Your Custom Quiz

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, what is a proposed benefit of meniscal preservation over meniscectomy?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Meniscal preservation is linked to better long-term joint function and reduced OA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Improved long-term outcomes.
Meniscal preservation is linked to better long-term joint function and reduced OA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

2024-5-VS-rocheleau-5

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In O'Marra 2026 et al., on perioperative septic peritonitis, which of the following is a recommended strategy to mitigate intra-abdominal hypertension in at-risk veterinary patients?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. IAH can compromise healing and perfusion. Recommended strategies include decompression techniques, sedation, and open abdomen management.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Open abdomen management.
IAH can compromise healing and perfusion. Recommended strategies include decompression techniques, sedation, and open abdomen management.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Early enteral nutrition (<24–48 hrs) is associated with improved survival and reduced hospitalization in dogs with septic peritonitis.
  • Appropriate empirical antimicrobials improve survival in cats, but data are mixed in dogs.
  • Recurrent septic peritonitis (RecSP) has poor survival (0%–43.9%); most common cause is gastrointestinal dehiscence.
  • Intraoperative hypotension and preoperative hypoalbuminemia may increase dehiscence risk, though findings are inconsistent.
  • Lidocaine CRI during surgery improves survival over opioids alone in dogs.
  • Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is not recommended due to risks of coagulopathy and kidney injury; albumin use is controversial.
  • Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is under-recognized but contributes to mortality; IAP monitoring should be considered.
  • Diagnostic tests (effusion lactate, glucose, cytology) are unreliable for detecting RecSP; clinical judgment and ultrasound are advised.

O'Marra

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

2026-1-VS-omarra-5

Article Title: Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Heikkilä 2024 et al., on COPLA scaffold evaluation, what was the significant imaging-based outcome at 6 months in the COPLA group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The COPLA group had significantly fewer shoulders with OA at 6 months than the Control group (14% vs. 67%, p=0.019):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Significantly lower prevalence of OA compared to Control group.
The COPLA group had significantly fewer shoulders with OA at 6 months than the Control group (14% vs. 67%, p=0.019):contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 22 dogs (36 shoulders) with shoulder OCD randomly assigned to COPLA scaffold (n=19) or Control (n=17) group
  • At 6 months: Significantly fewer dogs in COPLA group had OA (14% vs. 67%; p = 0.019)
  • At 1.5 years: OA prevalence increased in both groups with no significant difference (COPLA: 64%, Control: 60%)
  • HCPI (pain index) increased significantly at 1 week post-op in COPLA dogs only (p = 0.001), but later normalized
  • Static weight-bearing improved only in unilaterally operated COPLA limbs (p = 0.015)
  • One dog in COPLA group had a fragment dislodge requiring arthroscopic removal
  • Overall, COPLA scaffold may provide short-term benefit in OA reduction, but long-term outcomes were similar

Heikkila

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-heikkila-1

Article Title: Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial of Polylactide–Collagen Scaffold in Treatment of Shoulder Osteochondritis Dissecans in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Beamon 2022 et al., on calcanean tunnel orientation, which construct demonstrated significantly higher yield load than modified tunnels?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. TT constructs showed a 25% higher yield load than MT (P = .027), indicating stronger early resistance to deformation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Transverse tunnel (TT).
TT constructs showed a 25% higher yield load than MT (P = .027), indicating stronger early resistance to deformation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in peak load, failure load, stiffness, or 3 mm gap formation among bone tunnel types.
  • Transverse tunnel (TT) constructs had 25% higher yield load than modified tunnels (MT) (P = .027).
  • Most common failure mode was suture pull-through (67%), with no significant difference between groups.
  • Gap formation ≥3 mm occurred in ~90% of constructs; no significant difference in force needed for gap among groups.
  • All bone tunnel techniques (TT, VT, MT) are viable options for CCT reattachment in dogs.
  • The 3-loop pulley (3LP) pattern provided strong, uniform repair, with higher loads to failure than previously reported.
  • TT constructs showed more tendon distortion at the repair interface during loading.
  • Inclusion of accessory tendon may have improved repair strength compared to prior studies using GT alone.

