Your Custom Quiz

In Azuma 2024 et al., on 3D vs 2D laparoscopy, how did the total surgical times compare between 2D and 3D laparoscopic groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Although 3D improved one procedural step, the overall surgical time did not differ between groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference.
Although 3D improved one procedural step, the overall surgical time did not differ between groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D laparoscopy significantly reduced time to first endoclip placement compared to 2D (median 76 vs. 238 seconds, p = .016).
  • Total surgical time was not significantly different between 3D and 2D groups.
  • No differences were observed in intraoperative complications such as cystic duct injury, clip dislodgment, or gallbladder perforation.
  • Cystic duct stump length was comparable between groups (median 2.5 mm).
  • Liver parenchyma attachment severity did not differ significantly between 2D and 3D groups.
  • All procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon, potentially reducing the benefit seen with 3D visualization.
  • No conversions to open surgery occurred, and no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • The study suggests 3D laparoscopy may aid less experienced surgeons due to enhanced depth perception.

Azuma

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

2024-4-VS-azuma-2

Article Title: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Nicolas 2024 et al., what was a key advantage of the lateral scapular osteotomy approach versus dorsal or ventral routes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The approach offered good foramen access while preserving articular facets and minimizing spinal disruption:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Avoided thoracic entry and preserved vertebral stability.
The approach offered good foramen access while preserving articular facets and minimizing spinal disruption:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • The lateral approach via scapular osteotomy allowed safe access to the T1-2 foramen in a French Bulldog with foraminal disc extrusion.
  • A mini-hemilaminectomy was performed, preserving articular facets.
  • The dog had no neurologic deficits postoperatively, returned to ambulation within 24 hours, and was discharged in 3 days.
  • At 10 months, CT confirmed excellent scapular healing and no recurrence.
  • Double 2.4-mm locking plates provided stable fixation across the scapular spine.
  • The technique avoided thoracic entry or dorsal spine dissection, suggesting a less invasive alternative for select T1-2 foraminal cases.

Nicolas

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Scapular Osteotomy for Lateral Access to a T1-2 Foraminal Disc Extrusion, Treated by Mini-Hemilaminectomy in a Dog

2024-2-VCOT-nicolas-4

Article Title: Scapular Osteotomy for Lateral Access to a T1-2 Foraminal Disc Extrusion, Treated by Mini-Hemilaminectomy in a Dog

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Dobberstein 2024 et al., on liver biopsy forceps, which biopsy technique caused the most tissue crush artifact?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The TP technique caused significantly greater tissue crush than twist alone (p = .01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Twist + Pull.
The TP technique caused significantly greater tissue crush than twist alone (p = .01).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Subjects: 12 healthy colony cats, 68 total liver samples collected via laparoscopy
  • Biopsy instruments: 3 mm vs 5 mm Storz Blakesley cup forceps
  • Techniques: Twist (T), Pull (P), Twist + Pull (TP)
  • Results:
    • 5 mm forceps yielded significantly more hepatic lobules (mean 12.4 vs 4.9), portal triads (29.6 vs 19.0), weight, and histologic area (p < .01)
    • T and P techniques yielded more portal triads and lobules than TP (p = .003 and p = .015)
    • TP technique resulted in greater tissue crush vs T (p = .01)
    • Good diagnostic agreement between 3 mm and 5 mm samples only with TP (κ = 0.75)
    • All samples were of sufficient diagnostic quality, despite size or technique
  • Clinical implication: Both 3 mm and 5 mm forceps are viable; further studies are needed to confirm diagnostic accuracy of 3 mm samples

Dobberstein

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of 3 and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy forceps in cats

