Quiz Question

In Zweig 2025 et al., on healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures, which radiographic change was associated with surgical management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgical fixation resulted in increased axial (distal) tibial tuberosity position compared with normal stifles.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increased axial tibial tuberosity position.
Surgical fixation resulted in increased axial (distal) tibial tuberosity position compared with normal stifles.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgically managed TTAF resulted in excellent clinical outcomes at skeletal maturity, with all dogs having normal limb function and no stifle instability.
  • Surgical treatment significantly altered proximal tibial morphology, including decreased tibial plateau angle (TPA) and increased patellar position (PP) compared with the contralateral limb.
  • Axial tibial tuberosity position (TTP-A) increased and transverse position (TTP-T) decreased in surgically treated stifles, indicating distal and caudal tuberosity migration.
  • Non-surgically managed TTAF did not significantly alter tibial morphology or PP, but outcomes were more variable.
  • Medial patellar luxation developed in 2/6 non-surgically treated dogs, whereas none occurred in surgically managed cases.
  • Pins-only and pin–tension band constructs produced similar radiographic changes and outcomes.
  • Despite morphologic changes, no dogs developed cruciate ligament instability at follow-up.
  • Non-surgical management yielded good to excellent owner-reported outcomes, but carried a potential increased risk of patellar luxation.

Zweig

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

6

2025

Treatment outcome and radiographic appearance of healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in skeletally mature dogs: 21 cases (2016–2023)

2025-6-VCOT-zweig-4

Article Title: Treatment outcome and radiographic appearance of healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in skeletally mature dogs: 21 cases (2016–2023)

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Hildebrandt 2023 et al., on Buccal Transposition Flap for Maxillary Lip Reconstruction in Dogs, what was a recommended intraoperative consideration to reduce postoperative flap trauma?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Coronectomy was used in 2 dogs to prevent trauma and oronasal fistula from mandibular canine contact.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Perform mandibular canine coronectomy.
Coronectomy was used in 2 dogs to prevent trauma and oronasal fistula from mandibular canine contact.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Buccal transposition flap provided successful closure of large maxillary lip defects in all 5 dogs
  • All flaps survived, with 3 dogs experiencing minor complications (e.g., fistulas, dehiscence) that resolved
  • Flap vascularization originated from the angularis oris and superior labial arteries, as confirmed via CT angiography
  • Excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes were achieved in all cases
  • Ex vivo cadaver study validated flap perfusion, showing consistent contrast filling of key arteries
  • Oronasal fistulas occurred in 2 dogs at the palatal incision site, likely due to contact with the mandibular canine tooth
  • Mandibular canine coronectomy was performed in 2/5 dogs to prevent flap trauma
  • Flap design and commissure positioning were customizable, aiding tension relief and improving outcomes

Hildebrandt

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Buccal transposition flap for closure of maxillary lip defects in 5 dogs

2023-2-VS-hildebrandt-3

Article Title: Buccal transposition flap for closure of maxillary lip defects in 5 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Cortez 2024 et al., on feline ectopic ureters, what was the most common anatomical classification of ectopic ureters in cats?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Eight cats had extramural ureters, supporting the finding that extramural presentation is more common in cats.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Extramural.
Eight cats had extramural ureters, supporting the finding that extramural presentation is more common in cats.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ectopic ureters in cats are rare, but most are extramural and bilateral.
  • Surgical techniques used included ureteroneocystostomy (UNC), neoureterostomy (NU), nephroureterectomy, and cystoscopic laser ablation (CLA).
  • All cats showed improvement in urinary continence postoperatively, with 11/12 achieving complete resolution.
  • Major complications were rare; one cat developed uroabdomen requiring revision surgery.
  • Diagnostic imaging was effective, with abdominal ultrasound diagnosing 8/10 and CT 3/3 cases.
  • Short- and long-term complications included urethral spasms, UTIs, stranguria, and rectal prolapse; all were manageable.
  • CLA was successful in 2 cats and is noted as a first-time described technique in feline ectopic ureter cases.
  • Median postoperative follow-up was 340 days, supporting good long-term outcomes.

