Your Custom Quiz

In Aly 2024 et al., on simulator training for feline OHE, how did simulator training affect postoperative pain scores?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cats in the SIM group had significantly lower rates of high pain scores triggering intervention (p < .01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lower in trained group.
Cats in the SIM group had significantly lower rates of high pain scores triggering intervention (p < .01).

🔍 Key Findings

  • This study evaluated whether high-fidelity surgical simulator training improved live animal and student outcomes in a feline OHE teaching lab involving 186 cats and 146 students.
  • Simulator training significantly improved surgical performance and outcomes:
    • Live surgery was 6 minutes shorter on average in the SIM group vs. NO-SIM (115 ± 21 min vs. 121 ± 16 min, p = .04).
    • Pain scores ≥5/20 occurred in 1% of SIM group cats vs. 15% of NO-SIM group cats (p < .01).
    • Rescue analgesia was needed less frequently in the SIM group (5% vs. 15%, p = .03).
    • Student confidence was significantly higher in the SIM group (median 7/10 vs. 6/10, p < .01).
  • The simulator used a realistic abdominal model with friable tissues and required performance of a full OHE procedure.
  • The study design was nonrandomized, grouped by class year, with limitations including lack of blinding during pain assessment in year two.
  • Authors concluded that pre-lab simulator competency improves both animal welfare and student confidence, recommending it as a prerequisite for live surgical training.

Aly

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Effect of surgical simulator training on student and live animal outcomes in a feline ovariohysterectomy teaching laboratory

2024-6-VS-aly-3

Article Title: Effect of surgical simulator training on student and live animal outcomes in a feline ovariohysterectomy teaching laboratory

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lomas 2025 et al., on hybrid THR in cats, which component combination was used in all cases?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All cats received a CFX cemented femoral stem and a 12 mm BFX cementless acetabular cup.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cemented femoral stem and cementless acetabular cup.
All cats received a CFX cemented femoral stem and a 12 mm BFX cementless acetabular cup.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Hybrid THR in cats showed no major complications across 17 hips in 15 cats, including 2 bilateral cases.
  • Postoperative radiographs confirmed stable implant positioning with no loosening, migration, or dislocation in follow-up imaging.
  • Mean owner satisfaction was high, with a mean short-form feline musculoskeletal pain index (sf-FMPI) score of 2/36 at a mean follow-up of 438 days.
  • SCFE (slipped capital femoral epiphysis) was the most common indication, seen in 13/17 hips.
  • Partial tenotomy of rectus femoris origin resolved intraoperative medial patella luxation in 3 cases—no cats required surgical correction later.
  • A micro BFX cup allowed for increased acetabular offset, possibly reducing luxation risk even when using a +0 femoral head offset.
  • Hybrid THR was successfully used as a revision for failed CFX THR due to recurrent luxation—implants remained stable post-revision.
  • Use of oversized cups (12 mm) with shallow seating or medial breach still resulted in stable outcomes, suggesting good implant fixation even with reduced bone stock.

Lomas

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Medium‐term outcomes of hybrid total hip arthroplasty in cats: Cemented femoral stem and cementless acetabular cup in 17 hips (2020–2023)

2025-6-VS-lomas-4

Article Title: Medium‐term outcomes of hybrid total hip arthroplasty in cats: Cemented femoral stem and cementless acetabular cup in 17 hips (2020–2023)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Dalton 2023 et al., In Minimally invasive acetabular fracture repair in dogs, what was the median total surgical time for the cadaveric minimally invasive acetabular fracture repairs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median surgical time was approximately 46 minutes, with incisions around 5 cm.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 46 minutes.
Median surgical time was approximately 46 minutes, with incisions around 5 cm.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Feasibility study in 5 canine cadavers plus 1 clinical case (Chihuahua, 5.5 kg).
  • Technique used two small approaches (caudal and craniolateral) connected with an epiperiosteal tunnel.
  • Plates were precontoured on mirrored 3D-printed hemipelves to improve fit and reduce intraoperative bending.
  • Cadaver outcomes: fracture gap <2 mm, step defect <1 mm, pelvic angulation <5°.
  • Sciatic nerve injury was minimal: 1/5 cadavers had a mild indentation; others had no gross injury.
  • Median total surgical time: ~46 minutes in cadavers; incisions ~5 cm.
  • Clinical Chihuahua case: weight-bearing within 24 hrs, radiographic union at 3 months; one screw fractured but no adverse effect.
  • Authors conclude: MIAF with 3D printing is feasible and accurate, but requires further evaluation before routine use.

