Your Custom Quiz

In Kershaw 2025 et al., on PSG vs AD, how many joint penetrations occurred in the PSG group during cadaveric screw placement?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 7 PSG placements avoided joint penetration, compared to 3/7 joint penetrations in the AD group.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.
All 7 PSG placements avoided joint penetration, compared to 3/7 joint penetrations in the AD group.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed patient-specific guides (PSGs) significantly improved accuracy of drill hole entry (p < 0.001) and exit (p = 0.044) compared to commercial aiming devices (AD).
  • Zero joint penetrations occurred with PSGs, whereas 3 of 7 AD-guided screws were predicted to penetrate the joint (p = 0.19).
  • Variance in exit point and drill angle was significantly lower in PSG group, suggesting more consistent results.
  • One PSG case failed due to improper guide seating, but this was corrected with improved soft tissue clearance.
  • PSGs enabled safer trajectories despite use by novice surgeons, emphasizing their value in less experienced hands.
  • Drill holes placed with ADs deviated more cranially and distally, increasing the risk of articular violation.
  • Use of PSGs allowed for tighter clustering of drill trajectories, especially in the cranial–caudal axis.
  • Subjective feedback favored PSGs for ease of use and ergonomic design, despite requiring slightly larger incisions.

Kershaw

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

5

2025

Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

2025-5-VCOT-kershaw-2

Article Title: Patient-specific Guides Improve the Accuracy and Safety of Transcondylar Screw Placement—A Cadaveric Study in the Canine Humerus

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Aly 2024 et al., on simulator training for feline OHE, how did simulator training affect postoperative pain scores?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cats in the SIM group had significantly lower rates of high pain scores triggering intervention (p < .01).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lower in trained group.
Cats in the SIM group had significantly lower rates of high pain scores triggering intervention (p < .01).

🔍 Key Findings

  • This study evaluated whether high-fidelity surgical simulator training improved live animal and student outcomes in a feline OHE teaching lab involving 186 cats and 146 students.
  • Simulator training significantly improved surgical performance and outcomes:
    • Live surgery was 6 minutes shorter on average in the SIM group vs. NO-SIM (115 ± 21 min vs. 121 ± 16 min, p = .04).
    • Pain scores ≥5/20 occurred in 1% of SIM group cats vs. 15% of NO-SIM group cats (p < .01).
    • Rescue analgesia was needed less frequently in the SIM group (5% vs. 15%, p = .03).
    • Student confidence was significantly higher in the SIM group (median 7/10 vs. 6/10, p < .01).
  • The simulator used a realistic abdominal model with friable tissues and required performance of a full OHE procedure.
  • The study design was nonrandomized, grouped by class year, with limitations including lack of blinding during pain assessment in year two.
  • Authors concluded that pre-lab simulator competency improves both animal welfare and student confidence, recommending it as a prerequisite for live surgical training.

Aly

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Effect of surgical simulator training on student and live animal outcomes in a feline ovariohysterectomy teaching laboratory

2024-6-VS-aly-3

Article Title: Effect of surgical simulator training on student and live animal outcomes in a feline ovariohysterectomy teaching laboratory

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Monti 2025 et al., on lymph node fluorescence imaging, which factor was identified as a limitation of ICG uptake for sentinel lymph node identification?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Lymphatic rerouting or blockage due to tumor invasion reduced ICG uptake in some nodes, limiting their intraoperative visualization.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Neoplastic obstruction of lymphatics.
Lymphatic rerouting or blockage due to tumor invasion reduced ICG uptake in some nodes, limiting their intraoperative visualization.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic ISLN removal using NIRF-ICG was feasible in 89% of dogs (16/18), demonstrating high procedural success with minimal invasiveness.
  • Median laparoscopic dissection time was only 12 minutes, suggesting efficiency of the NIRF-guided approach.
  • No postoperative complications were observed, and intraoperative complications occurred in only 2 dogs (11.1%), both requiring conversion to open surgery.
  • Metastatic disease was confirmed in 48% of patients (12/25 nodes), including cases where LNs appeared normal in size, highlighting the value of histologic evaluation.
  • NIRF-ICG enabled precise identification of small and mildly enlarged nodes, which are often missed during traditional imaging or palpation.
  • Fluorescent dye leakage following LN capsule rupture limited visibility and required surgical conversion, indicating a key limitation of the technique.
  • ICG signal was occasionally absent in metastatic LNs, likely due to lymphatic rerouting or obstruction, underscoring limitations in SLN identification.
  • The lateral approach allowed consistent access to ipsilateral MILN, IILN, and sacral LNs, though contralateral nodes were inaccessible with this method.