Cortez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of cats undergoing surgical treatment of ectopic ureters

2024-6-VS-cortez-2

Article Title: Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of cats undergoing surgical treatment of ectopic ureters

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Winston 2023 et al., on LES-AS surgery outcomes, which of the following best describes the surgical approach used for the myotomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors performed a standard ventral midline celiotomy with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ventral midline celiotomy with Dor fundoplication.
The authors performed a standard ventral midline celiotomy with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Modified Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication improved vomiting/regurgitation scores by 180%, QoL by 100%, and owner-perceived body weight by 63% (P < .05).
  • 6 of 9 dogs with postoperative VFSS showed objective improvement in gastric filling scores; others remained stable.
  • Oral sildenafil was discontinued postoperatively in all dogs, indicating surgical success comparable to medical management.
  • 12 of 13 dogs survived to discharge; one dog was euthanized due to aspiration pneumonia postoperatively.
  • 50% of dogs experienced gastrostomy tube complications, higher than reported in previous literature.
  • Most complications were gastrostomy-tube related, with some requiring surgical correction (e.g., tube migration, leakage).
  • Feeding strategies (Bailey chair, elevated bowls) and food consistency (gruel/liquid) remained essential postoperatively to control regurgitation.
  • 9 of 11 owners would opt for the surgery again; those who wouldn’t cited risk or lack of efficacy.

Winston

Veterinary Surgery

2

2023

Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

2023-2-VS-winston-2

Article Title: Management and outcomes of 13 dogs treated with a modified Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for lower esophageal sphincter achalasia-like syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Schroeder 2022 et al., on fascial anatomy mapping, what is the characteristic of type I fascia?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Type I fascia is defined as discrete fascial sheets visible to the naked eye and easily dissectible.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C. Discrete, clearly dissectible fascial sheets.
Type I fascia is defined as discrete fascial sheets visible to the naked eye and easily dissectible.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascial planes in dogs were consistently classifiable into four surgical types:
  • Type I (discrete sheets), Type II (tightly adhered to thin muscle), Type III (tightly adhered to thick muscle), and Type IV (periosteum-associated).
  • Two junction types were identified: Type A (easily elevated) and Type B (higher risk of disruption).
  • Disruption-prone areas include the scapular spine (type IV fascia) and lateral thorax near the 13th rib, where rib resection may be needed to preserve margins.
  • The latissimus dorsi transition zones and fascial areas near the thoracic inlet and scapulohumeral joint were prone to fascial thinning or disruption.
  • Partial muscle resections or periosteal elevations may be required in areas with fragile fascia to maintain oncologic margins.
  • Dorsal spinous processes (T6–L6) showed type IV fascia; however, osteotomy may be needed in some dogs for clear margins.
  • Blended fascial transitions (e.g., rectus abdominis: type II cranially, type I caudally) necessitate intraoperative judgment on resection depth.
  • Cutaneous trunci may suffice as a deep margin for small, low-grade tumors in well-muscled dogs, but not reliably for high-grade or larger masses.

Schroeder

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

2022-1-VS-schroeder-1

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Mihara 2024 et al., on mitral valve repair in dogs, what geometric change supported improved valve competence?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative CL increased significantly, restoring mitral competence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Coaptation length increase.
Postoperative CL increased significantly, restoring mitral competence.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mitral valve plasty (MVP) in dogs with MMVD significantly reduced regurgitant volume and fraction, and normalized LA:Ao ratio, indicating reversal of volume overload.
  • MVP altered mitral valve geometry, with reduced annular dimensions and increased coaptation length, enhancing valve competence.
  • Postoperative LA:Ao ratio dropped from 2.2 to 1.2, consistent with improved left atrial pressure and size.
  • Forward stroke volume index and cardiac index increased at 3 months, reflecting improved hemodynamic function despite reduced fractional shortening.
  • Three dogs (3.9%) died postoperatively, highlighting a 96.1% survival rate within 3 months.
  • The repair technique involved artificial chordal replacement and annuloplasty; no cleft closure or leaflet suturing was used.
  • Color Doppler echocardiography confirmed substantial reduction in mitral regurgitation postoperatively in most dogs.

Mihara

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

2024-3-VS-mihara-2

Article Title: Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Kuvaldina 2023 et al., in Minimally invasive axillary lymphadenectomy in dogs, what anatomical variation was noted during cadaver dissection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One limb had two distinct axillary lymph nodes, an important anatomical finding noted during cadaveric dissection.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Double axillary lymph node in one limb.
One limb had two distinct axillary lymph nodes, an important anatomical finding noted during cadaveric dissection.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A minimally invasive endoscopic technique was successfully developed for excisional biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in dogs.
  • The procedure was performed on 4 cadavers (6 limbs) and 3 clinical patients, with no major complications reported.
  • Mean cadaveric time: accessory axillary node 5.1 min; axillary node 33 min. One limb had a double axillary node.
  • In clinical cases, 2/3 were completed endoscopically; one required conversion to open due to node elevation difficulty.
  • Surgical times in clinical cases ranged from 35 to 58 minutes, depending on node accessibility and number.
  • Postoperative morbidity was minimal: no lymphedema, minor seroma or lameness resolved quickly.
  • The SILS port approach enabled effective access, though precise placement was critical to visualization.
  • This is the first reported veterinary endoscopic technique for axillary lymphadenectomy; potential for improved staging and reduced morbidity.

