Your Custom Quiz

In Gibson 2024 et al., on mediastinoscopy in dogs, which factor was identified as a major **technical limitation** of using a human-designed mediastinoscope?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Human-designed mediastinoscopes had channels too short and lacked adequate reach in dogs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Instrument reach and stability limitations.
Human-designed mediastinoscopes had channels too short and lacked adequate reach in dogs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mediastinoscopy was technically feasible in large-breed canine cadavers using a SILS port and standard laparoscopic instruments.
  • The left tracheobronchial lymph node (LTBLN) was successfully retrieved in all cadavers (7/7), while cranial mediastinal lymph nodes were retrieved in only 1/7.
  • Postprocedural pleural gas was observed in 4/7 cadavers, likely due to CO₂ insufflation.
  • Instrument limitations with a human-designed mediastinoscope led to preference for laparoscopic instruments and SILS port for improved access and visualization.
  • Complication rates were low, with only two minor (Grade 1) adverse events (pleural tear and LN rupture).
  • Obesity and mediastinal fat were cited as potential challenges to visualization and node retrieval.
  • NASA-TLX workload scores were lowest for tracheobronchial nodes, indicating these were the easiest to access.
  • The authors concluded this approach may facilitate minimally invasive biopsy or resection of cranial mediastinal masses in live dogs, but clinical trials are needed to validate safety and efficacy.

Gibson

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Evaluation of mediastinoscopy for cranial mediastinal and tracheobronchial lymphadenectomy in canine cadavers

2024-5-VS-gibson-3

Article Title: Evaluation of mediastinoscopy for cranial mediastinal and tracheobronchial lymphadenectomy in canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sandoval 2024 et al., on lung lobectomy technique outcomes, what was the most common intraoperative complication?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hemorrhage occurred in 11.8% of lobectomies and was the most frequently observed intraoperative issue.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Intraoperative hemorrhage.
Hemorrhage occurred in 11.8% of lobectomies and was the most frequently observed intraoperative issue.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Intra- and postoperative complications occurred only in stapled lobectomies, but the difference was not statistically significant (intra: p = .069, post: p = .112).
  • Intraoperative hemorrhage was the most common complication (11.8%), followed by air leakage (2%).
  • All self-ligating loop (SLL) lobectomies had zero complications (n=18), though the sample was small.
  • Postoperative complications included 4 catastrophic events (cardiopulmonary arrest), all in stapled cases.
  • Lung lobectomy technique was not associated with duration of chest tube use, hospitalization, or survival (p > .05).
  • 94.3% of patients survived to discharge (82/87).
  • SLLs are lower-cost and may be more feasible for thoracoscopic/minimally invasive approaches due to smaller port size (5mm vs. 12mm for staplers).
  • A future superiority study would need ≥103 lobectomies per group to assess differences in complication rates.

Sandoval

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

2024-7-VS-sandoval-2

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Smith 2025 et al., on bacterial cultures in TECA dehiscence, what percentage of dogs had changes in antibiotic susceptibility when the same bacteria were isolated at both TECA and dehiscence?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In 4 of 7 cases where the same bacteria were cultured, antibiotic susceptibility differed.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 57%.
In 4 of 7 cases where the same bacteria were cultured, antibiotic susceptibility differed.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Only 1 of 12 dogs (8.3%) cultured the same single organism (Staphylococcus schleiferi) at TECA and dehiscence sites.
  • In 58.3% (7/12), none of the bacteria from TECA cultures were found at dehiscence.
  • Staphylococcus spp. were isolated in 83.3% of dehiscence samples.
  • Methicillin resistance was high among Staphylococcus isolates: 80% at dehiscence.
  • Antibiotic susceptibility differed in 57% (4/7) of cases where the same bacteria were cultured at both time points.
  • TECA cultures were not predictive of bacteria at incisional dehiscence.
  • 75% of dogs healed with either medical or surgical management.

Recommendation: Repeat cultures at dehiscence to guide antibiotic therapy.

Smith

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

2025-3-VS-smith-5

Article Title: Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Price 2024 et al., on left-sided TD ligation in dogs, which procedure was successfully completed via the same incision as TD ligation?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All 10 cadavers had this procedure performed via the same left thoracotomy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Subphrenic pericardiectomy.
All 10 cadavers had this procedure performed via the same left thoracotomy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Left fourth intercostal thoracotomy allowed successful thoracic duct (TD) ligation in 9/10 canine cadavers.
  • 10/13 clinical cases had a single TD branch at the left fourth intercostal space, indicating lower anatomical complexity.
  • All TD branches at this site were lateral to the esophagus, simplifying surgical access.
  • Unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy was successfully performed via the same incision in 10/10 cadavers.
  • Fewer TD branches at the fourth intercostal space than traditional caudal sites may reduce the risk of missed collaterals.
  • In contrast, traditional caudal TD ligation sites had up to 5 branches, requiring broader dissection.
  • No cadaver had right-sided TD branches, reducing surgical complexity at the studied location.
  • Contrast-confirmed ligation was effective in 90% (9/10) cadavers on CT imaging.

