Quiz Question

In Latifi 2022 et al., on forelimb fascial mapping, which fascial type was most frequently observed in the antebrachium of dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Type I fascia predominated in the antebrachium, although it thinned distally and became less reliable.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Type I fascia (discrete fascial sheet).
Type I fascia predominated in the antebrachium, although it thinned distally and became less reliable.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia was present over most of the canine forelimb, but key areas like the elbow, carpus, and manus lacked robust fascial planes for wide resection.
  • Type I fascia (discrete sheet) was primarily found in the antebrachium, with type IV (periosteal) fascia located at the olecranon, scapular spine, and accessory carpal bone.
  • Distal antebrachial fascia was thin and adherent, often blending with carpal structures and lacking reliable surgical planes.
  • Partial tenectomy or joint capsule resection was often required for wide excision in the distal limb, especially over the triceps tendon and carpus.
  • Nerve transections (e.g., superficial radial or ulnar branches) were commonly needed to maintain fascial margins, though often with minimal functional loss due to overlapping innervation.
  • Digital and metacarpal pads lacked clear deep fascial borders, making digit amputation necessary for oncologic margins in distal tumors.
  • Dissections revealed fascial junctions as either Type A (easily separable) or Type B (risk of disruption), guiding resection plane selection.
  • Findings provide a surgical map to guide preoperative planning for superficial tumor excision on the forelimb.

Latifi

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

2022-1-VS-latifi-1

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Schroeder 2022 et al., on fascial anatomy mapping, what surgical approach may be required for tumors near the 13th rib?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The fascia near the 13th rib is thin and prone to tearing; subperiosteal elevation or rib removal is needed to preserve margins.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C. Subperiosteal elevation or partial rib ostectomy.
The fascia near the 13th rib is thin and prone to tearing; subperiosteal elevation or rib removal is needed to preserve margins.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascial planes in dogs were consistently classifiable into four surgical types:
  • Type I (discrete sheets), Type II (tightly adhered to thin muscle), Type III (tightly adhered to thick muscle), and Type IV (periosteum-associated).
  • Two junction types were identified: Type A (easily elevated) and Type B (higher risk of disruption).
  • Disruption-prone areas include the scapular spine (type IV fascia) and lateral thorax near the 13th rib, where rib resection may be needed to preserve margins.
  • The latissimus dorsi transition zones and fascial areas near the thoracic inlet and scapulohumeral joint were prone to fascial thinning or disruption.
  • Partial muscle resections or periosteal elevations may be required in areas with fragile fascia to maintain oncologic margins.
  • Dorsal spinous processes (T6–L6) showed type IV fascia; however, osteotomy may be needed in some dogs for clear margins.
  • Blended fascial transitions (e.g., rectus abdominis: type II cranially, type I caudally) necessitate intraoperative judgment on resection depth.
  • Cutaneous trunci may suffice as a deep margin for small, low-grade tumors in well-muscled dogs, but not reliably for high-grade or larger masses.

Schroeder

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

2022-1-VS-schroeder-3

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Jones 2024 et al., on elbow OA cysts, which joints were most commonly affected by SBCs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 62% of SBCs were found in the humerus, making it the most affected site.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Humerus.
62% of SBCs were found in the humerus, making it the most affected site.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Sample: 38 Labrador Retrievers (76 elbows)
  • SBCs (subchondral bone cysts):
    • Not found in elbows without OA
  • Increased number and size with OA severity:
    • Grade 1: median 3 SBCs
    • Grade 2: 9 SBCs
    • Grade 3: 20 SBCs (p < .001)
    • Larger SBCs in more severe OA (OR = 1.056, p = .012)
  • Locations: 62% humerus, 28% ulna, 10% radius
  • Sex and Age Effects:
    • Older dogs had larger SBCs (p = .013)
    • Female dogs had smaller SBCs (p = .002)
    • SBC number unrelated to age or sex

Jones

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Evaluation of subchondral bone cysts in canine elbows with radiographic osteoarthritis secondary to elbow dysplasia

2024-2-VS-jones-2

Article Title: Evaluation of subchondral bone cysts in canine elbows with radiographic osteoarthritis secondary to elbow dysplasia

