Your Custom Quiz

In Jones 2024 et al., on LEAP plate use, which dog breed made up the majority of the study population?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Spaniel breeds, particularly English Springer Spaniels, were the most common in this study population.
Incorrect. The correct answer is English Springer Spaniel.
Spaniel breeds, particularly English Springer Spaniels, were the most common in this study population.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 62 fractures in 61 dogs (44 lateral condylar, 18 intracondylar); mostly Spaniels
  • LEAP plate used in all cases; minimal intraoperative contouring needed (1 French Bulldog)
  • Overall complication rate: ~33%, mostly minor; 1 amputation due to catastrophic infection
  • Radiographic healing:
    • Lateral epicondylar part healed in 100%
    • Condylar part healed in ~61.5% LCF and ~57.1% ICF
  • Functional outcomes:
    • 87% returned to full limb use
    • Median LOAD score: 2 for LCF, 6.5 for ICF
  • Design adjustments made post-study to strengthen weak zones around 3rd–4th screw holes

Jones

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Clinical Assessment of a Lateral Epicondylar Anatomical Plate for the Stabilization of Humeral Condylar Fractures in Dogs

2024-4-VS-jones-5

Article Title: Clinical Assessment of a Lateral Epicondylar Anatomical Plate for the Stabilization of Humeral Condylar Fractures in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cantatore 2022 et al., on transanal submucosal resection, what was the major complication rate following surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 1 of 93 dogs experienced a major complication requiring surgical revision.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.1%.
Only 1 of 93 dogs experienced a major complication requiring surgical revision.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Submucosal resection via a transanal approach was associated with a low rate (1.1%) of major complications and prolonged survival across benign and malignant rectal tumors.
  • Overall recurrence rate was 21.5%, with higher recurrence in malignant tumors: 28.6% (carcinomas) and 30.4% (carcinoma in situ) vs. 13.6% (adenomas).
  • Complications (P = .032) and incomplete margins (P = .023) were independently associated with increased recurrence risk.
  • Recurrence was the only factor associated with increased risk of tumor-related death (P = .046).
  • Repeat submucosal resection was successful in 60% of dogs with recurrence, indicating feasibility of this as a salvage approach.
  • 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for carcinomas were 95%, 89%, and 73%, though overall survival was significantly longer for benign tumors (P = .001).
  • Preoperative diagnostics (FNA, biopsy) were often inconsistent with final histopathology – only 64.3% biopsy agreement.
  • Presurgical imaging was not consistently performed, limiting accurate staging in many dogs.

Cantatore

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Submucosal resection via a transanal approach for treatment of epithelial rectal tumors – a multicenter study

2022-3-VS-cantatore-3

Article Title: Submucosal resection via a transanal approach for treatment of epithelial rectal tumors – a multicenter study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lotsikas 2025 et al., on stifle distraction portal, what was the effect of VSTL duration (5 vs. 10 minutes) on overall cartilage damage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. There were no statistically significant differences in IACI between groups A (5-min) and B (10-min)【69†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference in overall damage between durations.
There were no statistically significant differences in IACI between groups A (5-min) and B (10-min)【69†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】

🔍 Key Findings

Study type: Cadaveric stifle arthroscopy in large breed dogs (n=12 joints from 6 dogs)
Goal: Describe and assess the proximal lateral portal for insertion of a Ventura stifle thrust lever (VSTL)
Main results:

  • No damage to the long digital extensor tendon (LDE) with this portal
  • VSTL could be placed without removing the arthroscope
  • Portal creation time ~37 seconds (faster than previously reported)

Cartilage impact:

  • Superficial iatrogenic articular cartilage injury (IACI) present in all specimens
  • No difference in IACI between 5- and 10-minute lever durations
  • Zone 4 (lateral femoral condyle) had significantly more damage than zones 1–3 (p < .05)

Conclusion: Portal was safe, repeatable, minimally invasive, and did not increase cartilage damage with up to 10-minute lever use

Lotsikas

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Proximal lateral insertion portal of an intra-articular arthroscopic stifle lever: A cadaveric study