2024-2-VS-dobberstein-1

Article Title: Comparison of the diagnostic yield of 3 and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy forceps in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Paulick 2022 et al., on feline ilial plating, which implant system demonstrated the **lowest bending stiffness** under cyclic loading?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. ALPS-5 constructs had significantly lower stiffness than all other groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is ALPS-5.
ALPS-5 constructs had significantly lower stiffness than all other groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Locking plates (except ALPS-5) withstood significantly more cycles before failure than nonlocking DCP constructs.
  • ALPS-6.5, LCP, and FIXIN plates endured higher loads and resisted displacement better than DCP and ALPS-5.
  • ALPS-5 plates showed lower bending stiffness than all other constructs (P < .05).
  • DCP constructs failed due to screw loosening, seen in all specimens.
  • Locking constructs failed by bone slicing, affecting 100% of specimens.
  • Catastrophic implant failure (fracture or plastic deformation) occurred only in ALPS-5 group.
  • Plate size and screw-plate interface both influence resistance to cyclic loading in feline ilial fracture repair.
  • Locking plates are preferable for reducing screw pullout, but plate strength (e.g., cross-section) must match loading forces.

Paulick

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Ex vivo comparison of lateral plate repairs of experimental oblique ilial fractures in cats

2022-1-VS-paulick-1

Article Title: Ex vivo comparison of lateral plate repairs of experimental oblique ilial fractures in cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Azuma 2024 et al., on 3D vs 2D laparoscopy, which surgical step showed significantly reduced time using 3D visualization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3D laparoscopy significantly shortened the time to the first endoclip (median 76 vs. 238 sec, p = .016).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Time from insertion to first endoclip placement.
3D laparoscopy significantly shortened the time to the first endoclip (median 76 vs. 238 sec, p = .016).

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D laparoscopy significantly reduced time to first endoclip placement compared to 2D (median 76 vs. 238 seconds, p = .016).
  • Total surgical time was not significantly different between 3D and 2D groups.
  • No differences were observed in intraoperative complications such as cystic duct injury, clip dislodgment, or gallbladder perforation.
  • Cystic duct stump length was comparable between groups (median 2.5 mm).
  • Liver parenchyma attachment severity did not differ significantly between 2D and 3D groups.
  • All procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon, potentially reducing the benefit seen with 3D visualization.
  • No conversions to open surgery occurred, and no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • The study suggests 3D laparoscopy may aid less experienced surgeons due to enhanced depth perception.

Azuma

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

2024-4-VS-azuma-1

Article Title: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Farrell 2022 et al., on checklist reliability in OVH simulation, what was the main benefit of using digital recordings for student performance assessment?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Digital recordings allowed multiple raters to evaluate performance without introducing bias.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Enabled blinded multi-rater evaluation.
Digital recordings allowed multiple raters to evaluate performance without introducing bias.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 39 of 40 checklist items for simulated OVH surgical assessment had good content validity (CVI = 0.81)
  • Only 1 of 6 items from the OSATS GRS (respect for tissue) met inclusion criteria (CVI = 0.80)
  • Checklist showed strong reliability (G-coefficient = 0.85) for moderate-stakes exams
  • Modified OSATS GRS showed acceptable reliability (G-coefficient = 0.79)
  • Two raters needed for acceptable reliability in high-stakes exams when using the checklist
  • Minimal interrater bias found; variance largely due to interaction among student, rater, and item
  • Digital recordings were a reliable method of evaluating surgical performance
  • Study supports using checklist over OSATS GRS for assessing preclinical students on simulated models

Farrell

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

2022-5-VS-farrell-5

Article Title: Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Dalton 2023 et al., In Minimally invasive acetabular fracture repair in dogs, what reduction quality was reported in cadaveric cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cadavers achieved near-anatomic reductions with minimal gap and step defect.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fracture gap <2 mm and step defect <1 mm.
Cadavers achieved near-anatomic reductions with minimal gap and step defect.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Feasibility study in 5 canine cadavers plus 1 clinical case (Chihuahua, 5.5 kg).
  • Technique used two small approaches (caudal and craniolateral) connected with an epiperiosteal tunnel.
  • Plates were precontoured on mirrored 3D-printed hemipelves to improve fit and reduce intraoperative bending.
  • Cadaver outcomes: fracture gap <2 mm, step defect <1 mm, pelvic angulation <5°.
  • Sciatic nerve injury was minimal: 1/5 cadavers had a mild indentation; others had no gross injury.
  • Median total surgical time: ~46 minutes in cadavers; incisions ~5 cm.
  • Clinical Chihuahua case: weight-bearing within 24 hrs, radiographic union at 3 months; one screw fractured but no adverse effect.
  • Authors conclude: MIAF with 3D printing is feasible and accurate, but requires further evaluation before routine use.

