Your Custom Quiz

In Pfund 2025 et al., on femoral cortical thickness, what best describes the reliability of CTI measurements across observers?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The CTI showed excellent interobserver reliability with minimal variability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Near-perfect agreement, ICC = 0.984.
The CTI showed excellent interobserver reliability with minimal variability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lower CTI values were significantly associated with higher risk of both intraoperative and postoperative femoral fractures or fissures (p <.0001).
  • The mean CTI for all dogs was 0.285, whereas dogs with fissures/fractures had a mean CTI of 0.246.
  • For each 0.001 increase in CTI, odds of fissure/fracture decreased by 2–3% depending on perioperative timing.
  • High interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.984) and consistency between pre- and postoperative CTI measurements (ICC = 0.96).
  • CTI was the only significant risk factor identified; age, breed, bodyweight, BCS, CFI, or luxoid hips were not significant.
  • Prophylactic lateral plating in dogs with low CTI (mean 0.230) resulted in no postoperative fractures.
  • Postoperative fractures occurred in 8% of cases, and 93% of dogs returned to full function within one year.
  • CTI may be a useful radiographic screening tool, especially when advanced imaging (e.g., DEXA) is unavailable.

Pfund

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Femoral cortical thickness index in a population of dogs undergoing total hip replacement

2025-6-VS-pfund-4

Article Title: Femoral cortical thickness index in a population of dogs undergoing total hip replacement

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what was the study’s conclusion regarding PDS versus Monocryl use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no statistically significant difference in dehiscence rates between groups using PDS or Monocryl for skin closure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PDS and Monocryl had equivalent outcomes.
The study found no statistically significant difference in dehiscence rates between groups using PDS or Monocryl for skin closure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in non-infected incisional dehiscence rates among groups using PDS vs. Monocryl for subcutaneous and skin closure.
  • Overall dehiscence rate: 9.48% (22/232 dogs).
  • Postoperative antibiotic use and signs of inflammation were significantly associated with dehiscence (p = .023 and p < .001, respectively).
  • Dogs not receiving postoperative antibiotics had a higher dehiscence rate (14.74%) than those that did (5.84%).
  • Most dehiscence cases were superficial (85.7%), and the average length of dehiscence was 1.71 cm.
  • No statistically significant impact of weight, BCS, incision length, procedure type, surgeon experience, closure direction, or barrier use on dehiscence rate.

Caiazzo

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

2025-3-VS-caiazzo-3

Article Title: Impact of suture materials polydioxanone and poliglecaprone 25 on non-infected clean orthopedic stifle procedure incisional dehiscence rates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Ferreira 2025 et al., on tibial torsion measurement, which population was primarily studied?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study focused on dogs with MPL, mostly from small breeds.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Small-breed dogs with MPL.
The study focused on dogs with MPL, mostly from small breeds.

🔍 Key Findings

Objective: Validate a new 3D CT-based method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with MPL, comparing it to a traditional method.

Sample: 40 tibiae from client-owned dogs with MPL (primarily small-breed).

Repeatability (intraobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.99 → excellent agreement

Reproducibility (interobserver):

  • New method: ICC = 0.83 → high agreement
  • Traditional method: ICC = 0.52 → moderate agreement

Torsion angle measurements:

  • New method avg: 16.00° ± 8.77
  • Traditional method avg: 8.76° ± 4.92

Conclusion: The new method is more repeatable, reproducible, and provides higher torsion values than the traditional Aper method, especially reliable for small-breed dogs.

Ferreira

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

2025-3-VS-ferreira-5

Article Title: Repeatability and reproducibility of a tomographic method for measuring tibial torsion in dogs with medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, what was the most common location of leakage for skin staple enterotomy (SSE)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Center of closure.
All SSE constructs leaked from the center of closure, with immediate leakage in 35%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-2

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Guénégo 2025 et al., on AMA-based CCWO, what was the postoperative AMA angle achieved in most dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The AMA angle was reduced to 0° in most dogs, achieving axis alignment.
Incorrect. The correct answer is .
The AMA angle was reduced to 0° in most dogs, achieving axis alignment.