2025-3-VS-lotsikas-4

Article Title: Proximal lateral insertion portal of an intra-articular arthroscopic stifle lever: A cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Haine 2022 et al., on outcomes in canine limb tumors, which best describes the surgical complication profile for PNE procedures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 26% had minor complications, but none required additional surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Moderate complication rate, no revisions needed.
26% had minor complications, but none required additional surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fewer R1 margins (tumor on ink) were achieved in mast cell tumors (MCTs) when using 6–10 mm lateral margins versus 0–5 mm (7% vs. 55%; _P_ = .049).
  • For soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), no benefit was seen in margin completeness between 0–5 mm vs. 6–10 mm lateral margins (41% vs. 43% R1).
  • Overall R1 rates were 26% for MCTs and 42% for STSs following PNE.
  • R scheme (“tumor on ink” = R1) had better interobserver agreement (83%) compared to ≤1 mm margin criteria (68% agreement).
  • Complication rate was moderate (26%), but no surgeries required revision.
  • Local recurrence/metastasis occurred in 14% of dogs, with 60% of those having R1 margins.
  • Adjunctive therapy was considered clinically indicated in 46% of 0–5 mm margin cases vs. 24% of 6–10 mm cases.
  • Histologic grade and tumor size were not predictive of margin completeness.

Haine

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

2022-7-VS-haine-5

Article Title: Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Ferreira 2025 et al., on tibial torsion measurement, which method had the highest interobserver reproducibility?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The new method had an interobserver ICC of 0.83, higher than the traditional method (0.52).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3D tomographic method described in this study.
The new method had an interobserver ICC of 0.83, higher than the traditional method (0.52).

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Validate a new 3D CT-based method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with MPL, comparing it to a traditional method.

Sample: 40 tibiae from client-owned dogs with MPL (primarily small-breed).

Repeatability (intraobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.99 → excellent agreement

Reproducibility (interobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.83 → high agreement
  • Traditional method: ICC = 0.52 → moderate agreement

Torsion angle measurements:

  • New method avg: 16.00° ± 8.77
  • Traditional method avg: 8.76° ± 4.92

Conclusion: The new method is more repeatable, reproducible, and provides higher torsion values than the traditional Aper method, especially reliable for small-breed dogs.

Ferreira

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

2025-3-VS-ferreira-1

Article Title: Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Ellis 2024 et al., what was the significant finding in the MCP HU values in Guide Dogs vs Border Collies?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hounsfield units were significantly higher in the MCP of Guide Dogs across mean and maximum measures (p < 0.01):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Guide Dogs had higher mean and maximum HU.
Hounsfield units were significantly higher in the MCP of Guide Dogs across mean and maximum measures (p < 0.01):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 86 elbows assessed: 32 Guide Dogs, 11 Border Collies
  • Guide Dogs showed significantly higher HU values in:
    • MCP: min (p = 0.022), mean (p < 0.01), max (p < 0.01)
    • Humeral trochlea: mean (p < 0.01), max (p < 0.01)
  • Results imply breed-associated HU variation, not necessarily pathologic sclerosis
  • Relevance: Important to avoid false positives for elbow dysplasia during CT-based breeding screens
  • Good interobserver agreement for mean HU values (ICC ~0.82–0.90)

Ellis

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Comparison of Hounsfield Units within the Humeral Trochlea and Medial Coronoid Process in a Population of Labrador X Golden Retriever Guide Dogs and Border Collies

2024-3-VCOT-ellis-1

Article Title: Comparison of Hounsfield Units within the Humeral Trochlea and Medial Coronoid Process in a Population of Labrador X Golden Retriever Guide Dogs and Border Collies

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In David 2024 et al., on single-port cryptorchidectomy, what was the most common method used for transection of the spermatic cord?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 10 of 14 dogs underwent SL compared to only 4 with VSD.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Suture ligation (SL).
10 of 14 dogs underwent SL compared to only 4 with VSD.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Single-port laparoscopic-assisted cryptorchidectomy (SP-LAC) was feasible in 13/14 dogs with abdominal cryptorchidism.
  • Median surgical time was 17 min for unilateral and 27 min for bilateral cryptorchidectomy.
  • All testes were successfully exteriorized through a 15-mm mini-celiotomy in most dogs; only 2 needed slight enlargement.
  • One major complication occurred (testicular artery hemorrhage, requiring conversion to open surgery).
  • Two minor complications involved trocar-related issues (splenic capsule laceration, capnoretroperitoneum).
  • No incisional complications were reported postoperatively; some dogs had mild dermatitis at the clipped site.
  • The technique requires only one surgeon and no advanced tools beyond a single-port endoscope.
  • Low-pressure capnoperitoneum (6 mmHg) was adequate for visualization in most cases.

