Your Custom Quiz

In Viljoen 2022 et al., on surgical hand prep protocols, why must the CHX results be interpreted cautiously?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CHX results may be skewed due to unvalidated neutralizing agents, which can continue antibacterial action post-sample.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Neutralizer validation was not performed.
CHX results may be skewed due to unvalidated neutralizing agents, which can continue antibacterial action post-sample.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Pre-ABHR hand preparation lowered CFUs at 120 minutes post-gloving compared to ABHR alone (P = .001)
  • pH-neutral soap followed by ABHR outperformed ABHR alone despite being nonmedicated (P = .001)
  • CHX and BAC prewashes showed better immediate CFU reduction post-preparation than pHN (P = .012)
  • No significant difference in total log10 CFU reduction across all four groups over the full surgical period (P = .362)
  • Glove perforation in the thumb was a significant contamination factor (P = .036)
  • All dogs recovered without surgical site infections, though SSI incidence was not a primary outcome
  • Neutralizer validation lacking, so CHX results interpreted cautiously
  • Study supports a 1-minute hand wash with pH-neutral soap prior to ABHR as effective and safe

Viljoen

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of 4 surgical hand‐preparation procedures prior to application of an alcohol-based hand rub in veterinary students

2022-3-VS-viljoen-4

Article Title: Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of 4 surgical hand‐preparation procedures prior to application of an alcohol-based hand rub in veterinary students

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In İnal 2025 et al., on feline high-rise trauma, which surface type was associated with significantly higher odds of injury?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cats falling on hard (concrete) surfaces had 7.98× greater odds of injury than those landing on soft surfaces
Incorrect. The correct answer is Concrete.
Cats falling on hard (concrete) surfaces had 7.98× greater odds of injury than those landing on soft surfaces

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 373 cats with high-rise syndrome (HRS) from 2017–2020.
ATTS was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001); each point increase decreased survival odds (OR = 0.46).
AUC for ATTS ROC curve: 0.857 (95% CI: 0.788–0.926).
Floor height, lesion type, and ground surface were not significantly associated with survival.
Odds of injury were 7.98× higher when landing on hard vs. soft surface (p < 0.001).
16.96× increased injury risk from the fourth vs. third floor (p = 0.008).
Cats with ATTS ≥7 had 62% mortality; median ATTS increased with floor height (r = 0.244, p < 0.001).
Thoracic and vertebral trauma were most common causes of death.
Only 32% of cats had the “classic” HRS triad (pneumothorax, epistaxis, hard palate fracture).

Inal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2025

Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

2025-1-VC-inal-4

Article Title: Survival Rate of High-Rise Syndrome Cases Using Animal Trauma Triage Score in Cats

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Longo 2025 et al., on MITA, how many dogs had an unacceptable outcome due to the MITA procedure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only one unacceptable outcome was reported, but it was unrelated to MITA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.
Only one unacceptable outcome was reported, but it was unrelated to MITA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 15 dogs underwent minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis (MITA); 10 partial, 5 pantarsal.
  • Mean time to radiographic union: 1.8 ± 0.5 months.
  • Mean time to clinical union: 3.7 ± 0.8 months.
  • Complete osseous union: 46%; the rest achieved ≥50% with functional weightbearing.
  • Complication rate: 26% major (mostly implant-related); no catastrophic complications or plantar necrosis.
  • Functional outcomes: 6 full, 8 acceptable, 1 unacceptable (not due to MITA).
  • MITA may lower soft tissue complications vs open approaches and enable faster healing.

Longo

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

2025-1-VS-longo-5

Article Title: Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cruciani 2022 et al., on feline pancreaticoduodenostomy, which postoperative finding was observed and monitored without clinical consequence?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ampulla-like dilation near the anastomosis was seen on ultrasound but was not clinically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Progressive dilation of the pancreatic duct.
Ampulla-like dilation near the anastomosis was seen on ultrasound but was not clinically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Left pancreaticoduodenostomy successfully restored digestive continuity after right lobe and body pancreatectomy in a cat.
  • No clinical signs of exocrine or endocrine insufficiency were observed postoperatively up to 225 days.
  • Histopathology confirmed chronic pancreatitis with abscess formation and reactive lymphadenopathy.
  • No postoperative pancreatitis developed, based on imaging and normal feline pancreatic lipase levels.
  • Progressive focal ampulla-like dilation of the pancreatic duct occurred near the anastomosis without clinical signs.
  • The cat maintained weight and improved clinically for several months post-op, indicating satisfactory outcomes.
  • Surgical technique involved end-to-side anastomosis between the left pancreatic duct and duodenum.
  • Ultimately, the cat was euthanized due to disseminated carcinoma, presumed unrelated to the pancreatic surgery.

