Your Custom Quiz

In Danielski 2025 et al., on PUO complication reduction, which statement best describes the **healing outcome**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Radiographic healing was confirmed in 92/93 limbs, with only one delayed case.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 98.9% of limbs achieved healing by 6 weeks.
Radiographic healing was confirmed in 92/93 limbs, with only one delayed case.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Combined intramedullary (IM) pin and rhBMP-2 use resulted in a low complication rate (7.4%) after proximal ulnar osteotomy (PUO).
  • Major complications occurred in 5.3% of cases (4 infections, 1 pin breakage with ulnar tilt requiring revision).
  • Minor complications occurred in 2.1% of cases (seroma, delayed union).
  • No cases of non-union were observed; 98.9% of limbs achieved radiographic healing by 6 weeks.
  • IM pin breakage was noted in 11.8% of limbs but did not affect healing outcomes.
  • Chondrodystrophic breeds made up 64.8% of the cohort and tolerated the procedure well.
  • Compared to prior studies, complication rates were substantially reduced with this technique (prior major: 13.9%; this study: 5.3%).
  • The use of rhBMP-2 likely enhanced early bone healing and provided biologic support, particularly important in breeds at higher risk of complications.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Impact of intramedullary pinning and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 on postoperative complications after proximal ulnar osteotomy in dogs

2025-6-VS-danielski-3

Article Title: Impact of intramedullary pinning and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 on postoperative complications after proximal ulnar osteotomy in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Adams 2022 et al., on C-section survival rates, what was the neonatal survival to discharge rate in puppies from elective procedures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Neonatal survival after elective C-section was 99.2%, significantly higher than emergency cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 99.2%.
Neonatal survival after elective C-section was 99.2%, significantly higher than emergency cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Neonatal survival to discharge was 93.1% overall, with no significant difference between brachycephalic (94.8%) and nonbrachycephalic (91.8%) breeds.
  • Elective C-section significantly improved neonatal survival (99.2%) compared to emergency C-section (87.1%) (p < .001).
  • Larger C-section litter size was positively associated with survival (p = .004; OR 1.57), whereas total litter size had no effect.
  • Maternal heart rate and stage of labor were associated with neonatal mortality in univariable analysis, but not multivariable.
  • Brachycephalism alone was not a risk factor for neonatal mortality (p = .221) in multivariable analysis.
  • Emergency C-section was the strongest predictor of neonatal mortality (OR 4.75), regardless of breed.
  • Multidisciplinary team approach likely contributed to high survival rates, emphasizing importance of coordinated care.
  • Historical factors such as primiparity and maternal age were not associated with mortality in this cohort.

Adams

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Risk factors for neonatal mortality prior to hospital discharge in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing cesarean section

2022-7-VS-adams-3

Article Title: Risk factors for neonatal mortality prior to hospital discharge in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs undergoing cesarean section

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Longo 2025 et al., on MITA, which complication category occurred in 26% of dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 26% of dogs had major complications, mostly implant-related.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Major complications.
26% of dogs had major complications, mostly implant-related.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 15 dogs underwent minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis (MITA); 10 partial, 5 pantarsal.
  • Mean time to radiographic union: 1.8 ± 0.5 months.
  • Mean time to clinical union: 3.7 ± 0.8 months.
  • Complete osseous union: 46%; the rest achieved ≥50% with functional weightbearing.
  • Complication rate: 26% major (mostly implant-related); no catastrophic complications or plantar necrosis.
  • Functional outcomes: 6 full, 8 acceptable, 1 unacceptable (not due to MITA).
  • MITA may lower soft tissue complications vs open approaches and enable faster healing.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

2025-1-VS-longo-3

Article Title: Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sandberg 2024 et al., which joint was most affected by the tactical harness in all planes of motion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All planes of motion in the elbow showed significant alteration during both walk and trot when harness was worn:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Elbow.
All planes of motion in the elbow showed significant alteration during both walk and trot when harness was worn:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Tactical harness use altered kinematics in all forelimb joints
  • Elbow most affected: increased extension, internal rotation, abduction at walk and trot
  • Carpus: reduced flexion, increased abduction at walk
  • Shoulder: least affected, but showed reduced flexion and increased abduction during walk
  • Only significant ROM increases:
    • Shoulder frontal plane (22%)
    • Elbow transverse plane (19%) at walk
  • Results suggest potential functional limitations from harness use during duty

