Your Custom Quiz

In Barrett 2023 et al., on complication grading systems, what is an example of a **Grade I complication** in the aCD system?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Grade I complications require no intervention beyond supportive care (e.g., fever, mild skin irritation, or self-resolving issues).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Postoperative fever requiring no treatment.
Grade I complications require no intervention beyond supportive care (e.g., fever, mild skin irritation, or self-resolving issues).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cook system had good reliability across all cases (ICC = 0.848), even when complications, sequelae, and failure-to-cure were included.
  • aCD system had excellent reliability when excluding sequelae/failure-to-cure cases (ICC = 0.975) but only moderate reliability when including them (ICC = 0.620).
  • Majority of complications (60–63%) were graded as Grade 3 in the aCD system, corresponding to surgical or anesthetic intervention.
  • Cook system classified most cases (78–81%) as major complications.
  • Assessors had difficulty distinguishing sequelae from Grade 1 complications, and failure-to-cure from Grades 1–2, reducing aCD reliability.
  • The aCD system offers more resolution (5 grades vs. 3) and less subjectivity through objective definitions.
  • Novel terminology (e.g., sequelae, failure to cure) in the aCD system may hinder its uptake without proper training.
  • Reclassifying expected events (e.g., swelling, bruising) as sequelae could significantly reduce reported complication rates in other studies.

Barrett

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Comparison of two postoperative complication grading systems after treatment of stifle and shoulder instability in 68 dogs

2023-1-VS-barrett-5

Article Title: Comparison of two postoperative complication grading systems after treatment of stifle and shoulder instability in 68 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Carvajal 2025 et al., on femoral stem breakage, what was the overall success of revision surgery in affected dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Revision outcomes were good: 9 of 10 dogs with follow-up after revision had full functional recovery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 9 of 10 regained full function.
Revision outcomes were good: 9 of 10 dogs with follow-up after revision had full functional recovery.

🔍 Key Findings

Incidence of BFX lateral bolt stem breakage: 2.95% (13 dogs, 14 stems)

Implant factors:

  • 13/14 were BFX lateral bolt stems (sizes #5–7)
  • +9 necks used in 5/11 of 17 mm heads
  • 10/14 stems undersized based on radiographs
  • 10/13 dogs exceeded weight limits for implanted stem size

Malalignment:

  • 10/14 had varus alignment (median 3.9°)
  • 8/14 had insufficient proximodistal seating

Breakage site: Proximolateral shoulder in all cases

Revision outcomes:

  • 11 revised (7 CFX, 3 larger BFX, 1 collared)
  • 9/10 revised dogs regained full function
  • Complications: 1 rebreakage, 1 periprosthetic fracture, 1 fixation failure

Histopathology:

  • Electron microscopy showed fatigue striations and incomplete bead fusion

Conclusion: Avoid small BFX lateral bolt stems if undersized or if long necks required; use weight guidelines to prevent fatigue failure.

Carvajal

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

2025-3-VS-carvajal-5

Article Title: Breakage of cementless press‐fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013–2023)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Foster 2026 et al., on right hepatic lobectomy, what was the most common intraoperative complication observed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hemorrhage occurred in 25/70 dogs and was the most common intraoperative complication.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Hemorrhage.
Hemorrhage occurred in 25/70 dogs and was the most common intraoperative complication.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Perioperative mortality rate was low (2.9%), with no intraoperative deaths reported.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 54.3% of dogs, most commonly hemorrhage and cardiovascular events.
  • 21% of dogs required blood transfusions, though transfusion was not associated with higher complication risk.
  • Advanced hemodynamic support (fluid + cardiovascular) was significantly associated with short-term complications (OR 17.3, p = .029) and shorter survival.
  • No surgical method (e.g., TA stapler, vessel sealing device, hilar resection) was associated with increased risk of complications.
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the most common diagnosis (53%), with an MST of 741 days and 17.6% recurrence.
  • Surgical margins (complete vs incomplete) were not associated with overall survival time in dogs with HCC.
  • The use of preoperative CT and improved surgical instrumentation may have contributed to the lower observed mortality.

