Your Custom Quiz

In Walker 2022 et al., on TPLO mRUST scoring, which cortex was **excluded** from scoring due to plate obstruction?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The medial cortex was obstructed by the TPLO plate and excluded from mRUST scoring.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Medial.
The medial cortex was obstructed by the TPLO plate and excluded from mRUST scoring.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO mRUST scoring showed improved inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.56) compared to subjective evaluation (Kappa = 0.33).
  • Intra-rater reliability was similar for both methods (TPLO mRUST: 0.73, subjective: 0.72).
  • TPLO mRUST scores ≥10/12 strongly correlated with radiographic union, as subjectively assessed (99% agreement).
  • No significant difference in healing between first and second TPLO sides (P = .09), countering assumptions about load-bearing impact.
  • Higher initial lameness scores and younger age were associated with higher TPLO mRUST scores, suggesting more robust healing in those groups.
  • Postoperative complications were linked to lower TPLO mRUST scores, indicating impaired healing.
  • Medial cortex was excluded from scoring due to plate obstruction, validating use of only 3 cortices for scoring.
  • The TPLO mRUST system may standardize healing assessment, reducing subjective bias across specialties.

Walker

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

2022-8-VS-walker-3

Article Title: Evaluation of a modified radiographic union scale for tibial fractures scoring system in staged bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures and comparison of first and second side radiographic bone healing

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2025 et al., on spinal drill guide accuracy, what was the Zdichavski classification for all screw placements?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 140 screw holes were classified as Grade 1, indicating fully contained, optimal placement.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Grade 1: Optimal placement.
All 140 screw holes were classified as Grade 1, indicating fully contained, optimal placement.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed, SOP plate-specific guides enabled safe screw placement from T12–L5 in canine cadavers and models.
  • All 140 screw trajectories were classified as Zdichavski Grade 1, indicating optimal placement without vertebral canal breach.
  • Screw angles (cranial-caudal and transverse) matched preoperative planning, with no significant deviation.
  • Entry/exit point deviations were <1 mm on average, deemed clinically negligible.
  • Drill guides were quick to place (<30 sec per vertebra) and improved ease of surgery.
  • Plates acted as effective reduction tools, guiding alignment during screw placement in mobile spines.
  • Minor technical challenges arose from cadaveric spine mobility, mitigated by sequential screw insertion.
  • Technique may enable future use in fracture/luxation reduction, pending further cadaveric and clinical trials.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Development and testing of an animal-specific and string-of-pearls (SOP) plate specific, three-dimensionally (3D) printed drilling guide: A proof of concept study for canine thoracolumbar spinal stabilization

2025-6-VS-miller-2

Article Title: Development and testing of an animal-specific and string-of-pearls (SOP) plate specific, three-dimensionally (3D) printed drilling guide: A proof of concept study for canine thoracolumbar spinal stabilization

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Barrett 2023 et al., on complication grading systems, which system showed **higher interobserver reliability** when evaluating only true complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. When sequelae and failure-to-cure cases were excluded, the aCD system had **excellent reliability** (ICC = 0.975) versus good reliability for Cook (ICC = 0.857).
Incorrect. The correct answer is The adapted Clavien–Dindo (aCD) system.
When sequelae and failure-to-cure cases were excluded, the aCD system had **excellent reliability** (ICC = 0.975) versus good reliability for Cook (ICC = 0.857).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cook system had good reliability across all cases (ICC = 0.848), even when complications, sequelae, and failure-to-cure were included.
  • aCD system had excellent reliability when excluding sequelae/failure-to-cure cases (ICC = 0.975) but only moderate reliability when including them (ICC = 0.620).
  • Majority of complications (60–63%) were graded as Grade 3 in the aCD system, corresponding to surgical or anesthetic intervention.
  • Cook system classified most cases (78–81%) as major complications.
  • Assessors had difficulty distinguishing sequelae from Grade 1 complications, and failure-to-cure from Grades 1–2, reducing aCD reliability.
  • The aCD system offers more resolution (5 grades vs. 3) and less subjectivity through objective definitions.
  • Novel terminology (e.g., sequelae, failure to cure) in the aCD system may hinder its uptake without proper training.
  • Reclassifying expected events (e.g., swelling, bruising) as sequelae could significantly reduce reported complication rates in other studies.

