Quiz Question

In Israel 2022 et al., on cerclage wire in THR, what is the most appropriate placement location for the cerclage to prevent proximal femoral fractures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This location targets the area of greatest hoop strain and is essential for preventing fissures during press-fit implantation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Proximal to the lesser trochanter and near the calcar.
This location targets the area of greatest hoop strain and is essential for preventing fissures during press-fit implantation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No proximal femoral fractures occurred in any of the 184 hips with cerclage wire placement
  • Cerclage wire was well tolerated, with no failures or complications related to the wire
  • Application of a single cerclage wire took <10 minutes, was cost-effective, and required minimal instrumentation
  • 3 postoperative complications (1 fissure, 2 fractures) occurred distal to the cerclage site, near the stem tip, requiring plate/screw fixation
  • All dogs returned to normal activity, and all owners were satisfied with the outcome
  • Cerclage placement location is critical—must be proximal to the lesser trochanter and close to the calcar to resist hoop strain
  • Biomechanical evidence supports that cerclage wires improve resistance to hoop strain and subsidence of cementless stems
  • Press-fit cementless stems may settle, but when supported by cerclage, this does not result in fractures even in undersized implants

Israel

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

2022-2-VS-israel-2

Article Title: Outcome of canine cementless collared stem total hip replacement with proximal femoral periprosthetic cerclage application: 184 consecutive cases

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, which liver lobes showed significantly lower CT localization accuracy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These lobes were significantly more prone to localization errors.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Quadrate and right lateral.
These lobes were significantly more prone to localization errors.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT localization of liver masses was more accurate by division (88%) than by lobe (74.3%)
  • Inter-radiologist agreement was excellent for division (kappa up to 0.885) and only moderate–good for lobe
  • Quadrate and right lateral lobes had significantly lower localization accuracy compared to left lateral or medial lobes
  • CT localization of the left division was most accurate (90.1%) compared to central (77.1%) and right (88.3%)
  • Portal and hepatic venous phases were equally helpful for localization (each ~30–38% usefulness)
  • No significant associations found between histopathologic diagnosis and localization accuracy
  • Lobe-level CT localization should be interpreted with caution, especially for the quadrate and right lateral lobes
  • Radiologist experience likely influenced accuracy, with the most experienced radiologist performing best

Thomsen

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Computed tomography scan accuracy for the prediction of lobe and division of liver tumors by four board-certified radiologists

2024-7-VS-thomsen-2

Article Title: Computed tomography scan accuracy for the prediction of lobe and division of liver tumors by four board-certified radiologists

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lhuillery 2022 et al., on GDV stabilization timing, what was noted about degree of gastric torsion between immediate and delayed groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Delayed cases had fewer 180°/270° torsions, likely due to spontaneous derotation post-decompression.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Delayed group had more 0° torsions.
Delayed cases had fewer 180°/270° torsions, likely due to spontaneous derotation post-decompression.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Survival rates did not differ between immediate (90 min) and delayed (≥5 h) surgical stabilization groups at discharge or 1-month post-op (approx. 80% survival in both).
  • Hyperlactatemia at 24 hours post-fluid therapy was significantly associated with in-hospital and 1-month mortality (P = .01 and P = .02).
  • Persistent tachycardia during hospitalization was linked to increased 1-month mortality (P = .015).
  • Partial gastrectomy was required in ~6–10% of cases, with high associated mortality.
  • Preoperative stabilization protocols (trocarization, nasogastric tube) allowed safe surgical delays up to 13.7 hours without impacting survival.
  • Degree of gastric torsion differed between groups; more 0° torsions in delayed cases, potentially due to decompression-induced derotation.
  • No difference in post-op complications such as arrhythmias, hypotension, or AKI between groups.
  • More intra-anesthetic deaths occurred in immediate surgery group, highlighting importance of adequate pre-op stabilization.

