Quiz Question

In Otero Balda 2025 et al., on Short-term outcomes after feline cPSS surgery, what was the 30-day survival rate in cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after surgical attenuation of a single congenital portosystemic shunt?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study reported a 30-day survival rate of 78% in PANS-affected cats.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 78%.
The study reported a 30-day survival rate of 78% in PANS-affected cats.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 78% of cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after congenital portosystemic shunt (cPSS) surgery survived to 30 days.
  • Postattenuation seizures (PAS) were associated with significantly decreased 30-day survival (50% vs. 78%; OR: 0.015, p = .005).
  • Treatment of PANS with propofol was a negative prognostic factor (OR: 0.112, p = .0008).
  • Generalized PAS accounted for most seizure cases and were more frequently fatal than focal or unknown-type seizures.
  • Pretreatment with levetiracetam (LEV1 protocol) showed a trend toward improved survival (100% vs. 60.6% in untreated cats), though not statistically significant (p = .06).
  • Shunt morphology, method of attenuation, and study period (early vs. late) were not significantly associated with 30-day survival.
  • Electrolyte, glucose, and ammonia abnormalities were not strongly linked to survival outcomes in this study.
  • Majority of PAS-related deaths were due to uncontrolled generalized seizures or euthanasia because of severity.

Otero Balda

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

2025-5-VS-otero-1

Article Title: Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Carvajal 2023 et al., on serum biomarkers post-THA, what was the observed trend in CRP levels from preoperative to 6-month follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no significant change across time points, with CRP levels staying within normal limits.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They remained low and stable.
The study found no significant change across time points, with CRP levels staying within normal limits.

🔍 Key Findings

  • C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels remained low at 3 and 6 months after uncomplicated THA in dogs.
  • No significant differences were observed in CRP or SAA between preoperative, 3-month, and 6-month time points.
  • Mean CRP values were 3.8 mg/L pre-op, 0.8 mg/L at 3 months, and 1.4 mg/L at 6 months.
  • Mean SAA values were 13.9 mg/L pre-op, 14.1 mg/L at 3 months, and 18.4 mg/L at 6 months.
  • All dogs recovered normally with no complications or persistent signs of inflammation at follow-up.
  • Study establishes baseline CRP and SAA levels for dogs post-THA, useful for comparison in suspected PJI.
  • These markers may help differentiate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) if values deviate from baseline post-THA.
  • NSAID therapy was discontinued by 6 months in all dogs, possibly reflecting decreased inflammation.

Carvajal

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Serum acute-phase protein concentrations following uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty in dogs

2023-1-VS-carvajal-1

Article Title: Serum acute-phase protein concentrations following uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Enright 2022 et al., on adrenalectomy outcomes, which postoperative complication occurred in dogs and may support use of anticoagulants in hypertensive cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Thromboembolic events were suspected in 3 of the 9 dogs that died postoperatively, particularly in those with difficult-to-control hypertension.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Thromboembolic events.
Thromboembolic events were suspected in 3 of the 9 dogs that died postoperatively, particularly in those with difficult-to-control hypertension.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 83% of dogs survived to discharge after adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.
  • Median survival time post-discharge was 1169 days (3.2 years).
  • Preoperative alpha-blocker therapy (e.g., phenoxybenzamine) was not associated with improved survival.
  • Dogs receiving alpha-blockers had higher intraoperative systolic BP, with median values 170 mmHg vs. 142 mmHg in non-treated dogs (P = .01).
  • Intraoperative arrhythmias occurred in 30% of cases, with no difference between dogs receiving alpha-blockers and those not.
  • Histologic vascular invasion occurred in ~70% of tumors.
  • Tumor recurrence was suspected in 3 dogs, and metastasis in 8 dogs, though not histologically confirmed in most cases.
  • Postoperative complications included refractory hypotension, acute kidney injury, and hypertension persisting >48 hours in 10 dogs.

Enright

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

2022-3-VS-enright-5

Article Title: Short‐ and long‐term survival after adrenalectomy in 53 dogs with pheochromocytomas with or without alpha‐blocker therapy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In González Montaño 2023 et al., on traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP), what was the most common concurrent thoracic injury in patients with traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Pneumothorax was present in 100% of cases and was often bilateral.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Pneumothorax.
Pneumothorax was present in 100% of cases and was often bilateral.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts (TPP) were diagnosed in 11 patients (9 dogs, 2 cats) using CT after blunt trauma.
  • TPPs were identified on radiographs in 64% of cases that were CT-confirmed, highlighting the superior sensitivity of CT.
  • Most cases (7/10) were managed conservatively, with complete recovery and no TPP-related mortality.
  • Thoracic surgery (lung lobectomy) was performed in 3 dogs, due to persistent pneumothorax or large TPP with perceived risk of complications.
  • All pneumothorax cases were managed with thoracostomy tubes, and chest drains were used in 73% of cases.
  • Pneumothorax was present in 100% of patients, often bilateral, and pulmonary contusions were reported in 73%.
  • One cat was euthanized due to unrelated maxillofacial trauma; no deaths were attributed to TPP itself.
  • Long-term follow-up (median 768 days) revealed only 1 case with possible TPP-related pneumonia; others had no complications.