Foster

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Outcomes and prognostic variables associated with right divisional hepatic lobectomies in 70 dogs

2026-1-VS-foster-1

Article Title: Outcomes and prognostic variables associated with right divisional hepatic lobectomies in 70 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Anderson 2025 et al., on wound drain configurations, which configuration had the highest mean volume of fluid retrieved?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Perpendicular configuration achieved the highest fluid retrieval (11.35 ± 6.1 mL), though differences were not statistically significant.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Perpendicular configuration.
Perpendicular configuration achieved the highest fluid retrieval (11.35 ± 6.1 mL), though differences were not statistically significant.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Cadaveric model using four large-breed dogs with 10x10 cm full-thickness wounds at four locations (shoulder, thorax, flank, thigh).
  • Configurations Tested: Diagonal, opposite, parallel, and perpendicular placements of wound infusion catheter and JP drain.
  • Fluid Retrieval:
    • No significant difference by configuration (p = .92) or location (p = .32).
    • Perpendicular configuration had the highest mean retrieval (11.35 mL, 56.8% of instilled volume).
    • Flank location had the lowest retrieval (7.2 mL, 35.9%).
  • Surface Area Coverage:
    • Parallel configuration achieved the highest SA coverage (83.4% ± 11.6%, p < .01).
    • Perpendicular was lowest.
  • Leakage:
    • No difference in leakage between configurations (p = .74) or locations (p = .10).
    • Leakage commonly occurred at drain or catheter entry points (93.8% of wounds).
  • Conclusion: Parallel drain configuration optimized fluid dispersion. Infusion-retrieval systems may allow for topical therapy delivery in closed wounds.

Anderson

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Application and influence of four drain configurations on fluid dispersal and retrieval in a cadaveric canine wound infusion-retrieval system model

2025-2-VS-anderson2-2

Article Title: Application and influence of four drain configurations on fluid dispersal and retrieval in a cadaveric canine wound infusion-retrieval system model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fidelis 2025 et al., on suture eyelet geometry, what was the **primary mode of failure** observed across all tests?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All failures were due to suture breakage; no anchor pull-out or anchor deformation was reported.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Suture breakage.
All failures were due to suture breakage; no anchor pull-out or anchor deformation was reported.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Raised eyelets caused more suture mid-section failures than embedded eyelets, suggesting wear or cutting against the anchor.
  • No significant effect of cyclic loading on failure load (Fmax) was found for any anchor group.
  • Anika anchor showed the least reduction in suture strength relative to the reference (eyebolt screw), indicating a favorable design.
  • All sutures failed via suture breakage, not anchor pullout, indicating suture fatigue was the primary failure mode.
  • Sutures in raised eyelets more often failed at the mid-section, while those in embedded eyelets failed at the knot.
  • IMEX and Jorvet anchors showed significantly reduced Fmax compared to eyebolt screws.
  • Loading direction and anchor design likely affect wear and ultimate failure, particularly in dynamic in vivo conditions.
  • Future designs should aim for embedded, smooth eyelets that can accommodate larger suture sizes without increasing wear.

Fidelis

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

2025-6-VS-fidelis-5

Article Title: Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Husi 2023 et al., on TPLO vs TPLO-IB biomechanics, which test revealed significantly greater cranial tibial translation after TPLO compared to intact stifles?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cranial tibial translation was ~6× higher in TPLO stifles vs intact during both eTPT and iTPT, but not during TCT.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both eTPT and iTPT.
Cranial tibial translation was ~6× higher in TPLO stifles vs intact during both eTPT and iTPT, but not during TCT.

🔍 Key Findings

  • TPLO alone failed to neutralize rotational instability under tibial pivot compression (TPT), despite a negative TCT.
  • TPLO combined with lateral augmentation (TPLO-IB) restored both craniocaudal and rotational stability to near-intact levels.
  • Cranial tibial translation was 6× greater after TPLO vs intact stifles when tested with TPT (p < .001).
  • No significant difference in cranial tibial translation or internal rotation between intact stifles and TPLO-IB group during TCT, eTPT, or iTPT.
  • TPLO-IB did not overconstrain the stifle, avoiding excessive external rotation.
  • External tibial rotation (eTPT) was more sensitive than TCT in detecting persistent instability after TPLO.
  • Excellent intraobserver reliability for both eTPT and iTPT (ICC > 0.9).
  • Study supports intraoperative use of TPT to identify cases needing additional rotational stabilization.

Husi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

2023-5-VS-husi-2

Article Title: Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra-articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Bilmont 2025 et al., on cup version comparison, what best describes the relationship between pelvic extension and open face version?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Increasing pelvic extension linearly increased open face version up to 35°, with minimal impact on truncated face values.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It increases open face retroversion.
Increasing pelvic extension linearly increased open face version up to 35°, with minimal impact on truncated face values.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Open face version was significantly greater than truncated face version by 14°–22° (p <.001).
  • Open face version increased linearly with inclination and pelvic extension, while truncated face version remained largely stable.
  • Truncated face version is an unreliable surrogate for open face version.
  • Accurate interpretation of cup version should include both truncated face version and inclination.
  • Canine 3D pelvic model and CT-based simulation used for all measurements.

