Your Custom Quiz

In Petchell 2025 et al., on CORA-based CCWO, which parameter was defined preoperatively to enable CORA-based planning?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MAA was preset at 3° or 5° depending on breed size, which allowed precise calculation of the CORA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Desired mechanical axis advancement (MAA).
MAA was preset at 3° or 5° depending on breed size, which allowed precise calculation of the CORA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy (CCWOCORA) consistently achieved the target postoperative TPA of 5° across all tibial morphologies.
  • CCWOCORA produced significantly less variability in postoperative TPA compared to other methods (TPA range: 5.00–5.00°; p < .001).
  • Mechanical axis advancement (MAA) was precisely controlled at 3° in CCWOCORA, leading to greater surgical predictability.
  • Other techniques (e.g., CCWOTPA, CCWOTPA–5, CCWOISO) showed greater variance in TPA, MAA, and tibial length.
  • In small-breed dogs, increasing the MAA from 3° to 5° did not affect TPA outcomes, but increased proximal bone stock, improving feasibility.
  • Wedge angles and tibial length changes varied by method, but CCWOCORA maintained length better than TPA-based methods.
  • The technique allows preoperative planning of both desired MAA and TPA, enhancing predictability and customization.
  • CORA methodology enables precise geometric correction and alignment of mechanical axes, reducing reliance on trial-and-error alignment.

Petchell

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

2025-7-VS-petchell-2

Article Title: An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Haine 2022 et al., on outcomes in canine limb tumors, which lateral surgical margin width significantly reduced R1 margin rates?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6–10 mm.
Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fewer R1 margins (tumor on ink) were achieved in mast cell tumors (MCTs) when using 6–10 mm lateral margins versus 0–5 mm (7% vs. 55%; _P_ = .049).
  • For soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), no benefit was seen in margin completeness between 0–5 mm vs. 6–10 mm lateral margins (41% vs. 43% R1).
  • Overall R1 rates were 26% for MCTs and 42% for STSs following PNE.
  • R scheme (“tumor on ink” = R1) had better interobserver agreement (83%) compared to ≤1 mm margin criteria (68% agreement).
  • Complication rate was moderate (26%), but no surgeries required revision.
  • Local recurrence/metastasis occurred in 14% of dogs, with 60% of those having R1 margins.
  • Adjunctive therapy was considered clinically indicated in 46% of 0–5 mm margin cases vs. 24% of 6–10 mm cases.
  • Histologic grade and tumor size were not predictive of margin completeness.

Haine

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

2022-7-VS-haine-2

Article Title: Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Larose 2024 et al., on fluorescence cholangiography, what is the recommended clinical protocol for ICG in urgent laparoscopic procedures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. If 3–5 h delay isn’t possible, dosing at premed is still effective and recommended.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.05 mg/kg with premedication.
If 3–5 h delay isn’t possible, dosing at premed is still effective and recommended.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography (NIRFC) was feasible and safe in all healthy dogs studied, with no major adverse effects noted.
  • Low-dose ICG (0.05 mg/kg) at 3 h pre-op achieved the highest target-to-background (cystic duct-to-liver) contrast ratio, reaching nearly 4:1 at 280 minutes.
  • Early imaging (time 0) favored low-dose ICG for optimal cystic duct visualization; high-dose ICG led to excessive liver fluorescence and reduced contrast.
  • Visualization of biliary tree occurred within 10–20 min post-injection regardless of dose, but longer delays improved background clearance and contrast.
  • No significant cardiovascular or histamine-related side effects were observed with either dose of ICG.
  • Repeated ICG injections showed minimal residual fluorescence when using a >72 h washout period; shorter intervals caused mild carryover in high-dose groups.
  • Surgeon scoring matched contrast ratios, confirming clinical relevance of imaging outcomes.
  • Recommended dose for laparoscopic imaging: 0.05 mg/kg ICG given 3–5 h before surgery, or at premedication for urgent cases.

Larose

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography in dogs: A pilot study

2024-4-VS-larose2-5

Article Title: Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography in dogs: A pilot study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Guénégo 2025 et al., on AMA-based CCWO, which combination was key to minimizing SSIs in AMA-based CCWO?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Use of RJB and postop antibiotics was associated with a low SSI rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Robert Jones bandage and antibiotics.
Use of RJB and postop antibiotics was associated with a low SSI rate.

