Your Custom Quiz

In Farrugia 2025 et al., on BODPUO location effects, what was the observed outcome when the osteotomy was placed at 26% of ulna length?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. More proximal osteotomies (26%) achieved the greatest postoperative change in proximal ulna tilt.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Greatest change in ulna tilt (~18°).
More proximal osteotomies (26%) achieved the greatest postoperative change in proximal ulna tilt.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Proximal BODPUOs (closer to 26–28% of ulna length) resulted in greater increases in proximal ulna tilt postoperatively (up to 18°).
  • Distal osteotomies (closer to 48–49%) yielded minimal change in ulna angle.
  • Strong linear relationship between osteotomy location and change in angle; correlation coefficient = 0.73.
  • Initial proximal ulna angle (IPUA) influences results—angles closer to 90° yielded greater changes.
  • Craniocaudal osteotomy angle had minimal impact on tilt change after adjusting for location.
  • Osteotomy length had no significant effect on change in angle.
  • Prediction intervals showed wide individual variation in outcomes, especially with more proximal osteotomies.
  • No increase in complications was associated with more proximal osteotomies, contrary to past assumptions.

Farrugia

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

2025-6-VS-farrugia-1

Article Title: Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulna osteotomy: Effect of location on change in angle of the proximal ulna segment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Adams 2022 et al., on C-section survival rates, how did brachycephalic breed status influence survival in the multivariable model?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Brachycephalism was not a significant variable in the multivariable model for neonatal survival (p = .221).
Incorrect. The correct answer is No effect.
Brachycephalism was not a significant variable in the multivariable model for neonatal survival (p = .221).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Neonatal survival to discharge was 93.1% overall, with no significant difference between brachycephalic (94.8%) and nonbrachycephalic (91.8%) breeds.
  • Elective C-section significantly improved neonatal survival (99.2%) compared to emergency C-section (87.1%) (p < .001).
  • Larger C-section litter size was positively associated with survival (p = .004; OR 1.57), whereas total litter size had no effect.
  • Maternal heart rate and stage of labor were associated with neonatal mortality in univariable analysis, but not multivariable.
  • Brachycephalism alone was not a risk factor for neonatal mortality (p = .221) in multivariable analysis.
  • Emergency C-section was the strongest predictor of neonatal mortality (OR 4.75), regardless of breed.
  • Multidisciplinary team approach likely contributed to high survival rates, emphasizing importance of coordinated care.
  • Historical factors such as primiparity and maternal age were not associated with mortality in this cohort.

Adams

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Risk factors for neonatal mortality prior to hospital discharge in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing cesarean section

2022-7-VS-adams-4

Article Title: Risk factors for neonatal mortality prior to hospital discharge in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing cesarean section

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Danielski 2022 et al., on humero-anconeal incongruity, what role did the novel caudo-medial arthroscope portal play in the study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This portal provided consistent access to view and assess the HA lesion associated with HIF.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It enabled visualization of the caudal humeral condyle.
This portal provided consistent access to view and assess the HA lesion associated with HIF.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A novel caudo-medial arthroscopic portal allowed visualization of previously undescribed cartilage lesions on the caudal medial humeral condyle.
  • A consistent focal cartilage lesion (HA lesion) was observed in 100% of elbows with HIF (21/21), but in none of the 31 elbows without HIF.
  • Lesions varied from indentations to full-thickness cartilage loss, typically elliptical and located just medial to the humeral condyle isthmus.
  • A clunk-like sensation and dynamic engagement of the anconeal process into the lesion were observed in 16/21 elbows with HIF during elbow manipulation.
  • In 5/21 elbows, engagement of the anconeal process led to observable widening of the HIF line, suggesting dynamic instability.
  • Findings support a novel concept of humero-anconeal incongruity as a contributor to the pathogenesis of HIF.
  • Spaniel breed was not a confounder—the lesion was only present in elbows with HIF, regardless of breed.
  • The study suggests potential for using arthroscopy as a screening tool for early detection of humero-anconeal incongruity and HIF risk.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

2022-1-VS-danielski2-5

Article Title: Humero-anconeal elbow incongruity in spaniel breed dogs with humeral intracondylar fissure: Arthroscopic findings

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Santos 2025 et al., on feline MPL morphology, what best describes the significance of anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) differences?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MPL II cats had significantly higher aLDFA (91.6°) vs control (90.7°) and MPL III (90.7°); p = 0.014.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significantly higher in MPL II vs both control and MPL III.
MPL II cats had significantly higher aLDFA (91.6°) vs control (90.7°) and MPL III (90.7°); p = 0.014.