González Montaño

Veterinary Surgery

4

2023

Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

2023-4-VS-gonzalezmontano-2

Article Title: Traumatic pulmonary pseudocysts in nine dogs and two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Fidelis 2025 et al., on suture eyelet geometry, which two anchors most frequently showed **suture failure at the mid-section**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Sutures in raised eyelet anchors (Jorvet and IMEX) commonly failed at the mid-section, indicating cutting or abrasion.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Jorvet and IMEX.
Sutures in raised eyelet anchors (Jorvet and IMEX) commonly failed at the mid-section, indicating cutting or abrasion.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Raised eyelets caused more suture mid-section failures than embedded eyelets, suggesting wear or cutting against the anchor.
  • No significant effect of cyclic loading on failure load (Fmax) was found for any anchor group.
  • Anika anchor showed the least reduction in suture strength relative to the reference (eyebolt screw), indicating a favorable design.
  • All sutures failed via suture breakage, not anchor pullout, indicating suture fatigue was the primary failure mode.
  • Sutures in raised eyelets more often failed at the mid-section, while those in embedded eyelets failed at the knot.
  • IMEX and Jorvet anchors showed significantly reduced Fmax compared to eyebolt screws.
  • Loading direction and anchor design likely affect wear and ultimate failure, particularly in dynamic in vivo conditions.
  • Future designs should aim for embedded, smooth eyelets that can accommodate larger suture sizes without increasing wear.

Fidelis

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

2025-6-VS-fidelis-3

Article Title: Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Kershaw 2025 et al., on PSG vs AD, how many joint penetrations occurred in the PSG group during cadaveric screw placement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 7 PSG placements avoided joint penetration, compared to 3/7 joint penetrations in the AD group.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.
All 7 PSG placements avoided joint penetration, compared to 3/7 joint penetrations in the AD group.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed patient-specific guides (PSGs) significantly improved accuracy of drill hole entry (p < 0.001) and exit (p = 0.044) compared to commercial aiming devices (AD).
  • Zero joint penetrations occurred with PSGs, whereas 3 of 7 AD-guided screws were predicted to penetrate the joint (p = 0.19).
  • Variance in exit point and drill angle was significantly lower in PSG group, suggesting more consistent results.
  • One PSG case failed due to improper guide seating, but this was corrected with improved soft tissue clearance.
  • PSGs enabled safer trajectories despite use by novice surgeons, emphasizing their value in less experienced hands.
  • Drill holes placed with ADs deviated more cranially and distally, increasing the risk of articular violation.
  • Use of PSGs allowed for tighter clustering of drill trajectories, especially in the cranial–caudal axis.
  • Subjective feedback favored PSGs for ease of use and ergonomic design, despite requiring slightly larger incisions.

Kershaw

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

2025-5-VCOT-kershaw-2

Article Title: Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Muroi 2024 et al., on radius plate stress effects, what clinical implication is suggested regarding implant-induced osteoporosis (IIO)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Study concludes IIO and bone changes may stem from reduced tension on plated cortex.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It may result from reduced cortical tension beneath LP.
Study concludes IIO and bone changes may stem from reduced tension on plated cortex.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Finite element analysis compared intact radii vs. locking plates placed 1 mm or 3 mm above the bone
  • LP placement significantly reduced tensile (maximum principal) stress on cranial cortex, potentially causing implant-induced osteoporosis
  • Shell element findings:
    • Max principal stress significantly lower in both LP groups vs. intact (p < 0.05)
  • Solid element findings:
    • Equivalent stress higher and max principal stress lower in LP groups
  • Implication: Tension reduction may impair bone remodeling; implant design and placement height affect stress environment

Muroi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Stress Changes in the Canine Radius after Locking Plate Fixation Using Finite Element Analysis

2024-3-VCOT-muroi-5

Article Title: Stress Changes in the Canine Radius after Locking Plate Fixation Using Finite Element Analysis

