Your Custom Quiz

In Dalton 2023 et al., In Minimally invasive acetabular fracture repair in dogs, which intraoperative complication was observed in cadaveric specimens?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. One cadaver had mild sciatic nerve indentation; others had no gross nerve injury.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Sciatic nerve indentation.
One cadaver had mild sciatic nerve indentation; others had no gross nerve injury.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Feasibility study in 5 canine cadavers plus 1 clinical case (Chihuahua, 5.5 kg).
  • Technique used two small approaches (caudal and craniolateral) connected with an epiperiosteal tunnel.
  • Plates were precontoured on mirrored 3D-printed hemipelves to improve fit and reduce intraoperative bending.
  • Cadaver outcomes: fracture gap <2 mm, step defect <1 mm, pelvic angulation <5°.
  • Sciatic nerve injury was minimal: 1/5 cadavers had a mild indentation; others had no gross injury.
  • Median total surgical time: ~46 minutes in cadavers; incisions ~5 cm.
  • Clinical Chihuahua case: weight-bearing within 24 hrs, radiographic union at 3 months; one screw fractured but no adverse effect.
  • Authors conclude: MIAF with 3D printing is feasible and accurate, but requires further evaluation before routine use.

Dalton

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

2023-7-VS-dalton-3

Article Title: Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Low 2024 et al., what was the most common minor postoperative complication observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Seromas were the most frequent minor complication (7 elbows):contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Seroma formation.
Seromas were the most frequent minor complication (7 elbows):contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 47 dogs (57 elbows) underwent TCS placement for HIF
  • Overall complication rate = 17.5%
    • Minor: seromas (7 elbows)
    • Major: septic arthritis (3 elbows) — all resolved with antibiotics
  • No screw failures, medial epicondylar fractures, or catastrophic outcomes noted
  • Long-term follow-up in 41 dogs (50 elbows):
    • 90% full function, 10% acceptable function
    • Mean follow-up = ~2.5 years
  • Increased age was significantly protective (p = 0.0051; OR = 0.61)
  • TCS placement method (freehand, guide, aiming device) significantly impacted screw angulation but not complication rate
  • Outcome not affected by presence of complications

Low

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Long-Term Outcome and Complications after Transcondylar Screw Placement for Canine Humeral Intracondylar Fissure

2024-4-VCOT-low-4

Article Title: Long-Term Outcome and Complications after Transcondylar Screw Placement for Canine Humeral Intracondylar Fissure

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Fidelis 2025 et al., on suture eyelet geometry, which two anchors most frequently showed **suture failure at the mid-section**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Sutures in raised eyelet anchors (Jorvet and IMEX) commonly failed at the mid-section, indicating cutting or abrasion.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Jorvet and IMEX.
Sutures in raised eyelet anchors (Jorvet and IMEX) commonly failed at the mid-section, indicating cutting or abrasion.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Raised eyelets caused more suture mid-section failures than embedded eyelets, suggesting wear or cutting against the anchor.
  • No significant effect of cyclic loading on failure load (Fmax) was found for any anchor group.
  • Anika anchor showed the least reduction in suture strength relative to the reference (eyebolt screw), indicating a favorable design.
  • All sutures failed via suture breakage, not anchor pullout, indicating suture fatigue was the primary failure mode.
  • Sutures in raised eyelets more often failed at the mid-section, while those in embedded eyelets failed at the knot.
  • IMEX and Jorvet anchors showed significantly reduced Fmax compared to eyebolt screws.
  • Loading direction and anchor design likely affect wear and ultimate failure, particularly in dynamic in vivo conditions.
  • Future designs should aim for embedded, smooth eyelets that can accommodate larger suture sizes without increasing wear.