Sandberg

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

2

2024

Influence of Wearing a Tactical Harness on Three-Dimensional Thoracic Limb Kinematics

2024-2-VCOT-sandberg-1

Article Title: Influence of Wearing a Tactical Harness on Three-Dimensional Thoracic Limb Kinematics

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In İnal 2025 et al., on feline high-rise trauma, what was the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for ATTS in predicting mortality?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The AUC was 0.857, indicating good predictive performance for ATTS
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.86.
The AUC was 0.857, indicating good predictive performance for ATTS

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 373 cats with high-rise syndrome (HRS) from 2017–2020.
ATTS was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001); each point increase decreased survival odds (OR = 0.46).
AUC for ATTS ROC curve: 0.857 (95% CI: 0.788–0.926).
Floor height, lesion type, and ground surface were not significantly associated with survival.
Odds of injury were 7.98× higher when landing on hard vs. soft surface (p < 0.001).
16.96× increased injury risk from the fourth vs. third floor (p = 0.008).
Cats with ATTS ≥7 had 62% mortality; median ATTS increased with floor height (r = 0.244, p < 0.001).
Thoracic and vertebral trauma were most common causes of death.
Only 32% of cats had the “classic” HRS triad (pneumothorax, epistaxis, hard palate fracture).

Inal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

2025-1-VC-inal-2

Article Title: Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Deprey 2022 et al., on gap fracture implants, which construct demonstrated higher torque to failure during torsional testing?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The NAS-ILN resisted significantly more torque before failure than the LCP construct in torsional testing.
Incorrect. The correct answer is NAS-ILN construct.
The NAS-ILN resisted significantly more torque before failure than the LCP construct in torsional testing.

🔍 Key Findings

  • NAS-ILN had significantly greater stiffness in both axial compression and 4-point bending compared to LCP constructs.
  • Ultimate load to failure was significantly higher for NAS-ILN in compression (804 N vs 328 N) and bending (25.7 Nm vs 16.3 Nm).
  • Torsional stiffness and angular deformation were similar, but NAS-ILN resisted higher torque to failure than LCP (22.5 Nm vs 19.1 Nm).
  • No slack was observed with the NAS-ILN construct, unlike older nail designs.
  • Failure modes differed: LCPs failed via plate bending; NAS-ILNs failed at the implant or bone near screw holes.
  • Titanium alloy and curved design of NAS-ILN provides better anatomic fit and more uniform stress distribution.
  • A third, perpendicular locking hole in NAS-ILN may enhance torsional stability but was not utilized in this study.
  • The curved, angle-stable design of NAS-ILN is a novel advancement in veterinary orthopedics.

Deprey

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

2022-8-VS-deprey-3

Article Title: Mechanical evaluation of a novel angle‐stable interlocking nail in a gap fracture model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what procedural outcome showed the largest percent reduction with 3DPCs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Pullout events dropped from a mean of 10 to 2.2—a ~78% reduction, more than other measured variables.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cannula pullout events.
Pullout events dropped from a mean of 10 to 2.2—a ~78% reduction, more than other measured variables.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Customized 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs) significantly reduced surgical time in feline cadaver models (125.6 vs. 95.2 min, p = 0.03).
  • Use of 3DPCs resulted in a reduction in instrument collisions (6.8 vs. 2.6, p = 0.03).
  • Cannula pullout complications decreased with 3DPCs (10 vs. 2.2 per procedure, p = 0.03).
  • 3DPCs were designed at shorter lengths (3 cm), improving intra-abdominal working space in cats.
  • No incisional or postoperative complications occurred in the two live feline cases.
  • One 3DPC insufflation port broke intraoperatively; resolved by using a male luer lock connector in the next case.
  • CO₂ leakage occurred from re-used silicone valves in 2 ports; emphasizing the need for durable valve design.
  • Estimated cost per 3DPC was <$5.00, suggesting cost-effective customization for feline laparoscopy.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

