Quiz Question

In Song 2024 et al., on CT vs cystoscopy for ectopic ureters in dogs, what did the authors conclude regarding CT's role in surgical planning?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CT misclassified too many dogs to serve as the sole diagnostic tool; cystoscopy is recommended for confirmation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CT should be confirmed with cystoscopy.
CT misclassified too many dogs to serve as the sole diagnostic tool; cystoscopy is recommended for confirmation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT correctly identified ectopic ureters in 91% of dogs, but missed 50% of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
  • Sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, while specificity was 71%, indicating moderate diagnostic performance.
  • Sensitivity for extramural ectopic ureters was only 29%, despite a high specificity of 97%.
  • CT was inaccurate in predicting ureteral orifice location, with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 76% depending on the site.
  • 26% of dogs were misclassified for cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA) eligibility based on CT findings alone.
  • Overall CT accuracy for CLA candidacy was 74%, but a significant minority would have been inappropriately treated.
  • Multivariate analysis found no predictive factors (e.g., colon distension, body weight) for when CT would be incorrect.
  • Authors recommend confirmatory cystoscopy to verify CT findings prior to treatment planning.

Song

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

2024-3-VS-song-5

Article Title: Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Ibrahim 2022 et al., on scrotal arterial supply, what was concluded regarding the use of scrotal flaps in neutered dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Neutered or cryptorchid dogs may have insufficient scrotal tissue for reliable flap design.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Scrotum may be too small or absent.
Neutered or cryptorchid dogs may have insufficient scrotal tissue for reliable flap design.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dorsal scrotal arteries, branching from the ventral perineal arteries, are the dominant arterial supply to the scrotum in dogs.
  • The ventral scrotal arteries, arising from the external pudendal arteries, perfused only the cranial scrotal border and were inconsistently present or absent in some dogs.
  • A scrotal flap based on the dorsal scrotal arteries showed strong perfusion and may be a viable axial pattern flap.
  • Perfusion was consistent across fresh and frozen cadavers, showing no difference due to preservation method.
  • Poor flap survival (27%) occurred when based on cranial supply alone (i.e., ventral scrotal arteries), confirming importance of preserving caudal supply.
  • There are anastomoses between dorsal and ventral scrotal arteries, offering collateral flow but insufficient alone for complete perfusion.
  • Scrotal flaps based on the caudal pedicle may be applicable for reconstruction of proximal medial/lateral thigh wounds.
  • Proposed flap requires careful preservation of ventral perineal arteries, ideally designed 2.5–3 cm lateral to midline in large dogs.

Ibrahim

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Arterial supply to the scrotum: A cadaveric angiographic study

2022-4-VS-ibrahim-4

Article Title: Arterial supply to the scrotum: A cadaveric angiographic study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Loh 2024 et al., on treatment outcomes for CvHL in dogs, which nonsurgical method had the highest success rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hobbles achieved a 61.8% success rate, the highest among nonsurgical treatments.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Hobbles.
Hobbles achieved a 61.8% success rate, the highest among nonsurgical treatments.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Low-trauma events caused 82.9% of CvHL cases; Poodles and poodle-crosses represented 49.4% of cases.
  • Success rate of hobbles (61.8%) was significantly higher than closed reduction alone (10.3%) or Ehmer sling (18.5%).
  • Multivariate analysis found hobbles 7.62x more likely to succeed vs. closed reduction (p = .001).
  • Specialist surgeons had higher success with nonsurgical management (OR: 2.68; p = .047).
  • Older age associated with better outcomes (OR: 1.15 per year; p < .0005).
  • Ehmer sling is not recommended due to high failure and complication rates (60.6%).
  • Toggle rod stabilization had a high surgical success rate (88.2%) with low complication.
  • No link was found between CvHL and hip dysplasia or OA in most cases (only 2/108 showed OA).

Loh

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Caudoventral hip luxation in 160 dogs (2003–2023): A multicenter retrospective case series