Dalton

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

2023-7-VS-dalton-4

Article Title: Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Petazzoni 2022 et al., on DPO in older dogs, what was the most significant improvement in radiographic hip assessment 1 year after surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median Norberg angle increased by 21.8%, indicating improved hip congruity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Improved Norberg angle.
Median Norberg angle increased by 21.8%, indicating improved hip congruity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • DPO improved joint congruity and clinical signs in dogs ≥10 months old with minimal osteoarthritis.
  • Median Norberg angle increased by 21.8% 1 year postoperatively (from 87° to 106°; p < .01).
  • Femoral head coverage increased significantly, with PC rising 66.7% and LHC by 162.5% at 1 year (p < .01).
  • No significant change in pelvic canal width postoperatively, suggesting pelvic conformation was preserved.
  • All ilial osteotomies healed with complete osseous bridging by 8 weeks; 7/11 pubic osteotomies achieved full healing.
  • No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported, including implant failure.
  • Locking plates and additional ventral plating were used in select cases and may have contributed to implant stability.
  • DPO may be extended to older dogs with suitable hip morphology and minimal OA, expanding traditional age criteria.

Petazzoni

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Clinical outcomes of double pelvic osteotomies in eight dogs with hip dysplasia aged 10–28 months

2022-2-VS-petazzoni-1

Article Title: Clinical outcomes of double pelvic osteotomies in eight dogs with hip dysplasia aged 10–28 months

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sisk 2024 et al., what is a theoretical advantage of expandable intramedullary nails?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Expandable IMNs are designed to better contact the endosteum with less intraoperative imaging:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Minimized need for fluoroscopy.
Expandable IMNs are designed to better contact the endosteum with less intraoperative imaging:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • IMN provides relative stability, resists bending/torsion due to central axis alignment
  • Larger diameter nails = exponentially greater stiffness (∝ D⁴)
  • Trade-off: Larger interlocking holes weaken fatigue strength of the nail
  • Reaming increases contact/stability but has pros/cons:
    • Improves outcomes in closed fractures
    • May reduce endosteal blood flow in thin-walled bones (e.g., cats)
  • Design advances:
    • Angle-stable IMN reduce rotational slack
    • Expandable nails simplify insertion but may compromise removal or compressive load resistance
    • Precontoured nails match bone curvature but lack consistent clinical superiority
  • Material debates continue (e.g., titanium vs. stainless steel vs. magnesium)

Sisk

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

2024-6-VCOT-sisk-3

Article Title: Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Azuma 2024 et al., on 3D vs 2D laparoscopy, which group might benefit most from 3D laparoscopy based on the study’s discussion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 3D visualization improves depth perception, aiding less experienced surgeons.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Trainee or novice surgeons.
3D visualization improves depth perception, aiding less experienced surgeons.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D laparoscopy significantly reduced time to first endoclip placement compared to 2D (median 76 vs. 238 seconds, p = .016).
  • Total surgical time was not significantly different between 3D and 2D groups.
  • No differences were observed in intraoperative complications such as cystic duct injury, clip dislodgment, or gallbladder perforation.
  • Cystic duct stump length was comparable between groups (median 2.5 mm).
  • Liver parenchyma attachment severity did not differ significantly between 2D and 3D groups.
  • All procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon, potentially reducing the benefit seen with 3D visualization.
  • No conversions to open surgery occurred, and no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • The study suggests 3D laparoscopy may aid less experienced surgeons due to enhanced depth perception.

Azuma

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

2024-4-VS-azuma-5

Article Title: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy for cholecystectomy in a canine cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.