
Quiz Question
In Moreira 2024 et al., which CCWO technique resulted in the lowest mean prediction error for postoperative TPA?
2024-1-VS-moreira-1
In Sullivan 2025 et al., on TTT stabilization methods, what theoretical advantage does the spacer pin technique offer?
🔍 Key Findings
- Spacer pin fixation showed no difference in failure force or stiffness compared to tension band wire (TBW) or 2-pin techniques.
- All constructs failed under loads >1000 N, exceeding estimated peak quadriceps force in dogs during walking (~240 N).
- Patellar ligament failure was the most common mode of failure across all groups (5–8 samples per group).
- Distal tibial crest fractures were seen only in 2-pin and spacer pin groups, not in TBW group, suggesting TBW may protect against crest failure.
- No failures occurred at pin tracts, possibly due to pin placement within patellar ligament footprint.
- Spacer pin technique avoids placing pins through the tuberosity, potentially reducing risks of soft tissue complications like tendinopathy or irritation.
- Use of partial osteotomy with robust distal crest may substitute for TBW without compromising initial mechanical strength.
- Further in vivo or cyclic loading studies are required, as this cadaveric study tested only acute tensile failure.
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
3
2025
Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs
2025-3-VCOT-sullivan-4
In Cheon 2025 et al., on guide accuracy in DFO, what correction capacities were designed into the universal guide?
🔍 Key Findings
- Both patient-specific and universal guides yielded correction errors <2°, with no statistically significant difference in accuracy.
- Universal guide corrected aLDFA up to 24° and AA up to 20°, addressing multiplanar deformities effectively.
- Patient-specific guides allowed for preoperative simulation, providing more stable pin placement and potentially aiding less-experienced surgeons.
- Universal guide eliminated the need for CT-based customization, reducing time and cost.
- Cadaver and bone model trials showed consistent accuracy, validating both methods in vitro and ex vivo.
- No significant differences in outcome when correcting uniplanar (aLDFA) vs biplanar (aLDFA + AA) deformities.
- Universal guide's fixed size presented limitations in small dogs, potentially requiring multiple size options.
- Universal guide showed potential for standard use, offering repeatable outcomes with minimal prep despite needing precise intraoperative placement.
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
3
2025
Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs
2025-3-VCOT-cheon-2
In Gutbrod 2024 et al., on feline tibial stabilization, what intramedullary pin diameter was associated with the highest biomechanical performance?
🔍 Key Findings
- 2.4 mm LCP with a 1.6 mm IM pin had the highest axial stiffness and yield strength among the tested constructs.
- Axial stiffness was significantly higher in the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm IM pin group compared to 2.7 mm LCP alone (p = .013).
- No significant difference in torsional stiffness was found among groups.
- 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin had the lowest stiffness and failure load, underperforming both other constructs.
- All constructs failed via valgus bending, consistent with clinical observations in feline tibial fractures.
- A 1.6 mm pin (~50% canal fill) resulted in superior construct performance vs. 1.0 mm (~30% fill).
- Group 2 (2.4 LCP + 1.6 mm pin) outperformed the 2.7 mm LCP alone in stiffness, despite using a smaller plate.
- Plate–rod constructs may better preserve periosteal blood supply and support minimally invasive stabilization strategies.
Veterinary Surgery
4
2024
Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia
2024-4-VS-gutbrod-3
In Cheon 2025 et al., on guide accuracy in DFO, how did correction accuracy compare between uniplanar and biplanar deformities?
🔍 Key Findings
- Both patient-specific and universal guides yielded correction errors <2°, with no statistically significant difference in accuracy.
- Universal guide corrected aLDFA up to 24° and AA up to 20°, addressing multiplanar deformities effectively.
- Patient-specific guides allowed for preoperative simulation, providing more stable pin placement and potentially aiding less-experienced surgeons.
- Universal guide eliminated the need for CT-based customization, reducing time and cost.
- Cadaver and bone model trials showed consistent accuracy, validating both methods in vitro and ex vivo.
- No significant differences in outcome when correcting uniplanar (aLDFA) vs biplanar (aLDFA + AA) deformities.
- Universal guide's fixed size presented limitations in small dogs, potentially requiring multiple size options.
- Universal guide showed potential for standard use, offering repeatable outcomes with minimal prep despite needing precise intraoperative placement.
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
3
2025
Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs
2025-3-VCOT-cheon-5
In Mazdarani 2025 et al., on simulated muscle loading, what was the clinical significance of using hip mobility in limb press models?
🔍 Key Findings
- Simulated quadriceps and gastrocnemius forces increased proportionally with axial load in all three femoral fixation models.
- Model 2 (rigid fixation) resulted in subphysiologic quadriceps forces and abnormally high gastrocnemius forces, reducing model fidelity.
- Models 1 and 3 (with hip mobility) produced more physiologic quadriceps and force ratios, especially under 30–40% bodyweight loads.
- Force ratios were significantly lower in rigid fixation (Model 2) compared to hip-mobile models (p = .007), suggesting model design affects simulated muscle coordination.