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 21 cats (10 control, 11 affected); 14 normal limbs vs 18 with MPL (MPL II: 7, MPL III: 11).

Significantly different CT measurements in MPL vs control:

  • aLDFA: MPL II > control and MPL III (p = 0.014)
  • FTW: MPL III > control (p = 0.021)
  • FTD: control > MPL II and III (p < 0.001)
  • TTA: MPL II and III had increased external tibial torsion vs control (p < 0.001)
  • fPL and PV: MPL III cats had longer and more voluminous patellae

No significant differences in AA, mMPTA, TTD, fPW, aPH.
Patella width exceeded trochlear width in all groups.
Authors suggest femoral and tibial angular correction may not be indicated in most feline MPL II–III cases.
Soft tissue techniques and trochleoplasty warrant further investigation.
CT method: Intraobserver ICC good in 64%, interobserver poor in 36% of metrics.

Santos

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-1-VC-santos-3

Article Title: Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Ferreira 2025 et al., on tibial torsion measurement, what was the average torsion angle measured using the new method?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The new CT-based method reported a mean torsion angle of 16.00° ± 8.77.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 16.00° ± 8.77.
The new CT-based method reported a mean torsion angle of 16.00° ± 8.77.

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Validate a new 3D CT-based method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with MPL, comparing it to a traditional method.

Sample: 40 tibiae from client-owned dogs with MPL (primarily small-breed).

Repeatability (intraobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.99 → excellent agreement

Reproducibility (interobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.83 → high agreement
  • Traditional method: ICC = 0.52 → moderate agreement

Torsion angle measurements:

  • New method avg: 16.00° ± 8.77
  • Traditional method avg: 8.76° ± 4.92

Conclusion: The new method is more repeatable, reproducible, and provides higher torsion values than the traditional Aper method, especially reliable for small-breed dogs.

Ferreira

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

2025-3-VS-ferreira-3

Article Title: Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Guénégo 2025 et al., on AMA-based CCWO, what was the postoperative AMA angle achieved in most dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The AMA angle was reduced to 0° in most dogs, achieving axis alignment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is .
The AMA angle was reduced to 0° in most dogs, achieving axis alignment.

🔍 Key Findings

  • AMA-based CCWO realigned the anatomical and mechanical axes in 82% of dogs >50 kg, with postoperative AMA angle of 0° in most cases.
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) rate was only 0.5%, markedly lower than TPLO-reported rates in similar populations (up to 37.5%).
  • All osteotomies achieved Grade 4 healing by 8 weeks, with no implant failures.
  • AMA-based planning based on preoperative AMA and TPA allowed for better correction of proximal tibial angulation compared to TPLO in large dogs.
  • Use of a double locking plate (DLP) fixation and Robert Jones bandage (RJB) contributed to improved mechanical stability and infection prevention.
  • Dogs with AMA angle >3.4° (hyper-CCAPT) were 38% of the cohort, supporting AMA as a critical metric in planning.
  • Postoperative alignment of the AA and MA was more consistently achieved when preoperative AMA was >2.4°, confirming suitability of AMA-based CCWO for severe angulation.
  • Most infections in TPLOs occur within 15 days, but RJB plus antibiotics in this study appeared protective, suggesting benefit for early-phase SSI prevention.

Guénégo

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

2025-3-VCOT-guenego-1

Article Title: Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Morgera 2022 et al., on stifle surgery draping methods, which of the following was true regarding anesthesia duration between groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both groups had a mean duration of ~73.8 minutes; there was no significant difference.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Anesthesia time was not significantly different.
Both groups had a mean duration of ~73.8 minutes; there was no significant difference.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in infection-inflammation rates between single-layer Kraton drapes and traditional double-layer draping at both 21 days and 6 months postop.
  • Infection-inflammation occurred in 4.56% (36/789) of cases; equally distributed across draping techniques.
  • Tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) was the most common procedure (61%).
  • Kraton drape features an elastic fenestration that seals without adhesives or towel clamps, offering ecological and workflow advantages.
  • Mean anesthesia duration was similar between groups (~73.8 min), suggesting draping method did not impact overall surgical time.
  • Culture confirmation of infection was low (14 dogs), showing reliance on clinical criteria for diagnosis.
  • Potential benefits of single-layer draping include reduced waste, no need for towel clamps, and ease of use without increased risk.
  • Limitations included subjective follow-up (nearly 30% indirect via phone/images) and antimicrobial usage in all cases.

