Your Custom Quiz

In Matz 2022 et al., on stapler size comparison, what did the authors conclude about the clinical use of the evaluated staplers?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All three tested stapler types produced acceptable ILP values, suggesting they are viable options for typhlectomy in similarly sized dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All tested staplers are acceptable for similar dogs.
All three tested stapler types produced acceptable ILP values, suggesting they are viable options for typhlectomy in similarly sized dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in initial leak pressure (ILP) among TA 30 V3 2.5 mm, TA 60 3.5 mm, and TA 60 4.8 mm stapler sizes (P = .78).
  • All stapler types exceeded the physiological intraluminal pressure threshold (~25 mmHg), suggesting acceptable leak resistance.
  • Mean ILPs: TA 30 V3 (181.5 mmHg), TA 60 3.5 mm (112 mmHg), TA 60 4.8 mm (77.2 mmHg).
  • Leakage occurred at the staple line in 23 of 24 specimens; only one had ileal wall rupture.
  • No correlation found between ILP and cadaver weight, cecal wall thickness, or cecal length.
  • Cecal wall thickness averaged 4.9 mm, yet staple heights ranged only from 1.0–2.0 mm.
  • One specimen in each TA 60 group leaked near or below physiologic pressures, suggesting rare outliers.
  • Study supports clinical viability of all tested stapler sizes for canine typhlectomy, but highlights need for in vivo data on healing and complications.

Matz

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Ex vivo comparison of different thoracoabdominal stapler sizes for typhlectomy in canine cadavers

2022-4-VS-matz-5

Article Title: Ex vivo comparison of different thoracoabdominal stapler sizes for typhlectomy in canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Guénégo 2025 et al., on AMA-based CCWO, what proportion of dogs had contralateral CCLR after initial AMA-based CCWO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 66% of dogs developed contralateral CCLR during the study period.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 66%.
66% of dogs developed contralateral CCLR during the study period.

🔍 Key Findings

  • AMA-based CCWO realigned the anatomical and mechanical axes in 82% of dogs >50 kg, with postoperative AMA angle of 0° in most cases.
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) rate was only 0.5%, markedly lower than TPLO-reported rates in similar populations (up to 37.5%).
  • All osteotomies achieved Grade 4 healing by 8 weeks, with no implant failures.
  • AMA-based planning based on preoperative AMA and TPA allowed for better correction of proximal tibial angulation compared to TPLO in large dogs.
  • Use of a double locking plate (DLP) fixation and Robert Jones bandage (RJB) contributed to improved mechanical stability and infection prevention.
  • Dogs with AMA angle >3.4° (hyper-CCAPT) were 38% of the cohort, supporting AMA as a critical metric in planning.
  • Postoperative alignment of the AA and MA was more consistently achieved when preoperative AMA was >2.4°, confirming suitability of AMA-based CCWO for severe angulation.
  • Most infections in TPLOs occur within 15 days, but RJB plus antibiotics in this study appeared protective, suggesting benefit for early-phase SSI prevention.

Guénégo

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

2025-3-VCOT-guenego-4

Article Title: Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Jourdain 2024 et al., on fluoroscopic fixation of feline SIL, what tool enabled accurate screw guidance during surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The headless cannulated screws were placed with fluoroscopic guidance over a guide wire.
Incorrect. The correct answer is C-arm fluoroscopy with cannulated guide wire navigation.
The headless cannulated screws were placed with fluoroscopic guidance over a guide wire.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Minimally invasive fluoroscopic technique yielded median reduction of 94.1% immediately postoperative.
  • Screw purchase ≥60% in sacral body achieved in 82% of cases, with median purchase of 73.3%.
  • One screw exited caudally; no dorsal, ventral, or cranial exits reported.
  • At 7-week follow-up, reduction and purchase slightly declined but remained effective (p = .008 and p = .013).
  • No screw loosening observed, even in suboptimal reductions or purchases.
  • Pelvic canal width and symmetry (PCDR and HCWR) were restored and maintained.
  • Excellent long-term function: FMPI ≥0.98 in 9 of 10 cats; owners reported 10/10 satisfaction.
  • Fluoroscopy enabled accurate screw placement and minimized tissue trauma, contributing to rapid recovery.

