Quiz Question

In Peterson 2022 et al., on crescent guide in TPLO, what was the primary benefit observed in novice surgeons using the crescent guide over other devices?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Use of the crescent guide resulted in significantly less medial cortical damage compared to the radial guide and standard jig.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced medial cortical damage.
Use of the crescent guide resulted in significantly less medial cortical damage compared to the radial guide and standard jig.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Crescent guide use resulted in significantly less medial cortical damage (mean 3.8 mm²) than the radial saw guide (35.7 mm²) and standard jig (51.3 mm²) in bone models.
  • No significant difference in osteotomy accuracy (distance of eccentricity, coronal or axial angulation) among crescent guide, radial guide, or standard jig in either bone models or cadavers.
  • Device application time was shortest with the crescent guide and longest for the radial saw guide.
  • Osteotomy time was fastest with the crescent guide compared to the radial saw guide (P = .015).
  • Participants rated the crescent guide easier to apply than both the radial saw guide (P < .005) and the standard jig (P = .015).
  • 5 of 6 novice participants preferred the crescent guide over the other devices for performing TPLO.
  • Subjective ease of osteotomy performance was higher with the crescent guide vs. radial guide (P < .001).
  • Crescent guide does not assist in fragment stabilization or plateau rotation unlike a standard TPLO jig.

Peterson

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Evaluation of a crescent saw guide for tibial plateau‐leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

2022-3-VS-peterson-1

Article Title: Evaluation of a crescent saw guide for tibial plateau‐leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In O'Marra 2026 et al., on perioperative septic peritonitis, what was the most commonly reported cause of recurrent septic peritonitis in dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Gastrointestinal dehiscence was the most common cause of recurrent septic peritonitis, which carried a poor survival rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Dehiscence of gastrointestinal surgical site.
Gastrointestinal dehiscence was the most common cause of recurrent septic peritonitis, which carried a poor survival rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Early enteral nutrition (<24–48 hrs) is associated with improved survival and reduced hospitalization in dogs with septic peritonitis.
  • Appropriate empirical antimicrobials improve survival in cats, but data are mixed in dogs.
  • Recurrent septic peritonitis (RecSP) has poor survival (0%–43.9%); most common cause is gastrointestinal dehiscence.
  • Intraoperative hypotension and preoperative hypoalbuminemia may increase dehiscence risk, though findings are inconsistent.
  • Lidocaine CRI during surgery improves survival over opioids alone in dogs.
  • Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is not recommended due to risks of coagulopathy and kidney injury; albumin use is controversial.
  • Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is under-recognized but contributes to mortality; IAP monitoring should be considered.
  • Diagnostic tests (effusion lactate, glucose, cytology) are unreliable for detecting RecSP; clinical judgment and ultrasound are advised.

O'Marra

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

2026-1-VS-omarra-3

Article Title: Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Sunlight 2022 et al., on Protein C monitoring, what was the most common reason for requiring a second PTCE procedure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This was the most frequent finding at repeat venography in dogs needing second procedures.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Compression and contraction of previously placed coils.
This was the most frequent finding at repeat venography in dogs needing second procedures.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Postoperative Protein C (PC) activity increased in 78.7% of dogs, and was significantly higher in dogs with excellent clinical outcomes.
  • Complete acute shunt occlusion resulted in higher postoperative PC activity (96.3%) and better ultimate clinical outcomes than incomplete occlusion.
  • Preoperative PC was not predictive of clinical status, but postoperative PC was associated with improved outcomes.
  • Standard biochemical markers (HCT, MCV, ALB, BUN) also improved postoperatively, especially in dogs with excellent clinical outcomes.
  • Dogs requiring a second procedure had significantly lower postoperative PC (43.5%) than those not requiring further intervention (78.5%).
  • Repeat procedures improved PC and BUN values, with PC increasing significantly after second intervention (to 69.8%).
  • PC normalization (within reference interval) occurred in 87.5% of dogs with excellent clinical status, compared to only 12.5% in those with poor status.
  • Clinical outcome classification (excellent/fair/poor) correlated with biochemical normalization and lack of need for diet/medications.

