Quiz Question

In David 2024 et al., on single-port cryptorchidectomy, which location was chosen for laparoscopic port placement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A 12-mm cannula was placed cranial to the prepuce in the ventral midline.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Prepubic midline.
A 12-mm cannula was placed cranial to the prepuce in the ventral midline.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Single-port laparoscopic-assisted cryptorchidectomy (SP-LAC) was feasible in 13/14 dogs with abdominal cryptorchidism.
  • Median surgical time was 17 min for unilateral and 27 min for bilateral cryptorchidectomy.
  • All testes were successfully exteriorized through a 15-mm mini-celiotomy in most dogs; only 2 needed slight enlargement.
  • One major complication occurred (testicular artery hemorrhage, requiring conversion to open surgery).
  • Two minor complications involved trocar-related issues (splenic capsule laceration, capnoretroperitoneum).
  • No incisional complications were reported postoperatively; some dogs had mild dermatitis at the clipped site.
  • The technique requires only one surgeon and no advanced tools beyond a single-port endoscope.
  • Low-pressure capnoperitoneum (6 mmHg) was adequate for visualization in most cases.

David

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Single-port laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cryptorchidectomy in 14 dogs

2024-3-VS-david-4

Article Title: Single-port laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cryptorchidectomy in 14 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Banks 2023 et al., on TECA-LBO in brachycephalic dogs, which diagnostic imaging findings were significantly more common in EBBs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%) were significantly more common in EBBs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Brainstem changes and otitis interna.
Otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%) were significantly more common in EBBs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) presented more acutely and at younger ages, most often with neurological signs compared to other breeds.
  • Preoperative signs such as facial nerve paresis, vestibular syndrome, and Horner’s syndrome were significantly more common in EBBs.
  • EBBs showed more severe imaging findings, including higher rates of otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%).
  • Intraoperative complications were more frequent in EBBs (11.1% vs. 5.3%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .078).
  • Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly between EBBs and other breeds (23.5% vs. 29.3%).
  • Surgical time was significantly longer in EBBs (median 115 vs. 95 minutes; p = .011).
  • MRI or combined CT/MRI were more frequently used in EBBs, likely due to the higher prevalence of neurological signs.
  • Despite anatomical challenges, complication rates in EBBs were comparable, supporting TECA-LBO safety in these breeds.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

2023-5-VS-banks-4

Article Title: Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Lin 2025 et al., on surgical approaches to the radius, which approach provided significantly more surface exposure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The CLA exposed significantly more radial surface area than CMA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Craniolateral approach.
The CLA exposed significantly more radial surface area than CMA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Craniolateral approach (CLA) exposed significantly more radial surface area than craniomedial approach (CMA) (19.4 cm² vs. 13.8 cm²; p = 0.01).
  • Proximal width of exposure was greater in CLA, especially at 12.5% length (P2 level, p = 0.016), aiding plate placement.
  • No significant difference in exposed bone length between approaches.
  • CLA avoided major neurovascular structures, making dissection cleaner and safer proximally.
  • CMA consistently encountered median nerve/artery/vein, complicating proximal exposure.
  • CLA allowed better access to proximal radius for locking plate application, which may benefit MIPO techniques.
  • CLA also enables ulna fixation via the same incision, whereas CMA requires a separate skin incision.
  • Anatomical tilt of the proximal cranial surface favored CLA, requiring less plate contouring than CMA for proper fit.

Lin

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Does the Craniolateral Approach Provide Better Exposure to the Radius than the Craniomedial Approach for Internal Fracture Fixation in Dogs?

2025-3-VCOT-lin-1

Article Title: Does the Craniolateral Approach Provide Better Exposure to the Radius than the Craniomedial Approach for Internal Fracture Fixation in Dogs?

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, which surgical maneuver was used to correct antebrachiocarpal incongruency?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The radioulnar ligament was transected to allow mobility of the distal radial segment for angular correction and carpal congruity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Radioulnar ligament transection.
The radioulnar ligament was transected to allow mobility of the distal radial segment for angular correction and carpal congruity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CESF with distraction osteogenesis restored elbow congruity and normalized aLDRA in skeletally immature dogs with PCDRP.
  • Radial head subluxation was eliminated in all dogs, and elbow incongruity reduced significantly (from 6.1 mm to 0.3 mm, p <.01).
  • Mean radial lengthening of 22.6 mm (∼11% of normal length) was achieved, but only 80% of recorded distraction translated to length gain.
  • Major complications occurred in 2/12 dogs: one with permanent carpal contracture, one with radial fracture at wire tract.
  • Minor complications (e.g., carpal pain, restricted extension, synostosis, pin tract issues) were noted in 10/12 dogs but generally resolved.
  • Owner surveys (8/12 dogs) reported good to excellent long-term function, even up to 6 years post-op.
  • Radial valgus deformities were moderate (mean 15°) and less severe than deformities from ulnar physeal closure.
  • Surgical strategy included staged distraction, with radial or combined radius/ulna distraction guided by fluoroscopy and adjusted per case.

