein, lungs, and aorta were often <1 mm from implants, especially mid-thoracic:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Evaluated ideal dorsolateral implant trajectories in T1–T13 using CT in 30 dogs across five weight classes.
  • Corridor widths were narrowest in the mid-thoracic vertebrae (as little as 1.8 mm) and increased cranially and caudally.
  • Allowable deviation angles (ADA) were often very small (as little as ), indicating high risk for canal or thoracic structure breach.
  • Distances to critical structures (lungs, aorta, subclavian artery, azygos vein) were often <1 mm, even in large dogs.
  • Data suggest extreme caution and precision are needed for thoracic vertebral implant placement and support use of navigation or 3D-printed guides.

Sabol

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Implantation Corridors in Canine Thoracic Vertebrae: A Morphometric Study in Dogs of Varying Sizes

2024-2-VCOT-sabol-3

Article Title: Implantation Corridors in Canine Thoracic Vertebrae: A Morphometric Study in Dogs of Varying Sizes

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Smith 2025 et al., on bacterial cultures in TECA dehiscence, what percentage of dogs had the same single bacterial species cultured at both time points?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 1 out of 12 dogs (8.3%) had the same single bacteria (Staph schleiferi) at both TECA and dehiscence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 8.3%.
Only 1 out of 12 dogs (8.3%) had the same single bacteria (Staph schleiferi) at both TECA and dehiscence.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Only 1 of 12 dogs (8.3%) cultured the same single organism (Staphylococcus schleiferi) at TECA and dehiscence sites.
  • In 58.3% (7/12), none of the bacteria from TECA cultures were found at dehiscence.
  • Staphylococcus spp. were isolated in 83.3% of dehiscence samples.
  • Methicillin resistance was high among Staphylococcus isolates: 80% at dehiscence.
  • Antibiotic susceptibility differed in 57% (4/7) of cases where the same bacteria were cultured at both time points.
  • TECA cultures were not predictive of bacteria at incisional dehiscence.
  • 75% of dogs healed with either medical or surgical management.

Recommendation: Repeat cultures at dehiscence to guide antibiotic therapy.

Smith

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

2025-3-VS-smith-1

Article Title: Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Berthomé 2025 et al., on prophylactic fenestration in cervical IVDE, which statement best describes complication rates between PF and non-PF groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates (p = .838).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both groups had similar complication rates.
There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates (p = .838).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Prophylactic fenestration (PF) significantly reduced recurrence of cervical intervertebral disc extrusion (0% vs. 37.8%, p < .001).
  • Surgery time was longer with PF (median 182 vs. 110 min, p = .017), but no difference in perioperative complication rates (PF 16.7%, non-PF 18.9%; p = .838).
  • 25% overall recurrence rate, but all recurrences occurred in the non-PF group.
  • Medical management was effective in 92.9% of recurrence cases.
  • Most PF sites targeted adjacent discs; 88.9% were at adjacent levels, which are common recurrence sites.
  • Neurologic outcomes were similar between PF and non-PF dogs post-surgery and at follow-up.
  • Fenestration technique (blade vs. burr) not shown to affect outcome but contributed to extended surgical time.
  • No major complications or deaths linked directly to PF in initial surgeries.

Berthomé

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Recurrence of cervical intervertebral disc extrusion in 55 dogs after surgical decompression with or without prophylactic fenestration

2025-6-VS-berthome-4

Article Title: Recurrence of cervical intervertebral disc extrusion in 55 dogs after surgical decompression with or without prophylactic fenestration

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Parlier 2024 et al., on insufflation effects on portal pressure in dogs, what insufflation pressure was predicted to induce portal hypertension (>15 mmHg)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Portal hypertension was predicted to occur at 6.4 mmHg based on the exponential model.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6.4 mmHg.
Portal hypertension was predicted to occur at 6.4 mmHg based on the exponential model.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal pressure increased proportionally with insufflation pressure: 38% at 6 mmHg, 95% at 10 mmHg, and 175% at 14 mmHg.
  • Exponential model: average increase of 7.45% per mmHg of insufflation pressure (CI: 4.7–10.2%).
  • No systemic hemodynamic adverse effects were observed; MAP remained >60 mmHg throughout.
  • Portal hypertension threshold (15 mmHg) predicted at ~6.4 mmHg insufflation pressure.
  • No statistical impact from patient weight, pressure-to-weight ratio, or order of insufflation rounds.
  • Measurement technique was feasible and safe, with only minor challenges (e.g., catheter kinking).
  • The study supports use of the lowest insufflation pressure needed for visualization to avoid portal hypertension.
  • Baseline portal pressures returned after desufflation, supporting comparison pre- and post-attenuation.