Cruciani

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Left pancreaticoduodenostomy after removal of the right lobe and the head of the pancreas in a cat

2022-8-VS-cruciani-2

Article Title: Left pancreaticoduodenostomy after removal of the right lobe and the head of the pancreas in a cat

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kang 2023 et al., on 3DEP accuracy, which of the following statements best describes the effect of surgical experience on performance?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both experienced and inexperienced surgeons achieved comparable accuracy in screw placement and slot creation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant differences were observed between surgeon experience.
Both experienced and inexperienced surgeons achieved comparable accuracy in screw placement and slot creation.

2023-8-VS-kang-4

Article Title:

Journal:

In Takagi 2022 et al., on hepatic venous anatomy, which liver lobe exhibited the greatest variability in the number of veins draining into the left hepatic vein?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The left lateral lobe showed 2–8 draining veins into the LHV, the widest range observed.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Left lateral lobe.
The left lateral lobe showed 2–8 draining veins into the LHV, the widest range observed.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Hepatic venous drainage patterns vary widely across all lobes, especially the left lateral lobe.
  • Right lateral lobe had a median of 2 vessels draining directly into the caudal vena cava (CVC); range: 1–4.
  • Caudate process of caudate lobe had the most variability: 1–5 vessels draining into the CVC; 2 vessels was most common (54.5%).
  • Left lateral lobe drained via 2–8 veins into the left hepatic vein (LHV), with 3 veins most common (31.2%).
  • Left medial lobe typically had 1 vein draining into the LHV (61% of dogs).
  • Papillary process drained into the LHV in 93.5% of cases; 6.5% drained directly to the CVC.
  • Quadrate lobe always had 1 vessel draining either directly to the CVC or via the LHV.
  • CTA revealed more variations than previously described in plastinated or cadaveric studies, highlighting its superior value in surgical planning.

Takagi

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Computed angiographic variations in hepatic venous vasculature in dogs

2022-4-VS-takagi-3

Article Title: Computed angiographic variations in hepatic venous vasculature in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Tani 2022 et al., on FCU tendon reconstruction, what did histology of the FCU in Case 1 reveal?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Histology showed mild atrophy and degeneration, consistent with injury rather than systemic disease.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Mild nonspecific degeneration.
Histology showed mild atrophy and degeneration, consistent with injury rather than systemic disease.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fascia lata autograft reconstruction of the FCU tendon successfully treated carpal hyperextension in both dogs.
  • Primary repair was not possible in one dog due to complete rupture; a fascia lata graft bridged the tendon gap.
  • In the second case, elongated tendon was corrected and reinforced with fascia lata to prevent recurrence.
  • Type I external skeletal fixation was used for 6 weeks to support tendon healing in both dogs.
  • Postoperative gait and range of motion returned to normal, with no recurrence at 36-month follow-up.
  • Ultrasonography aided diagnosis, revealing thinning and echogenic changes in the FCU tendon.
  • Histologic findings showed mild, nonspecific muscle changes, suggesting injury rather than a systemic disease.
  • No complications occurred, and fascia lata showed potential for biological integration and remodeling into tendon-like structure.