Morgera

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Surgical site infection‐inflammation in dogs draped with a single‐layer Kraton elastic seal extremity drape for stifle surgery

2022-3-VS-morgera-5

Article Title: Surgical site infection‐inflammation in dogs draped with a single‐layer Kraton elastic seal extremity drape for stifle surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Longo 2022 et al., on CT-guided osteotomies, what was the most common osteotomy location used in this study?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Femoral diaphyseal osteotomies were most commonly performed (10/22).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Femoral diaphysis.
Femoral diaphyseal osteotomies were most commonly performed (10/22).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D CT volume rendering and CAL measurement successfully guided correction of femoral and tibial torsion in dogs with patellar luxation (PL).
  • Physiological patellar tracking was restored in 100% (22/22) of cases after detorsional osteotomy.
  • 94% of dogs (17/18) had either full or acceptable functional outcomes post-surgery.
  • CAL-based correction was accurate in 19/22 cases, confirming reliability of the measurement technique.
  • Complication rate was 45%, with major complications in 2/22 cases—both involved combined femoral and tibial osteotomies.
  • Combined femoral and tibial osteotomies in the same limb were linked to a higher risk of complications and poorer outcomes.
  • Diaphyseal osteotomies offered more implant space, but metaphyseal locations were associated with faster bone healing.
  • Use of a TPLO jig or goniometer was not essential—CAL-based bone marking was sufficient in most cases.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

2022-7-VS-longo-4

Article Title: Three‐dimensional volume rendering planning, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes for femoral and tibial detorsional osteotomies in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Longo 2023 et al., on CT trochlear measurements, what best describes the significance of FTA and FTRIA in surgical planning for MPL?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FTA and FTRIA had lower sensitivity and specificity than FTGA and were less reliable for guiding surgical decisions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They were less predictive than FTGA and had lower sensitivity.
FTA and FTRIA had lower sensitivity and specificity than FTGA and were less reliable for guiding surgical decisions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dogs with MPL had significantly shallower femoral trochlear grooves compared to controls, based on CT-measured femoral trochlear groove angle (FTGA).
  • FTGA >134° in small breeds (SB) and >128° in medium/large breeds (MLB) were associated with MPL and can serve as surgical thresholds for considering trochleoplasty.
  • FTA and FTRIA measurements were less reliable, showing lower sensitivity/specificity than FTGA.
  • Inter-rater reliability for FTGA was excellent (ICC > 0.9), supporting its use in clinical decision-making.
  • FTGA differed significantly between SB and MLB dogs, suggesting anatomical variation influences MPL predisposition.
  • Dogs with MPL but with FTGA below threshold may not benefit from trochleoplasty, supporting individualized surgical planning.
  • CT provides more precise and reproducible evaluation of trochlear morphology than radiography or ultrasound.
  • The study introduces a CT protocol using P25 and P50 reference points for consistent FTGA measurement.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-longo-3

Article Title: Computed tomographic measurements of the femoral trochlea in dogs with and without medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Scheuermann 2023 et al., on MIPO with 3D-printed bone models, how accurate was alignment overall using precontoured plates from 3D-printed femurs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Precontoured plates from 3D models achieved highly accurate alignment across all planes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Median deviations <3 mm or <3° in all planes.
Precontoured plates from 3D models achieved highly accurate alignment across all planes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Precontoured plates based on 3D-printed femurs produced accurate femoral alignment (median deviations <3 mm or <3° in all planes).
  • Both fracture reduction system (FRS) and intramedullary pin (IMP) methods achieved near-anatomic alignment in cadaveric femoral fractures.
  • FRS required fewer fluoroscopic images (median 7 vs. 26, P = .001), but longer surgical time (median 43 vs. 29 min, P = .011).
  • Sagittal plane alignment: FRS led to mild increased recurvatum (median 2.9°), but still within near-anatomic limits (<5°).
  • Axial alignment: Both groups achieved near-anatomic torsion (<10°), though one IMP case had acceptable (not near-anatomic) alignment.
  • Custom drill guides and FRS improved fluoroscopy efficiency but were cumbersome and time-consuming to use. Authors do not recommend current prototype for clinical use.
  • Clinical significance: 3D printed models allow accurate precontouring, reducing intra-op plate adjustment; custom guides may reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D-printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

2023-7-VS-scheuermann-4

Article Title: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of femoral fractures with 3D-printed bone models and custom surgical guides: A cadaveric study in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.