Lhuillery

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

2022-5-VS-lhuillery-4

Article Title: Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Case 2024 et al., on feline pancreatectomy, which anatomical region was resected in all cats?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All cats underwent laparoscopic resection of the left pancreatic limb using a harmonic scalpel.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Left limb.
All cats underwent laparoscopic resection of the left pancreatic limb using a harmonic scalpel.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Success rate: All 9 cats underwent successful laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy.
  • Complications:
    • 1 minor intraoperative hemorrhage (Grade 1)
    • 1 sterile peritonitis (Grade 2) post-op, resolved conservatively
  • Pancreatic function:
    • fTLI decreased by 37% (p = .03), but stayed within normal limits
    • fPLI and A1C were unchanged
  • Resection details:
    • Mean weight: 3.0 ± 1.4 g
    • Mean surgical time: 59.7 ± 16.2 min
  • Follow-up: 250–446 days — all cats remained clinically healthy
  • Conclusion: Ultrasonic LPP is safe and effective in healthy cats, preserving endocrine/exocrine function

Case

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy of the left limb using a harmonic scalpel in nine cats

2024-2-VS-case-5

Article Title: Laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy of the left limb using a harmonic scalpel in nine cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Hanlon 2022 et al., on short screw sacroiliac fixation, how did screw positioning affect neurovascular safety?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All short screws were located lateral to the spinal canal, avoiding this risk entirely.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Short screws terminated lateral to the spinal canal.
All short screws were located lateral to the spinal canal, avoiding this risk entirely.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Two short screws (SLS or SPS) provided >2× peak load, yield load, and stiffness vs a single long screw (LLS) for SI joint stabilization.
  • No mechanical advantage was seen between the two short screw types (lag vs positional).
  • All short screws terminated lateral to the spinal canal, avoiding spinal impingement.
  • Ventral sacral foraminal impingement occurred in 3 short-screw cases (1 SPS, 2 SLS), all involving the caudal screw.
  • LLS group showed more abaxial displacement at osteotomy sites, suggesting inferior stabilization for concurrent pelvic fractures.
  • Short screw constructs had longer total screw length (48 mm) than LLS (40 mm), contributing to increased stiffness.
  • Positioning of caudal screw in a cranial/craniodorsal trajectory may help avoid nerve foraminal injury.
  • No significant difference in displacement at peak load among groups; stiffness and load capacity were the primary benefits.

Hanlon

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Mechanical evaluation of canine sacroiliac joint stabilization using two short screws

2022-7-VS-hanlon-3

Article Title: Mechanical evaluation of canine sacroiliac joint stabilization using two short screws

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Davey 2024 et al., on modified closed anal sacculectomy, what feature distinguishes the modified closed technique from the traditional closed method for anal sacculectomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The modified technique involves complete excision of the duct and sac en bloc to reduce tumor cell seeding.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Circumferential duct excision and en bloc removal.
The modified technique involves complete excision of the duct and sac en bloc to reduce tumor cell seeding.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified closed anal sacculectomy resulted in a local recurrence rate of only 2.2%, substantially lower than prior reports (18–50%).
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 31.9% of dogs; most (93%) were minor, with dehiscence being the most common.
  • Mean survival time in deceased dogs was 521 days; median was 388 days.
  • Surgical technique included complete en bloc excision of the sac and duct with sphincter reconstruction, aiming to reduce seeding risk.
  • Only one major complication resulted in euthanasia due to infection and dehiscence.
  • Histologic margins were complete in 44.7% of dogs; lymphatic invasion was present in 31.9%, and vascular in 8.5%.
  • Adjunctive chemotherapy was administered in 34% of dogs (mostly carboplatin); not standardized due to retrospective design.
  • Routine rectal exam was key to diagnosis in 57.4% of dogs with no clinical signs, underscoring the importance of screening.

Davey

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Outcomes of dogs with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma treated via modified closed anal sacculectomy (2015–2022)

2024-6-VS-davey-3

Article Title: Outcomes of dogs with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma treated via modified closed anal sacculectomy (2015–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2024 et al., on surgical comparison of staphylectomy vs. FFP, which breed most frequently underwent a folded flap palatoplasty?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Among 54 French Bulldogs in the study, a slight majority received FFP (53.7%) compared to staphylectomy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is French Bulldog.
Among 54 French Bulldogs in the study, a slight majority received FFP (53.7%) compared to staphylectomy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • FFP resulted in longer median surgery (75 min) and anesthesia (111 min) durations than S (51 min and 80 min, respectively).
  • No significant difference in anesthetic complications, regurgitation, aspiration pneumonia, or hospitalization time between S and FFP.
  • Major complications were rare (4%) and equally distributed between procedures; included tracheostomy and euthanasia due to severe airway disease.
  • Postoperative oxygen use was common (52% of dogs) but not significantly different between procedures.
  • FFP dogs more often had laryngeal collapse (especially Grade 1: 68% vs. 32% in S dogs).
  • Most dogs (85%) had concurrent nares surgery, with caudal wedge resection more frequent in FFP dogs.
  • Few dogs needed revision soft palate surgery (7/124 total); similar between groups.
  • Postoperative clinical signs improved across both procedures; regurgitation was the most persistent sign post-op.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