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Schroeder 2022 et al., on fascial anatomy mapping, what is the characteristic of type I fascia?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Type I fascia is defined as discrete fascial sheets visible to the naked eye and easily dissectible.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C. Discrete, clearly dissectible fascial sheets.
Type I fascia is defined as discrete fascial sheets visible to the naked eye and easily dissectible.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascial planes in dogs were consistently classifiable into four surgical types:
  • Type I (discrete sheets), Type II (tightly adhered to thin muscle), Type III (tightly adhered to thick muscle), and Type IV (periosteum-associated).
  • Two junction types were identified: Type A (easily elevated) and Type B (higher risk of disruption).
  • Disruption-prone areas include the scapular spine (type IV fascia) and lateral thorax near the 13th rib, where rib resection may be needed to preserve margins.
  • The latissimus dorsi transition zones and fascial areas near the thoracic inlet and scapulohumeral joint were prone to fascial thinning or disruption.
  • Partial muscle resections or periosteal elevations may be required in areas with fragile fascia to maintain oncologic margins.
  • Dorsal spinous processes (T6–L6) showed type IV fascia; however, osteotomy may be needed in some dogs for clear margins.
  • Blended fascial transitions (e.g., rectus abdominis: type II cranially, type I caudally) necessitate intraoperative judgment on resection depth.
  • Cutaneous trunci may suffice as a deep margin for small, low-grade tumors in well-muscled dogs, but not reliably for high-grade or larger masses.

Schroeder

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

2022-1-VS-schroeder-1

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Healy 2025 et al., on incidental PBBs, which lung lobe was most frequently affected?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 35% of the PBBs were located in the left caudal lung lobe.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Left caudal lobe.
35% of the PBBs were located in the left caudal lung lobe.

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 2,178 canine CTs reviewed retrospectively.
Prevalence: Incidental PBBs found in 1.37% (30/2178).
Outcome: None of the dogs with incidental PBBs developed clinical spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) over a median follow-up of 1255 days.
Significant Associations:

  • Age: Dogs with PBBs were significantly older (median 10.5 yrs vs. 8.2 yrs, p = .001).
  • CT indication: PBBs more likely during neoplastic staging (p = .006).

PBB Characteristics:

  • Total = 60 PBBs (median 1/dog; range 1–7).
  • Location: 35% in left caudal, 31.6% right caudal, only 13.3% in right cranial lobe.
  • Size-based: 25 bullae (>10 mm), 35 blebs (≤10 mm).

Conclusion: Prophylactic resection of incidental PBBs not justified given no observed SP risk in this population.

Healy

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Significance of incidentally identified bullae and blebs on thoracic computed tomography and prevalence of subsequent pneumothorax in dogs

2025-1-VS-healy-5

Article Title: Significance of incidentally identified bullae and blebs on thoracic computed tomography and prevalence of subsequent pneumothorax in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Quitzan 2022 et al., on staple line configuration, what was concluded about the vertical staple line?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No FEESA constructs leaked from the vertical staple line in the study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No leakage occurred from this location.
No FEESA constructs leaked from the vertical staple line in the study.

🔍 Key Findings

  • All FEESA configurations leaked at lower pressures than intact segments, confirming reduced integrity vs. native tissue.
  • FEESA with 3-row transverse staples (3V/3T or 2V/3T) had significantly higher leak pressures than 2-row configurations.
  • 3V/3T configuration had the highest ILP (69.88 ± 21.23 mmHg) among all groups, significantly greater than 2V/2T and 3V/2T (P < .001).
  • Leakage consistently occurred at the transverse staple line (not vertical), regardless of configuration.
  • No significant difference in maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) between FEESA groups.
  • All FEESA constructs withstood intraluminal pressures >25 mmHg, exceeding normal physiological jejunal pressure in dogs.
  • No leaks occurred from the vertical staple line, highlighting it as a more robust closure site.
  • Third staple row in transverse line may be a viable alternative to suture oversew, pending further clinical evaluation.

Quitzan

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study

2022-5-VS-quitzan-5

Article Title: Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Farrugia 2025 et al., on BODPUO location effects, what impact did initial proximal ulna angle (IPUA) have on surgical outcome?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Patients with initial ulna angles near 90° had greater triceps force influence and more ulna tilt change.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Higher IPUA (near 90°) led to greater ulna tilt.
Patients with initial ulna angles near 90° had greater triceps force influence and more ulna tilt change.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal BODPUOs (closer to 26–28% of ulna length) resulted in greater increases in proximal ulna tilt postoperatively (up to 18°).
  • Distal osteotomies (closer to 48–49%) yielded minimal change in ulna angle.
  • Strong linear relationship between osteotomy location and change in angle; correlation coefficient = 0.73.
  • Initial proximal ulna angle (IPUA) influences results—angles closer to 90° yielded greater changes.
  • Craniocaudal osteotomy angle had minimal impact on tilt change after adjusting for location.
  • Osteotomy length had no significant effect on change in angle.
  • Prediction intervals showed wide individual variation in outcomes, especially with more proximal osteotomies.
  • No increase in complications was associated with more proximal osteotomies, contrary to past assumptions.