Parlier

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

2024-4-VS-parlier-2

Article Title: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Folk 2025 et al., on vessel sealing device reuse, what was the frequency of positive aerobic cultures from either devices or debris?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No positive aerobic cultures were obtained from devices or debris after EtO sterilization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0%.
No positive aerobic cultures were obtained from devices or debris after EtO sterilization.

🔍 Key Findings

40 dogs underwent splenectomy using 16 bipolar vessel sealing devices (VSDs)
Devices were reused up to 4 times after handwashing and ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization
Biologic debris was found in 100% of devices, specifically under the transection blade, even after a single use

  • Mostly scant (14/16) or mild (2/16) debris

No devices or debris yielded positive aerobic culture after EtO sterilization
EtO sterilization proved microbiologically effective despite visible residue
Perioperative failure rate: 1 device (malfunctioned during first activation)

Folk

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Incidence of residual biologic debris and contamination of reused bipolar vessel sealing devices after ethylene oxide sterilization following splenectomy

2025-3-VS-folk-3

Article Title: Incidence of residual biologic debris and contamination of reused bipolar vessel sealing devices after ethylene oxide sterilization following splenectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Walker 2022 et al., on TPLO mRUST scoring, which minimum score was associated with a 99% likelihood of subjective union?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Scores ≥10/12 were subjectively judged to represent radiographic union in 99% of cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 10/12.
Scores ≥10/12 were subjectively judged to represent radiographic union in 99% of cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO mRUST scoring showed improved inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.56) compared to subjective evaluation (Kappa = 0.33).
  • Intra-rater reliability was similar for both methods (TPLO mRUST: 0.73, subjective: 0.72).
  • TPLO mRUST scores ≥10/12 strongly correlated with radiographic union, as subjectively assessed (99% agreement).
  • No significant difference in healing between first and second TPLO sides (P = .09), countering assumptions about load-bearing impact.
  • Higher initial lameness scores and younger age were associated with higher TPLO mRUST scores, suggesting more robust healing in those groups.
  • Postoperative complications were linked to lower TPLO mRUST scores, indicating impaired healing.
  • Medial cortex was excluded from scoring due to plate obstruction, validating use of only 3 cortices for scoring.
  • The TPLO mRUST system may standardize healing assessment, reducing subjective bias across specialties.

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

2022-8-VS-walker-2

Article Title: Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2023 et al., on TECA-LBO in brachycephalic dogs, what was the overall perioperative complication rate and how did it compare between groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Overall perioperative complications occurred in 27.8% of surgeries; the difference between EBBs (23.5%) and OBs (29.3%) was not statistically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 27.8%; higher in EBBs but not significant.
Overall perioperative complications occurred in 27.8% of surgeries; the difference between EBBs (23.5%) and OBs (29.3%) was not statistically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) presented more acutely and at younger ages, most often with neurological signs compared to other breeds.
  • Preoperative signs such as facial nerve paresis, vestibular syndrome, and Horner’s syndrome were significantly more common in EBBs.
  • EBBs showed more severe imaging findings, including higher rates of otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%).
  • Intraoperative complications were more frequent in EBBs (11.1% vs. 5.3%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .078).
  • Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly between EBBs and other breeds (23.5% vs. 29.3%).
  • Surgical time was significantly longer in EBBs (median 115 vs. 95 minutes; p = .011).
  • MRI or combined CT/MRI were more frequently used in EBBs, likely due to the higher prevalence of neurological signs.
  • Despite anatomical challenges, complication rates in EBBs were comparable, supporting TECA-LBO safety in these breeds.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

2023-5-VS-banks-5

Article Title: Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Healing & Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.