Beamon

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Effect of calcanean bone‐tunnel orientation for teno‐osseous repair in a canine common calcanean tendon avulsion model

2022-4-VS-beamon-1

Article Title: Effect of calcanean bone‐tunnel orientation for teno‐osseous repair in a canine common calcanean tendon avulsion model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Monnet 2023 et al., on barbed vs conventional suture in vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA), how did the number of suture bites compare between the UBS and conventional groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. UBS group used significantly fewer suture bites (median 14 vs. 19; p = .012).
Incorrect. The correct answer is UBS required fewer suture bites.
UBS group used significantly fewer suture bites (median 14 vs. 19; p = .012).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Leakage pressure was not significantly different between unidirectional barbed suture (UBS) and conventional (C) suture groups (p = .236).
  • UBS group had a 28% lower median leakage pressure than the C group (8.6 mmHg vs. 11.7 mmHg), suggesting higher biological risk of leakage.
  • UBS significantly reduced suturing time (median 12.7 vs. 17.3 minutes; p < .0002).
  • Fewer suture bites were needed in the UBS group (median 14 vs. 19; p = .012).
  • No suture breakage or urethral narrowing occurred in either group.
  • Leakage site distribution (ventral vs lateral) was similar between groups; no dorsal leaks noted.
  • Leakage occurred as low as 5 mmHg in UBS group, indicating potential for postoperative extravasation.
  • UBS may aid intracorporeal suturing in minimally invasive prostatectomy, but catheterization remains necessary postoperatively.

Monnet

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of conventional versus unidirectional barbed suture on leakage pressures in canine vesicourethral anastomosis: An ex-vivo study

2023-5-VS-monnet-4

Article Title: Influence of conventional versus unidirectional barbed suture on leakage pressures in canine vesicourethral anastomosis: An ex-vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Dalton 2023 et al., on acetabular fracture repair, what was the median postoperative fracture gap reported in canine cadavers?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The median postoperative fracture gap was consistently less than 2 mm in all cadaver specimens, demonstrating precise fracture reduction.
Incorrect. The correct answer is <2 mm.
The median postoperative fracture gap was consistently less than 2 mm in all cadaver specimens, demonstrating precise fracture reduction.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures using precontoured plates on 3D-printed models is feasible and technically reproducible in dogs.
  • All cadavers had fracture gaps <2 mm and step defects <1 mm, indicating accurate reduction.
  • Sciatic nerve injury was minimal or absent in all cases, supporting potential neuroprotection from indirect approaches.
  • Pelvic angulation was maintained <5°, confirming preservation of alignment post-reduction.
  • Surgical time averaged ~46 minutes in cadavers for both approaches and repair.
  • Clinical case showed good radiographic healing by 8 weeks and full union by 3 months, with early weight-bearing post-op.
  • Use of locking screws improved reduction fidelity, particularly across a broad plate span.
  • 3D printing accelerated surgical planning, though its necessity remains debated due to the availability and cost concerns.

Dalton

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

2023-6-VS-dalton-1

Article Title: Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Banks 2023 et al., on TECA-LBO in brachycephalic dogs, which neurologic sign was most significantly more common in extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) preoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Facial nerve paresis occurred in 28.4% of EBBs compared to only 5.3% in other breeds (p = .001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Facial nerve paresis.
Facial nerve paresis occurred in 28.4% of EBBs compared to only 5.3% in other breeds (p = .001).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Extreme brachycephalic breeds (EBBs) presented more acutely and at younger ages, most often with neurological signs compared to other breeds.
  • Preoperative signs such as facial nerve paresis, vestibular syndrome, and Horner’s syndrome were significantly more common in EBBs.
  • EBBs showed more severe imaging findings, including higher rates of otitis interna (46.3% vs. 8.5%) and brainstem changes (17.5% vs. 3%).
  • Intraoperative complications were more frequent in EBBs (11.1% vs. 5.3%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .078).
  • Perioperative complication rates did not differ significantly between EBBs and other breeds (23.5% vs. 29.3%).
  • Surgical time was significantly longer in EBBs (median 115 vs. 95 minutes; p = .011).
  • MRI or combined CT/MRI were more frequently used in EBBs, likely due to the higher prevalence of neurological signs.
  • Despite anatomical challenges, complication rates in EBBs were comparable, supporting TECA-LBO safety in these breeds.