8

2024

Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

2024-8-VS-miller-4

Article Title: Complications and outcome following staphylectomy and folded flap palatoplasty in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Latifi 2022 et al., on forelimb fascial mapping, why is complete fascial excision often not feasible in the manus region?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Fascia in the manus is thin, adherent, and blends with joint structures, limiting clean dissection.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fascial planes blend into ligaments and joint capsule.
Fascia in the manus is thin, adherent, and blends with joint structures, limiting clean dissection.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia was present over most of the canine forelimb, but key areas like the elbow, carpus, and manus lacked robust fascial planes for wide resection.
  • Type I fascia (discrete sheet) was primarily found in the antebrachium, with type IV (periosteal) fascia located at the olecranon, scapular spine, and accessory carpal bone.
  • Distal antebrachial fascia was thin and adherent, often blending with carpal structures and lacking reliable surgical planes.
  • Partial tenectomy or joint capsule resection was often required for wide excision in the distal limb, especially over the triceps tendon and carpus.
  • Nerve transections (e.g., superficial radial or ulnar branches) were commonly needed to maintain fascial margins, though often with minimal functional loss due to overlapping innervation.
  • Digital and metacarpal pads lacked clear deep fascial borders, making digit amputation necessary for oncologic margins in distal tumors.
  • Dissections revealed fascial junctions as either Type A (easily separable) or Type B (risk of disruption), guiding resection plane selection.
  • Findings provide a surgical map to guide preoperative planning for superficial tumor excision on the forelimb.

Latifi

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

2022-1-VS-latifi-5

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Schroeder 2022 et al., on fascial anatomy mapping, what is the characteristic of type I fascia?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Type I fascia is defined as discrete fascial sheets visible to the naked eye and easily dissectible.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C. Discrete, clearly dissectible fascial sheets.
Type I fascia is defined as discrete fascial sheets visible to the naked eye and easily dissectible.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascial planes in dogs were consistently classifiable into four surgical types:
  • Type I (discrete sheets), Type II (tightly adhered to thin muscle), Type III (tightly adhered to thick muscle), and Type IV (periosteum-associated).
  • Two junction types were identified: Type A (easily elevated) and Type B (higher risk of disruption).
  • Disruption-prone areas include the scapular spine (type IV fascia) and lateral thorax near the 13th rib, where rib resection may be needed to preserve margins.
  • The latissimus dorsi transition zones and fascial areas near the thoracic inlet and scapulohumeral joint were prone to fascial thinning or disruption.
  • Partial muscle resections or periosteal elevations may be required in areas with fragile fascia to maintain oncologic margins.
  • Dorsal spinous processes (T6–L6) showed type IV fascia; however, osteotomy may be needed in some dogs for clear margins.
  • Blended fascial transitions (e.g., rectus abdominis: type II cranially, type I caudally) necessitate intraoperative judgment on resection depth.
  • Cutaneous trunci may suffice as a deep margin for small, low-grade tumors in well-muscled dogs, but not reliably for high-grade or larger masses.

Schroeder

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

2022-1-VS-schroeder-1

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kershaw 2025 et al., on PSG vs AD, which directional deviation was more common in screws placed using the aiming device?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Screws placed with ADs deviated more cranially and distally than those placed with PSGs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cranial and distal.
Screws placed with ADs deviated more cranially and distally than those placed with PSGs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed patient-specific guides (PSGs) significantly improved accuracy of drill hole entry (p < 0.001) and exit (p = 0.044) compared to commercial aiming devices (AD).
  • Zero joint penetrations occurred with PSGs, whereas 3 of 7 AD-guided screws were predicted to penetrate the joint (p = 0.19).
  • Variance in exit point and drill angle was significantly lower in PSG group, suggesting more consistent results.
  • One PSG case failed due to improper guide seating, but this was corrected with improved soft tissue clearance.
  • PSGs enabled safer trajectories despite use by novice surgeons, emphasizing their value in less experienced hands.
  • Drill holes placed with ADs deviated more cranially and distally, increasing the risk of articular violation.
  • Use of PSGs allowed for tighter clustering of drill trajectories, especially in the cranial–caudal axis.
  • Subjective feedback favored PSGs for ease of use and ergonomic design, despite requiring slightly larger incisions.

Kershaw

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

2025-5-VCOT-kershaw-4

Article Title: Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Anatomy & Surgical Approach
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.