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Adams 2024 et al., on canine tibial plateau fractures, what minor complication was observed postoperatively in Case 2?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Case 2 experienced implant yield at 2 weeks, leading to a 0.8 mm step defect on CT.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Screw and K-wire yield with step defect.
Case 2 experienced implant yield at 2 weeks, leading to a 0.8 mm step defect on CT.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Tibial plateau fractures (TPF) are rare in dogs, but can be surgically stabilized with good outcomes even in complex trauma cases.
  • Lateral TPFs (Unger type 41-B1) were approached via caudolateral arthrotomy, with elevation of the lateral meniscus for visualization and use of lag screws and K-wires for fixation.
  • Medial TPF (Unger type 41-B2) was addressed via medial parapatellar approach using K-wires and a figure-of-eight tension band.
  • One minor complication occurred: implant yield at 2 weeks in a case with a concurrent fibular fracture, resulting in a 0.8 mm step defect.
  • No major complications were recorded, and all dogs achieved clinical union with full function by 8–10 weeks.
  • Long-term owner-reported outcomes (LOAD scores) were excellent (5/52), indicating minimal osteoarthritis or chronic pain.
  • Concurrent fibular fractures may increase risk of implant failure and should influence implant selection (e.g., considering buttress plating).
  • Arthroscopic-assisted techniques may be applicable in select cases, but open reduction was preferred due to fragment displacement or concurrent injuries.

Adams

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Prospective evaluation of the surgical stabilization and outcome of canine tibial plateau fractures in three cases

2024-6-VS-adams-2

Article Title: Prospective evaluation of the surgical stabilization and outcome of canine tibial plateau fractures in three cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Frapwell 2026 et al., on humeral condyle morphology, what hypothesis was proposed to explain HIF formation related to condylar shape?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors propose that abnormal condylar angles may generate shear forces orthogonal to the fissure, contributing to HIF pathogenesis.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Shear force orthogonal to the fissure.
Authors propose that abnormal condylar angles may generate shear forces orthogonal to the fissure, contributing to HIF pathogenesis.

🔍 Key Findings

  • HIF-affected dogs had significantly greater angle A and B, indicating increased axial articular angulation of the medial and lateral humeral condyle (p < .001).
  • Vertical condylar height (lengths a and b) was significantly greater in HIF-affected dogs compared to controls (p = .007 and p < .001 respectively).
  • Angle G (dorsal plane medial condyle angle) was also significantly greater in HIF-affected dogs, suggesting altered medial humeral morphology (p < .001).
  • The angle between axial surfaces (A–B angle) was significantly more acute in HIF dogs (107.4° vs. 114.2°, p < .001), suggesting potential for increased shear force.
  • Springer Spaniels with HIF showed significantly greater angulation and vertical height than unaffected Springer controls (p < .001 to .007 across variables).
  • Morphological differences persisted across non-spaniel breeds, reinforcing that altered condylar geometry is not breed-restricted.
  • Authors propose that greater condylar angulation contributes to shear stress, orthogonal to the fissure, possibly contributing to HIF pathogenesis.
  • These morphologic alterations could inform future screening or preventive strategies, and may explain variable surgical outcomes and implant failure.

Frapwell

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Analysis of humeral condylar morphology in dogs with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

2026-1-vs-frapwell-4

Article Title: Analysis of humeral condylar morphology in dogs with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Buote 2023 et al., on laparoscopic gastrectomy in cats, what complication was **not** observed in either live patient after surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No intra- or postoperative complications were reported in the two live cats, including absence of leak, GI signs, or pain.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All of the above.
No intra- or postoperative complications were reported in the two live cats, including absence of leak, GI signs, or pain.

🔍 Key Findings

  • LVSG was feasible in 9/10 feline cadavers with successful stapled gastrectomy and minimal technical complications.
  • Stenosis at the incisura angularis occurred in 2/10 cadavers, associated with staple placement too close to the lesser curvature.
  • Leak testing was negative in 8 cadavers and both live cats, indicating effective staple sealing.
  • Mean stomach resection was ~28%, though less than human standards (~75–80%) for metabolic effects.
  • Surgery was performed safely in two live feline subjects, with no intraoperative or postoperative complications over a 6-month follow-up.
  • Technique refinements included orogastric tube placement and custom 3D-printed cannulas to improve staple line accuracy and avoid stenosis.
  • Tri-Staple purple cartridges provided graduated compression suited for feline gastric tissue thickness (~2.5 mm).
  • No need for staple line oversew in live cats; staple-only closure proved safe in this short-term study.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

2023-6-buote2-3

Article Title: Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in felines: A cadaveric feasibility study and experimental case series in two cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Healing & Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.