2024-4-VS-loh-1

Article Title: Caudoventral hip luxation in 160 dogs (2003–2023): A multicenter retrospective case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Zweig 2025 et al., on healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures, what conclusion was reached regarding non-surgical management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Non-surgical management resulted in good to excellent outcomes but was associated with medial patellar luxation in some dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It is acceptable but may increase patellar luxation risk.
Non-surgical management resulted in good to excellent outcomes but was associated with medial patellar luxation in some dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgically managed TTAF resulted in excellent clinical outcomes at skeletal maturity, with all dogs having normal limb function and no stifle instability.
  • Surgical treatment significantly altered proximal tibial morphology, including decreased tibial plateau angle (TPA) and increased patellar position (PP) compared with the contralateral limb.
  • Axial tibial tuberosity position (TTP-A) increased and transverse position (TTP-T) decreased in surgically treated stifles, indicating distal and caudal tuberosity migration.
  • Non-surgically managed TTAF did not significantly alter tibial morphology or PP, but outcomes were more variable.
  • Medial patellar luxation developed in 2/6 non-surgically treated dogs, whereas none occurred in surgically managed cases.
  • Pins-only and pin–tension band constructs produced similar radiographic changes and outcomes.
  • Despite morphologic changes, no dogs developed cruciate ligament instability at follow-up.
  • Non-surgical management yielded good to excellent owner-reported outcomes, but carried a potential increased risk of patellar luxation.

Zweig

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

6

2025

Treatment outcome and radiographic appearance of healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in skeletally mature dogs: 21 cases (2016–2023)

2025-6-VCOT-zweig-5

Article Title: Treatment outcome and radiographic appearance of healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in skeletally mature dogs: 21 cases (2016–2023)

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Song 2024 et al., on CT vs cystoscopy for ectopic ureters in dogs, what percentage of dogs with normal ureters were missed by CT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CT correctly identified all ectopic ureters in 91% but missed half of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 50%.
CT correctly identified all ectopic ureters in 91% but missed half of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT correctly identified ectopic ureters in 91% of dogs, but missed 50% of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
  • Sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, while specificity was 71%, indicating moderate diagnostic performance.
  • Sensitivity for extramural ectopic ureters was only 29%, despite a high specificity of 97%.
  • CT was inaccurate in predicting ureteral orifice location, with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 76% depending on the site.
  • 26% of dogs were misclassified for cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA) eligibility based on CT findings alone.
  • Overall CT accuracy for CLA candidacy was 74%, but a significant minority would have been inappropriately treated.
  • Multivariate analysis found no predictive factors (e.g., colon distension, body weight) for when CT would be incorrect.
  • Authors recommend confirmatory cystoscopy to verify CT findings prior to treatment planning.

Song

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

2024-3-VS-song-1

Article Title: Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cola 2024 et al., on laparotomy-assisted endoscopy, what was the primary factor associated with the need to convert to enterotomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Intestinal wall damage was significantly associated with surgical conversion (p = .043).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Intestinal wall damage.
Intestinal wall damage was significantly associated with surgical conversion (p = .043).

🔍 Key Findings

  • LAER was effective (partial or complete) in 35/40 cases, regardless of FB location or type.
  • Intestinal wall damage significantly increased the likelihood of conversion to enterotomy (p = .043).
  • LAER led to significantly shorter hospitalization (median 48 h vs 72 h; p = .006).
  • Patients in the LAER group required less postoperative analgesia (median 36 h vs 48 h; p < .001).
  • Faster return to spontaneous feeding was seen in LAER group (median 24 h vs 36 h; p = .012).
  • No significant difference in complication rate or postoperative ileus between LAER and enterotomy groups.
  • Sharp, linear, or multiple FBs did not significantly affect LAER effectiveness.
  • Conversion to surgery was required in 5/40 LAER attempts, mostly due to immovable FBs or intestinal damage.

Cola

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Laparotomy‐assisted endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal foreign bodies: Evaluation of this technique and postoperative recovery in dogs and cats

2024-7-VS-cola-1

Article Title: Laparotomy‐assisted endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal foreign bodies: Evaluation of this technique and postoperative recovery in dogs and cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Song 2024 et al., on CT vs cystoscopy for ectopic ureters in dogs, what proportion of dogs were misclassified for CLA candidacy based on CT findings alone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 26% of cases were misclassified for CLA based on CT, underlining its limitations for treatment planning.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 26%.
26% of cases were misclassified for CLA based on CT, underlining its limitations for treatment planning.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT correctly identified ectopic ureters in 91% of dogs, but missed 50% of normal ureters, limiting its negative predictive value.
  • Sensitivity for intramural ectopic ureters was 65%, while specificity was 71%, indicating moderate diagnostic performance.
  • Sensitivity for extramural ectopic ureters was only 29%, despite a high specificity of 97%.
  • CT was inaccurate in predicting ureteral orifice location, with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 76% depending on the site.
  • 26% of dogs were misclassified for cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA) eligibility based on CT findings alone.
  • Overall CT accuracy for CLA candidacy was 74%, but a significant minority would have been inappropriately treated.
  • Multivariate analysis found no predictive factors (e.g., colon distension, body weight) for when CT would be incorrect.
  • Authors recommend confirmatory cystoscopy to verify CT findings prior to treatment planning.