Banks

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

2023-5-VS-banks-1

Article Title: Influence of extreme brachycephalic conformation on perioperative complications associated with total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy in 242 dogs (2010–2020)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Welsh 2025 et al., on orthogonal plating, how did unilateral plating compare to orthogonal plating?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Unilateral plating showed 3.5–4.1x greater gap strain than OP groups (p < .0075).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3.5–4.1x higher in UP.
Unilateral plating showed 3.5–4.1x greater gap strain than OP groups (p < .0075).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Compared unilateral plating (UP) vs orthogonal plating (OP) with 2.0, 2.4, and 3.0 mm plates (OP2.0, OP2.4, OP3.0).
  • Model: acetal homopolymer (Delrin) rod with 29 mm fixed fracture gap, loaded axially (4–196 N, 90,000 cycles).
  • OP constructs had 2.5–4.1x higher strength and 3.0–4.2x higher stiffness than UP constructs (p < .0002).
  • UP had 3.5–4.1x higher gap strain than OP groups (p < .0075).
  • All OP groups exceeded 1000 N max load before failure (vs 424 N for UP).
  • Greater implant size in OP groups further increased performance.
  • All constructs survived fatigue loading; 3.5 mm plates showed deformation, especially UP; OP plates remained intact.

Welsh

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Biomechanical analysis of orthogonal and unilateral locking plate constructs in a fracture gap model

2025-4-VS-welsh-2

Article Title: Biomechanical analysis of orthogonal and unilateral locking plate constructs in a fracture gap model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Larose 2024 et al., on laparoscopic liver biopsies in dogs, which artifact was significantly more common in 3 mm biopsy samples compared to 5 mm samples?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Crush artifact scores were higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), although fragmentation scores were not different.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Crush artifact.
Crush artifact scores were higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), although fragmentation scores were not different.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Histologic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm biopsies was 90%, with a Gwet's AC1 of 0.81 (p < .0001).
  • 5 mm biopsies yielded significantly more portal triads and lobules than 3 mm samples (p = .0003 and p < .0001).
  • Crush artifacts were significantly higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), though fragmentation scores were similar (p = .935).
  • Both forceps produced adequate samples for histopathology, copper quantification, and bacterial culture.
  • No hemorrhage requiring intervention occurred, and both sizes were deemed safe and minimally invasive.
  • Surface area ≥40 mm² strongly predicted ≥11 portal triads, a desirable threshold for reliable histopathology.
  • Use of 3 mm instruments was easier in small dogs (<12 kg), but more challenging in larger dogs due to shaft length.
  • Clinical diagnoses were unaffected by forceps size, even in the one discordant histologic pair.

Larose

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

2024-4-VS-larose1-3

Article Title: Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Monti 2025 et al., on lymph node fluorescence imaging, which factor was identified as a limitation of ICG uptake for sentinel lymph node identification?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lymphatic rerouting or blockage due to tumor invasion reduced ICG uptake in some nodes, limiting their intraoperative visualization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Neoplastic obstruction of lymphatics.
Lymphatic rerouting or blockage due to tumor invasion reduced ICG uptake in some nodes, limiting their intraoperative visualization.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic ISLN removal using NIRF-ICG was feasible in 89% of dogs (16/18), demonstrating high procedural success with minimal invasiveness.
  • Median laparoscopic dissection time was only 12 minutes, suggesting efficiency of the NIRF-guided approach.
  • No postoperative complications were observed, and intraoperative complications occurred in only 2 dogs (11.1%), both requiring conversion to open surgery.
  • Metastatic disease was confirmed in 48% of patients (12/25 nodes), including cases where LNs appeared normal in size, highlighting the value of histologic evaluation.
  • NIRF-ICG enabled precise identification of small and mildly enlarged nodes, which are often missed during traditional imaging or palpation.
  • Fluorescent dye leakage following LN capsule rupture limited visibility and required surgical conversion, indicating a key limitation of the technique.
  • ICG signal was occasionally absent in metastatic LNs, likely due to lymphatic rerouting or obstruction, underscoring limitations in SLN identification.
  • The lateral approach allowed consistent access to ipsilateral MILN, IILN, and sacral LNs, though contralateral nodes were inaccessible with this method.

Monti

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Near‐infrared fluorescence‐guided minimally invasive surgery for iliosacral lymph node removal in 18 dogs (2023–2025)

2025-6-VS-monti-3

Article Title: Near‐infrared fluorescence‐guided minimally invasive surgery for iliosacral lymph node removal in 18 dogs (2023–2025)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.