🔍 Key Findings

  • AMA-based CCWO realigned the anatomical and mechanical axes in 82% of dogs >50 kg, with postoperative AMA angle of 0° in most cases.
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) rate was only 0.5%, markedly lower than TPLO-reported rates in similar populations (up to 37.5%).
  • All osteotomies achieved Grade 4 healing by 8 weeks, with no implant failures.
  • AMA-based planning based on preoperative AMA and TPA allowed for better correction of proximal tibial angulation compared to TPLO in large dogs.
  • Use of a double locking plate (DLP) fixation and Robert Jones bandage (RJB) contributed to improved mechanical stability and infection prevention.
  • Dogs with AMA angle >3.4° (hyper-CCAPT) were 38% of the cohort, supporting AMA as a critical metric in planning.
  • Postoperative alignment of the AA and MA was more consistently achieved when preoperative AMA was >2.4°, confirming suitability of AMA-based CCWO for severe angulation.
  • Most infections in TPLOs occur within 15 days, but RJB plus antibiotics in this study appeared protective, suggesting benefit for early-phase SSI prevention.

Guénégo

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

2025-3-VCOT-guenego-1

Article Title: Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Zweig 2025 et al., on healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures, what conclusion was reached regarding non-surgical management?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Non-surgical management resulted in good to excellent outcomes but was associated with medial patellar luxation in some dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It is acceptable but may increase patellar luxation risk.
Non-surgical management resulted in good to excellent outcomes but was associated with medial patellar luxation in some dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Surgically managed TTAF resulted in excellent clinical outcomes at skeletal maturity, with all dogs having normal limb function and no stifle instability.
  • Surgical treatment significantly altered proximal tibial morphology, including decreased tibial plateau angle (TPA) and increased patellar position (PP) compared with the contralateral limb.
  • Axial tibial tuberosity position (TTP-A) increased and transverse position (TTP-T) decreased in surgically treated stifles, indicating distal and caudal tuberosity migration.
  • Non-surgically managed TTAF did not significantly alter tibial morphology or PP, but outcomes were more variable.
  • Medial patellar luxation developed in 2/6 non-surgically treated dogs, whereas none occurred in surgically managed cases.
  • Pins-only and pin–tension band constructs produced similar radiographic changes and outcomes.
  • Despite morphologic changes, no dogs developed cruciate ligament instability at follow-up.
  • Non-surgical management yielded good to excellent owner-reported outcomes, but carried a potential increased risk of patellar luxation.

Zweig

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

6

2025

Treatment outcome and radiographic appearance of healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in skeletally mature dogs: 21 cases (2016–2023)

2025-6-VCOT-zweig-5

Article Title: Treatment outcome and radiographic appearance of healed tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in skeletally mature dogs: 21 cases (2016–2023)

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Oramas 2025 et al., on laparoscopic liver lobectomy, what factor was strongly correlated with increased lobectomy time?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A strong positive correlation was found between lobectomy time and liver lobe weight (r = .73, p = .004).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Weight of the liver lobe.
A strong positive correlation was found between lobectomy time and liver lobe weight (r = .73, p = .004).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 13 cadaver dogs underwent laparoscopic right lateral liver lobectomy in sternal recumbency using a transdiaphragmatic intrathoracic trocar (ITT).
  • All lobectomies were successful, regardless of dog size.
  • Median total surgical time: 35.5 min; median lobectomy time: 18.5 min.
  • ITT port enhanced visualization and access to hilus.
  • No correlation between body weight and hilus access (p = .78).
  • Stronger correlation between liver lobe weight and lobectomy time (r = .73, p = .004).
  • Complication in 3/13 cases: Loss of insufflation due to balloon-tip port failure and pneumothorax.
  • Recommendation: Use a new balloon trocar per case in clinical applications to prevent failure.