Sunlight

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Protein C and comparative biochemical changes in dogs treated with percutaneous transvenous coil embolization of congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

2022-1-VS-sunlight-4

Article Title: Protein C and comparative biochemical changes in dogs treated with percutaneous transvenous coil embolization of congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Latifi 2022 et al., on forelimb fascial mapping, which statement is TRUE regarding nerve transection during tumor resection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cutaneous innervation is often redundant, and functional loss is limited if only superficial branches are transected.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Sensory loss from radial nerve transection is usually minimal due to overlapping innervation.
Cutaneous innervation is often redundant, and functional loss is limited if only superficial branches are transected.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia was present over most of the canine forelimb, but key areas like the elbow, carpus, and manus lacked robust fascial planes for wide resection.
  • Type I fascia (discrete sheet) was primarily found in the antebrachium, with type IV (periosteal) fascia located at the olecranon, scapular spine, and accessory carpal bone.
  • Distal antebrachial fascia was thin and adherent, often blending with carpal structures and lacking reliable surgical planes.
  • Partial tenectomy or joint capsule resection was often required for wide excision in the distal limb, especially over the triceps tendon and carpus.
  • Nerve transections (e.g., superficial radial or ulnar branches) were commonly needed to maintain fascial margins, though often with minimal functional loss due to overlapping innervation.
  • Digital and metacarpal pads lacked clear deep fascial borders, making digit amputation necessary for oncologic margins in distal tumors.
  • Dissections revealed fascial junctions as either Type A (easily separable) or Type B (risk of disruption), guiding resection plane selection.
  • Findings provide a surgical map to guide preoperative planning for superficial tumor excision on the forelimb.

Latifi

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

2022-1-VS-latifi-4

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction systems, how did the complication rates compare between groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The 3D-MIPO group had a 27% complication rate compared to 14% in the c-MIPO group.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Higher in 3D-MIPO.
The 3D-MIPO group had a 27% complication rate compared to 14% in the c-MIPO group.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The study was a historic case-control trial comparing custom 3D-printed VSP-guided MIPO (3D-MIPO) to conventional MIPO (c-MIPO) in dogs with diaphyseal tibial fractures.
  • Surgical time was significantly shorter in the 3D-MIPO group (117 min vs. 151 min; p = .014), and fluoroscopy use was dramatically reduced (11 vs. 37 images; p < .001).
  • All 3D-MIPO reductions were acceptable or near-anatomic; 2 c-MIPO dogs had unacceptable reductions.
  • Tibial length, frontal, and sagittal alignment post-op were similar between groups; no significant difference in anatomic restoration (p > .1).
  • Radiographic union occurred in all dogs by 3 months. Time to union was similar between groups (3D-MIPO: 67 days vs. c-MIPO: 53 days; p = .207).
  • Postoperative complication rate was higher in 3D-MIPO (27% vs. 14%), including 2 major infections requiring implant removal.
  • 3D-MIPO required more pre-op time (~23 hours longer from presentation to surgery; p = .002), partly due to guide printing/sterilization.
  • Improved surgical efficiency and more consistent reductions were noted in the 3D-MIPO group, supporting its clinical utility despite increased pre-op logistics.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Virtual surgical planning and use of a 3D‐printed, patient‐specific reduction system for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of diaphyseal tibial fractures in dogs: A historic case control study

2024-6-VS-scheuermann2-5

Article Title: Virtual surgical planning and use of a 3D‐printed, patient‐specific reduction system for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of diaphyseal tibial fractures in dogs: A historic case control study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Dickson 2024 et al., on VATS for feline chylothorax, what was the most common postoperative complication?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 5 of 15 cats developed persistent pleural effusion, the most frequent complication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Persistent pleural effusion.
5 of 15 cats developed persistent pleural effusion, the most frequent complication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Objective: To evaluate outcomes and complications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for idiopathic chylothorax in 15 cats.
  • All 15 cats underwent thoracoscopic thoracic duct ligation (TDL); 13 also had simultaneous pericardectomy, 2 had VATS TDL + laparoscopic cisterna chyli ablation (CCA), and 1 cat had an open CCA.
  • Median surgical time was 152.5 minutes (range 60–255).
  • Contrast was used intraoperatively in 13 cats; 11 received methylene blue, and 2 received indocyanine green (ICG).
  • One intraoperative complication (6%) occurred — a minor intercostal artery laceration. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 3 cases (20%) due to visualization issues or bleeding.
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 8 cats (53%), with persistent pleural effusion in 5 cats (33%) being the most common.
  • Mortality was high: 4 cats (27%) died or were euthanized before discharge. Only 7 of 11 cats discharged had resolution of effusion, and recurrence occurred in 1.
  • Authors concluded that while VATS is technically feasible in cats, it did not improve clinical outcomes compared to open surgery, and feline idiopathic chylothorax continues to have a high mortality rate.