De Moya

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

2025-6-VS-demoya-5

Article Title: Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cruciani 2022 et al., on feline pancreaticoduodenostomy, which anatomical consideration required splenectomy during surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The splenic artery and vein could not be preserved due to the extent of the abscess in the left lobe.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Location of pancreatic abscess near splenic vessels.
The splenic artery and vein could not be preserved due to the extent of the abscess in the left lobe.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Left pancreaticoduodenostomy successfully restored digestive continuity after right lobe and body pancreatectomy in a cat.
  • No clinical signs of exocrine or endocrine insufficiency were observed postoperatively up to 225 days.
  • Histopathology confirmed chronic pancreatitis with abscess formation and reactive lymphadenopathy.
  • No postoperative pancreatitis developed, based on imaging and normal feline pancreatic lipase levels.
  • Progressive focal ampulla-like dilation of the pancreatic duct occurred near the anastomosis without clinical signs.
  • The cat maintained weight and improved clinically for several months post-op, indicating satisfactory outcomes.
  • Surgical technique involved end-to-side anastomosis between the left pancreatic duct and duodenum.
  • Ultimately, the cat was euthanized due to disseminated carcinoma, presumed unrelated to the pancreatic surgery.

Cruciani

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Left pancreaticoduodenostomy after removal of the right lobe and the head of the pancreas in a cat

2022-8-VS-cruciani-5

Article Title: Left pancreaticoduodenostomy after removal of the right lobe and the head of the pancreas in a cat

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Jones 2024 et al., on LEAP plate use, which dog breed made up the majority of the study population?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Spaniel breeds, particularly English Springer Spaniels, were the most common in this study population.
Incorrect. The correct answer is English Springer Spaniel.
Spaniel breeds, particularly English Springer Spaniels, were the most common in this study population.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 62 fractures in 61 dogs (44 lateral condylar, 18 intracondylar); mostly Spaniels
  • LEAP plate used in all cases; minimal intraoperative contouring needed (1 French Bulldog)
  • Overall complication rate: ~33%, mostly minor; 1 amputation due to catastrophic infection
  • Radiographic healing:
    • Lateral epicondylar part healed in 100%
    • Condylar part healed in ~61.5% LCF and ~57.1% ICF
  • Functional outcomes:
    • 87% returned to full limb use
    • Median LOAD score: 2 for LCF, 6.5 for ICF
  • Design adjustments made post-study to strengthen weak zones around 3rd–4th screw holes

Jones

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Clinical Assessment of a Lateral Epicondylar Anatomical Plate for the Stabilization of Humeral Condylar Fractures in Dogs

2024-4-VS-jones-5

Article Title: Clinical Assessment of a Lateral Epicondylar Anatomical Plate for the Stabilization of Humeral Condylar Fractures in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Price 2024 et al., on left-sided TD ligation in dogs, how many clinical cases showed a single thoracic duct branch at the proposed surgical site?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 10 of 13 clinical lymphangiograms showed a single branch at the fourth intercostal space.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 10 out of 13.
10 of 13 clinical lymphangiograms showed a single branch at the fourth intercostal space.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Left fourth intercostal thoracotomy allowed successful thoracic duct (TD) ligation in 9/10 canine cadavers.
  • 10/13 clinical cases had a single TD branch at the left fourth intercostal space, indicating lower anatomical complexity.
  • All TD branches at this site were lateral to the esophagus, simplifying surgical access.
  • Unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy was successfully performed via the same incision in 10/10 cadavers.
  • Fewer TD branches at the fourth intercostal space than traditional caudal sites may reduce the risk of missed collaterals.
  • In contrast, traditional caudal TD ligation sites had up to 5 branches, requiring broader dissection.
  • No cadaver had right-sided TD branches, reducing surgical complexity at the studied location.
  • Contrast-confirmed ligation was effective in 90% (9/10) cadavers on CT imaging.

