Your Custom Quiz

In Kurogochi 2025 et al., on cardioplegia in mitral repair, what was the effect of mDN solution on sinus rhythm recovery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Faster sinus rhythm recovery in the mDN group (60s vs 362s, p = 0.027) suggests electrical stabilization benefits.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It resulted in significantly faster sinus rhythm recovery.
Faster sinus rhythm recovery in the mDN group (60s vs 362s, p = 0.027) suggests electrical stabilization benefits.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in cardiac troponin I levels 12h post-op between mDN and St. Thomas cardioplegia groups (p = 0.478)
  • Sinus rhythm returned faster in the mDN group after aortic cross-clamp removal (median 60s vs 362s, p = 0.027)
  • Lower serum potassium at cross-clamp removal in the mDN group (median 4.5 mEq/L vs 5.4, p = 0.005)
  • Fewer doses needed in the mDN group (median 2.5 vs 4.0, p = 0.040)
  • Higher total crystalloid volume used in mDN group (23.6 vs 12.6 mL/kg, p < 0.001)
  • No difference in survival (700-day survival 90% in both groups, p = 0.958)
  • No difference in hospitalization duration (median 6 days for both, p = 0.789)
  • Echocardiographic remodeling similar between groups at 24h post-op

Kurogochi

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

Saline‐based modified del Nido cardioplegia versus multidose St. Thomas cardioplegia in canine mitral valve repair: A randomized controlled trial

2025-7-VS-kurogochi-1

Article Title: Saline‐based modified del Nido cardioplegia versus multidose St. Thomas cardioplegia in canine mitral valve repair: A randomized controlled trial

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Petazzoni 2022 et al., on DPO in older dogs, what was the selection criterion for minimal osteoarthritis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Radiographic inclusion required ≤2 mm osteophytes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Osteophytes ≤2 mm.
Radiographic inclusion required ≤2 mm osteophytes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • DPO improved joint congruity and clinical signs in dogs ≥10 months old with minimal osteoarthritis.
  • Median Norberg angle increased by 21.8% 1 year postoperatively (from 87° to 106°; p < .01).
  • Femoral head coverage increased significantly, with PC rising 66.7% and LHC by 162.5% at 1 year (p < .01).
  • No significant change in pelvic canal width postoperatively, suggesting pelvic conformation was preserved.
  • All ilial osteotomies healed with complete osseous bridging by 8 weeks; 7/11 pubic osteotomies achieved full healing.
  • No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported, including implant failure.
  • Locking plates and additional ventral plating were used in select cases and may have contributed to implant stability.
  • DPO may be extended to older dogs with suitable hip morphology and minimal OA, expanding traditional age criteria.

Petazzoni

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Clinical outcomes of double pelvic osteotomies in eight dogs with hip dysplasia aged 10–28 months

2022-2-VS-petazzoni-4

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of double pelvic osteotomies in eight dogs with hip dysplasia aged 10–28 months

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Perez Neto 2025 et al., on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, what was the most common site of failure in both groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 92% of both prosthetic and control femurs failed at the femoral neck.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Femoral neck.
92% of both prosthetic and control femurs failed at the femoral neck.

🔍 Key Findings

  • In an ex vivo study of 20 canine femur pairs, implantation of a novel hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) prosthesis reduced maximum load (ML) by 22% and load at collapse (LC) by 27% vs. intact controls (p ≤ 0.05).
  • Displacement at maximum load (DML), displacement at collapse (DC), and stiffness (k) were not significantly different between prosthesis and control groups.
  • Both groups showed similar failure patterns, with 92% failing at the femoral neck.
  • All prosthetic femurs still withstood ~6.2× body weight — exceeding estimated in vivo peak loads (~1.64× BW).
  • Prosthesis positioning (neutral vs valgus) had no significant effect on biomechanical outcomes.
  • Implant design preserved more metaphyseal bone stock than total hip replacement, possibly explaining the smaller load reduction compared to other short-stem prostheses.
  • The press-fit cobalt–chromium design with conical stem allowed full contact and stress distribution over the femoral head/neck.
  • Authors conclude the device has adequate immediate biomechanical strength for clinical use, though long-term in vivo studies are needed.