Price

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

2024-3-VS-price-5

Article Title: Evaluation of thoracic duct ligation and unilateral subphrenic pericardiectomy via a left fourth intercostal approach in normal canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fracka 2025 et al., on cementless knee replacement, which advantage of cementless TKR is emphasized in the discussion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cementless TKR offers enhanced bone integration, eliminates cement-related complications, and preserves bone stock【57†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】
Incorrect. The correct answer is Enhanced osseointegration and bone preservation.
Cementless TKR offers enhanced bone integration, eliminates cement-related complications, and preserves bone stock【57†Veterinary Surgery†L1-L20】

🔍 Key Findings

Subject: 7-year-old Labrador underwent cementless total knee replacement (TKR) due to severe stifle OA.

Clinical function:

  • Improved ROM from 90° pre-op to 120° post-op.
  • Weight-bearing increased from toe-touching to 70% bodyweight by 6 weeks post-op.
  • No visible lameness by 14 weeks.

Implant performance:

  • No complications at any follow-up points.
  • No osteolysis, loosening, or metallosis at 6-year necropsy.

Wear evaluation:

  • Mild UHMWPE insert wear, localized to caudal edges.

Histologic findings:

  • Robust osseointegration at implant-bone interface.
  • Fibrous tissue only in areas lacking porous coating.

Conclusion:

  • Cementless TKR demonstrated excellent 6-year survival and functional outcomes.
  • Support for considering early surgical intervention in severe stifle OA.

Fracka

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Long‐term clinical outcomes and retrieval analysis of a cementless total knee replacement in a dog

2025-3-VS-fracka-5

Article Title: Long‐term clinical outcomes and retrieval analysis of a cementless total knee replacement in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Brincin 2023 et al., on radiographic follow-up post-MPL surgery, which factor was MOST strongly associated with a change in postoperative plan after MPL surgery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The odds of a change in management were 32× higher when both clinical concerns and radiographic abnormalities were present.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Clinician concern plus radiographic abnormality.
The odds of a change in management were 32× higher when both clinical concerns and radiographic abnormalities were present.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Routine follow-up radiographs after MPL surgery influenced management in only 3% of asymptomatic cases.
  • Isolated radiographic abnormalities were rare (3.3%) and even less likely to alter treatment unless accompanied by clinical concerns.
  • Dogs with both radiographic changes and clinical/owner concerns had 32× higher odds of a management change (OR 32.16, P < .001).
  • Lameness, NSAID use, or prior unplanned visits significantly increased the odds of altered post-op plans.
  • Owner-reported concerns alone led to a change in only 1.6% of cases without corroborating clinical findings.
  • Radiographic follow-up was deemed unnecessary in dogs without owner concerns or abnormal physical findings.
  • Hands-on clinical exam remains critical, though video-based rechecks may aid triage in uncomplicated cases.
  • The study supports selective radiographic follow-up, reducing unnecessary imaging, stress, and clinician workload.

Brincin

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

2023-3-VS-brincin-2

Article Title: The value of routine radiographic follow up in the postoperative management of canine medial patellar luxation

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Israel 2023 et al., on povidone-iodine lavage, what was the calculated break-even cost for the PrePIL protocol?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The break-even cost for PrePIL use was calculated at $49.74, significantly higher than the actual $2.07 cost.
Incorrect. The correct answer is $49.74.
The break-even cost for PrePIL use was calculated at $49.74, significantly higher than the actual $2.07 cost.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No infections (0/102) occurred in cases where preclosure povidone-iodine lavage (PrePIL) was used, compared to 21/2111 (0.99%) with saline lavage.
  • Break-even cost for PrePIL was calculated at $49.74, while the actual cost was only $2.07, confirming strong cost-effectiveness.
  • No adverse reactions or healing complications were reported in the 102 PrePIL cases.
  • The PrePIL protocol used 0.35% povidone-iodine for 3 minutes before closure, followed by sterile saline lavage.
  • Majority of THRs (97%) used cementless fixation (BFX) in PrePIL group; only 3 cases used CFX components.
  • Surgeries followed consistent perioperative antibiotic protocols, making PrePIL the only major protocol variable.
  • Antibiotics were not added to lavage, aligning with WHO and CDC guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship.
  • The infection reduction with PrePIL supports routine use in total hip replacement to reduce periprosthetic joint infections.