2023-7-VS-buote-5

Article Title: 3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Eiger 2024 et al., on NIRFA-ICG in axial flaps, how did inter-rater reliability (ICC) compare between evaluated flaps for VFP scoring?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CSE had low ICC (0.09) due to all surgeons scoring 4/4, while OMO and THO had moderate inter-rater variability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CSE lowest ICC due to uniform scores; OMO and THO moderate.
CSE had low ICC (0.09) due to all surgeons scoring 4/4, while OMO and THO had moderate inter-rater variability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Caudal superficial epigastric (CSE) flaps were most visible with NIRFA, scoring 4/4 VFP in 97% of evaluations.
  • CSE flap margins were altered in 65% of observations after NIRFA, showing the strongest influence on surgical planning.
  • Thoracodorsal (THO) and omocervical (OMO) flaps had lower visualization scores, with 60–81% of images scoring below 2.
  • Surgeons were 17–25 times more likely to adjust margins for CSE flaps versus OMO or THO based on fluorescence imaging.
  • Poor inter-rater agreement was found for OMO (ICC 0.49) and THO (ICC 0.35); CSE had near-perfect agreement, but ICC was low due to uniform high scoring.
  • Visualization was affected by flap depth and panniculus, making deeper vessels (OMO, THO) harder to see.
  • Surgeons often shortened flap length and reduced flap area when modifying based on NIRFA results.
  • Real-time angiosome visualization via NIRFA-ICG may reduce necrosis risk and improve patient-specific APF design.

Eiger

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Use of near‐infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green to evaluate direct cutaneous arteries used for canine axial pattern flaps

2024-6-VS-eiger-4

Article Title: Use of near‐infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green to evaluate direct cutaneous arteries used for canine axial pattern flaps

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Vandekerckhove 2024 et al., what value did the LImax range across all cadavers?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Reported LImax ranged from 0.25 to 0.77, median 0.53
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.25–0.77.
Reported LImax ranged from 0.25 to 0.77, median 0.53

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Used VMBDmD to quantify hip laxity under increasing force in cadaveric dogs (n=34).
  • 90% of hips reached ≥90% of LImax at 95.32 N, defining this force as sufficient for subluxation.
  • LImax was not significantly influenced by osteoarthritis, weight, sex, or limb side.
  • Position of device (lever length) influenced rate of laxity acquisition, not final LImax.
  • LI curves were repeatable across 5 sessions, indicating elastic—not plastic—deformation.

Vandekerckhove

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

2024-1-VCOT-vandekerckhove-5

Article Title: Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Shetler 2022 et al., on radial head OCD, what was the main advantage of the lateral arthroscopic approach over the standard medial approach?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Medial portals did not allow access to the OCD lesion, which was located on the caudolateral aspect of the radial head.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Improved access to the caudolateral radial head.
Medial portals did not allow access to the OCD lesion, which was located on the caudolateral aspect of the radial head.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bilateral radial head OCD lesions were identified in a 6-month-old English Bulldog with elbow lameness.
  • Medial arthroscopic portals allowed only partial visualization of radial head lesions, insufficient for treatment.
  • Lateral arthroscopy portals provided excellent access for fragment removal and abrasion arthroplasty.
  • Histopathology confirmed OCD, showing cartilage degeneration and retained cartilaginous cores.
  • Dog showed complete resolution of lameness and no elbow pain at 5 months post-op.
  • Lesions were caudolateral on the radial head, with discoid elevation of cartilage and clefts.
  • Lateral approach avoids major neurovascular structures, reducing iatrogenic risk.
  • The authors suggest lateral elbow arthroscopy may have broader indications, including for medial compartment disease or synovial biopsies.

Shetler

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

The use of lateral arthroscopy portals for the management of bilateral osteochondritis dissecans of the radial head in an English bulldog

2022-8-VS-shetler-1

Article Title: The use of lateral arthroscopy portals for the management of bilateral osteochondritis dissecans of the radial head in an English bulldog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.