Monti

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Near‐infrared fluorescence‐guided minimally invasive surgery for iliosacral lymph node removal in 18 dogs (2023–2025)

2025-6-VS-monti-3

Article Title: Near‐infrared fluorescence‐guided minimally invasive surgery for iliosacral lymph node removal in 18 dogs (2023–2025)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Hawker 2024 et al., on checklist attitudes, what proportion of ACVS diplomates reported using a surgical safety checklist (SSC)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Survey data indicated 67.9% of respondents used an SSC at their practice.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 67.9%.
Survey data indicated 67.9% of respondents used an SSC at their practice.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 67.9% of respondents reported using SSCs, with most indicating frequent use (64% used in every surgery).
  • 78.7% agreed SSCs reduce complications, and 89.6% believed SSCs improve communication.
  • Respondents not using SSCs were more likely to view them as a waste of time (p < .001).
  • Forgetfulness (39.6%) and time constraints (36.5%) were leading reasons for checklist noncompletion.
  • Only 23.3% had SSC training during surgical residency, with newer diplomates more likely to have had exposure (p < .001).
  • Key strategies to improve uptake included: staff feedback modifications (67.9%), formal designation of initiator (48.6%), and training (52.2%).
  • Surgeons and OR staff were most commonly identified as noncompliant team members.
  • SSC use was more frequent in small animal practices, and mandating SSCs by management was favored but not always effective alone.

Hawker

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

2024-5-VS-hawker-1

Article Title: Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Klever 2024 et al., what effect does a dorsoventral projection have on Norberg angle measurements?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Dorsoventral projection increased Norberg angle by 3.2–5.8%, potentially overestimating joint congruity
Incorrect. The correct answer is Increases angle by 3–6%.
Dorsoventral projection increased Norberg angle by 3.2–5.8%, potentially overestimating joint congruity

🔍 Key Findings

  • Dorsoventral radiographs artificially increase Norberg angle values by 3.2–5.8% and should be excluded.
  • Lateral pelvic tilt >2° causes asymmetric changes in Norberg angle; >3° results in significant side-specific changes.
  • Cranioventral-to-caudodorsal tilt >10° results in obvious radiographic tilt, but changes Norberg angle by only ~2%.
  • Tilted but subjectively acceptable images have minor impact and may still be usable for screening.
  • Norberg angle readings differed consistently between left/right hips — possibly due to operator handedness.

Klever

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Influence of Femoral Position and Pelvic Projection on Norberg Angle Measurements

2024-1-VCOT-klever-1

Article Title: Influence of Femoral Position and Pelvic Projection on Norberg Angle Measurements

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Danielski 2022 et al., on PAUL complications, what was the inter-observer agreement (kappa) for predicting complications from radiographs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Kappa values were as low as 0.11, indicating poor agreement between experts.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.11.
Kappa values were as low as 0.11, indicating poor agreement between experts.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Major complications occurred in 25.6% of limbs treated with PAUL, including non-union, implant failure, and infection requiring revision surgery.
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with a higher risk of complications (7% increased risk per additional kg; p = .04).
  • Post-operative radiographic assessment was unreliable in predicting complications; inter-observer agreement was poor (kappa ≤ 0.12).
  • Expert evaluation of implant or reduction errors had low predictive value (k < 0.2) for postoperative complications.
  • Common major complications included non-union (6 limbs), screw breakage, and surgical site infections.
  • Implant removal was required in 11.5% of limbs, mostly due to non-union or infection.
  • Being a Labrador appeared protective on univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis after adjusting for weight.
  • Radiographs showing suboptimal plate placement or osteotomy reduction did not reliably correlate with actual complication occurrence.

Danielski

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs

2022-1-VS-danielski-5

Article Title: Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Story 2024 et al., on eTPA osteotomy comparison, which group demonstrated **tibial shortening** as an outcome?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group B (TPLO + CCWO) was the only group associated with tibial shortening (−0.58% change in length).
Incorrect. The correct answer is TPLO + CCWO.
Group B (TPLO + CCWO) was the only group associated with tibial shortening (−0.58% change in length).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Population: 16 dogs (27 tibias), TPA >34°
  • Techniques analyzed:
    • Group A: CBLO + CCWO
    • Group B: TPLO + CCWO
    • Group C: mCCWO
    • Group D: PTNWO
  • Outcomes:
    • All groups achieved post-correction TPA < 14°.
    • Group A: Slight over-correction (mean TPA 10.47°); greatest mechanical axis shift.
    • Group B: Tibial shortening (~0.58%); least mechanical axis shift.
    • Group C: Lowest post-correction TPA (mean 4.76°); under-correction.
    • Group D: High accuracy, minimal shortening (mean 7.09° post).
  • Statistical Significance:
    • Significant differences in tibial length change and mCrDTA (mechanical axis shift) between groups (p <.05).
    • TPA correction accuracy: Group A (1.02), B (0.95), C (0.89), D (0.98).