Dalton

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

2023-7-VS-dalton-2

Article Title: Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Papacella-Beugger 2024 et al., what was the median deviation of screw entry points?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The median entry point deviation from plan was 1.8 mm (range: 0.3–3.7 mm):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.8 mm.
The median entry point deviation from plan was 1.8 mm (range: 0.3–3.7 mm):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Cadaveric study using 3 miniature breed dogs (6 hemipelves) to assess spinal neuronavigation accuracy for lumbar plate fixation
  • 20 screws placed using CBCT-based navigation with real-time tracking
  • 85% (17/20) of screws were safely and accurately placed
  • Median deviation of screw entry points from plan: 1.8 mm
  • All 3 misplaced screws occurred in a single cadaver, attributed to inexperienced drill handling
  • Custom 3D-printed lightweight tracking array was necessary due to small spinous processes in miniature dogs
  • No iatrogenic canal perforations or vertebral damage in any specimen
  • Concludes neuronavigation offers precise, safe placement of spinal implants in small dogs, with minimal anatomic disruption

Papacella

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Spinal Neuronavigation for Lumbar Plate Fixation in Miniature Breed Dogs

2024-6-VCOT-papacella-beugger-2

Article Title: Spinal Neuronavigation for Lumbar Plate Fixation in Miniature Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Zab 2026 et al., on THA stem templating, which radiographic projection produced significantly larger templated femoral stem sizes?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Flexed projections produced a median stem size of 9 versus 8 for extended projections (p < .0001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Hip-flexed projection.
Flexed projections produced a median stem size of 9 versus 8 for extended projections (p < .0001).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Hip-flexed and hip-extended radiographs produced significantly different femoral stem template sizes, confirming the techniques are not interchangeable (p < .0001).
  • Hip-extended templating underestimated implanted stem size (mean difference −0.54), whereas hip-flexed templating overestimated implanted size (mean difference +0.30).
  • Neither radiographic method consistently predicted the actual implanted femoral stem, emphasizing the importance of intraoperative assessment.
  • Flexed projections generated larger template sizes (median stem size 9) than extended projections (median stem size 8).
  • Canal flare index (CFI) was significantly higher on flexed views (1.89 vs 1.61; p < .0001), reducing apparent "stovepipe" morphology.
  • 88% of extended projections were classified as stovepipe femora versus 44% of flexed projections (p = .0027), suggesting substantial projection-related morphologic distortion.
  • Femoral length appeared significantly longer on flexed radiographs (204.8 mm vs 189.3 mm; p < .001), supporting the presence of foreshortening on extended views.
  • Hip-flexed radiographs may be a practical alternative when hip extension is not possible, especially in severe OA, but implant selection should remain guided by intraoperative findings.

Zab

Veterinary Surgery

4

2026

Comparison of canine femoral implant templating for total hip arthroplasty on 25 sets of craniocaudal extended and caudocranial flexed hip radiographs

2026-4-vs-zab-1

Article Title: Comparison of canine femoral implant templating for total hip arthroplasty on 25 sets of craniocaudal extended and caudocranial flexed hip radiographs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Katz 2022 et al., on meniscal flounce sign, which of the following was recommended despite the flounce sign's diagnostic value?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Authors emphasized flounce should complement, not replace, probing for full evaluation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Probing of the meniscus.
Authors emphasized flounce should complement, not replace, probing for full evaluation.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A positive meniscal flounce sign was associated with normal menisci in 95.5% of cases, demonstrating strong predictive value.
  • Absence of the meniscal flounce sign was associated with meniscal tears in 92.7% of cases.
  • Overall diagnostic accuracy of the flounce sign was 94.6%, with 96.6% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity.
  • Most tears in flounce-negative stifles were bucket-handle tears (73.8%), while radial tears were present in some flounce-positive stifles.
  • Radial tears did not consistently eliminate the flounce sign, suggesting they may not disrupt meniscal fiber tension sufficiently.
  • All procedures were arthroscopically performed, with probing and visualization of the medial meniscus' caudal pole.
  • Flounce sign should complement, not replace, probing—especially as some tear types (e.g., radial) may not abolish the sign.
  • Limb positioning and joint distraction may affect flounce visibility, introducing minor observer variability.

Katz

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

The significance of the meniscal flounce sign in canine stifle arthroscopy

2022-2-VS-katz-5

Article Title: The significance of the meniscal flounce sign in canine stifle arthroscopy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Forman 2026 et al., on laparoscopic warm-up effects, how did warm-up influence performance scores?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group W had significantly higher rubric scores (138.4 vs 121.5).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Warm-up improved scores significantly.
Group W had significantly higher rubric scores (138.4 vs 121.5).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Preoperative warm-up significantly reduced surgical time — mean ~20 minutes shorter (63 min vs 84 min; p < 0.05)
  • Warm-up significantly improved performance scores using a validated rubric (138.4 vs 121.5; p < 0.05)
  • Combined warm-up (simulator + video game) enhanced efficiency and technical proficiency in novice surgeons
  • No intraoperative complications occurred in either group, suggesting safety of trainee-performed LOVE under supervision
  • Warm-up protocol consisted of 30 minutes (15 min simulator + 15 min laparoscopic video game)
  • All participants had baseline laparoscopic exposure but limited hands-on experience, reflecting realistic novice conditions
  • Validated scoring included GOALS and procedural steps, supporting objective assessment of surgical readiness
  • Findings support incorporation of warm-up into surgical training programs to improve efficiency and potentially reduce errors