Price

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

2024-3-VS-price-4

Article Title: Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Otero Balda 2025 et al., on Short-term outcomes after feline cPSS surgery, which of the following was **not** significantly associated with 30-day survival in PANS-affected cats?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Shunt type (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) was not significantly linked to 30-day survival in this study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Shunt morphology.
Shunt type (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) was not significantly linked to 30-day survival in this study.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 78% of cats that developed postattenuation neurologic signs (PANS) after congenital portosystemic shunt (cPSS) surgery survived to 30 days.
  • Postattenuation seizures (PAS) were associated with significantly decreased 30-day survival (50% vs. 78%; OR: 0.015, p = .005).
  • Treatment of PANS with propofol was a negative prognostic factor (OR: 0.112, p = .0008).
  • Generalized PAS accounted for most seizure cases and were more frequently fatal than focal or unknown-type seizures.
  • Pretreatment with levetiracetam (LEV1 protocol) showed a trend toward improved survival (100% vs. 60.6% in untreated cats), though not statistically significant (p = .06).
  • Shunt morphology, method of attenuation, and study period (early vs. late) were not significantly associated with 30-day survival.
  • Electrolyte, glucose, and ammonia abnormalities were not strongly linked to survival outcomes in this study.
  • Majority of PAS-related deaths were due to uncontrolled generalized seizures or euthanasia because of severity.

Otero Balda

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

2025-5-VS-otero-4

Article Title: Prognostic factors for short‐term survival of cats that experienced postattenuation neurologic signs after surgical attenuation of single congenital portosystemic shunts

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Berger 2023 et al., on elbow COR estimation, how might external epicondylar landmarks assist in elbow surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Epicondyles were used to relate exit points of COR axes, potentially aiding intraoperative tunnel guidance.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They approximate COR for implant alignment.
Epicondyles were used to relate exit points of COR axes, potentially aiding intraoperative tunnel guidance.

🔍 Key Findings

  • COR of elbows with FMCP was significantly more caudal compared to normal elbows, based on CT-derived geometry.
  • In normal elbows, 74% of medial and 93% of lateral axes exited cranial and distal to the epicondyles.
  • In FMCP elbows, 81% of medial and 70% of lateral axes exited caudal and distal to the epicondyles.
  • Different landmark combinations produced slightly different COR approximations, especially between humeral vs. radius/ulna-based axes.
  • The medial-lateral axis using trochlea and capitulum centers provided the most consistent COR approximation.
  • COR estimations based on diseased elbows may not match normal joint geometry, impacting implant alignment accuracy.
  • External epicondylar landmarks may be useful intraoperatively to estimate COR location, but variability limits precision.
  • Drill diameter size may buffer small COR differences, but impact in advanced disease or bilateral cases remains unclear.

Berger

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

2023-1-VS-berger-5

Article Title: The use of subchondral bone topography to approximate the center of rotation of the elbow joint in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Hildebrandt 2023 et al., on Buccal Transposition Flap for Maxillary Lip Reconstruction in Dogs, what was a recommended intraoperative consideration to reduce postoperative flap trauma?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Coronectomy was used in 2 dogs to prevent trauma and oronasal fistula from mandibular canine contact.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Perform mandibular canine coronectomy.
Coronectomy was used in 2 dogs to prevent trauma and oronasal fistula from mandibular canine contact.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Buccal transposition flap provided successful closure of large maxillary lip defects in all 5 dogs
  • All flaps survived, with 3 dogs experiencing minor complications (e.g., fistulas, dehiscence) that resolved
  • Flap vascularization originated from the angularis oris and superior labial arteries, as confirmed via CT angiography
  • Excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes were achieved in all cases
  • Ex vivo cadaver study validated flap perfusion, showing consistent contrast filling of key arteries
  • Oronasal fistulas occurred in 2 dogs at the palatal incision site, likely due to contact with the mandibular canine tooth
  • Mandibular canine coronectomy was performed in 2/5 dogs to prevent flap trauma
  • Flap design and commissure positioning were customizable, aiding tension relief and improving outcomes

Hildebrandt

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Buccal transposition flap for closure of maxillary lip defects in 5 dogs

2023-2-VS-hildebrandt-3

Article Title: Buccal transposition flap for closure of maxillary lip defects in 5 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Anatomy & Surgical Approach
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.