Oramas

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Evaluation of sternal recumbency for laparoscopic right lateral liver lobectomy through a transdiaphragmatic port in a canine cadaveric population

2025-4-VS-oramas-2

Article Title: Evaluation of sternal recumbency for laparoscopic right lateral liver lobectomy through a transdiaphragmatic port in a canine cadaveric population

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Huerta 2025 et al., on TPLO healing assessment, what was concluded about the use of 5- vs 10-point scoring systems?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. There was no statistical difference in scoring reliability between the two systems
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference between systems.
There was no statistical difference in scoring reliability between the two systems

🔍 Key Findings

Population: 29 Boxer dogs and 29 age-matched Labrador Retrievers undergoing TPLO.
Scoring Systems Compared: 5-point vs. 10-point radiographic healing systems.
Healing Scores (Week 8):

  • Boxers: 5-point mean = 3.3; 10-point mean = 6.9
  • Labradors: 5-point mean = 3.6; 10-point mean = 7.5
  • Statistically significant difference (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001)

Osteotomy Gap ≥1 mm (present in 16.4%): Associated with significantly lower healing scores and increased recommendations for additional radiographic follow-up (p < 0.0001).
Observer Reliability:

  • Both systems = good interobserver consistency.
  • Slightly better intraobserver consistency with the 10-point scale.

Clinical Implication: Boxer dogs may need extended healing time or altered follow-up strategy after TPLO.

Huerta

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Evaluation of Osteotomy Healing in Boxer Dogs Undergoing Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy Using Two Radiographic Scoring Systems

2025-1-VC-Huerta-5

Article Title: Evaluation of Osteotomy Healing in Boxer Dogs Undergoing Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy Using Two Radiographic Scoring Systems

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Marchionatti 2022 et al., on antiseptic efficacy comparison, which of the following best reflects the conclusion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study concluded both protocols were comparable for SSI prevention and bacterial reduction:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine are both effective, with no clear superiority.
The study concluded both protocols were comparable for SSI prevention and bacterial reduction:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

🔍 Key Findings

  • Chlorhexidine-based asepsis protocols were comparable to povidone-iodine for reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates in veterinary surgery.
  • No significant difference in skin bacterial colonization was observed between the two antiseptics, at both immediate and delayed timepoints.
  • Chlorhexidine-alcohol protocols showed a non-significant trend toward improved bacterial reduction in some studies, though inconsistent across all studies.
  • Use of neutralizing agents was inconsistent, which may have led to overestimation of antiseptic efficacy in several studies.
  • Formulations and concentrations varied widely (e.g., chlorhexidine 0.5–4%, povidone-iodine 0.7–1%), contributing to heterogeneity and limiting definitive conclusions.
  • Only a minority of studies reported using CDC criteria for SSI diagnosis, affecting the reliability of infection outcomes.
  • Risk of bias was high or unclear in multiple domains across all included studies, limiting overall confidence in conclusions.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed no statistically significant superiority of either protocol for SSI prevention or skin bacterial reduction.

Marchionatti

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022-5-VS-marchionatti-5

Article Title: Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Deprey 2022 et al., on gap fracture implants, which construct had significantly lower axial deformation in compression testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The NAS-ILN had significantly lower axial deformation in axial compression testing compared to the LCP.
Incorrect. The correct answer is NAS-ILN construct.
The NAS-ILN had significantly lower axial deformation in axial compression testing compared to the LCP.

🔍 Key Findings

  • NAS-ILN had significantly greater stiffness in both axial compression and 4-point bending compared to LCP constructs.
  • Ultimate load to failure was significantly higher for NAS-ILN in compression (804 N vs 328 N) and bending (25.7 Nm vs 16.3 Nm).
  • Torsional stiffness and angular deformation were similar, but NAS-ILN resisted higher torque to failure than LCP (22.5 Nm vs 19.1 Nm).
  • No slack was observed with the NAS-ILN construct, unlike older nail designs.
  • Failure modes differed: LCPs failed via plate bending; NAS-ILNs failed at the implant or bone near screw holes.
  • Titanium alloy and curved design of NAS-ILN provides better anatomic fit and more uniform stress distribution.
  • A third, perpendicular locking hole in NAS-ILN may enhance torsional stability but was not utilized in this study.
  • The curved, angle-stable design of NAS-ILN is a novel advancement in veterinary orthopedics.

Deprey

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

2022-8-VS-deprey-1

Article Title: Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.