Dickson

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Outcome of video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment of idiopathic chylothorax in 15 cats

2024-5-VS-dickson-1

Article Title: Outcome of video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment of idiopathic chylothorax in 15 cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Israel 2022 et al., on cerclage wire in THR, which of the following statements about cerclage wire outcomes is CORRECT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No wire-related complications or failures occurred in the study's 184 THRs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No complications were reported from cerclage wire use.
No wire-related complications or failures occurred in the study's 184 THRs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No proximal femoral fractures occurred in any of the 184 hips with cerclage wire placement
  • Cerclage wire was well tolerated, with no failures or complications related to the wire
  • Application of a single cerclage wire took <10 minutes, was cost-effective, and required minimal instrumentation
  • 3 postoperative complications (1 fissure, 2 fractures) occurred distal to the cerclage site, near the stem tip, requiring plate/screw fixation
  • All dogs returned to normal activity, and all owners were satisfied with the outcome
  • Cerclage placement location is critical—must be proximal to the lesser trochanter and close to the calcar to resist hoop strain
  • Biomechanical evidence supports that cerclage wires improve resistance to hoop strain and subsidence of cementless stems
  • Press-fit cementless stems may settle, but when supported by cerclage, this does not result in fractures even in undersized implants

Israel

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

2022-2-VS-israel-3

Article Title: Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Logothetou 2024 et al., on SPF complications, which anatomic site for SPF reconstruction was associated with the fewest complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Flaps on the head had significantly fewer complications compared to other regions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Head.
Flaps on the head had significantly fewer complications compared to other regions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Complication rate for subdermal plexus flaps (SPFs) in dogs was 53.6%.
  • Skin staples had a numerically higher complication rate (72.2%) than sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant due to small sample size.
  • Most common complication was wound dehiscence (35%), followed by seroma (14%) and wound discharge (14%).
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with higher complication risk (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).
  • Advancement flaps were associated with a lower incidence of complications on univariable analysis (p < .001).
  • Head region flap closures had fewer complications, while proximal pelvic limb closures had the highest complication rate.
  • Age was a risk factor—each additional year increased odds of complications (OR = 1.019; p = .004).
  • Closure technique did not significantly influence complication severity, though staple use was numerically worse.

Logothetou

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

2024-3-VS-logothetou-3

Article Title: Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Williams 2024 et al., on adrenaline use in maxillary nerve blocks, which breed showed significantly higher **normalized hemorrhage** despite adrenaline use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Even after adjusting for weight, English bulldogs bled more (p = .048).
Incorrect. The correct answer is English Bulldog.
Even after adjusting for weight, English bulldogs bled more (p = .048).

🔍 Key Findings

  • The addition of adrenaline (0.00198%) to bilateral maxillary nerve blocks significantly reduced intraoperative hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy (median reduction: 77.1%).
  • Normalized hemorrhage (g/kg) and total hemorrhage (g) were significantly lower in the adrenaline group (p = .021 and p = .013, respectively).
  • Surgeon-assessed hemorrhage scores were also significantly lower in the adrenaline group (median 2 vs. 3; p = .029), indicating improved surgical visibility.
  • No adverse effects (e.g. tachycardia, arrhythmia, or hypertension) were observed with adrenaline administration.
  • A standardized intraoral approach to the maxillary nerve block was used with 0.5 mL per side regardless of dog size.
  • Breed effect observed: English Bulldogs had higher normalized hemorrhage, possibly due to anatomical variation or underdosing relative to size.
  • Adrenaline may also prolong local anesthetic action and reduce blood aspiration risks, though this was not directly measured.
  • The study supports the routine inclusion of adrenaline in maxillary nerve blocks for staphylectomy in BOAS patients to improve surgical field and reduce bleeding.

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-8-VS-williams-5

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Heald 2022 et al., on PED wound therapy, which of the following statements best describes the cat's outcome after PED treatment?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Culture on day 17 showed no infection, and the wound healed fully by day 47.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PED resolved infection and wound healed by day 47.
Culture on day 17 showed no infection, and the wound healed fully by day 47.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Electroceutical dressing (PED) promoted complete healing of chronic wounds in both a dog and a cat previously unresponsive to standard therapies.
  • Infection clearance occurred in both animals by the end of PED therapy, as shown by negative culture results.
  • In the dog, wound area reduced by ~4.2× over 10 days; healing completed by day 67 with no further antibiotic therapy.
  • In the cat, wound area reduced by ~2.5× over 17 days; healing completed by day 47 without systemic antibiotics.
  • PEDs function via direct current (DC) stimulation, believed to generate hypochlorous acid (HOCl) with antibacterial properties.
  • No side effects or adverse tissue reactions were observed in either case, supporting biocompatibility.
  • Multidrug-resistant organisms (e.g., S. pseudintermedius, S. canis, S. epidermidis) were eradicated by PED treatment.
  • PED therapy may reduce reliance on antibiotics and surgery, offering a novel adjunct for chronic, infected wounds.

Heald

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Electroceutical treatment of infected chronic wounds in a dog and a cat

2022-3-VS-heald-4

Article Title: Electroceutical treatment of infected chronic wounds in a dog and a cat

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Healing & Complications
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.