Barrett

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Comparison of two postoperative complication grading systems after treatment of stifle and shoulder instability in 68 dogs

2023-1-VS-barrett-1

Article Title: Comparison of two postoperative complication grading systems after treatment of stifle and shoulder instability in 68 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Knudsen 2024 et al., on CT imaging protocol, what was the maximum volume of contrast solution injected per stifle?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CTA contrast solution volume per stifle was capped at 5 mL to achieve joint distension without leakage.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 5 mL.
CTA contrast solution volume per stifle was capped at 5 mL to achieve joint distension without leakage.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Study Design: Prospective case series of 52 scans from 44 dogs with CCL injury.
  • Main Technique: 16-slice CTA; evaluated by 3 observers with varying experience; validated against surgical mini-medial arthrotomy findings.
  • Diagnostic Metrics (Reading 2):
    • Sensitivity: 1.00 (Observers 1 & 2), 0.93 (Observer 3)
    • Specificity: 0.78–0.91
    • Positive Likelihood Ratio: Up to 10.71
    • Negative Likelihood Ratio: As low as 0.08
    • Accuracy: 90%+ for all in Reading 2
  • Observer Effect: Significant improvement between first and second reading for less experienced observers (p < 0.05); learning curve evident.
  • Meniscal lesions found:
    • 9/12 in suspected late meniscal injury cases
    • 19/40 in newly diagnosed CCL cases
    • Most common = bucket handle tears
  • Conclusion: Multidetector CTA is a clinically useful, non-invasive tool for identifying medial meniscal lesions in dogs with CCL disease.

Knudsen

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

2024-1-VS-knudsen-5

Article Title: Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In De Moya 2023 et al., on femoral pinning outcomes, what was a reported benefit of FGPP over open techniques?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. FGPP is a minimally invasive technique with lower tissue trauma than open repair.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced surgical trauma and morbidity.
FGPP is a minimally invasive technique with lower tissue trauma than open repair.

🔍 Key Findings

  • FGPP (fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pinning) resulted in successful healing in 10/13 fractures, with good limb function.
  • Complications occurred in 5 of 11 cases, including intra-articular implants, malunion, implant failure/nonunion, and implant migration.
  • Cases with delayed surgery (>15 days) or radiographic remodeling were more likely to experience major complications.
  • Most fractures (10/13) were classified as Salter-Harris type I with mild displacement.
  • Median surgical time was 60 minutes, and no conversions to open surgery were needed.
  • Postoperative femoral neck resorption was minimal, suggesting possible benefits of the minimally invasive approach for preserving vascular supply.
  • One intra-articular pin led to progressive joint disease and required femoral head ostectomy.
  • FGPP appears best suited for acute, minimally displaced fractures in young dogs (<8 months) with planned elective explant to avoid growth disturbance.

De Moya

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Closed reduction and fluoroscopic‐guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

2023-6-VS-demoya-4-c617b

Article Title: Closed reduction and fluoroscopic‐guided percutaneous pinning of femoral capital physeal or neck fractures: Thirteen fractures in 11 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Bower 2025 et al., on radial diaphyseal exposure, which statement best describes the comparison between craniomedial and craniolateral approaches?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no statistically significant difference in exposed surface area between approaches.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both approaches provided comparable exposure.
The study found no statistically significant difference in exposed surface area between approaches.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Craniomedial and craniolateral approaches provided comparable exposure of the feline radial diaphysis (p > .05).
  • Mean exposed surface area was slightly greater with the craniolateral approach, both including and excluding the supinator muscle, but differences were not significant.
  • Elevation of the supinator muscle increased exposure for both approaches.
  • Cadaver weight and limb side did not significantly affect exposure area.
  • The craniolateral approach allows easier patient positioning in lateral recumbency without traction or an assistant.
  • Craniolateral access facilitates dual bone fixation (radius and ulna) through a single approach.
  • The craniomedial approach carries greater risk to median and radial nerves during muscle elevation.
  • Findings validate the craniolateral approach as a practical alternative for feline antebrachial fracture repair.

Bower

Veterinary Surgery

8

2025

Comparison of exposure of the feline radial diaphysis by the craniomedial and craniolateral surgical approaches for repair of antebrachial fractures

2025-8-VS-bower-1

Article Title: Comparison of exposure of the feline radial diaphysis by the craniomedial and craniolateral surgical approaches for repair of antebrachial fractures

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Eskelinen 2025 et al., on Plate–Pin fixation for MPL, what was the authors’ recommendation regarding the number of screws for TT fixation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In cases with screw breakage, only two screws were used; authors suggest at least three.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Three or more screws.
In cases with screw breakage, only two screws were used; authors suggest at least three.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Plate–Pin TTT fixation resolved MPL in 64/65 stifles with low recurrence (1.5%) and good lameness outcomes postoperatively.
  • Complication rate was 21.5% (14/65 stifles), mostly minor (57%); major issues included pin migration, fracture, or capsular failure.
  • Pin-related issues accounted for 8 of 20 total complications, highlighting implant refinement is needed.
  • No avulsions, TT fixation failures, or luxation recurrence occurred in cases where surgical technique was followed precisely.
  • Surgical deviations increased complication risk 11.3× (p < 0.05), suggesting adherence to protocol is critical.
  • Single-session bilateral MPL surgery had comparable complication rate (3/20) to unilateral surgery (11/45).
  • Screw breakage occurred in 3 cases, suggesting at least 3 screws may be needed for secure TT fixation.
  • Authors suggest temporary pin fixation and later removal may reduce complications, though prospective studies are needed.