Kuvaldina

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

2023-7-VS-kuvaldina-5

Article Title: Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Shetler 2022 et al., on radial head OCD, what feature characterized the OCD lesions arthroscopically?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This classic appearance described a partially detached OCD flap.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Discoid elevation of cartilage with a cleft.
This classic appearance described a partially detached OCD flap.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bilateral radial head OCD lesions were identified in a 6-month-old English Bulldog with elbow lameness.
  • Medial arthroscopic portals allowed only partial visualization of radial head lesions, insufficient for treatment.
  • Lateral arthroscopy portals provided excellent access for fragment removal and abrasion arthroplasty.
  • Histopathology confirmed OCD, showing cartilage degeneration and retained cartilaginous cores.
  • Dog showed complete resolution of lameness and no elbow pain at 5 months post-op.
  • Lesions were caudolateral on the radial head, with discoid elevation of cartilage and clefts.
  • Lateral approach avoids major neurovascular structures, reducing iatrogenic risk.
  • The authors suggest lateral elbow arthroscopy may have broader indications, including for medial compartment disease or synovial biopsies.

Shetler

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

The use of lateral arthroscopy portals for the management of bilateral osteochondritis dissecans of the radial head in an English bulldog

2022-8-VS-shetler-3

Article Title: The use of lateral arthroscopy portals for the management of bilateral osteochondritis dissecans of the radial head in an English bulldog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Miller 2025 et al., on spinal drill guide accuracy, what was the reported mean deviation between planned and actual screw entry/exit points?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The mean deviation was less than 1 mm across all entry and exit points, supporting guide accuracy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Less than 2 mm.
The mean deviation was less than 1 mm across all entry and exit points, supporting guide accuracy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed, SOP plate-specific guides enabled safe screw placement from T12–L5 in canine cadavers and models.
  • All 140 screw trajectories were classified as Zdichavski Grade 1, indicating optimal placement without vertebral canal breach.
  • Screw angles (cranial-caudal and transverse) matched preoperative planning, with no significant deviation.
  • Entry/exit point deviations were <1 mm on average, deemed clinically negligible.
  • Drill guides were quick to place (<30 sec per vertebra) and improved ease of surgery.
  • Plates acted as effective reduction tools, guiding alignment during screw placement in mobile spines.
  • Minor technical challenges arose from cadaveric spine mobility, mitigated by sequential screw insertion.
  • Technique may enable future use in fracture/luxation reduction, pending further cadaveric and clinical trials.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Development and testing of an animal-specific and string-of-pearls (SOP) plate specific, three-dimensionally (3D) printed drilling guide: A proof of concept study for canine thoracolumbar spinal stabilization

2025-6-VS-miller-1

Article Title: Development and testing of an animal-specific and string-of-pearls (SOP) plate specific, three-dimensionally (3D) printed drilling guide: A proof of concept study for canine thoracolumbar spinal stabilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

In Dalton 2023 et al., In Minimally invasive acetabular fracture repair in dogs, which intraoperative complication was observed in cadaveric specimens?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One cadaver had mild sciatic nerve indentation; others had no gross nerve injury.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Sciatic nerve indentation.
One cadaver had mild sciatic nerve indentation; others had no gross nerve injury.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Feasibility study in 5 canine cadavers plus 1 clinical case (Chihuahua, 5.5 kg).
  • Technique used two small approaches (caudal and craniolateral) connected with an epiperiosteal tunnel.
  • Plates were precontoured on mirrored 3D-printed hemipelves to improve fit and reduce intraoperative bending.
  • Cadaver outcomes: fracture gap <2 mm, step defect <1 mm, pelvic angulation <5°.
  • Sciatic nerve injury was minimal: 1/5 cadavers had a mild indentation; others had no gross injury.
  • Median total surgical time: ~46 minutes in cadavers; incisions ~5 cm.
  • Clinical Chihuahua case: weight-bearing within 24 hrs, radiographic union at 3 months; one screw fractured but no adverse effect.
  • Authors conclude: MIAF with 3D printing is feasible and accurate, but requires further evaluation before routine use.

Dalton

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

2023-7-VS-dalton-3

Article Title: Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

How "Board-worthy" is this question?

🔥100% would expect this on the real thing

🤔Useful, but not core exam material

🗑️Not relevant or too off-base

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the question vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Quiz Results

Topic: Anatomy & Surgical Approach
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.