Jourdain

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac luxations in cats using 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws: Description, evaluation and clinical outcome

2024-4-VS-jourdain-4

Article Title: Fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac luxations in cats using 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws: Description, evaluation and clinical outcome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McCagherty 2025 et al., on WID detection accuracy, how did image-guided swabs compare to non-guided swabs in bacterial yield?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Paired swabs showed no statistical difference in species count or CFU yield.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference was found between groups.
Paired swabs showed no statistical difference in species count or CFU yield.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bacterial fluorescence was detected in all wounds (17 dogs, 4 cats) using the point-of-care wound imaging device (WID).
  • The WID confirmed the presence of clinically relevant wound infection in all evaluated cases at the time of imaging.
  • No significant difference was found in bacterial yield or burden between image-guided and non-guided swabs (QBC and PCR; p > 0.05).
  • The WID helped guide wound debridement in some cases by localizing areas of fluorescence, especially in necrotic tissue.
  • Most infections were polymicrobial and dominated by anaerobes, highlighting the need for anaerobic culture inclusion.
  • PCR analysis showed low bacterial DNA yields, often complicated by host DNA contamination, limiting its utility.
  • The study did not evaluate sensitivity/specificity of WID, as only fluorescence-positive wounds were included.
  • Clinical utility of WID lies in immediate visual confirmation of infection, supporting timely antimicrobial treatment decisions.

McCagherty

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Diagnostic value of a point of care bacterial fluorescence imaging device for detecting wound infections in dogs and cats

2025-6-VS-mccagherty-2

Article Title: Diagnostic value of a point of care bacterial fluorescence imaging device for detecting wound infections in dogs and cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Tobias 2025 et al., on frontal sinus mucoceles, what was concluded about the role of guaifenesin in post-op management of mucoceles?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Guaifenesin was used in several cases to aid mucus clearance, but its efficacy in dogs remains undocumented.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Used to reduce mucus viscosity; benefit unproven.
Guaifenesin was used in several cases to aid mucus clearance, but its efficacy in dogs remains undocumented.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Frontal sinus mucoceles occurred in young dogs, often linked to prior skull trauma by 10 months of age.
  • All dogs presented with expansile, fluid-filled lesions causing facial swelling; CT showed multicentric bone erosion, including the frontal bone and cribriform plate.
  • Surgical options included frontal sinusotomy with either sinus lining ablation or re-establishment of nasofrontal drainage, with or without stenting.
  • Nasofrontal stenting led to long-term resolution in most dogs, although recurrence occurred in 4/8 dogs, requiring revision surgery in 3.
  • Complications were minor and included swelling or nasal discharge; no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • Histology confirmed sterile mucoceles with neutrophilic inflammation and mucin, and cultures were negative in all cases.
  • Guaifenesin was used postoperatively in several cases to reduce mucus viscosity; its benefit is unproven in dogs but may support drainage.

Tobias

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

2025-6-VS-tobias-5

Article Title: Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Jones 2024 et al., on LEAP plate use, what percentage of lateral epicondylar fractures showed radiographic evidence of healing at final follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All lateral epicondylar fractures (53/53) demonstrated evidence of healing on follow-up imaging.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 100%.
All lateral epicondylar fractures (53/53) demonstrated evidence of healing on follow-up imaging.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 62 fractures in 61 dogs (44 lateral condylar, 18 intracondylar); mostly Spaniels
  • LEAP plate used in all cases; minimal intraoperative contouring needed (1 French Bulldog)
  • Overall complication rate: ~33%, mostly minor; 1 amputation due to catastrophic infection
  • Radiographic healing:
    • Lateral epicondylar part healed in 100%
    • Condylar part healed in ~61.5% LCF and ~57.1% ICF
  • Functional outcomes:
    • 87% returned to full limb use
    • Median LOAD score: 2 for LCF, 6.5 for ICF
  • Design adjustments made post-study to strengthen weak zones around 3rd–4th screw holes

Jones

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Clinical Assessment of a Lateral Epicondylar Anatomical Plate for the Stabilization of Humeral Condylar Fractures in Dogs

2024-4-VS-jones-1

Article Title: Clinical Assessment of a Lateral Epicondylar Anatomical Plate for the Stabilization of Humeral Condylar Fractures in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hertel 2025 et al., on portal venotomy for insulinoma, what material and technique were used to close the venotomy site?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This closure method minimized bleeding and supported vascular integrity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 5–0 polypropylene in simple continuous pattern reinforced with tissue glue.
This closure method minimized bleeding and supported vascular integrity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Portal venotomy enabled successful en bloc resection of a pancreatic insulinoma and associated thrombus in the portal vein, a novel approach in veterinary literature.
  • Temporary portal vein occlusion (15 min) was well tolerated, causing only transient small intestinal congestion without lasting hemodynamic compromise.
  • No intraoperative hemorrhage occurred following vascular isolation and venotomy repair with 5–0 polypropylene in a simple continuous pattern.
  • Postoperative complications were minimal, with only moderate pancreatitis managed medically and no portal hypertension observed on follow-up imaging.
  • Histopathology confirmed insulinoma, with no initial metastasis; CT at 6 months revealed hepatic and peritoneal metastases but no local recurrence at the venotomy site.
  • Portal vein luminal stenosis occurred post-repair but was clinically insignificant.
  • Advanced CT imaging and 3D printed modeling significantly enhanced surgical planning and anatomical assessment.
  • Surgical excision achieved good short-term outcomes, and the dog was alive and euglycemic one year later despite metastatic disease.