Eskelinen

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

2025-4-VCOT-eskelinen-5

Article Title: Outcome and Complications Following Medial Patellar Luxation Corrective Surgery with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Using a Locking Plate and a Pin Fixation: 45 Unilateral and 20 Single-Session Bilateral Procedures

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Matz 2022 et al., on stapler size comparison, what did the authors conclude about the clinical use of the evaluated staplers?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All three tested stapler types produced acceptable ILP values, suggesting they are viable options for typhlectomy in similarly sized dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is All tested staplers are acceptable for similar dogs.
All three tested stapler types produced acceptable ILP values, suggesting they are viable options for typhlectomy in similarly sized dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in initial leak pressure (ILP) among TA 30 V3 2.5 mm, TA 60 3.5 mm, and TA 60 4.8 mm stapler sizes (P = .78).
  • All stapler types exceeded the physiological intraluminal pressure threshold (~25 mmHg), suggesting acceptable leak resistance.
  • Mean ILPs: TA 30 V3 (181.5 mmHg), TA 60 3.5 mm (112 mmHg), TA 60 4.8 mm (77.2 mmHg).
  • Leakage occurred at the staple line in 23 of 24 specimens; only one had ileal wall rupture.
  • No correlation found between ILP and cadaver weight, cecal wall thickness, or cecal length.
  • Cecal wall thickness averaged 4.9 mm, yet staple heights ranged only from 1.0–2.0 mm.
  • One specimen in each TA 60 group leaked near or below physiologic pressures, suggesting rare outliers.
  • Study supports clinical viability of all tested stapler sizes for canine typhlectomy, but highlights need for in vivo data on healing and complications.

Matz

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Ex vivo comparison of different thoracoabdominal stapler sizes for typhlectomy in canine cadavers

2022-4-VS-matz-5

Article Title: Ex vivo comparison of different thoracoabdominal stapler sizes for typhlectomy in canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Meltzer 2022 et al., on femoral implant selection, what was the role of canal flare index (CFI) in femoral component selection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CFI <1.8 was linked to increased risk of fracture and stem subsidence in cementless implants.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lower CFI was associated with femoral fractures and guided cemented stem selection.
CFI <1.8 was linked to increased risk of fracture and stem subsidence in cementless implants.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Hybrid implants were used in older, heavier dogs with lower canal flare index (CFI) compared to cementless types.
  • CFI <1.8 was associated with higher risk of femoral fracture or stem subsidence with cementless implants.
  • Total complication rate was 14%, with catastrophic complications in only 1.5%—lower than reported in other studies.
  • No significant difference in complication rates across implant types (BFX, BFX-C, hybrid).
  • Femur fractures were rare (2.9%), lower than in prior studies, and successfully managed with cerclage/plate fixation.
  • Coxofemoral luxation was the most common complication (8 cases); all occurred within 62 days post-op, mostly resolved with revision.
  • Collared BFX stems did not significantly reduce complications, though they may limit stem subsidence.
  • An implant selection algorithm was proposed, using age ≥7 years, weight ≥45 kg, and CFI <1.8 to guide cemented vs. cementless stem use.

Meltzer

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Case factors for selection of femoral component type in canine hip arthroplasty using a modular system

2022-2-VS-meltzer-4

Article Title: Case factors for selection of femoral component type in canine hip arthroplasty using a modular system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Case 2024 et al., on feline pancreatectomy, what significant change was observed in trypsin-like immunoreactivity postoperatively?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean fTLI declined by 37% after surgery (p = .03) but remained within the normal range.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It decreased by 37%.
Mean fTLI declined by 37% after surgery (p = .03) but remained within the normal range.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Success rate: All 9 cats underwent successful laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy.
  • Complications:
    • 1 minor intraoperative hemorrhage (Grade 1)
    • 1 sterile peritonitis (Grade 2) post-op, resolved conservatively
  • Pancreatic function:
    • fTLI decreased by 37% (p = .03), but stayed within normal limits
    • fPLI and A1C were unchanged
  • Resection details:
    • Mean weight: 3.0 ± 1.4 g
    • Mean surgical time: 59.7 ± 16.2 min
  • Follow-up: 250–446 days — all cats remained clinically healthy
  • Conclusion: Ultrasonic LPP is safe and effective in healthy cats, preserving endocrine/exocrine function

Case

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy of the left limb using a harmonic scalpel in nine cats

2024-2-VS-case-1

Article Title: Laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy of the left limb using a harmonic scalpel in nine cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.