🔍 Key Findings

  • AMA-based CCWO realigned the anatomical and mechanical axes in 82% of dogs >50 kg, with postoperative AMA angle of 0° in most cases.
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) rate was only 0.5%, markedly lower than TPLO-reported rates in similar populations (up to 37.5%).
  • All osteotomies achieved Grade 4 healing by 8 weeks, with no implant failures.
  • AMA-based planning based on preoperative AMA and TPA allowed for better correction of proximal tibial angulation compared to TPLO in large dogs.
  • Use of a double locking plate (DLP) fixation and Robert Jones bandage (RJB) contributed to improved mechanical stability and infection prevention.
  • Dogs with AMA angle >3.4° (hyper-CCAPT) were 38% of the cohort, supporting AMA as a critical metric in planning.
  • Postoperative alignment of the AA and MA was more consistently achieved when preoperative AMA was >2.4°, confirming suitability of AMA-based CCWO for severe angulation.
  • Most infections in TPLOs occur within 15 days, but RJB plus antibiotics in this study appeared protective, suggesting benefit for early-phase SSI prevention.

Guénégo

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

2025-3-VCOT-guenego-3

Article Title: Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Crystal 2024 et al., on elbow osteotomies, how did opening wedge osteotomies compare to external rotational osteotomies in reducing medial compartment load?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Opening wedge osteotomies were more effective at reducing medial load (adjustment value 7.26, p = 0.045).
Incorrect. The correct answer is More effective.
Opening wedge osteotomies were more effective at reducing medial load (adjustment value 7.26, p = 0.045).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Ex vivo cadaver study using 5 paired canine thoracic limbs
  • Compared medial opening wedge osteotomy (MOWO) and external rotational osteotomy (ERO) of the humerus
  • Measured pressure changes in the medial compartment using thin-film sensors
  • ERO significantly reduced peak pressure and pressure distribution in the medial elbow compartment (p < 0.05)
  • MOWO showed no significant pressure reduction relative to native state
  • Combined MOWO + ERO did not significantly improve over ERO alone
  • Findings support the biomechanical rationale for ERO as a surgical strategy to offload the medial compartment in cases like medial compartment disease (MCD)

Crystal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Effect of Medial Opening Wedge and External Rotational Humeral Osteotomies on Medial Elbow Compartment Pressure: An Ex Vivo Study

2024-4-VCOT-crystal-3

Article Title: Effect of Medial Opening Wedge and External Rotational Humeral Osteotomies on Medial Elbow Compartment Pressure: An Ex Vivo Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Anderson 2025 et al., on wound drain configurations, what was the rate of leakage observed across all wounds?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Leakage occurred in 93.8% of wounds, mostly at entry sites for the drain system.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 93.8%.
Leakage occurred in 93.8% of wounds, mostly at entry sites for the drain system.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Cadaveric model using four large-breed dogs with 10x10 cm full-thickness wounds at four locations (shoulder, thorax, flank, thigh).
  • Configurations Tested: Diagonal, opposite, parallel, and perpendicular placements of wound infusion catheter and JP drain.
  • Fluid Retrieval:
    • No significant difference by configuration (p = .92) or location (p = .32).
    • Perpendicular configuration had the highest mean retrieval (11.35 mL, 56.8% of instilled volume).
    • Flank location had the lowest retrieval (7.2 mL, 35.9%).
  • Surface Area Coverage:
    • Parallel configuration achieved the highest SA coverage (83.4% ± 11.6%, p < .01).
    • Perpendicular was lowest.
  • Leakage:
    • No difference in leakage between configurations (p = .74) or locations (p = .10).
    • Leakage commonly occurred at drain or catheter entry points (93.8% of wounds).
  • Conclusion: Parallel drain configuration optimized fluid dispersion. Infusion-retrieval systems may allow for topical therapy delivery in closed wounds.

Anderson

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Application and influence of four drain configurations on fluid dispersal and retrieval in a cadaveric canine wound infusion-retrieval system model

2025-2-VS-anderson2-3

Article Title: Application and influence of four drain configurations on fluid dispersal and retrieval in a cadaveric canine wound infusion-retrieval system model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Gutbrod 2024 et al., on feline tibial stabilization, what intramedullary pin diameter was associated with the highest biomechanical performance?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group 2 used a 1.6 mm pin filling ~50% of the tibial canal, yielding superior stiffness.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.6 mm (50% fill).
Group 2 used a 1.6 mm pin filling ~50% of the tibial canal, yielding superior stiffness.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 2.4 mm LCP with a 1.6 mm IM pin had the highest axial stiffness and yield strength among the tested constructs.
  • Axial stiffness was significantly higher in the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm IM pin group compared to 2.7 mm LCP alone (p = .013).
  • No significant difference in torsional stiffness was found among groups.
  • 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin had the lowest stiffness and failure load, underperforming both other constructs.
  • All constructs failed via valgus bending, consistent with clinical observations in feline tibial fractures.
  • A 1.6 mm pin (~50% canal fill) resulted in superior construct performance vs. 1.0 mm (~30% fill).
  • Group 2 (2.4 LCP + 1.6 mm pin) outperformed the 2.7 mm LCP alone in stiffness, despite using a smaller plate.
  • Plate–rod constructs may better preserve periosteal blood supply and support minimally invasive stabilization strategies.