Perez Neto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

2025-4-VCOT-perezneto-3

Article Title: Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Condon 2024 et al., which inciting cause was most frequently associated with condylar fracture in French Bulldogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Falls were the leading cause; stairs accounted for 20.45% of cases:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fall on stairs.
Falls were the leading cause; stairs accounted for 20.45% of cases:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Lateral humeral condylar fractures = 69.8% of cases; medial = 16.2%; Y/T = 14.0%
  • Falls/stairs were the inciting trauma in 45.6% of cases; significantly younger dogs were more likely to fracture after major trauma (p = 0.01)
  • Complication rate = 22% (10 major, 20 minor); implant migration and seroma most common
  • Fixation method had no significant impact on complication rates (p = 0.87)
  • Epicondylar comminution was significantly associated with complications (p = 0.02, OR = 3.27)
  • Contralateral intracondylar fissure found in 9.8%, none progressed to fracture during study
  • Wide inter-center variation in complication rate (5–62%, p = 0.002)

Condon

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Humeral Condylar Fractures in French Bulldogs—Inciting Cause and Factors Influencing Complications of Internal Fixation in 136 Dogs

2024-2-VCOT-condon-3

Article Title: Humeral Condylar Fractures in French Bulldogs—Inciting Cause and Factors Influencing Complications of Internal Fixation in 136 Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In McKay 2023 et al., on patellar tendon augmentation, what suture technique was used for the primary repair in all experimental groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All constructs used locking loop core sutures and simple continuous epitendinous suture for standardization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Locking loop with SCES.
All constructs used locking loop core sutures and simple continuous epitendinous suture for standardization.

2023-8-VS-mckay-5

Article Title:

Journal:

In Tobias 2025 et al., on frontal sinus mucoceles, which imaging finding was most consistently reported across all dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All dogs had a fluid-attenuating, expansile lesion with a contrast-enhancing soft tissue rim on CT.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fluid-filled frontal sinus with soft tissue rim.
All dogs had a fluid-attenuating, expansile lesion with a contrast-enhancing soft tissue rim on CT.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Frontal sinus mucoceles occurred in young dogs, often linked to prior skull trauma by 10 months of age.
  • All dogs presented with expansile, fluid-filled lesions causing facial swelling; CT showed multicentric bone erosion, including the frontal bone and cribriform plate.
  • Surgical options included frontal sinusotomy with either sinus lining ablation or re-establishment of nasofrontal drainage, with or without stenting.
  • Nasofrontal stenting led to long-term resolution in most dogs, although recurrence occurred in 4/8 dogs, requiring revision surgery in 3.
  • Complications were minor and included swelling or nasal discharge; no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • Histology confirmed sterile mucoceles with neutrophilic inflammation and mucin, and cultures were negative in all cases.
  • Guaifenesin was used postoperatively in several cases to reduce mucus viscosity; its benefit is unproven in dogs but may support drainage.

Tobias

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

2025-6-VS-tobias-2

Article Title: Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Perez Neto 2025 et al., on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, implantation of the prosthesis reduced maximum load by approximately what percentage compared to controls?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Maximum load was 22% lower in prosthetic femurs versus intact controls.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 22%.
Maximum load was 22% lower in prosthetic femurs versus intact controls.

🔍 Key Findings

  • In an ex vivo study of 20 canine femur pairs, implantation of a novel hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) prosthesis reduced maximum load (ML) by 22% and load at collapse (LC) by 27% vs. intact controls (p ≤ 0.05).
  • Displacement at maximum load (DML), displacement at collapse (DC), and stiffness (k) were not significantly different between prosthesis and control groups.
  • Both groups showed similar failure patterns, with 92% failing at the femoral neck.
  • All prosthetic femurs still withstood ~6.2× body weight — exceeding estimated in vivo peak loads (~1.64× BW).
  • Prosthesis positioning (neutral vs valgus) had no significant effect on biomechanical outcomes.
  • Implant design preserved more metaphyseal bone stock than total hip replacement, possibly explaining the smaller load reduction compared to other short-stem prostheses.
  • The press-fit cobalt–chromium design with conical stem allowed full contact and stress distribution over the femoral head/neck.
  • Authors conclude the device has adequate immediate biomechanical strength for clinical use, though long-term in vivo studies are needed.