Story

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

2024-1-VS-story-2

Article Title: Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Peterson 2022 et al., on crescent guide in TPLO, what was the primary benefit observed in novice surgeons using the crescent guide over other devices?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Use of the crescent guide resulted in significantly less medial cortical damage compared to the radial guide and standard jig.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reduced medial cortical damage.
Use of the crescent guide resulted in significantly less medial cortical damage compared to the radial guide and standard jig.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Crescent guide use resulted in significantly less medial cortical damage (mean 3.8 mm²) than the radial saw guide (35.7 mm²) and standard jig (51.3 mm²) in bone models.
  • No significant difference in osteotomy accuracy (distance of eccentricity, coronal or axial angulation) among crescent guide, radial guide, or standard jig in either bone models or cadavers.
  • Device application time was shortest with the crescent guide and longest for the radial saw guide.
  • Osteotomy time was fastest with the crescent guide compared to the radial saw guide (P = .015).
  • Participants rated the crescent guide easier to apply than both the radial saw guide (P < .005) and the standard jig (P = .015).
  • 5 of 6 novice participants preferred the crescent guide over the other devices for performing TPLO.
  • Subjective ease of osteotomy performance was higher with the crescent guide vs. radial guide (P < .001).
  • Crescent guide does not assist in fragment stabilization or plateau rotation unlike a standard TPLO jig.

Peterson

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Evaluation of a crescent saw guide for tibial plateau‐leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

2022-3-VS-peterson-1

Article Title: Evaluation of a crescent saw guide for tibial plateau‐leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Duvieusart 2025 et al., on lung lobectomy approaches, what percentage of the lung was typically removed by weight across all techniques?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. There was no significant difference in lobectomy weight percentage; the mean was around 32%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 30%–35%.
There was no significant difference in lobectomy weight percentage; the mean was around 32%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Canine cadaveric study comparing intercostal thoracotomy (ICT), median sternotomy (MS), and transdiaphragmatic with caudal median sternotomy (TDCM) for accessory lung lobectomy (ALL).
  • Main Outcomes:
    • Exposure Area: TDCM (193.5 cm²) > MS (106.5 cm²) > ICT (73.5 cm²) (p = .01).
    • TDCM provided significantly greater exposure than MS (p = .02) and ICT (p = .02); MS > ICT (p = .04).
    • Surgical Time: No significant difference (p = .06).
    • Lobe Excision (% by weight/surface area): No significant difference between groups (p = .4).
    • Staple Line Leak: Leak at ≤40 cmH₂O in 2/4 ICT, 0/4 MS, 0/4 TDCM (p = .09).
  • Complications:
    • 1/4 MS cases had iatrogenic damage to an adjacent lobe.
  • Technical Insights:
    • TDCM approach allowed immediate visualization of all three parts of the right pulmonary ligament.
    • The TDCM approach offers improved access without requiring en bloc removal with the right caudal lobe.
  • Conclusion: The TDCM approach provides improved exposure for ALL lobectomy with no increase in surgical time or complications relative to other approaches.

Duvieusart

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

2025-1-VS-duvieusart-3

Article Title: Comparison of three approaches for accessory lung lobectomy in the canine cadaveric model: Intercostal thoracotomy, median sternotomy, and a transdiaphragmatic approach combined with caudal median sternotomy

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Latifi 2024 et al., on fascial mapping in the canine hindlimb, which fascial structure was most suitable as a consistent surgical deep margin in the lateral thigh?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The fascia lata was a robust type I sheet suitable for pseudocompartmental resection.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fascia lata.
The fascia lata was a robust type I sheet suitable for pseudocompartmental resection.

🔍 Key Findings

  • This anatomical study mapped fascial planes of the canine hindlimb and pelvis to aid superficial tumor resection.
  • Type I fascia (discrete sheets) was suitable for deep margins in fascia lata, lateral crus, and gluteal regions.
  • Areas with poor or absent fascia included the ischiorectal fossa, femoral triangle, stifle extensor mechanism, and pes.
  • Type IV fascia associated with periosteum (e.g., patella, tibial tuberosity) required partial ostectomy for inclusion in surgical margins.
  • Nerves at risk during deep dissection included obturator, superficial peroneal, and tibial nerves, particularly in regions with weak fascia.
  • In males, bulbospongiosus muscle could act as a fascial plane but dissection was challenging and potentially hemorrhagic.
  • In females, constrictor vulvae/vestibulae muscles were tightly associated with mucosa, limiting clean resection options.
  • Distal hindlimb resections often lacked a usable fascial plane, suggesting that amputation or adjuvant therapy may be more appropriate.

Latifi

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs: Part III – Hindlimb and pelvis

2024-3-VS-latifi-4

Article Title: Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs: Part III – Hindlimb and pelvis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.