- Joint angles (stifle and hock) remained within acceptable limits, though slight flexion occurred with increasing load.
- Relative foot position differed by ~3.9 mm between models 2 and 3, with model 2 showing a more caudal position.
- Model 3 preserved benefits of hip mobility while allowing radiographic documentation, making it a preferred setup for future studies.
- The study suggests that models used in feline stifle stabilization research may underestimate physiologic forces, especially with rigid fixation designs.
Veterinary Surgery
5
2025
Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press
2025-5-VS-mazdarani-5
In Allaith 2023 et al., on THR outcomes, which implant types were associated with increased complications following femoral head and neck excision?
🔍 Key Findings
From Allaith et al., 2023 – Outcomes from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry
- 2375 total hip replacements were analyzed across 1852 dogs, making this the largest multiuser canine THR dataset to date.
- Most common indications for THR were hip dysplasia (51%) and osteoarthritis (34%).
- Implants used included Kyon (46%), BioMedtrix CFX (22%), Hybrid (11%), BFX (9%), and Helica (4.5%).
- Veterinary-reported complication rate was 8.5%, while owner-reported was 23%, with moderate agreement (k=0.44).
- Most common complications: Luxation, femoral fracture, and aseptic loosening.
- BioMedtrix BFX and Helica implants had a higher risk of complications when used after femoral head and neck excision (P = .031).
- Postoperative LOAD scores significantly improved vs preoperative (21 → 11; P < .0001), supporting improved mobility.
- Owner satisfaction was high, with 88% rating outcome as very good or good.
Veterinary Surgery
2
2023
Outcomes and complications reported from a multiuser canine hip replacement registry over a 10-year period
2023-2-VS-allaith-2
In Longo 2022 et al., on CT-guided osteotomies, what was the most common osteotomy location used in this study?
🔍 Key Findings
- 3D CT volume rendering and CAL measurement successfully guided correction of femoral and tibial torsion in dogs with patellar luxation (PL).
- Physiological patellar tracking was restored in 100% (22/22) of cases after detorsional osteotomy.
- 94% of dogs (17/18) had either full or acceptable functional outcomes post-surgery.
- CAL-based correction was accurate in 19/22 cases, confirming reliability of the measurement technique.
- Complication rate was 45%, with major complications in 2/22 cases—both involved combined femoral and tibial osteotomies.
- Combined femoral and tibial osteotomies in the same limb were linked to a higher risk of complications and poorer outcomes.
- Diaphyseal osteotomies offered more implant space, but metaphyseal locations were associated with faster bone healing.
- Use of a TPLO jig or goniometer was not essential—CAL-based bone marking was sufficient in most cases.
Veterinary Surgery
7
2022
Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs
2022-7-VS-longo-4
In Wilson 2025 et al., on acetabular measurement accuracy, which method demonstrated the highest intra- and interobserver reliability?
🔍 Key Findings
Study population: 73 hips from 60 dogs undergoing cementless THR.
Methods evaluated:
- ACVD/ACOLL (acetabular circle on VD or OLL view)
- ALVD/ALOLL (acetabular line)
- FHCVD/FHCOLL/FHCCCHB (femoral head circle)
- Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver consistency were excellent for ACVD and ACOLL.
- FHC methods consistently underestimated actual cup size by 2.4–3.6 mm.
- AC and AL methods had low bias (±0.5 mm) and better predictive value.
- OA severity negatively affected the accuracy of all measurements (p < .05).
- Highest predictive accuracy was ~49% using ACVD with rounding down protocol.
Veterinary Surgery
1
2025
Evaluation of three acetabular measurement methods for total hip replacement in dogs
2025-1-VS-wilson-1
In Lomas 2025 et al., on hybrid THR in cats, what was the most common indication for total hip replacement (THR) in this cohort?
🔍 Key Findings
- Hybrid THR in cats showed no major complications across 17 hips in 15 cats, including 2 bilateral cases.
- Postoperative radiographs confirmed stable implant positioning with no loosening, migration, or dislocation in follow-up imaging.
- Mean owner satisfaction was high, with a mean short-form feline musculoskeletal pain index (sf-FMPI) score of 2/36 at a mean follow-up of 438 days.
- SCFE (slipped capital femoral epiphysis) was the most common indication, seen in 13/17 hips.
- Partial tenotomy of rectus femoris origin resolved intraoperative medial patella luxation in 3 cases—no cats required surgical correction later.
- A micro BFX cup allowed for increased acetabular offset, possibly reducing luxation risk even when using a +0 femoral head offset.
- Hybrid THR was successfully used as a revision for failed CFX THR due to recurrent luxation—implants remained stable post-revision.
- Use of oversized cups (12 mm) with shallow seating or medial breach still resulted in stable outcomes, suggesting good implant fixation even with reduced bone stock.
Veterinary Surgery
6
2025
Medium‐term outcomes of hybrid total hip arthroplasty in cats: Cemented femoral stem and cementless acetabular cup in 17 hips (2020–2023)
2025-6-VS-lomas-1
Quiz Results
You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly
Key Findings