Perez Neto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

2025-4-VCOT-perezneto-1

Article Title: Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Marshall 2022 et al., which **dog-related factor** significantly increased the odds of delayed or non-union?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Odds increased 21% per year of age (OR 1.21 per year).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Age.
Odds increased 21% per year of age (OR 1.21 per year).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Delayed union occurred in 13.9% of fractures; non-union in 4.6%; mal-union in 0.7%
  • Major implant failure increased odds of delayed or non-union by 12.9×
  • Surgical site infection increased risk 3.2×; bone grafting (any type) was also associated (OR 3.3)
  • Comminuted fractures had 4.2× greater odds of delayed or non-union
  • Older age increased risk, with odds increasing by 21% per year
  • Radius and ulna fractures in toy breeds were not high risk, contrary to historical belief
  • Most non-unions required revision surgery with rhBMP-2 or autograft to achieve union
  • Ilium fractures showed 0% delayed/non-union — possibly due to robust muscle envelope

Marshall

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Delayed union, non-union and mal-union in 442 dogs

2022-7-VS-marshall-5

Article Title: Delayed union, non-union and mal-union in 442 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Price 2024 et al., on left-sided TD ligation in dogs, where were all thoracic duct branches located in cadaveric dissections?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All TD branches in cadavers were lateral to the esophagus, simplifying access.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Left side of esophagus.
All TD branches in cadavers were lateral to the esophagus, simplifying access.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Left fourth intercostal thoracotomy allowed successful thoracic duct (TD) ligation in 9/10 canine cadavers.
  • 10/13 clinical cases had a single TD branch at the left fourth intercostal space, indicating lower anatomical complexity.
  • All TD branches at this site were lateral to the esophagus, simplifying surgical access.
  • Unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy was successfully performed via the same incision in 10/10 cadavers.
  • Fewer TD branches at the fourth intercostal space than traditional caudal sites may reduce the risk of missed collaterals.
  • In contrast, traditional caudal TD ligation sites had up to 5 branches, requiring broader dissection.
  • No cadaver had right-sided TD branches, reducing surgical complexity at the studied location.
  • Contrast-confirmed ligation was effective in 90% (9/10) cadavers on CT imaging.

Price

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

2024-3-VS-price-2

Article Title: Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kikuchi 2025 et al., on arthroscopic MMI in toy breeds, what was the purpose of using a 2.4-mm arthroscope in this population?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A 2.4-mm arthroscope allowed detailed assessment of the stifle joint in toy breeds, ensuring meniscal injuries were not missed.
Incorrect. The correct answer is To achieve accurate diagnosis in small joints.
A 2.4-mm arthroscope allowed detailed assessment of the stifle joint in toy breeds, ensuring meniscal injuries were not missed.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Medial meniscus injury (MMI) occurred in 36.3% of stifles with CrCLR in toy breed dogs (<5 kg)
  • Complete CrCLR was significantly associated with MMI (15.3% of complete vs. 3.4% of partial)
  • Severe lameness (grade 3) increased the likelihood of MMI compared to mild lameness (grade 1)
  • Higher body weight, even within the toy breed range, was positively associated with MMI
  • Yorkshire Terriers had the highest MMI incidence (55.6%), but this was not a significant independent factor due to multicollinearity
  • Arthroscopy identified more meniscal damage (including small radial tears and bucket-handle lesions) than gross examination might detect
  • MMI was classified as mild (radial tear) or severe (bucket-handle or flap) with implications for partial meniscectomy
  • Arthroscopy was used in all cases, underscoring its utility in small-breed stifle assessment

Kikuchi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

2025-5-VCOT-kikuchi-5

Article Title: Incidence of Medial Meniscus Injury Detected by Arthroscopy in Toy Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.