Fidelis

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

2025-6-VS-fidelis-3

Article Title: Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Schmutterer 2024 et al., on stifle flexion angle effects, how did the center of force shift during increased stifle flexion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Center of force moved significantly more caudal with increased flexion, especially at the medial meniscus (p = 0.003)
Incorrect. The correct answer is Shifted caudally.
Center of force moved significantly more caudal with increased flexion, especially at the medial meniscus (p = 0.003)

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Biomechanical study on 14 hindlimbs from Retrievers (cadaveric)
  • Three stifle flexion angles tested: 125°, 135°, and 145°
  • Contact Force Ratio (CFR) was significantly higher at 125° and 135° than at 145° (p < 0.001)
  • Center of force shifted caudally with increasing flexion — especially in medial meniscus
  • Lateral meniscus peak pressure was significantly higher at 125° than 145° (p = 0.049)
  • Mean pressures on lateral meniscus decreased with extension, while medial meniscus pressure remained constant
  • Relevance: Helps interpret meniscal load in early cruciate disease and in surgical modeling

Schmutterer

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Evaluation of Meniscal Load and Load Distribution in the Sound Canine Stifle at Different Angles of Flexion

2024-3-VCOT-schmutterer-2

Article Title: Evaluation of Meniscal Load and Load Distribution in the Sound Canine Stifle at Different Angles of Flexion

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what procedural outcome showed the largest percent reduction with 3DPCs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Pullout events dropped from a mean of 10 to 2.2—a ~78% reduction, more than other measured variables.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cannula pullout events.
Pullout events dropped from a mean of 10 to 2.2—a ~78% reduction, more than other measured variables.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Customized 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs) significantly reduced surgical time in feline cadaver models (125.6 vs. 95.2 min, p = 0.03).
  • Use of 3DPCs resulted in a reduction in instrument collisions (6.8 vs. 2.6, p = 0.03).
  • Cannula pullout complications decreased with 3DPCs (10 vs. 2.2 per procedure, p = 0.03).
  • 3DPCs were designed at shorter lengths (3 cm), improving intra-abdominal working space in cats.
  • No incisional or postoperative complications occurred in the two live feline cases.
  • One 3DPC insufflation port broke intraoperatively; resolved by using a male luer lock connector in the next case.
  • CO₂ leakage occurred from re-used silicone valves in 2 ports; emphasizing the need for durable valve design.
  • Estimated cost per 3DPC was <$5.00, suggesting cost-effective customization for feline laparoscopy.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

2023-7-VS-buote-5

Article Title: 3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Radke 2022 et al., on outcome measure validation, what feature contributed to recommending CBPI, COI, and LOAD for clinical use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. These tools met COSMIN Category A criteria for recommendation based on their measurement properties.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Each showed sufficient content validity and (when applicable) internal consistency.
These tools met COSMIN Category A criteria for recommendation based on their measurement properties.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CBPI, COI, and LOAD are recommended for assessing canine osteoarthritis based on COSMIN criteria.
  • COI scored highest in development rigor and evidence quality among evaluated OROMs.
  • Internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness were commonly validated, though no OROMs reported measurement error.
  • LOAD was considered formative, and internal consistency assessment was deemed unnecessary.
  • CBPI and COI showed sufficient internal consistency, but CBPI’s factor structure was inconsistent across studies.
  • All 6 evaluated OROMs (CBPI, COI, LOAD, BHSII, HCPI, HVAS) were quick to complete (under 5 min).
  • Three tools—BHSII, HCPI, HVAS—need more evidence before recommendation; only CBPI, COI, and LOAD are Category A (recommended).
  • Future studies should assess interpretability, including measurement error and clinically meaningful change scores (MIC, SDC).

Radke

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Evidence‐based evaluation of owner‐reported outcome measures for canine orthopedic care – a COSMIN evaluation of 6 instruments

2022-2-VS-radke-5

Article Title: Evidence‐based evaluation of owner‐reported outcome measures for canine orthopedic care – a COSMIN evaluation of 6 instruments

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Petchell 2025 et al., on CORA-based CCWO, how did small-breed dogs respond to increasing MAA from 3° to 5° in CCWOCORA planning?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A 5° MAA allowed better feasibility in small-breed dogs without changing TPA outcomes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Proximal bone stock improved without affecting TPAPOST.
A 5° MAA allowed better feasibility in small-breed dogs without changing TPA outcomes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy (CCWOCORA) consistently achieved the target postoperative TPA of 5° across all tibial morphologies.
  • CCWOCORA produced significantly less variability in postoperative TPA compared to other methods (TPA range: 5.00–5.00°; p < .001).
  • Mechanical axis advancement (MAA) was precisely controlled at 3° in CCWOCORA, leading to greater surgical predictability.
  • Other techniques (e.g., CCWOTPA, CCWOTPA–5, CCWOISO) showed greater variance in TPA, MAA, and tibial length.
  • In small-breed dogs, increasing the MAA from 3° to 5° did not affect TPA outcomes, but increased proximal bone stock, improving feasibility.
  • Wedge angles and tibial length changes varied by method, but CCWOCORA maintained length better than TPA-based methods.
  • The technique allows preoperative planning of both desired MAA and TPA, enhancing predictability and customization.
  • CORA methodology enables precise geometric correction and alignment of mechanical axes, reducing reliance on trial-and-error alignment.