Song

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

2024-3-VS-song-4

Article Title: Receiver operating characteristics of computed tomography (CT) compared to cystoscopy in diagnosis of canine ectopic ureters: Thirty-five cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lhuillery 2022 et al., on GDV stabilization timing, which preoperative intervention was key to enabling delayed surgery without compromising outcomes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These methods effectively decompressed the stomach and prevented redilatation during delay.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Trocarization and nasogastric tube placement.
These methods effectively decompressed the stomach and prevented redilatation during delay.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Survival rates did not differ between immediate (90 min) and delayed (≥5 h) surgical stabilization groups at discharge or 1-month post-op (approx. 80% survival in both).
  • Hyperlactatemia at 24 hours post-fluid therapy was significantly associated with in-hospital and 1-month mortality (P = .01 and P = .02).
  • Persistent tachycardia during hospitalization was linked to increased 1-month mortality (P = .015).
  • Partial gastrectomy was required in ~6–10% of cases, with high associated mortality.
  • Preoperative stabilization protocols (trocarization, nasogastric tube) allowed safe surgical delays up to 13.7 hours without impacting survival.
  • Degree of gastric torsion differed between groups; more 0° torsions in delayed cases, potentially due to decompression-induced derotation.
  • No difference in post-op complications such as arrhythmias, hypotension, or AKI between groups.
  • More intra-anesthetic deaths occurred in immediate surgery group, highlighting importance of adequate pre-op stabilization.

Lhuillery

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

2022-5-VS-lhuillery-3

Article Title: Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Healy 2025 et al., on incidental PBBs, what recommendation is made regarding prophylactic lung resection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. With no SP observed, authors do not recommend prophylactic lung removal for incidental PBBs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Not justified based on study data.
With no SP observed, authors do not recommend prophylactic lung removal for incidental PBBs.

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 2,178 canine CTs reviewed retrospectively.
Prevalence: Incidental PBBs found in 1.37% (30/2178).
Outcome: None of the dogs with incidental PBBs developed clinical spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) over a median follow-up of 1255 days.
Significant Associations:

  • Age: Dogs with PBBs were significantly older (median 10.5 yrs vs. 8.2 yrs, p = .001).
  • CT indication: PBBs more likely during neoplastic staging (p = .006).

PBB Characteristics:

  • Total = 60 PBBs (median 1/dog; range 1–7).
  • Location: 35% in left caudal, 31.6% right caudal, only 13.3% in right cranial lobe.
  • Size-based: 25 bullae (>10 mm), 35 blebs (≤10 mm).

Conclusion: Prophylactic resection of incidental PBBs not justified given no observed SP risk in this population.

Healy

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Significance of incidentally identified bullae and blebs on thoracic computed tomography and prevalence of subsequent pneumothorax in dogs

2025-1-VS-healy-3

Article Title: Significance of incidentally identified bullae and blebs on thoracic computed tomography and prevalence of subsequent pneumothorax in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on intestinal obstruction and catheter technique in cats, what was the overall success rate of the red rubber catheter technique (RRCT) for removing linear foreign bodies?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The RRCT successfully removed LFBOs in 20 out of 24 cases, representing 83% success.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 83%.
The RRCT successfully removed LFBOs in 20 out of 24 cases, representing 83% success.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cats with linear (LFBO) and discrete (DFBO) small intestinal obstructions had similar survival (98.2% vs. 97%, p = 1.0).
  • Postoperative complications were not significantly different between LFBO and DFBO cases (p = .1386).
  • Intestinal dehiscence was rare (only 2 cats), both in DFBOs, with no statistical difference between groups.
  • Red rubber catheter technique (RRCT) successfully removed LFBOs in 83% (20/24) of attempts.
  • All failed RRCTs occurred in cats with perforations or tissue nonviability.
  • Cats with failed RRCTs had longer clinical signs pre-surgery (median 6.5 vs. 2.0 days).
  • Surgical time was longer in LFBO cats (median 77 min vs. 58 min, p = .0018).
  • Preoperative septic peritonitis was rare (4/169 cats), but occurred only in linear or mixed FBO cases.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Linear and discrete foreign body small intestinal obstruction outcomes, complication risk factors, and single incision red rubber catheter technique success in cats

2024-7-VS-miller-1

Article Title: Linear and discrete foreign body small intestinal obstruction outcomes, complication risk factors, and single incision red rubber catheter technique success in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Conservative vs Surgical
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.