Gutbrod

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

2024-4-VS-gutbrod-3

Article Title: Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Schneider 2025 et al., on axillary LN extirpation, which statement best reflects the accuracy of cytology for staging ALNs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Four LNs had false-negative cytology but were later confirmed metastatic on histopathology, highlighting limitations of cytology.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It misclassified 4 metastatic nodes as non-metastatic.
Four LNs had false-negative cytology but were later confirmed metastatic on histopathology, highlighting limitations of cytology.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Lateral approach to ALN extirpation was successful in 100% of cases (44 dogs, 48 ALNs) with consistent anatomical landmarks (costochondral junction of rib 1 and caudal scapular edge).
  • Median time for ALN removal was 16.6 minutes, highlighting a fast and efficient dissection method.
  • No intraoperative complications were recorded (e.g., hemorrhage or inability to find the lymph node).
  • Postoperative complications occurred in 18% of cases, including seromas (n=2), wound dehiscence (n=4), lameness (n=1), and discomfort (n=1).
  • Histopathology revealed 56% of ALNs had tumor-related pathology, including overt metastases, early metastasis (HN2), or premetastatic changes (HN1).
  • Normal-sized ALNs (<2 cm) still harbored metastases in 22% of cases, emphasizing the unreliability of size as a staging criterion.
  • False negatives in cytology occurred in 4 cases, underlining the limitations of cytologic evaluation for staging.
  • The technique was reproducible without specialized tools, suggesting wide applicability in general and referral practice.

Schneider

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

2025-6-VS-schneider-5

Article Title: Axillary lymph node removal for staging cancer; description of a lateral approach and application in 44 tumor-bearing dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Peterson 2022 et al., on crescent guide in TPLO, what is a noted **limitation** of the crescent guide compared to a standard TPLO jig?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Unlike a TPLO jig, the crescent guide does not provide fragment stability or assist with plateau rotation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It does not aid in fragment stabilization or rotation.
Unlike a TPLO jig, the crescent guide does not provide fragment stability or assist with plateau rotation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Crescent guide use resulted in significantly less medial cortical damage (mean 3.8 mm²) than the radial saw guide (35.7 mm²) and standard jig (51.3 mm²) in bone models.
  • No significant difference in osteotomy accuracy (distance of eccentricity, coronal or axial angulation) among crescent guide, radial guide, or standard jig in either bone models or cadavers.
  • Device application time was shortest with the crescent guide and longest for the radial saw guide.
  • Osteotomy time was fastest with the crescent guide compared to the radial saw guide (P = .015).
  • Participants rated the crescent guide easier to apply than both the radial saw guide (P < .005) and the standard jig (P = .015).
  • 5 of 6 novice participants preferred the crescent guide over the other devices for performing TPLO.
  • Subjective ease of osteotomy performance was higher with the crescent guide vs. radial guide (P < .001).
  • Crescent guide does not assist in fragment stabilization or plateau rotation unlike a standard TPLO jig.

Peterson

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Evaluation of a crescent saw guide for tibial plateau‐leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

2022-3-VS-peterson-5

Article Title: Evaluation of a crescent saw guide for tibial plateau‐leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Larose 2024 et al., on laparoscopic liver biopsies in dogs, which artifact was significantly more common in 3 mm biopsy samples compared to 5 mm samples?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Crush artifact scores were higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), although fragmentation scores were not different.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Crush artifact.
Crush artifact scores were higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), although fragmentation scores were not different.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Histologic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm biopsies was 90%, with a Gwet's AC1 of 0.81 (p < .0001).
  • 5 mm biopsies yielded significantly more portal triads and lobules than 3 mm samples (p = .0003 and p < .0001).
  • Crush artifacts were significantly higher in 3 mm samples (p = .035), though fragmentation scores were similar (p = .935).
  • Both forceps produced adequate samples for histopathology, copper quantification, and bacterial culture.
  • No hemorrhage requiring intervention occurred, and both sizes were deemed safe and minimally invasive.
  • Surface area ≥40 mm² strongly predicted ≥11 portal triads, a desirable threshold for reliable histopathology.
  • Use of 3 mm instruments was easier in small dogs (<12 kg), but more challenging in larger dogs due to shaft length.
  • Clinical diagnoses were unaffected by forceps size, even in the one discordant histologic pair.

Larose

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

2024-4-VS-larose1-3

Article Title: Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.