Petchell

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

2025-7-VS-petchell-3

Article Title: An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Santos 2025 et al., on feline MPL morphology, which patellar metric was significantly greater in MPL III compared to controls?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Patellar length was significantly longer in MPL III group vs control (14.3 mm vs 13.95 mm; p = 0.01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Patellar length (fPL).
Patellar length was significantly longer in MPL III group vs control (14.3 mm vs 13.95 mm; p = 0.01).

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 21 cats (10 control, 11 affected); 14 normal limbs vs 18 with MPL (MPL II: 7, MPL III: 11).

Significantly different CT measurements in MPL vs control:

  • aLDFA: MPL II > control and MPL III (p = 0.014)
  • FTW: MPL III > control (p = 0.021)
  • FTD: control > MPL II and III (p < 0.001)
  • TTA: MPL II and III had increased external tibial torsion vs control (p < 0.001)
  • fPL and PV: MPL III cats had longer and more voluminous patellae

No significant differences in AA, mMPTA, TTD, fPW, aPH.
Patella width exceeded trochlear width in all groups.
Authors suggest femoral and tibial angular correction may not be indicated in most feline MPL II–III cases.
Soft tissue techniques and trochleoplasty warrant further investigation.
CT method: Intraobserver ICC good in 64%, interobserver poor in 36% of metrics.

Santos

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

2025-1-VC-santos-4

Article Title: Computed Tomographic Measurement Method for Morphoanatomical Comparison of Femur, Tibia, and Patella in Cats with and without Medial Patellar Luxation

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Lederer 2025 et al., on MIPO vs ORPS, which outcome measure significantly differed between groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Time to clinical union was significantly longer in MIPO (85 days) vs ORPS (57 days), p = .010.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Time to clinical union.
Time to clinical union was significantly longer in MIPO (85 days) vs ORPS (57 days), p = .010.

🔍 Key Findings

Study size: 105 dogs (73 ORPS; 32 MIPO)

MIPO vs ORPS differences:

  • Surgical time: MIPO median 130 min vs ORPS 85 min (p < .001)
  • Explant rate: MIPO 25% vs ORPS 4.1% (p = .003)
  • Time to clinical union: MIPO 85 days vs ORPS 57 days (p = .010)
  • Frontal alignment deviation: MIPO 3.5° vs ORPS 2.0° (p = .047)
  • Comminution more frequent in MIPO (41% vs 16%; p = .012)

Significant predictors for MIPO use: More proximal fracture margin (p = .004), surgeon identity (p < .001)

No significant difference: Sagittal alignment, radial length, union rate, or complication rate by surgeon

Implant preference: Fixin plates used in 84% of MIPO; locking plates more common in ORPS

Lederer

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

2025-4-VS-lederer-1

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and plate stabilization of antebrachial fractures in 105 dogs (2017–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Filho 2024 et al., what did %BW distribution analysis reveal in dogs with forelimb amputations?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. %BW distribution between high and low forelimb amputees was not statistically different:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is No difference between high and low amputation.
%BW distribution between high and low forelimb amputees was not statistically different:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 39 dogs (mostly post-trauma) with either forelimb or hindlimb amputations (high vs low)
  • No significant difference in %BW distribution between high vs low forelimb amputations
  • In hindlimb amputees:
    • High amputations → more overload on contralateral hindlimb (p = 0.01)
    • Low amputations → more even load split, slight preference for contralateral hindlimb and ipsilateral forelimb
  • Values derived from pressure-sensitive walkway confirmed with statistical significance
  • Useful implications for prosthesis selection and rehabilitation planning

Filho

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Gait Analysis of Amputee Dogs Using a Pressure-Sensitive Walkway

2024-4-VCOT-filho-2

Article Title: Gait Analysis of Amputee Dogs Using a Pressure-Sensitive Walkway

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.