Hertel

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Successful venotomy for portal tumor thrombus removal due to pancreatic carcinoma in a dog

2025-5-VS-hertel-4

Article Title: Successful venotomy for portal tumor thrombus removal due to pancreatic carcinoma in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Downey 2023 et al., on thoracoscopic lobectomy, what complication occurred in the dog that did not survive?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The only fatality occurred in a brachycephalic dog with respiratory compromise under anesthesia.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Respiratory arrest due to BOAS.
The only fatality occurred in a brachycephalic dog with respiratory compromise under anesthesia.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Thoracoscopic (TL) or thoracoscopic-assisted (TAL) lobectomy was successfully performed in 12 dogs with non-neoplastic pulmonary consolidation (PC).
  • 44% (4/9) of TL cases were converted to open thoracotomy due to adhesions or poor visualization—higher than rates for neoplastic lobectomies.
  • OLV was successful in 7/9 TL dogs; unsuccessful attempts were managed with intermittent ventilation, mostly in brachycephalic breeds.
  • Median hospital stay was 3 days; 91.7% (11/12) survived to discharge, and 100% of survivors showed no recurrence at median 24-month follow-up.
  • Complications were mostly minor: pneumothorax (2), minor hemorrhage (3), dehiscence (1), and 1 fatality due to BOAS complications.
  • Histopathology showed infectious pneumonia in 10 dogs, and in 4 cases, foreign body migration was suspected as the underlying cause.
  • Median surgical time for TL was 90 minutes; conversion correlated with longer symptom duration (median 90 vs. 7 days).
  • Postoperative recovery was excellent in all surviving dogs, with one case of persistent cough attributed to concurrent heart disease.

Downey

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Evaluation of long‐term outcome after lung lobectomy for canine non‐neoplastic pulmonary consolidation via thoracoscopic or thoracoscopic‐assisted surgery in 12 dogs

2023-7-VS-downey-4

Article Title: Evaluation of long‐term outcome after lung lobectomy for canine non‐neoplastic pulmonary consolidation via thoracoscopic or thoracoscopic‐assisted surgery in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Farrugia 2025 et al., on BODPUO location effects, what was the observed outcome when the osteotomy was placed at 26% of ulna length?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. More proximal osteotomies (26%) achieved the greatest postoperative change in proximal ulna tilt.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Greatest change in ulna tilt (~18°).
More proximal osteotomies (26%) achieved the greatest postoperative change in proximal ulna tilt.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal BODPUOs (closer to 26–28% of ulna length) resulted in greater increases in proximal ulna tilt postoperatively (up to 18°).
  • Distal osteotomies (closer to 48–49%) yielded minimal change in ulna angle.
  • Strong linear relationship between osteotomy location and change in angle; correlation coefficient = 0.73.
  • Initial proximal ulna angle (IPUA) influences results—angles closer to 90° yielded greater changes.
  • Craniocaudal osteotomy angle had minimal impact on tilt change after adjusting for location.
  • Osteotomy length had no significant effect on change in angle.
  • Prediction intervals showed wide individual variation in outcomes, especially with more proximal osteotomies.
  • No increase in complications was associated with more proximal osteotomies, contrary to past assumptions.

Farrugia

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

2025-6-VS-farrugia-1

Article Title: Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fidelis 2025 et al., on suture eyelet geometry, which anchor showed the **least reduction in suture strength** compared to a smooth eyebolt reference?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The Anika anchor had significantly lower adverse impact on suture strength compared to others.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Anika.
The Anika anchor had significantly lower adverse impact on suture strength compared to others.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Raised eyelets caused more suture mid-section failures than embedded eyelets, suggesting wear or cutting against the anchor.
  • No significant effect of cyclic loading on failure load (Fmax) was found for any anchor group.
  • Anika anchor showed the least reduction in suture strength relative to the reference (eyebolt screw), indicating a favorable design.
  • All sutures failed via suture breakage, not anchor pullout, indicating suture fatigue was the primary failure mode.
  • Sutures in raised eyelets more often failed at the mid-section, while those in embedded eyelets failed at the knot.
  • IMEX and Jorvet anchors showed significantly reduced Fmax compared to eyebolt screws.
  • Loading direction and anchor design likely affect wear and ultimate failure, particularly in dynamic in vivo conditions.
  • Future designs should aim for embedded, smooth eyelets that can accommodate larger suture sizes without increasing wear.

Fidelis

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

2025-6-VS-fidelis-1

Article Title: Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.