Forman

Veterinary Surgery

3

2026

Effects of preoperative warm-ups on veterinary medical students' performance with live dog laparoscopic ovariectomy

2026-3-vs-forman-3

Article Title: Effects of preoperative warm-ups on veterinary medical students' performance with live dog laparoscopic ovariectomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McCarthy 2022 et al., on 3D drill guide accuracy, what was the advantage of 3D-GDT in terms of drill end point deviation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. End point deviation was significantly reduced in all axes with 3D-GDT.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lower deviation in craniocaudal, dorsoventral, and 3D linear distances.
End point deviation was significantly reduced in all axes with 3D-GDT.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed drill guides (3D-GDT) significantly reduced craniocaudal and dorsoventral drilling angle deviation compared to free-hand drilling technique (FHDT), with statistical significance (p < .0001 and p = .01 respectively).
  • No sacral corridor breaches occurred with 3D-GDT, whereas FHDT resulted in 20% drill exit incidences (3/15 cases).
  • 3D-GDT had lower deviation from optimal drill trajectory at end points in all axes: craniocaudal (1.84 ± 1.6 mm vs. 4.18 ± 2.4 mm), dorsoventral (1.11 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.4 ± 1.5 mm), and 3D linear (2.47 ± 1.4 mm vs. 5.35 ± 2.2 mm), all statistically significant.
  • Strong correlation (r = 0.77) between CT and 3D software measurements validated method reliability.
  • 3D guide trajectories showed consistent proximity to the optimal trajectory, especially at drill endpoints, indicating reduced variability in execution.
  • 3D-GDT was developed using open-source software and inexpensive materials, supporting future clinical application.
  • Major errors in FHDT occurred primarily at the drill endpoint, underscoring the challenge of maintaining optimal angulation during free-hand drilling.
  • The sacral corridor was recharacterized as pyramidal (not quadrilateral), with implications for safer implant placement.

McCarthy

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

2022-1-VS-mccarthy-3

Article Title: Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Marchionatti 2022 et al., on antiseptic efficacy comparison, what issue may falsely elevate the observed efficacy of antiseptics in skin cultures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Residual activity of antiseptics without neutralizers can persist after sampling, skewing results:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lack of neutralizing agents during sampling.
Residual activity of antiseptics without neutralizers can persist after sampling, skewing results:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

🔍 Key Findings

  • Chlorhexidine-based asepsis protocols were comparable to povidone-iodine for reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates in veterinary surgery.
  • No significant difference in skin bacterial colonization was observed between the two antiseptics, at both immediate and delayed timepoints.
  • Chlorhexidine-alcohol protocols showed a non-significant trend toward improved bacterial reduction in some studies, though inconsistent across all studies.
  • Use of neutralizing agents was inconsistent, which may have led to overestimation of antiseptic efficacy in several studies.
  • Formulations and concentrations varied widely (e.g., chlorhexidine 0.5–4%, povidone-iodine 0.7–1%), contributing to heterogeneity and limiting definitive conclusions.
  • Only a minority of studies reported using CDC criteria for SSI diagnosis, affecting the reliability of infection outcomes.
  • Risk of bias was high or unclear in multiple domains across all included studies, limiting overall confidence in conclusions.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed no statistically significant superiority of either protocol for SSI prevention or skin bacterial reduction.

Marchionatti

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022-5-VS-marchionatti-4

Article Title: Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Filho 2024 et al., what did %BW distribution analysis reveal in dogs with forelimb amputations?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. %BW distribution between high and low forelimb amputees was not statistically different:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is No difference between high and low amputation.
%BW distribution between high and low forelimb amputees was not statistically different:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 39 dogs (mostly post-trauma) with either forelimb or hindlimb amputations (high vs low)
  • No significant difference in %BW distribution between high vs low forelimb amputations
  • In hindlimb amputees:
    • High amputations → more overload on contralateral hindlimb (p = 0.01)
    • Low amputations → more even load split, slight preference for contralateral hindlimb and ipsilateral forelimb
  • Values derived from pressure-sensitive walkway confirmed with statistical significance
  • Useful implications for prosthesis selection and rehabilitation planning

Filho

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Gait Analysis of Amputee Dogs Using a Pressure-Sensitive Walkway

2024-4-VCOT-filho-2

Article Title: Gait Analysis of Amputee Dogs Using a Pressure-Sensitive Walkway

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.