Bilmont

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Assessment of BFX cup version in a three-dimensional model simulating the ventrodorsal radiographic view

2025-1-VS-bilmont-4

Article Title: Assessment of BFX cup version in a three-dimensional model simulating the ventrodorsal radiographic view

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sisk 2024 et al., which nail design feature may reduce infection risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Solid IMNs showed two-fold reduced infection rates vs. slotted or cannulated nails in rabbit studies:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Solid nail design.
Solid IMNs showed two-fold reduced infection rates vs. slotted or cannulated nails in rabbit studies:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • IMN provides relative stability, resists bending/torsion due to central axis alignment
  • Larger diameter nails = exponentially greater stiffness (∝ D⁴)
  • Trade-off: Larger interlocking holes weaken fatigue strength of the nail
  • Reaming increases contact/stability but has pros/cons:
    • Improves outcomes in closed fractures
    • May reduce endosteal blood flow in thin-walled bones (e.g., cats)
  • Design advances:
    • Angle-stable IMN reduce rotational slack
    • Expandable nails simplify insertion but may compromise removal or compressive load resistance
    • Precontoured nails match bone curvature but lack consistent clinical superiority
  • Material debates continue (e.g., titanium vs. stainless steel vs. magnesium)

Sisk

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

6

2024

Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

2024-6-VCOT-sisk-2

Article Title: Biomechanical Principles of Intramedullary Nails in Veterinary and Human Medicine

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Geier 2022 et al., on smoke evacuation in TPLO, which limitation of the smoke-evacuation pencil was reported by surgeons?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgeons noted the high-profile pencil hindered visibility during the procedure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It impaired visualization due to its high-profile design.
Surgeons noted the high-profile pencil hindered visibility during the procedure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Use of smoke evacuators reduced ultrafine particle concentrations by 56.4% during approach to the proximal tibia for TPLO in dogs.
  • Mean intraoperative particle concentrations were significantly higher in surgeries without smoke evacuation (1352 ppc vs. 763 ppc, P < .0001).
  • Maximum particle concentrations were six times higher without smoke evacuation (62,450 ppc vs. 10,100 ppc, P < .0001).
  • Particle counts increased above baseline regardless of evacuator use, confirming electrosurgery contributes substantially to airborne particles.
  • Surgeons noted reduced odor and health concerns when using the smoke evacuator, despite initial visibility limitations due to pencil attachment.
  • Standard surgical masks do not protect against ultrafine particles, underscoring the importance of smoke mitigation systems.
  • The smoke-evacuation unit did not eliminate all ultrafine particles, suggesting optimization (e.g., higher power setting) may be beneficial.
  • This is the first clinical veterinary study to measure surgical smoke reduction using evacuators during TPLO.

Geier

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

The effect of a smoke‐evacuation unit on ultrafine particle concentrations in the operating room during approach to the proximal tibia for tibial plateau-leveling osteotomy surgery in dogs

2022-5-VS-geier-4

Article Title: The effect of a smoke‐evacuation unit on ultrafine particle concentrations in the operating room during approach to the proximal tibia for tibial plateau-leveling osteotomy surgery in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Frapwell 2026 et al., on humeral condyle morphology, how did HIF-associated morphology differ in non-spaniels versus controls?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Non-spaniel breeds with HIF had similar changes as spaniels—greater axial angles and increased vertical condylar height.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both axial angles and height increased.
Non-spaniel breeds with HIF had similar changes as spaniels—greater axial angles and increased vertical condylar height.

🔍 Key Findings

  • HIF-affected dogs had significantly greater angle A and B, indicating increased axial articular angulation of the medial and lateral humeral condyle (p < .001).
  • Vertical condylar height (lengths a and b) was significantly greater in HIF-affected dogs compared to controls (p = .007 and p < .001 respectively).
  • Angle G (dorsal plane medial condyle angle) was also significantly greater in HIF-affected dogs, suggesting altered medial humeral morphology (p < .001).
  • The angle between axial surfaces (A–B angle) was significantly more acute in HIF dogs (107.4° vs. 114.2°, p < .001), suggesting potential for increased shear force.
  • Springer Spaniels with HIF showed significantly greater angulation and vertical height than unaffected Springer controls (p < .001 to .007 across variables).
  • Morphological differences persisted across non-spaniel breeds, reinforcing that altered condylar geometry is not breed-restricted.
  • Authors propose that greater condylar angulation contributes to shear stress, orthogonal to the fissure, possibly contributing to HIF pathogenesis.
  • These morphologic alterations could inform future screening or preventive strategies, and may explain variable surgical outcomes and implant failure.

Frapwell

Veterinary Surgery

1

2026

Analysis of humeral condylar morphology in dogs with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

2026-1-VS-frapwell-5

Article Title: Analysis of humeral condylar morphology in dogs with and without humeral intracondylar fissure

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.