Farrugia

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

2025-6-VS-farrugia-3

Article Title: Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Weisse 2026 et al., on HAVM treatment outcomes, why does DOV occlusion often achieve better durability than TAE?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. DOV targets the venous outflow (“sump”), promoting thrombosis of the nidus and reducing recurrence compared to arterial embolization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It eliminates the low-pressure venous outflow driving the AVM.
DOV targets the venous outflow (“sump”), promoting thrombosis of the nidus and reducing recurrence compared to arterial embolization.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgical management significantly improves survival vs medical therapy, with MST ~1942d vs 567d (p = .028), supporting intervention over conservative care.
  • DOV occlusion achieves superior initial occlusion rates (95% vs 56% for TAE; p = .007), making it more reliable for immediate flow cessation.
  • TAE has significantly higher recurrence rates (53% vs 15% for DOV; p < .001), often requiring repeat procedures.
  • Residual HAVM flow is more common after TAE (44% vs 5%), reflecting difficulty targeting the nidus via arterial routes.
  • Overall survival time between TAE and DOV is not significantly different, but more DOV patients remain alive at follow-up (55% vs 11%; p = .003).
  • Quality of life outcomes favor DOV, with 78% “excellent” vs 27% in TAE (p = .018).
  • Multiple arterial supply sources (e.g., gastric, phrenic, intercostal arteries) complicate complete embolization and contribute to recurrence (Figure 6, page 17).
  • Restoration of hepatopetal portal flow is a key success indicator, particularly after DOV occlusion (page 16 discussion).

Weisse

Veterinary Surgery

3

2026

Procedural descriptions and survival times for hepatic arteriovenous malformations (HAVM) in animals receiving primarily conservative treatment, arterial embolization, or dominant outflow vein occlusion

2026-3-vs-weisse-5

Article Title: Procedural descriptions and survival times for hepatic arteriovenous malformations (HAVM) in animals receiving primarily conservative treatment, arterial embolization, or dominant outflow vein occlusion

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Bounds 2023 et al., on feline hip arthroscopy, which limb positioning provided optimal joint visualization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This positioning maximized joint space and visualization in all hips.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Neutral duction with 90° extension and traction.
This positioning maximized joint space and visualization in all hips.

2023-8-VS-bounds-1

Article Title:

Journal:

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

In Raleigh 2022 et al., on pericardiectomy complications, what preoperative finding may serve as a warning sign for intraoperative VF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 7 of 16 dogs had arrhythmias (e.g., VPCs, VT, bradycardia) before VF occurred.
Incorrect. The correct answer is ECG-detected arrhythmias.
7 of 16 dogs had arrhythmias (e.g., VPCs, VT, bradycardia) before VF occurred.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 3% of pericardiectomy cases across reporting institutions.
  • 14 of 16 dogs (88%) that developed intraoperative VF died, indicating high mortality.
  • Electrosurgical devices were used in 15/16 dogs; VF onset coincided with their use in 8 dogs, suggesting a potential but unproven association.
  • Preoperative arrhythmias were seen in 7 dogs (e.g., VPCs, VT, bradycardia), possibly serving as early warning signs.
  • Thoracoscopic approach was used in 75% of cases; however, conversion to open surgery was required in 9/13 thoracoscopic procedures after VF onset.
  • Defibrillation was attempted in 13 dogs, but only 3 converted to sinus rhythm, and only 2 survived postoperatively.
  • VF may result from stray current or cardiac manipulation; bipolar energy devices were implicated despite lower theoretical risk.
  • Preventative strategies include judicious electrosurgery use, close ECG monitoring, rapid CPR preparedness, and preop cardiac risk assessment.

Raleigh

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

The development of ventricular fibrillation as a complication of pericardiectomy in 16 dogs

2022-4-VS-raleigh-4

Article Title: The development of ventricular fibrillation as a complication of pericardiectomy in 16 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
‍
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Anatomy & Surgical Approach
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.