Tani

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon with a fascia lata autograft in two dogs with carpal hyperextension

2022-8-VS-tani-5

Article Title: Reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon with a fascia lata autograft in two dogs with carpal hyperextension

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Campbell 2026 et al., on septic peritonitis surgery, which reinforcement technique showed experimental evidence of promoting vascular connection between tissues?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Studies show the omentum can adhere, vascularize, and promote healing at the repair site.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Omentalization with suturing.
Studies show the omentum can adhere, vascularize, and promote healing at the repair site.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Peritoneal effusion cytology remains the most rapid and reliable diagnostic for SP; detection of intracellular bacteria is highly specific (100%) and sensitive in dogs and cats.
  • Blood-effusion glucose difference >20 mg/dL has 100% sensitivity and specificity for SP in both dogs and cats, but point-of-care glucometers may falsely elevate effusion glucose.
  • Preoperative stapled intestinal anastomoses have lower dehiscence rates than handsewn in dogs with SP in some studies, especially in unstable patients.
  • Fluorescent angiography may outperform visual/palpatory assessment in determining intestinal viability during surgery.
  • Omentalization and serosal patching offer reinforcement for intestinal repairs in SP; experimental studies show improved healing, though clinical data are limited.
  • Open abdomen with VAC therapy offers comparable survival to closed methods, with potential benefits including improved peritoneal healing and drainage.
  • Closed suction drains show survival rates ranging from 52–100% in dogs and cats with SP; concerns exist about nosocomial infections, but survival was not consistently affected.
  • Lavage with saline is standard (200–300 mL/kg), but risks include mesothelial irritation and cytokine spread; buffered solutions like LRS or Plasmalyte may be superior.

Campbell

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Diagnosis and surgical management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

2026-1-vs-campbell-4

Article Title: Diagnosis and surgical management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sandoval 2024 et al., on lung lobectomy technique outcomes, what percentage of self-ligating loop (SLL) procedures had intra- or postoperative complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All intra- and postoperative complications occurred in stapled cases; no SLL complications were reported.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0%.
All intra- and postoperative complications occurred in stapled cases; no SLL complications were reported.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Intra- and postoperative complications occurred only in stapled lobectomies, but the difference was not statistically significant (intra: p = .069, post: p = .112).
  • Intraoperative hemorrhage was the most common complication (11.8%), followed by air leakage (2%).
  • All self-ligating loop (SLL) lobectomies had zero complications (n=18), though the sample was small.
  • Postoperative complications included 4 catastrophic events (cardiopulmonary arrest), all in stapled cases.
  • Lung lobectomy technique was not associated with duration of chest tube use, hospitalization, or survival (p > .05).
  • 94.3% of patients survived to discharge (82/87).
  • SLLs are lower-cost and may be more feasible for thoracoscopic/minimally invasive approaches due to smaller port size (5mm vs. 12mm for staplers).
  • A future superiority study would need ≥103 lobectomies per group to assess differences in complication rates.

Sandoval

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

2024-7-VS-sandoval-1

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Johnson 2026 et al., on long-term respiratory outcomes, which measure showed no significant difference between short- and long-term postoperative assessments?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Short- and long-term BOAS index values were statistically equivalent (p = .623), indicating durability of surgical benefit.
Incorrect. The correct answer is BOAS index.
Short- and long-term BOAS index values were statistically equivalent (p = .623), indicating durability of surgical benefit.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Long-term respiratory outcomes after BOAS surgery remained improved vs. preoperative values, with no significant decline over time.
  • Short-term and long-term Respiratory Functional Grades (RFGs) improved in 81% of dogs, with 34% improving by two grades.
  • BOAS indices improved significantly in both short- and long-term follow-ups (mean decrease ~23–25%), supporting sustained benefit.
  • No significant difference between short- and long-term BOAS indices (p = .623), indicating durability of surgical effects.
  • Obesity impacted outcomes — dogs with increased RFG at long-term follow-up were more likely to have gained weight.
  • Owner-reported outcomes poorly correlated with objective measures — some dogs classified as BOAS-affected were perceived by owners as “normal.”
  • Multilevel surgery was common, with palatoplasty, tonsillectomy, sacculectomy, and ala-vestibuloplasty most frequently performed.
  • Dogs undergoing revision airway surgery were excluded, possibly biasing long-term outcomes toward favorable results.

Johnson

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Comparison of short- and long-term objective respiratory outcomes after surgery for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

2026-1-VS-johnson-1

Article Title: Comparison of short- and long-term objective respiratory outcomes after surgery for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.