Israel

Veterinary Surgery

1

2023

Preclosure povidone‐iodine lavage in total hip replacement surgery: Infection outcomes and cost–benefit analysis

2023-1-VS-israel-2

Article Title: Preclosure povidone‐iodine lavage in total hip replacement surgery: Infection outcomes and cost–benefit analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, which feature helped protect the pancreatic duct during lasering?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The catheter served as a protective shield over the ductal orifice during the laser procedure.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Catheter positioned over pancreatic duct.
The catheter served as a protective shield over the ductal orifice during the laser procedure.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Endoscopic-assisted retrograde catheterization (EARC) and laser sphincterotomy were successful in 18/18 cadavers, demonstrating technical feasibility.
  • Intramural common bile duct (ICBD) length ranged from 10 to 21 mm (mean 15.8 mm), with no correlation to body weight (r = 0.06, p = .79).
  • Transition from ICBD to extramural duct was accurately identified endoscopically in 88% (16/18); transition was heralded by separation of the submucosal layer.
  • Partial lateral perforations occurred in 2/18 dogs, only during early learning phase; no leakage was found on open dissection.
  • Laser sphincterotomy preserved the pancreatic duct orifice, aided by protective catheter positioning.
  • Compared to open duodenotomy, this technique allows for a smaller incision and less manipulation of the pancreas, which may reduce morbidity.
  • No adverse events such as intra-abdominal saline egress or full-thickness perforation occurred, and the technique allowed safe access up to 10 mm from the MDP.
  • Cadaveric limitations included absence of biliary pathology and inability to evaluate live complications, but the technique shows promise for future live animal trials.

Miyagi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Endoscopic‐assisted laser sphincterotomy of the intramural common bile duct: A cadaveric pilot study

2025-5-VS-miyagi-3

Article Title: Endoscopic‐assisted laser sphincterotomy of the intramural common bile duct: A cadaveric pilot study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mihara 2024 et al., on mitral valve repair in dogs, what was the reported 3-month survival rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Three dogs died, leading to a survival rate of 96.1%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 96.1%.
Three dogs died, leading to a survival rate of 96.1%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mitral valve plasty (MVP) in dogs with MMVD significantly reduced regurgitant volume and fraction, and normalized LA:Ao ratio, indicating reversal of volume overload.
  • MVP altered mitral valve geometry, with reduced annular dimensions and increased coaptation length, enhancing valve competence.
  • Postoperative LA:Ao ratio dropped from 2.2 to 1.2, consistent with improved left atrial pressure and size.
  • Forward stroke volume index and cardiac index increased at 3 months, reflecting improved hemodynamic function despite reduced fractional shortening.
  • Three dogs (3.9%) died postoperatively, highlighting a 96.1% survival rate within 3 months.
  • The repair technique involved artificial chordal replacement and annuloplasty; no cleft closure or leaflet suturing was used.
  • Color Doppler echocardiography confirmed substantial reduction in mitral regurgitation postoperatively in most dogs.

Mihara

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

2024-3-VS-mihara-4

Article Title: Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Petchell 2025 et al., on CORA-based CCWO, which parameter was defined preoperatively to enable CORA-based planning?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. MAA was preset at 3° or 5° depending on breed size, which allowed precise calculation of the CORA.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Desired mechanical axis advancement (MAA).
MAA was preset at 3° or 5° depending on breed size, which allowed precise calculation of the CORA.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy (CCWOCORA) consistently achieved the target postoperative TPA of 5° across all tibial morphologies.
  • CCWOCORA produced significantly less variability in postoperative TPA compared to other methods (TPA range: 5.00–5.00°; p < .001).
  • Mechanical axis advancement (MAA) was precisely controlled at 3° in CCWOCORA, leading to greater surgical predictability.
  • Other techniques (e.g., CCWOTPA, CCWOTPA–5, CCWOISO) showed greater variance in TPA, MAA, and tibial length.
  • In small-breed dogs, increasing the MAA from 3° to 5° did not affect TPA outcomes, but increased proximal bone stock, improving feasibility.
  • Wedge angles and tibial length changes varied by method, but CCWOCORA maintained length better than TPA-based methods.
  • The technique allows preoperative planning of both desired MAA and TPA, enhancing predictability and customization.
  • CORA methodology enables precise geometric correction and alignment of mechanical axes, reducing reliance on trial-and-error alignment.

Petchell

Veterinary Surgery

7

2025

An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

2025-7-VS-petchell-2

Article Title: An in silico comparison of a novel CORA-based cranial closing wedge ostectomy methodology with three other techniques

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.