David

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Single-port laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cryptorchidectomy in 14 dogs

2024-3-VS-david-2

Article Title: Single-port laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cryptorchidectomy in 14 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kalmukov 2022 et al., on cell salvage efficacy, what was the main advantage of swab washing during intraoperative blood salvage?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Swab washing is useful when blood accumulates on swabs rather than in cavities, e.g., in soft tissue surgery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It served as an adjunct when direct suction was limited.
Swab washing is useful when blood accumulates on swabs rather than in cavities, e.g., in soft tissue surgery.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Direct suction salvaged more red blood cell mass (rbcM) than swab washing: 88.43% vs 84.74% (p = .015)
  • Swab washing still achieved high recovery (84.74%), making it a viable adjunct when suction is not possible
  • No significant difference in post-salvage PCV between methods (~34% for Su and ~33.9% for Sw)
  • Total salvaged blood volume was significantly higher using direct suction (143 mL vs 139.8 mL; p < .001)
  • Leukocytes are removed during salvage, potentially lowering risk of cytokine-mediated transfusion reactions
  • Expired pRBCs were used, but device still achieved high RBC recovery, supporting clinical utility
  • Swab washing via manual agitation may cause more RBC destruction than direct suction
  • Cell salvage may avoid complications of allogeneic transfusions, like storage lesions and immunologic reactions

Kalmukov

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

2022-8-VS-kalmukov-4

Article Title: Ex vivo evaluation of a novel cell salvage device to recover canine erythrocytes

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Farrell 2022 et al., on checklist reliability in OVH simulation, how many OSATS GRS items met the content validity criteria?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only “respect for tissue” met content validity criteria; the other 5 OSATS GRS items were excluded.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.
Only “respect for tissue” met content validity criteria; the other 5 OSATS GRS items were excluded.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 39 of 40 checklist items for simulated OVH surgical assessment had good content validity (CVI = 0.81)
  • Only 1 of 6 items from the OSATS GRS (respect for tissue) met inclusion criteria (CVI = 0.80)
  • Checklist showed strong reliability (G-coefficient = 0.85) for moderate-stakes exams
  • Modified OSATS GRS showed acceptable reliability (G-coefficient = 0.79)
  • Two raters needed for acceptable reliability in high-stakes exams when using the checklist
  • Minimal interrater bias found; variance largely due to interaction among student, rater, and item
  • Digital recordings were a reliable method of evaluating surgical performance
  • Study supports using checklist over OSATS GRS for assessing preclinical students on simulated models

Farrell

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

2022-5-VS-farrell-2

Article Title: Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sisk 2024 et al., on intramedullary nails, what biomechanical property is most affected by increasing nail diameter?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Stiffness increases with the 4th power of diameter (∝ D⁴), greatly improving resistance to deformation:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Torsional and bending stiffness.
Stiffness increases with the 4th power of diameter (∝ D⁴), greatly improving resistance to deformation:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • IMN provides relative stability, resists bending/torsion due to central axis alignment
  • Larger diameter nails = exponentially greater stiffness (∝ D⁴)
  • Trade-off: Larger interlocking holes weaken fatigue strength of the nail
  • Reaming increases contact/stability but has pros/cons:
    • Improves outcomes in closed fractures
    • May reduce endosteal blood flow in thin-walled bones (e.g., cats)
  • Design advances:
    • Angle-stable IMN reduce rotational slack
    • Expandable nails simplify insertion but may compromise removal or compressive load resistance
    • Precontoured nails match bone curvature but lack consistent clinical superiority
  • Material debates continue (e.g., titanium vs. stainless steel vs. magnesium)

Sisk

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

2024-6-VCOT-sisk-1

Article Title: Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.